Article lacks evidence to support its titular claim that most instances of bubble-wrapping, or most bubble-wrapping wrappers, face the bubbles outward.
Reason says the bubbles should go on the inside:
There are gaps between the bubbles. If they're on the outside, something can impact the item in a gap and bypass the padding. If the bubbles are on the inside, they become supports for the flat side (which, IIRC, is usually heavier plastic), so if there's an impact on a gap, there's still padding because the plastic is being held away from the item and the force is transferred to the surrounding bubbles.
That's how I was thinking about it before this article at least.
Imagine a small enough object, like a tip of a screwdriver, or a table's corner, touching an object wrapped bubbles out.
It simply makes contact with the object - here covered with only a very thin layer of plastic - between the bubbles, and given enough force, damages the object.
With bubbles inwards, it has to pierce or stretch the now airgapped layer of plastic first.
Even with multiple layers, bubbles inside give +1 airgapped layer.
>Below, what Perplexity Pro had to say.
When will this be as socially embarrassing as sending someone a “let me google that for you” link?
If you like to pop the bubbles the correct orientation is indeed the one you‘ve been using all along: bubbles towards your fingers.
The difference seems minor other than the ability to tape the flat side, and we have cling bubble wraps that don't need tape anyway.
tim-tday•3d ago
l1ng0•3d ago