frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

A dot a day keeps the clutter away

https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/dot-system
69•scottlawson•2h ago

Comments

jmward01•1h ago
First, great system. Second, I am going to pine for an electronic version and having read the post I get it. Feel free to laugh and read the next comment. That said there are two aspects to this system that come to mind immediately:

- The value of the information: This is the purpose of the dots and, I think the stated reason for the dots.

- The value of the process: If you did this and didn't have the final dot information, would it still be valuable in some way? I suspect there is value here in creating friction that helps you consider your environment more.

- But clearly there is also a cost (so, three things came to mind. sue me!). The cost would be stickers on my junk. I generally don't like that.

So call the cost and the value of the process a wash and you are left with 'can I get the value of the information without the cost or at a substantially lower cost?' That is, I think, an argument for AR. I'd love a version of this where I could tag a lot of things and gather my own usage data without putting stickers on my stuff. How often did I wear x, or use y? Did I actually eat 4k calories in fried chicken two weeks ago? Of course the privacy concerns here are the main stopper for me but when local compute is cheap enough AR tagging, like these dots, is something I definitely would try.

scottlawson•1h ago
I definitely see the appeal of an electronic version. I think it really depends on what you care about tracking. Food? Maybe use the same barcodes already on the product. Clothes? maybe RFID patches that are unobtrusive.

Things that are subject to a lot of wear and tear and handled a lot will not work well with dots as they will come off, but I don't find that to be a problem for the front of storage boxes so it works for me.

While I don't have an electronic system for tracking parts bins, the one exception is parts I place on PBCs. This is a small subset of my total parts and to track them I have an electronic database that's much more rigorous, tracking part numbers, data sheets, footprints, symbols, and it is much closer to the kind of part database that a site like digikey would use than the dot system.

I don't need dots to track parts I put on PCBs because I can do that all programmatically to scan the files and see what parts I place the most often.

I don't quite know what you mean with your question about whether it would be useful if I didn't have dot totals but still tracked them. I do find the dot totals to be useful, and comparing across years also helps me identify things that were used a lot, but maybe only two years ago. Stuff like glue and magnets seem timeless and are used constantly every year though.

jmward01•1h ago
I'll give you an example of how the process could be valuable even without the information. A huge amount of doing something is just getting over the initiating energy to start doing something. A trick to help with that is to start with a really low cost task. The point isn't the task, it is that you started which gets you into 'keep doing things' mode. The dots may act as a low cost task and help to get passed the initiating energy. I think there are other things that this could help too. This is a task, although simple, that can help define the phases of projects which could help planning and execution success. This is all just guessing, I'm not a psychologist, but I think there are potentially ways that this is helpful beyond just the data it presents which is a good thing.
jofzar•47m ago
Imo NFC tags could be the easiest way of doing the same thing for bigger items, scan it when you use it, log it.
pphysch•44m ago
Or just a QR code sticker to a URL only accessible from your LAN
stickfigure•1h ago
Interesting, but this seems to solve the wrong problem. I already know that the ice cream maker sitting on the shelf hasn't been used in 5 years. The problem is... what if I want to make ice cream?
starvit35•59m ago
towards the end he talks about this, dots determine how frequent it is used, therefore how close in proximity it should be to his work area. stuff which was dotted rarely or not at all was put into his shed outside, but even then he still had it and used it for a project later on.

if you're not going to use your ice cream maker every week, why have it on your kitchen counter, or kitchen shelf, put it away in a cupboard

scottlawson•46m ago
sometimes I see no dots on things that are cool and I have this innate urge to want to hold onto.

One example is a Picomotor piezo actuator. It's a really cool piece of technology. I want to believe so badly that I'll use it in a project someday.

but after four years and seeing zero dots on it, it's like having concrete evidence PROVING that I'm delusionally optimistic about how useful it is. I can't ignore the reality.

the Picomotor is my version of your ice cream maker. the lack of dots gives me the evidence I need to finally donate it to a better home

fontain•41m ago
Determine the cost of owning the ice cream maker per year. For some people, owning something costs nothing and in fact provides value, they find comfort in owning things, used or not. For some people, owning things is a burden, a drain, and owning something unused is painful.

An ice cream maker costs maybe $200? How would you feel if you disposed of the ice cream maker and then a week later realized you wanted it?

If you want to soften the blow, don’t throw things away: give them away to someone who will use them.

I hate owning things, owning an ice cream maker that I never use would weigh on me and I would much rather spend $200 on a new ice cream maker every 5 years (that I give away after a month) than have an unused ice cream maker for 5 years.

ihaveajob•55m ago
This is neat but my OCD brain is hurting. I suspect a location based sorting, where most-recently-used boxes are near the top, or closer to your workstation, solves the same problem without the visual clutter.
dave_universetf•41m ago
This is probably just a difference in how your brain and the author's work. A variety of home organizers have told me that people mean different things when they say they want an organized space. Some people want everything precisely labeled and sorted into narrow categories, and hidden away in drawers or closets. Others want everything visible and coarser categories. Each system looks and feels very distressing to brains of the other types.

It's especially a problem for people with ADHD, because the "very sorted and hidden" mode of organizing is heavily socialized as the _only_ way to be organized, but it's also the exact opposite of how (some) ADHD brains want to operate. OTOH the very exposed and "emergent" organization that works for an ADHD brain probably is mild torture to an OCD brain :)

For myself, the sorting system in this post looks pretty ideal. All the stuff is right there where I can see it and scan for what I'm after, it explicitly allows for emergent organization where classification happens incrementally over time, and the dots thing has near zero activation energy but still gives me long-term information I can use. It's much better than an electronic or "clean" inventory system precisely because I'll never be able to consistently keep using those, whereas slapping a dot on a box, even on bad brain days I can manage that!

switchbak•33m ago
> "very sorted and hidden" mode of organizing is heavily socialized as the _only_ way to be organized

In some circles perhaps. I'm more of a fan of Adam Savage's First Order Retrievability - an overly fancy term for a pretty simple concept. There's certainly large swaths of folks that adopt that vs the everything-in-a-drawer approach, especially in workplaces where otherwise it would just cause entirely too much friction for common operations.

I give myself a lot of grief for a messy workshop, but it is nice once you realize there's a lot of ways to be organized and it's a very personal process. The important part is to devote a bit of time and energy to it, and to slowly pay down the organizational debt. And to let go of the perfectionism!

At the end of the day, if someone doesn't like my open workspace style, they probably don't value working the way I do, and I'm ok with that.

switchbak•38m ago
That's close to what I do - except I use dust. Every ten years I get rid of the ones that have enough dust to make me sneeze.

And I put them in the crawl space :)

shermantanktop•55m ago
My low-tech solution to organizing electronic parts is to use shoeboxes, with written labels at the end, and plastic bags inside to organize the various groups of items.

They stack, and I am lazy, and so I put the one I just pulled out from the middle of the stack back on top. So the ones on top are the ones I use. If they are at the bottom they don't get used much.

On the other hand, I don't care which ones I use a lot as I am not trying find candidates for eviction. I just care about not having to pull items out of the bottom of a stack of five shoeboxes. It happens, because frequency != importance.

shevy-java•54m ago
Looks like a huge mess really.
samuelknight•54m ago
This is a physical implementation of a tiered caching hierarchy.
hecanjog•43m ago
I'm ready to reorganize, there are a lot of really good ideas here! Most of all I had a similar trajectory of starting with small component drawers and now it's a real pain to find appropriate places for everything. I didn't think to try larger boxes! Makes a lot of sense. I'm curious to try some variation of the dot system too, but I think I appreciated the somewhat mundane in-between details about your setup the most.

(I would have appreciated less AI-assistance in the prose though FWIW, I'm sorry if that's annoying to say!)

dave_universetf•39m ago
+1, the information content is nice, but the AI telltales and writing patterns were annoyingly distracting.
brandrick•43m ago
messy, but there is something endearing about the approach
tayo42•28m ago
I wouldn't want to clean up the dots when I'm done tracking lol

I feel like this adds a ton of visual noise. It would annoy me

jvanderbot•21m ago
Oh look, cache invalidation, one of the two hard problems in CS, aside from naming things and off by one errors.
Dansvidania•9m ago
I see what you did there
samlinnfer•18m ago
I hope those are plastic stickers because I can't imagine the pain of removing each paper sticker and have it shred into various tiny bits and while leaving some sticky gum behind.
TacticalCoder•6m ago
> I can't imagine the pain of removing each paper sticker and have it shred into various tiny bits and while leaving some sticky gum behind.

One product many have at home (if they've got a wife or if they're a woman): nail polish remover. This is a magical tool for it's ubiquitous. Sure, you can go and buy the proper stuff: but this one many already have some at home.

It works also should sticky stuff fall from trees on your car's windshield (do not use it on the car paint). It's really miracle stuff.

I also "steal" my wife's nail polish itself: I love to put marks on components so I know where they should be plugged. Even on my guns: there are pins that go one side but the other (say the two pins to take apart the lower and upper receiver of many rifles), so I mark them with nail polish from different colors. Cables on motherboard? Color code with nail polish: both on the mobo and on the cable.

Now you don't it to attack the plastic of the box: quickly wipe the sticky gum then clean it with some water.

Besides that from TFA:

> The first thing I did was get rid of every opaque container I owned. Every toolbox, every parts organizer with little pockets, anything I couldn't see through.

I saw a friend of mine doing that 25 years ago and immediately adopted that technique.

comrade1234•13m ago
Years ago I had a landlord that had been in the British military in some signal/ntelligence role. After, he made a living of stockpiling and selling obscure but simple chips from china to American military contractors.

The Claude Code Source Leak: fake tools, frustration regexes, undercover mode

https://alex000kim.com/posts/2026-03-31-claude-code-source-leak/
639•alex000kim•10h ago•248 comments

Ministack (Replacement for LocalStack)

https://ministack.org/
91•kerblang•3h ago•14 comments

OpenAI closes funding round at an $852B valuation

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/31/openai-funding-round-ipo.html
265•surprisetalk•3h ago•254 comments

A dot a day keeps the clutter away

https://scottlawsonbc.com/post/dot-system
69•scottlawson•2h ago•26 comments

4D Doom

https://github.com/danieldugas/HYPERHELL
93•chronolitus•4d ago•19 comments

Slop is not necessarily the future

https://www.greptile.com/blog/ai-slopware-future
160•dakshgupta•9h ago•286 comments

Show HN: 1-Bit Bonsai, the First Commercially Viable 1-Bit LLMs

https://prismml.com/
42•PrismML•2h ago•16 comments

Teenage Engineering's PO-32 acoustic modem and synth implementation

https://github.com/ericlewis/libpo32
72•ericlewis•3d ago•18 comments

I Traced My Traffic Through a Home Tailscale Exit Node

https://tech.stonecharioteer.com/posts/2026/tailscale-exit-nodes/
52•stonecharioteer•4h ago•25 comments

Open source CAD in the browser (Solvespace)

https://solvespace.com/webver.pl
273•phkahler•11h ago•88 comments

Ordinary Lab Gloves May Have Skewed Microplastic Data

https://nautil.us/ordinary-lab-gloves-may-have-skewed-microplastic-data-1279386
31•WaitWaitWha•2h ago•5 comments

Cohere Transcribe: Speech Recognition

https://cohere.com/blog/transcribe
146•gmays•7h ago•48 comments

Back to FreeBSD – Part 2 – Jails

https://hypha.pub/back-to-freebsd-part-2
28•vermaden•4d ago•5 comments

Learn Something Old Every Day, Part XVIII: How Does FPU Detection Work?

https://www.os2museum.com/wp/learn-something-old-every-day-part-xviii-how-does-fpu-detection-work/
10•kencausey•3d ago•0 comments

OkCupid gave 3M dating-app photos to facial recognition firm, FTC says

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/03/okcupid-match-pay-no-fine-for-sharing-user-photos-wit...
308•whiteboardr•5h ago•73 comments

GitHub's Historic Uptime

https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/
368•todsacerdoti•4h ago•100 comments

Claude Code's source code has been leaked via a map file in their NPM registry

https://twitter.com/Fried_rice/status/2038894956459290963
1860•treexs•14h ago•911 comments

Show HN: Forkrun – NUMA-aware shell parallelizer (50×–400× faster than parallel)

https://github.com/jkool702/forkrun
98•jkool702•4d ago•22 comments

Show HN: Postgres extension for BM25 relevance-ranked full-text search

https://github.com/timescale/pg_textsearch
84•tjgreen•7h ago•30 comments

Nematophagous Fungus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nematophagous_fungus
33•lordgilman•4d ago•5 comments

From 300KB to 69KB per Token: How LLM Architectures Solve the KV Cache Problem

https://news.future-shock.ai/the-weight-of-remembering/
74•future-shock-ai•3d ago•5 comments

Axios compromised on NPM – Malicious versions drop remote access trojan

https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/axios-compromised-on-npm-malicious-versions-drop-remote-access-t...
1756•mtud•21h ago•712 comments

Why the US Navy won't blast the Iranians and 'open' Strait of Hormuz

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/iran-strait-of-hormuz/
138•KoftaBob•14h ago•362 comments

Super Micro Computer Investors Look for Exits

https://catenaa.com/markets/equities/super-micro-computer-investors-look-for-exits/
24•malindasp•3h ago•9 comments

A Primer on Long-Duration Life Support

https://mceglowski.substack.com/p/a-primer-on-long-duration-life-support
60•zdw•4d ago•15 comments

Audio tapes reveal mass rule-breaking in Milgram's obedience experiments

https://www.psypost.org/audio-tapes-reveal-mass-rule-breaking-in-milgram-s-obedience-experiments-...
194•lentoutcry•3d ago•123 comments

Accidentally created my first fork bomb with Claude Code

https://www.droppedasbaby.com/posts/2602-01/
53•offbyone42•16h ago•13 comments

GitHub Monaspace Case Study

https://lettermatic.com/custom/monaspace-case-study
108•homebrewer•8h ago•36 comments

Combinators

https://tinyapl.rubenverg.com/docs/info/combinators
127•tosh•12h ago•38 comments

Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse
441•lpcvoid•9h ago•163 comments