frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

IBM Announces Strategic Collaboration with Arm

https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-04-02-ibm-announces-strategic-collaboration-with-arm-to-shape-the-f...
140•bonzini•4h ago•76 comments

Lemonade by AMD: a fast and open source local LLM server using GPU and NPU

https://lemonade-server.ai
42•AbuAssar•1h ago•11 comments

Inside Nepal's Fake Rescue Racket

https://kathmandupost.com/money/2026/03/27/inside-nepal-s-fake-rescue-racket
33•lode•1h ago•1 comments

Sweden goes back to basics, swapping screens for books in the classroom

https://undark.org/2026/04/01/sweden-schools-books/
177•novaRom•2h ago•93 comments

Bringing Clojure programming to Enterprise (2021)

https://blogit.michelin.io/clojure-programming/
93•smartmic•4h ago•29 comments

Significant Raise of Reports

https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/
58•stratos123•3h ago•26 comments

Gone (Almost) Phishin'

https://ma.tt/2026/03/gone-almost-phishin/
72•luu•2d ago•32 comments

Email obfuscation: What works in 2026?

https://spencermortensen.com/articles/email-obfuscation/
192•jaden•9h ago•61 comments

Mercor says it was hit by cyberattack tied to compromise LiteLLM

https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/31/mercor-says-it-was-hit-by-cyberattack-tied-to-compromise-of-ope...
81•jackson-mcd•1d ago•22 comments

Reinventing the Pull Request

https://lubeno.dev/blog/reinventing-the-pull-request
25•bkolobara•6d ago•19 comments

Enabling Codex to Analyze Two Decades of Hacker News Data

https://modolap.com/publication/hn-analysis-1
13•ronfriedhaber•2h ago•2 comments

Steam on Linux Use Skyrocketed Above 5% in March

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Steam-On-Linux-Tops-5p
491•hkmaxpro•9h ago•237 comments

Quantum computing bombshells that are not April Fools

https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=9665
205•Strilanc•12h ago•67 comments

EmDash – A spiritual successor to WordPress that solves plugin security

https://blog.cloudflare.com/emdash-wordpress/
602•elithrar•20h ago•450 comments

Telli (YC F24) is hiring engineers, designers, and more (on-site, Berlin)

http://hi.telli.com/join-us
1•sebselassie•5h ago

Artemis II Launch Day Updates

https://www.nasa.gov/blogs/missions/2026/04/01/live-artemis-ii-launch-day-updates/
974•apitman•19h ago•831 comments

Subscription bombing and how to mitigate it

https://bytemash.net/posts/subscription-bombing-your-signup-form-is-a-weapon/
198•homelessdino•8h ago•124 comments

New laws to make it easier to cancel subscriptions and get refunds

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg0v36ek2go
81•chrisjj•3h ago•30 comments

Built a cheap DIY fan controller because my motherboard never had working PWM

https://www.himthe.dev/blog/msi-forgot-my-fans
43•bobsterlobster•2d ago•15 comments

A new C++ back end for ocamlc

https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/14701
201•glittershark•13h ago•18 comments

DRAM pricing is killing the hobbyist SBC market

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/dram-pricing-is-killing-the-hobbyist-sbc-market/
522•ingve•15h ago•454 comments

Order and Tension

https://slab.org/2026/03/22/order-and-tension/
7•surprisetalk•3d ago•0 comments

Fast and Gorgeous Erosion Filter

https://blog.runevision.com/2026/03/fast-and-gorgeous-erosion-filter.html
187•runevision•2d ago•17 comments

Show HN: Git bayesect – Bayesian Git bisection for non-deterministic bugs

https://github.com/hauntsaninja/git_bayesect
295•hauntsaninja•4d ago•42 comments

A Founder Tried to Pitch – and Got a Restraining Order

https://trellis.law/case/26-civ-00518/a16z-capital-management-llc-vs-dulat-akan
12•elonmm•44m ago•6 comments

A.I. Helped One Man (and His Brother) Build a $1.8B Company

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/02/technology/ai-billion-dollar-company-medvi.html
23•jbredeche•1h ago•19 comments

DMCA-resistant Claude Code source code

https://codeberg.org/tornikeo/claude-code
13•tornikeo•2h ago•1 comments

ReactOS Shows Improved Stability and 64-Bit Support at Chemnitz Linux Days 2026

https://old.reddit.com/r/reactos/comments/1sa26yu/back_from_chemnitz_linux_days_2026/
11•jeditobe•1h ago•1 comments

Which European countries have the best salaries after taxes?

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2026/04/02/which-european-countries-have-the-best-salaries-aft...
9•andrewstetsenko•55m ago•24 comments

AI for American-produced cement and concrete

https://engineering.fb.com/2026/03/30/data-center-engineering/ai-for-american-produced-cement-and...
199•latchkey•19h ago•114 comments
Open in hackernews

Men are ditching TV for YouTube as AI usage and social media fatigue grow

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/media-use-and-attitudes/media-habits-adults/passive-social-media-use-ai-companionship-and-online-side-hustles-uk-adults-media-and-online-lives-revealed
37•bundie•3h ago

Comments

gradus_ad•1h ago
YouTube Premium is the best $10 I spend per month. Nowhere else can I consistently find the sort of niche content that interests me.
2OEH8eoCRo0•1h ago
I prefer newpipe for $0/mo
philipphutterer•1h ago
I prefer Tubular with Sponsorblock
kmarc•1h ago
Do you know how it compares to LibreTube[1]? For the SponsorBlock integration; it works well for me, but I kinda miss the newpipe interface.

[1]: https://github.com/libre-tube/LibreTube

philipphutterer•1h ago
I've never tried LibreTube. I am used to the new pipe interface and had all my subscriptions managed their so the move to Tubular was easy.
thousand_nights•1h ago
nowhere near comparable experience if you want to seamlessly use your YT account across a TV + phone + computer

i'd rather pay the $10 than pay with my time by being an ad-block whack-a-mole diagnostician

ovi256•1h ago
> ad-block whack-a-mole diagnostician that is being done as open source community efforts now: NewPipe for mobile, SmartTube for smart TVs etc. All you have to do is update them once in a while
cbdevidal•1h ago
For those of us who are too cheap to pay the subscription:

On my iPhone I almost never see YTube ads. I don’t use the YTube app and instead I install Chrome and watch YT that way. I lose notifications—which is perfect for me, since I don’t want many notifications on my phone anyway.

This might also work in Safari but I haven’t tested it.

StevenNunez•1h ago
On Android, Firefox with sponsorblock. I do pay for Premium though. In since YouTube Red.
2OEH8eoCRo0•1h ago
It's not comparable, it's superior! The youtube app stinks! And I don't care about "seamlessly" using it across my devices.
twobitshifter•1h ago
I mean it’s just $10. People are making livelihoods based off from YouTube. I get not liking ads, but if you have the option to go ad free for a low cost, why not do it? Do you pay for any of Netflix, Paramount, AppleTV, etc.?
frizlab•1h ago
I refuse to give google any cent (and I also do not use youtube at all, so at least I’m consistent).
2OEH8eoCRo0•1h ago
> Do you pay for any of Netflix, Paramount, AppleTV, etc.?

No.

Edit: I do pay $5/mo for PBS

tjpnz•1h ago
I would prefer to pay that money to creators directly than to pay it to an adtech firm and trust that they'll dole it out fairly.
duskdozer•1h ago
>if you have the option to go ad free for a low cost, why not do it?

It requires the use of a google account and there is no way to even request opting out of the accompanying data harvesting. Any "curation" or "recommendation" that would inevitably happen is also an anti-feature.

>Do you pay for any of Netflix, Paramount, AppleTV, etc.?

No

macNchz•1h ago
I find that all of Google’s ad products are under-moderated for malicious ads. It’s a choice on their part to not tightly control this—they certainly could, though it would harm their incredible profitability if they did more scrutiny on the ads they show. I personally don’t especially care to pay a premium not to see deepfakes of celebrities promoting crypto scams.
dominotw•1h ago
i judge ppl who dont have youtube premium as a not curious ppl :D
nkrisc•1h ago
Is there anything you can watch on premium that can’t watch on YouTube for free?
lotsofpulp•1h ago
I judge people who watch that much youtube as susceptible to disinformation.
flohofwoe•1h ago
is there a difference between youtube premium and youtube-with-adblocking?
eru•1h ago
It's harder to block ads on mobile.

That's why I pay.

eru•1h ago
If you don't watch on mobile, is there anything that YouTube Premiums gives you that an ad-blocker doesn't?
twobitshifter•1h ago
YouTube music, higher quality video, and the ‘jump ahead’ feature to skip portions of a video that others usually skip.
Melonai•17m ago
Also, though not a benefit to you in particular, apparently any creator you watch with Premium gets a way bigger payout for your view. Only heard about this anecdotally but it seems to track.
dfansteel•1h ago
There are problems with YouTube and the library is free.

https://dataspace.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp01dz010t34x

worldsayshi•1h ago
I find YT to be very sloppy nowadays. Not so much AI content as content that is over-optimized for clicks and revenue. 80% filler and maybe 20% substance.

I should probably de-algoify my YT experience.

bonoboTP•1h ago
YT is huge, and there is plenty of good stuff. You just need to subscribe to good channels that are not so easy to find. And block the clickbait channels when they appear.
worldsayshi•37m ago
I wish we could collectively move over to some decentralized alternative. Even if we make sure to disable the bad parts, relying on these few actors that have such revenue optimized and enshitification-prone business models does not sit right.

Although decentralization by itself does probably not protect from this trap in the long run.

aghuang•1h ago
I judge ppl who are brainwashed enough to pay for youtube premium and watch videos based on their thumbnails.
malnourish•1h ago
That's your right; I consider myself a very curious person but I never watch YouTube (I have watched less than 10 minutes in 2026).

I prefer to read news and information. What little exposure to YouTube personalities and editing styles I've had annoys me to no end.

scrollop•1h ago
More channels are fighting for attention though, so finding more channels are "creating buzz" or "news" based on mediocre information ie. taking things out of context and making unwarranted conclusions or blowing things out of proportions for clickbait titles.

"This changes everything!!"

Getting youtube fatigue.

bonoboTP•1h ago
I heavily use the "Not interested" and the "Do not recommend this channel" options a lot and don't click on clickbait, and use the DeArrow extension, and this way my front page looks quite good.
wrxd•1h ago
At this point you’re doing almost as much work as if you handpicked a few channels and put them in your RSS reader.

Algorithms are sold as “curation is hard, the algorithm does it for you” but getting the algorithm to do a good job is actually a lot of work

nandomrumber•1h ago
That’s not an argument against the comment you responded to.

If I just took any random 20 creators I’m subscribed to on YouTube, the premium membership fee, which includes YT Music, is more valuable than any of the other streaming services.

The only other streaming service I’ve been a paying member even longer than YouTube is di.fm

I also occasionally pay for a few months or bassdrive.com and or soma.fm

For movies / series, I’m back to sharing.

jaapz•1h ago
Disabled recommendations. Disabled comments (firefox plugin). Use subscriptions page as the homepage (firefox plugin). Only subscribe to channels that interest me (and aren't annoying like that).
pockybum522•1h ago
The browser extension "DeArrow" is well worth a look.
freetonik•1h ago
I've started putting together a curated directory of (subjectively) good YouTube channels and videos [1]. It's literally the 3rd day, so not many entries yet, but I plan to continue growing it like I did with Minifeed [2].

1. https://skyshelf.app/

2. https://minifeed.net/

jasondigitized•1h ago
Fully agree. There is so much good content and being ad-free is just a really great experience.
moffkalast•1h ago
uBlock origin + SponsorBlock has a much better price to performance ratio imo.
saint_yossarian•1h ago
I'd pay that, but it's about $22 in my country...
ssl232•1h ago
Next in Ofcom’s authoritarian sights: YouTube.
rimbo789•1h ago
Only 20 years too late. They should have been involved from the start
INTPenis•1h ago
Long long time ago buddy, I ditched TV 15+ years ago, can't even remember exactly when.

I only buy large monitors and mount them on my wall.

At first I only watched selfhosted media, but last 8 years it's been more and more Youtube. I'm not too happy about it, would like to wean myself off it.

I'm speaking from my own perspective here but scripted media is something I only watch socially, if my partner wants to watch with me. And I end up on my computer trying to type softly next to them.

All scripted media just seems so predictable now, I'm like Stan in that one South Park episode lol.

It also seems manipulative. I can see how a lot of shows just milk the story for more episodes until they can't milk it anymore. It doesn't seem genuine anymore, maybe it never was? Ratings have always existed, in my lifetime.

But the point is that the only newly produced content I watch is just regular people. One example is Antiques Roadshow, it's boring, maybe even "slow" TV, but it's real people. I much prefer watching real people than characters.

Something that really bugs me now is live action characters, I'd actually prefer cartoon characters. Because everything is so unreal and over the top, it might as well be a cartoon.

0dayman•1h ago
youtube is good when there's adblockers
MrBuddyCasino•1h ago
Ofcom emitting anti-social media statements shouldn't surprise anyone at this point. There is an ongoing EU-wide war against uncensored communication channels in the form of chat control, age verification, and anti anonymity. All to Protect The Children, of course.
lonelyasacloud•1h ago
> Ofcom emitting anti-social media statements shouldn't surprise anyone at this point.

Where was there anything in that story that was ant-social media?

raincole•1h ago
Ofcom is a disgrace to humanity. I guess this is an early signal that they plan to control how people use YouTube.
eru•1h ago
UK voters get what they vote for.
4ndrewl•1h ago
Literally untrue as we don't have proportional representation.
4ndrewl•1h ago
I think your disgrace-level calibration needs adjusting given everything else that's going on rn buddy.
beejiu•1h ago
Because you can't get doomlooped into right-wing podcasts and "citizen journalism" on the TV.

Sample quotes from men in the study:

"Who tells me what's right and what's wrong... is it true or is it not true? Some of the things on YouTube are independent. I find I would listen to them more, because they're on the ground. They're telling you the story. "

"If you see something on social media, whether you believe it or not, you can go to the comments and see everyone's points… If most people agree with it, you know you should be at least somewhat agreeing with it. "

"It seems to everyone that it's an agenda, like the government's behind an agenda… it's like a brainwashing tool for the government. An illegal immigrant killed someone in the street the other day, stabbed them to death… And it's all over Facebook, all over YouTube. And the news hasn’t even said anything about it"

Only one man mentioned using YouTube for entertainment.

ChrisRR•1h ago
Those quotes read like the quotes you'd read from someone's facebook after they've committed an atrocity
duskdozer•1h ago
Sigh. Those comments are truly something.
twobitshifter•1h ago
> Because you can't get doomlooped into right-wing podcasts and "citizen journalism" on the TV.

FoxNews, NewsMax, AM Radio are already good enough for that. I’ve also noticed that most of the guests on TV News are now YouTubers, so even if you are watching TV, you are going to see them.

Citizen journalism can be a bad thing, like the Nick Shirley example, but the alternative seems to be that only news Larry Ellison or some other billionaire approves will get on TV, that seems like a far worse scenario to me.

For the Iran war, on YouTube, you can see Canadian journalists sailing in the strait of Hormuz and interviews with real Iranians. You cannot see this on CBS.

beejiu•1h ago
I can only speak from a UK perspective, but all broadcast media here is regulated. So the things you might see in the US just can't happen and don't happen here. Everything has to be editorially balanced. Online media doesn't fall under the same regulations.
wrxd•1h ago
GB News?
beejiu•46m ago
GB News gets a lot of criticism, but I watch the odd show and I've always found it to be balanced. There's a lot of political and regulatory pressure against them, so much so that GB News took Ofcom to the High Court and overturned illegal actions that Ofcom had taken.
Melonai•43m ago
Those comments are something... I take the most issue with the second one. I wonder if the person knows they're directly describing group-think. That's something that would theoretically get you called a "sheeple" in some places, unless you agree with the general opinion held by most people there, of course. :)
TheRoque•1h ago
Youtube is also pretty boring though. I mean, there are ton of interesting content and quality content too, but the stuff that gets recommended, the "hype stuff" is full of false information, clickbait, tweaked reality to conform some narrative...
jasondigitized•1h ago
This is the only downside. You really need to curate good content.
krapp•1h ago
I don't know about everyone else's experience but I find Youtube to be pretty good at finding interesting content, especially for music. Curation is necessary but it does work.
magicalhippo•1h ago
Works fine for me recommending interesting educational and edutainment content.

I'm quite aggressively removing videos I don't like from my watch history, or flag "don't recommend" channels I know won't be for me. If I'm not careful it'll recommend crap for a while.

slumberlust•41m ago
Interesting. One of my many many complaints with YTMusic is that it does discovery very poorly. It fills any radio/discovery queue with one or two new songs followed by all the songs already on my playlists.

Other big complaints include no ability to prevent it from substantially using my cell data despite telling it to do everything over wifi. I've taken to just removing network permissions from the app unless I want to add something.

krapp•36m ago
I'm not using Youtube Music, just regular free Youtube with an ad blocker.
0x80h•1h ago
Agree, their algorithm sucks, I wish I could have more freedom to customize it
csantini•1h ago
Agree! So many great genuine creators, but the algo keeps pushing only clickbaity shit
Gualdrapo•1h ago
Everyone was a genuine creator but was corrupted at some point. It will happen to your favorite creator too.
2OEH8eoCRo0•1h ago
I have a friend that sends me lunatic fringe videos every day that youtube recommends. It's tiring
glimshe•49m ago
YouTube is as good as you make it. If you watch a lot of a type of content, it does a great job at finding similar content, including relevant things that you didn't know existed. If you just watch random popular stuff, then yeah, it's pretty trashy.
Lucasoato•1h ago
The thing is very simple: when watching TV I need to adjust my schedule to the shows I'd like to watch. With youtube (or any streaming platform), I can see them whenever I want, the platform adapts to my schedule.

Of course there are some exceptions, for example when I want to watch my national football team, I'd like to watch it live. Luckily, that won't be a problem anymore this year (Italy).

hnlmorg•1h ago
I don’t think the schedule argument is a strong one these days. DVRs have been around for decades now, and built into satellite and cable services too. In fact, some TVs even have DVR functionality built in.

What annoys me is when streaming services release shows on a weekly basis. Which makes them just as inconvenient to watch as traditional broadcasting.

2OEH8eoCRo0•1h ago
You used to be able to set your VCR to record the show at a certain time (and skip the ads by fast-forwarding). DVRs exist too. We have lost a lot of freedom.
seydor•1h ago
Youtube charges $10 per month and doesn't produce a single video. It's an amazing money maker for them and the only media subscription i pay for (to avoid ads on TVs). They should quit it with the Shorts though, nobody likes those
halflings•1h ago
> Youtube charges $10 per month and doesn't produce a single video

It is different from Netflix (that pays upfront for production costs), but there's of course a revenue share + the bulk of the revenue for creators is actually from sponsorships (which YT doesn't take a share of).

0x80h•1h ago
They get paid to display ads, and they get paid to hide ads. What a fantastic business model.

I'm also in the same bucket, happy to pay my subscription.

jaapz•1h ago
I used to be vehemently opposed to shorts, but with recommendations disabled it is tolerable, because only shorts from people I subscribe to are in there.

The only reason I really watch shorts is because Vsauce started using them a lot, and his content is definitely worth a watch every time in any format.

MagicMoonlight•1h ago
And they steal all the content for AI training. You couldn't buy their archive for all the money in the world.
jackdoe•1h ago
I will pay anything to watch styropyro!
falcor84•1h ago
These seem to be the main relevant insights from the "Adults' Media Lives" report [0] (and they are backed with some good quotes from the participants):

> Participants claimed to be streaming more and viewing less linear TV. This is part of a medium-term trend we have seen over recent years. Participants also reported more of their viewing as being on their own, with less shared/communal viewing overall.Many participants claimed to be viewing more YouTube, in particular, in the past year. For some men, YouTube is now their main (or only) form of viewing.

- p 20.

> Whilst in previous years YouTube was predominantly being used to access specialist content around users' personal interests, it now also seems to serve a broader range of viewing needs. These include “background” viewing (sometimes as a replacement for daytime TV) and videos about random, eclectic, interesting topics – serendipitous content discoveries traditionally associated with linear TV channels.

- p 21.

[0] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/rese...

chrsw•1h ago
There's a lot of AI slop on YouTube unfortunately. But with YT Premium (or adblockers) I can't think of a better platform currently for finding distraction free content focused on your interests.
prplxd_nihilist•1h ago
> Men are ditching TV for YouTube

this, and

> as AI usage and social media fatigue grow

this are not congruent, you are shown way more AI slop in YT than TV, where it is growing - but still no match. If anything, AI fatigue must be making people spend less time on the web. The write-up in the article itself is contradicting this title. Bad title.

TYPE_FASTER•1h ago
I have access to more content at the touch of a button than ever before.

I struggle to find content I actually want to watch. It's really weird.

I can't tell if it's me, or the content, or a combination.

I think part of it is our attention span, or lack thereof.

SirFatty•1h ago
"UK adults’ media and online lives revealed"

Adults are the focus here, not men.