This article is about Meta, not about the user. Who signs off on these? Is the intended audience other people at Meta, not the user?
They want to 1) attract talent, 2) tell wall street they can play in this space as well, 3) help employees feel the company is moving in the right direction.
A frontier LLM doesn't apply to their core consumer products.
So many different companies are going to have similarly powerful ai that there will be no moat around it and it will be cheap. They will never earn their investment back.
And further down the line in chips, which is why Elon is building a fab now.
There are plenty of capable models on HuggingFace, yet I have no way of running them.
I was saying this for years about Tesla’s FSD - they finally had to give in and drop the price to stay competitive.
(But today is not that day.)
The result for that specific image is: 500kb. 85% decrease in size
If Meta wants to be seen as a cutting edge massive lab they need to come across as one instead of looking like a school project version of a frontier model.
Love to see it. Cheers!
moab•2h ago
How does one get their hands on these models? They are not open-source, right? I go to meta.ai, but it's just a chat interface---no equivalent to codex or claud code? Can you use this through OpenCode? Is meta charging for model access, or is the gathering of chat data a sufficiently large tithe?
monkeydust•2h ago
moab•1h ago
Note: I'm expressing some skepticism here largely due to how recent rollouts from Meta flopped. Sincerely hoping that they do better this time around!
nemomarx•1h ago
pstuart•1h ago
meetpateltech•1h ago
from Facebook Newsroom: https://about.fb.com/news/2026/04/introducing-muse-spark-met...
tempaccount420•1h ago
giancarlostoro•1h ago