frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Android Developer Verification

https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/android-developer-verification-rolling-out-to-all-developers.html
59•ingve•1h ago

Comments

bstsb•1h ago
from https://9to5google.com/2026/03/30/android-developer-verifier... -

> Starting in April, Android Developer Verifier will be installed on devices.

so they're rolling out a system app that will call home to check whether any sideloaded apps have been "verified" with the developer's government ID? and this process will happen regardless of whether the user has enabled the "advanced flow" in Developer settings?

birdsongs•1h ago
Good of a reason as any to go google-less on my Graphene pixel, I guess. But man it sucks, mostly for all the people who can't. I can manage my financials and 2FA from my laptop, that was my last real reason to have google play installed, but it's just a convenience. (I know it's mandatory for others.)

I wonder how that sys app will be handled in GrapheneOS's google play sandbox?

subscribed•38m ago
It'll probably always confirm it's been verified.

GOS have already said users won't be impacted by this clampdown.

stuaxo•1h ago
Sorry, but absolutely not.

I stuck with Android for years as a dev as I once did Android apps and occasionally do tinker.

This is my last Android phone and Jolla is my next phone.

birdsongs•50m ago
I really want to like the concept of Jolla / a European mobile alternative but I see no reason why they're closed source SW in 2026. Open source everything, let the community help develop, and sell your hardware (and support/deals for B2B).

A single for-profit company owning the full HW and SW stack? My trust in companies lately is at a lifetime low. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

amarant•48m ago
Ooh, are you gonna go for their Ubuntu touch alternative, or their own OS?
andrepd•1h ago
I don't see a way out of this except government regulation. The EU has the most motivation to do it, as a huge economic bloc with a lot of motivation right now to become as independent from the US as possible.

I guess I can sort of manage to keep my head above water and keep buying secondhand phones which I unlock and install a supported version of LineageOS. But it's cumbersome, it gets more difficult and more restrictive every time. And I literally have a doctorate in computers for crying out loud! Is there any hope for Granny? For a kid? For >99% of people? Of course not.

This is so clearly a matter for government oversight: prevent abuse, monopolies, protect the citizen's safety, rights, welfare, etc. It's not reasonable to expect consumers to figure out if the meat they buy is tainted, just as it's not to figure out if their phone spies on them, manipulates information, or sells their data (especially when there's a duopoly). That's why we have laws and food inspectors, paid for by the public, working for the public. Same thing with digital rights.

pzo•57m ago
> I don't see a way out of this except government regulation.

IMHO governments are partially behind those initiatives so they are unlikely to regulate themself- reason in last few years they intensified work on Digital ID, Age Verification, Chat control, KYC, etc.

zrm•49m ago
There are different governments and different subdivisions within any given government. The only thing you need to get a government that had been pushing Chat Control to do some trust busting is to get more votes.
lokar•48m ago
For the limits on side-loading in particular, there are a few southeast asian nations (I can't recall, Vietnam? Thailand?) where almost all internet access is via Android, including banking. And social engineering fraud, where they call someone up, pretend to be the bank, and get them to side-load malware, has become a major financial, and political problem.

AIUI, they have told Google to find a fix, or else.

pzo•23m ago
> pretend to be the bank, and get them to side-load malware, has become a major financial, and political problem.

I been living in SE Asia for few years each in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam and really didn't notice that this is supposed to be like major political problem.

'Fraud' is the same smoke screen and excuse as 'protect the children from social media or pedophiles'.

lokar•17m ago
I can't find it now, but the article I read seemed to say that the gov was specifically upset about the banking issue, and might tell the banks they can't allow apps anymore.
nout•45m ago
EU is schizophrenic enough that it often produces very conflicting directions, opinions and policies.

One thing EU loves is regulation though, so I expect they will introduce preemptive regulations to enforce strict ID verification as well as regulations to fine big companies for breaching user privacy with strict ID verification policies.

user34283•41m ago
You'd think in 2026 regulators would finally step up their game to break up the mobile app distribution duopoly.

And Google thinks it can pull this ridiculous stunt.

retrodaredevil•28m ago
The thing is, the EU needs to be able to not only sell that the regulation they propose is good to the public, but also not piss off the US administration.

Most people are too non-technical to understand why this is a bad thing even when it's explained to them. Plus, whatever administration is in power in the US has a lot of influence.

Trump has already said that he wouldn't tolerate regulation that affects American companies [1], painting regulation that happens in another country as something that will affect US citizens. (I mean if you use the GDPR as an example, it's not wrong. Think of cookie pop ups while browsing the web in the US)

I would like the the EU would go harder with their regulations, because it usually results in other countries or states following their lead, but I dont see that happening. Regulation has been painted as "bad", and we have at least 3 more years until that changes.

[1] https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/12/tech/us-eu-tech-regulation-fi...

seanalltogether•23m ago
"This is so clearly a matter for government oversight: prevent abuse, protect the citizen's safety, rights, welfare, etc. It's not reasonable to expect consumers to figure out if the meat they buy is tainted, just as it's not to figure out if the APPS THEY INSTALL spies on them, manipulates information, or sells their data"

Do you see how quickly that argument can be flipped to support what google is doing here? Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if half the reason to to lock down phones is because governments keep pressuring them to do so.

EmbarrassedHelp•12m ago
I'm wondering if the EU is complicit in this somehow, despite claiming that they want to fight back against tech companies.

The EU Commission is currently pushing the shitty EU Identity Wallet for mandatory age verification, and it requires GooglePlay Services to be installed for "anti-tampering". That also means a ban on non official versions of Android like LineageOS and GrapheneOS.

Fordec•54m ago
Yeah, no, going back to web native. Keep your verification and your 20%.
parrellel•50m ago
Yeah, no. No one needs your spyware.
ethagnawl•49m ago
What % of Android users actually want this? Do they know or care?

I've been using Android since 2010 because it was open in ways that the Apple ecosystem wasn't. I do not want this and imagine hardly any other power users (for lack of a better term) do. I'm already using a mostly deGoogled device but this really seals the deal. I have been longing for a true Linux phone for years and now seems like a good time to get serious about the search and migration plan.

motbus3•37m ago
But but but it is for your security! You need to be protected!

Android isn't open source for a while. They started by pushing device certification which crippled any abilities of OEMs to make a better framework. Then they took many of the opensource packages out of android and redistributed as applications that they controlled via play services.

Then they made it harder to publish packages and created tons of rules that they can arbitrarily decide to cut ties with you or remove your remuneration.

What they are effectively doing now is to remove any ability of individual developers to push applications. Some will say the costs ain't that high, but (1) maybe not in USD dollars for Americans and (2) both Google and Apple will push those numbers way up high soon.

Even if that is not the case, if you don't agree with anything and you decide to have your own version of your family wiki, messenger or anything, they will be able to tell the authorities about it.

This is insane....

JLCarveth•37m ago
Being able to side load apps was why I switched to android 10 years ago
ux266478•31m ago
Yeah. Computing freedom to have a root shell and do as I please is the entire reason I put up with Android. Google is positioning Android to just be nothing more than a worse iOS. There's pretty much no point to it anymore.
cosmotic•35m ago
Rounded to the nearest percent, I'd guess power users make up 0% of android user base.
misir•26m ago
> What % of Android users actually want this? Do they know or care?

Bold of you assuming they're doing for users. It's fear-mongering at its finest - using the threat of security to install more control that has little to no protection against the said threats.

Now you might say it's going to raise the bar for the scammers, but nobody is going to be spending time on writing scam or malware for a few bucks. When the reward is high, they can just pay out already verified developers to distribute their builds under their accounts, or just find a workaround (fake ids?) which could be still way cheaper than the potential revenue potential of a successful attack. It's just an inconvenience that didn't existed before.

This is just a policy directly targeting the legit developers distributing apps to work around some of the platform's limitations (ie. uncrappifying youtube). They were previously free to share the workarounds they've developed for themselves since it was just as easy as sharing your APK. Now with added threat of losing your developer account and probably being perma-banned from google, those devs are less likely to continue distributing their workarounds.

charcircuit•16m ago
People don't want it until they've been scammed. Then they'll complain why you didn't save them.
beacon294•11m ago
You were wrong at percentage. The question is what count would want this.
nout•39m ago
That's seriously horrible. There are 5+ open source android apps that I use and want to continue using that are not available on Play Store, but rather through alternative stores (like Zapstore, Obtainium).

If I get a phone with preinstalled Graphene OS (like the upcoming Motorola phone), then does it avoid this stupidity? Or even with Graphene it prevents me from installing apks?

hirako2000•39m ago
The sad thing is only a tiny minority of android users side load apps. The rest will feel their phone is one step more secure.
rvnx•34m ago
Hey boss: “40M users are running a cracked version of YouTube premium on mobile, what can we do ?”
kayson•22m ago
> our recent analysis found over 90 times more malware from sideloaded sources than on Google Play

So what's the solution then? At the same time, I'm curious how this ends up happening to end users. Enabling unknown sources is trivial in a way (it's just one check box and if you try to install an APK from, say, Firefox, it'll take you right there), but how are people even getting to that point??

bossyTeacher•22m ago
"However, our recent analysis found over 90 times more malware from sideloaded sources than on Google Play."

Has anyone seen the report for that analysis. I bet most people here would love to read it too.

TGower•18m ago
It really seems like they are doing a lot to appease the tiny minority of us power users, adb load unaffected, one time toggle in settings to opt out, no change to alternative app stores as long as the apk was built by a verified developer. Crazy how harsh the sentiment is here, there are real people being harmed by scam apps intercepting sms one time codes and this will reduce the rate of that happening. It's not like we can't sideload anymore, though a lot of comments here seem to be implying otherwise.
kcb•17m ago
Because the initial announcement included none of that... it wasn't addressed at all until the harsh sentiment.
TGower•14m ago
Then shouldn't we celebrate the victory, drop it, and move on?
brnt•14m ago
Those scam apps largely are installed from the Play store. Let them fix that first.
TGower•9m ago
Really, there are apps that will intercept and exfiltrate your bank one time code sms that are just sitting on the play store? First I'm hearing of this, what's the name of one?
mrtksn•15m ago
The Android verification is such a broken experience. Recently I decided to purchase a dev account for my company, so far:

1) provided my company DUNS number etc. once to create the payment account. I did this some times ago, don’t remember the details but it was ab involved verification process and it is marked as verified business payment profile.

2) later on the payment step verified myself with a passport and bank statement to be able to actually pay with a proper bank card

3) After I paid I was told that now I need to verify my identity once more but this time with the passport and the incorporation certificate or some other company document.

fingers crossed that in few days it will be verified and it tells me that there are still website and phone number verification to do once the previous step is done. I already verified my e-mail a few times.

It’s painful, slow and annoying because if you fail at a step(i.e. needs verification that takes days at the payment) you have to start again the step.

I just remembered why I never use Android. It seems like no one owns the process and as a result you get unpolished shitty experience that fulfills the requirements of god knows how many people who work in the same company but don’t talk to each other.

ninjagoo•13m ago
It is way past time to build a 'people's phone', funding it through a platform like LiberaPay [1][2] or Open Collective [3][4], with a requirement for the device to be completely open-source.

[1] https://liberapay.com/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberapay [3] https://opencollective.com/ [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Collective

If we start today, we could have a new phone in 2-3 years. Future generations will thank us.

It's not just phones. There is a concerted movement by massively-moneyed folks to destroy the fabric of open society, so there are a number of different areas that need attention. A coordinated effort across the breadth of society to restore, maintain or improve the foundations of open society.

Show HN: 30u30.fyi – Is your startup founder on Forbes' most fraudulent list?

https://30u30.fyi
178•not-chatgpt•1h ago•61 comments

Fedware: Government apps that spy harder than the apps they ban

https://www.sambent.com/the-white-house-app-has-huawei-spyware-and-an-ice-tip-line/
345•speckx•5h ago•103 comments

Do your own writing

https://alexhwoods.com/dont-let-ai-write-for-you/
296•karimf•10h ago•89 comments

Learn Claude Code by doing, not reading

https://claude.nagdy.me/
97•taubek•3h ago•49 comments

Android Developer Verification

https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/android-developer-verification-rolling-out-to-a...
63•ingve•1h ago•39 comments

Turning a MacBook into a touchscreen with $1 of hardware (2018)

https://anishathalye.com/macbook-touchscreen/
143•HughParry•4h ago•69 comments

How to turn anything into a router

https://nbailey.ca/post/router/
551•yabones•10h ago•203 comments

Agents of Chaos

https://agentsofchaos.baulab.info/report.html
49•luu•3d ago•3 comments

Bird brains (2023)

https://www.dhanishsemar.com/writing/bird-brains
279•DiffTheEnder•10h ago•181 comments

Cherri – programming language that compiles to an Apple Shortuct

https://github.com/electrikmilk/cherri
223•mihau•2d ago•45 comments

Researchers find 3,500-year-old loom that reveals textile revolution

https://web.ua.es/en/actualidad-universitaria/2026/marzo2026/23-31/ua-researchers-find-3-500-year...
50•geox•3d ago•2 comments

Roulette Computers: Hidden Devices That Predict Spins

https://www.roulette-computers.com/
48•o4c•2d ago•13 comments

IronGlass Brings Legendary Soviet Cinema Lenses to Mirrorless Cameras

https://petapixel.com/2026/02/19/ironglass-brings-legendary-soviet-cinema-lenses-to-mirrorless-ca...
12•PaulHoule•4d ago•3 comments

Seeing Like a Spreadsheet

https://davidoks.blog/p/how-the-spreadsheet-reshaped-america
59•paulpauper•2d ago•18 comments

William Blake, Remote by the Sea

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/william-blake-remote-sea
40•occurrence•4h ago•1 comments

A sea of sparks: Seeing radioactivity

https://maurycyz.com/projects/spinthariscope/
42•maurycyz•5h ago•16 comments

OCR for construction documents does not work, we fixed it

https://www.getanchorgrid.com/developer/docs/endpoints/drawings-doors
113•wcisco17•7h ago•73 comments

Show HN: Coasts – Containerized Hosts for Agents

https://github.com/coast-guard/coasts
52•jsunderland323•8h ago•20 comments

CodingFont: A game to help you pick a coding font

https://www.codingfont.com/
281•nvahalik•8h ago•169 comments

Recover Apple Keychain

https://arkoinad.com/posts/apple_keychain_recovery.html
48•speckx•6h ago•13 comments

The Digital Leviathan

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-digital-leviathan/
8•sediment•1d ago•0 comments

In math, rigor is vital, but are digitized proofs taking it too far?

https://www.quantamagazine.org/in-math-rigor-is-vital-but-are-digitized-proofs-taking-it-too-far-...
93•isaacfrond•4d ago•80 comments

Build123d: A Python CAD programming library

https://github.com/gumyr/build123d
107•Ivoah•1d ago•44 comments

Why I'm betting on ATProto (and why you should, too)

https://brittanyellich.com/atproto/
16•speckx•4h ago•4 comments

I am definitely missing the pre-AI writing era

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BJ4pnropWdnzzgeJc/i-am-definitely-missing-the-pre-ai-writing-era
236•joozio•16h ago•185 comments

Mathematical methods and human thought in the age of AI

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26524
189•zaikunzhang•12h ago•74 comments

Take better notes, by hand

https://brianschrader.com/archive/take-better-notes-by-hand/
165•sonicrocketman•7h ago•79 comments

FTC action against Match and OkCupid for deceiving users, sharing personal data

https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/03/ftc-takes-action-against-match-okcupi...
225•gnabgib•8h ago•114 comments

From Proxmox to FreeBSD and Sylve in our office lab

https://www.iptechnics.com/blogs/from-proxmox-to-freebsd-and-sylve-in-our-office-lab
70•arch1e•2d ago•56 comments

Vulnerability research is cooked

https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/03/30/vulnerability-research-is-cooked/
108•pedro84•4h ago•72 comments