frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Migrating from DigitalOcean to Hetzner: From $1,432 to $233 With Zero Downtime

https://isayeter.com/posts/digitalocean-to-hetzner-migration/
33•yusufusta•32m ago•10 comments

Why Japan has such good railways

https://worksinprogress.co/issue/why-japan-has-such-good-railways/
42•RickJWagner•1h ago•22 comments

State of Kdenlive

https://kdenlive.org/news/2026/state-2026/
89•f_r_d•2h ago•29 comments

Michael Rabin Has Died

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_O._Rabin
208•tkhattra•2d ago•34 comments

Category Theory Illustrated – Orders

https://abuseofnotation.github.io/category-theory-illustrated/04_order/
138•boris_m•7h ago•40 comments

Amiga Graphics

https://amiga.lychesis.net/
151•sph•7h ago•31 comments

Claude Design

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-design-anthropic-labs
1093•meetpateltech•22h ago•721 comments

Show HN: I made a calculator that works over disjoint sets of intervals

https://victorpoughon.github.io/interval-calculator/
212•fouronnes3•12h ago•40 comments

It's OK to compare floating-points for equality

https://lisyarus.github.io/blog/posts/its-ok-to-compare-floating-points-for-equality.html
68•coinfused•3d ago•40 comments

Measuring Claude 4.7's tokenizer costs

https://www.claudecodecamp.com/p/i-measured-claude-4-7-s-new-tokenizer-here-s-what-it-costs-you
637•aray07•22h ago•451 comments

All 12 moonwalkers had "lunar hay fever" from dust smelling like gunpowder (2018)

https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/The_toxic_side_of_the_Moon
376•cybermango•19h ago•222 comments

Towards trust in Emacs

https://eshelyaron.com/posts/2026-04-15-towards-trust-in-emacs.html
145•eshelyaron•3d ago•20 comments

Spending 3 months coding by hand

https://miguelconner.substack.com/p/im-coding-by-hand
246•evakhoury•21h ago•256 comments

Flock Condemns False Child Predator Allegations, Yet Calls Critics Terrorists

https://ipvm.com/reports/flock-allegations-critics
48•jhonovich•1h ago•14 comments

A Dumb Introduction to Z3

https://ar-ms.me/thoughts/a-gentle-introduction-to-z3/
11•y1n0•4d ago•8 comments

Brunost: The Nynorsk Programming Language

https://lindbakk.com/blog/introducing-brunost
99•atomfinger•4d ago•45 comments

Are the costs of AI agents also rising exponentially? (2025)

https://www.tobyord.com/writing/hourly-costs-for-ai-agents
246•louiereederson•3d ago•86 comments

A simplified model of Fil-C

https://www.corsix.org/content/simplified-model-of-fil-c
188•aw1621107•16h ago•100 comments

Show HN: Smol machines – subsecond coldstart, portable virtual machines

https://github.com/smol-machines/smolvm
373•binsquare•20h ago•121 comments

The simple geometry behind any road

https://sandboxspirit.com/blog/simple-geometry-of-roads/
65•azhenley•2d ago•8 comments

Hyperscalers have already outspent most famous US megaprojects

https://twitter.com/finmoorhouse/status/2044933442236776794
233•nowflux•21h ago•181 comments

"cat readme.txt" is not safe if you use iTerm2

https://blog.calif.io/p/mad-bugs-even-cat-readmetxt-is-not
228•arkadiyt•19h ago•133 comments

Slop Cop

https://awnist.com/slop-cop
205•ericHosick•22h ago•126 comments

Rewriting Every Syscall in a Linux Binary at Load Time

https://amitlimaye1.substack.com/p/rewriting-every-syscall-in-a-linux
67•riteshnoronha16•4d ago•26 comments

Show HN: PanicLock – Close your MacBook lid disable TouchID –> password unlock

https://github.com/paniclock/paniclock/
214•seanieb•21h ago•99 comments

Binary Encodings for JSON and Variant

https://jincongho.com/posts/designing-binary-encodings-for-json-and-variant/
4•jincongho•3d ago•0 comments

Middle schooler finds coin from Troy in Berlin

https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/75848
249•speckx•23h ago•116 comments

Show HN: Sfsym – Export Apple SF Symbols as Vector SVG/PDF/PNG

https://github.com/yapstudios/sfsym
17•olliewagner•10h ago•5 comments

NASA Force

https://nasaforce.gov/
290•LorenDB•22h ago•282 comments

Landmark ancient-genome study shows surprise acceleration of human evolution

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-01204-5
92•unsuspecting•15h ago•98 comments
Open in hackernews

The quiet disappearance of the free-range childhood

https://bigthink.com/mind-behavior/the-quiet-disappearance-of-the-free-range-childhood/
46•sylvainkalache•2h ago

Comments

lmf4lol•1h ago
this resonates a lot. I am not sure how to handle this though. Next to our house (500m), the city government established a camp for “asylum seekers”. 100 men. Men only. How can I reasonable let my pre-teen daughters roam freely now? Id love to, but my gut feeling doesnt allow me to.

Maybe, back in the days, it was just a different time? A more high trust society that worked well?

Nowadays, we have news stories, where 70 year olds get stabbed by youngsters because they got lectures on their bad behaviour. When I was young, I had respect towards a 70 year old. Big time. Never would we have thought to pull out a knife…

Life changed a lot in recent years and not for the better on all dimensions.

Europe is still pretty save though. At least if you trust the statistics

techjamie•1h ago
Statistically, we live in the safest society we ever have. We see a lot of bad stuff happening because news reporting travels further and faster than ever before, amplifying the perception the world is going to shit.

Plus, now, basically every kid is running around with a phone that gives them access to talk to the police or their parents at any time. So it's going to be a lot riskier for someone to try anything against them. Even then, between 80-90% of sexual assaults are performed by people the victims already know, and around 30% of those are relatives of the victim.

shrubble•1h ago
I think it’s the importation of men from countries where rape is seen as natural and not illegal that’s the key concern here…
realo•37m ago
Wow. Are you for real?

I thought this kind of bigotry was only used by far right shit to manipulate feeble-minded people.

I'll be generous and assume this comment was not made by a human, but by a bot.

phyzix5761•23m ago
People hold beliefs based on information they've received from sources they perceive as trustworthy. Maybe the sources they're basing their beliefs on are not so trust worthy or maybe they have a different perspective on events. I'm inclined to say its an issue of trustworthiness because the source is likely news and media and those are created for the sole purpose of pushing specific agendas and narratives.
dghlsakjg•41m ago
Do you have any evidence or are you just basing your fears on feelings? Has there been a rise in sex attacks associated with this particular refugee housing?

You should flip through some newspaper archives from when you were a kid. I don’t know where you are, but I can almost certainly guarantee that there were kids attacking people back then too. Just because you and most you know would never have pulled a knife, doesn’t mean that there weren’t those that would. After all, you say the teens today attack old people with knives, but I really don’t think your teen daughters are stabbing people with knives.

How can you reasonably let your teen daughters out alone? Well, be reasonable. Find out if your fears are amped up by sensationalist press. Go meet your refugee neighbours. Quite honestly it sounds like YOU spend too much time inside.

Edit: I just saw your comment about importing men from countries where rape is natural. I can’t imagine that we have the same definition of reasonable.

baublet•33m ago
This is bigotry dressed up as concern. It’s also not something widespread. Seems like you just think immigrants are rapists.
roxolotl•1h ago
I’m reasonably convinced this explains basically everything currently attributed to social media, for children at least, and likely can also help explain some concern around birth rates and child rearing costs. Starting with the satanic panic the US has slowly closed down children’s lives because of concern that terrible things will happen to children if not continually under supervision. And the true is that yes sometimes bad things happen and have always happened. But if you look to many other countries they do not have the same extreme expectations of parents or the state to keep children’s lives locked down.
trallnag•1h ago
Does the term "satanic panic" also apply to the EU restricting internet access for the youth?
dghlsakjg•50m ago
Satanic panic was a very specific phenomenon in the US.
spicyusername•1h ago
I don't know. Maybe this is going away in some places, maybe I just have my own anecdata, but my kids play outside unsupervised all the time, as do all the kids in my neighborhood.

I live in just a regular suburban neighborhood on the outskirts of small Metro. Nothing special about it at all.

Every time I see one of these articles I always wonder who they're talking about.

I always feel like this is just one of those news headlines that won't go away, but isn't quite tethered to reality, but people really like to feel bad about modern life and so we keep talking about it as if it's real. I suspect the real reason kids aren't playing outside, if there is one, is not because they can't, it's because they choose not to. Just as adults are no longer choosing to go to third spaces. Screens came for everyone.

rayiner•1h ago
This behavior is probably overrepresented in the bougie places reporters live. I dropped my daughter off at the mall to hang out with their friends and one of the moms followed them around the whole time. They're all 13!
garbawarb•29m ago
Do journalists live in bougie places? It's not a particularly well-paying job.
amazingamazing•48m ago
> my kids play outside unsupervised all the time, as do all the kids in my neighborhood. I live in just a regular suburban neighborhood

Your kids are hardly free-range. Let me guess, there's no way for them to actually meaningfully leave the area (no train, bus, etc)? It's like dumping kids on a 5 acre farm and saying they can do whatever they want. hardly free-range in the way described in the article.

Presumably you live in a suburb for the reasons the person in the article checked in on the free-range kid.

my personal litmus test is if you'd let your 13 year kid explore Manhattan alone during the day. Many say no because it's dangerous, and yet Manhattan is safer than most American suburbs. just FUD all the way down sadly.

ghaff•42m ago
The usual contrast being drawn is kids wandering around a suburban area, walking to school, playing with kids in a nearby rural property. It's not hopping onto a bus to the city a few tens of miles away. You do see schoolchildren in Japan on the train by themselves but I'm not sure that's ever been very common in the US.
amazingamazing•40m ago
there's really no reason American kids in metro areas like SF, Boston, DC, NYC couldn't take a bus 5 miles away by themselves. when one comes up of an actual reason to why, it contradicts real statistics.

the biggest things parents should worry about is their kid being bullied by other kids during school, a supposedly safe place, and other family. strangers just aren't the major source of violence towards children.

ButlerianJihad•34m ago
Welp this week we in Phoenix are dealing with a report of a 17-year-old high school girl who boarded a light rail train (the one with security cameras and guards) and she was harassed and assaulted by a mob of boys on the train, presumably in front of human onlookers; she disembarked, and was assaulted some more.

She is now in a neck brace, and her mother is absolutely distraught, saying this is something she cannot fix for her beloved daughter. I am distraught as well that this could happen to anyone at all on the same train that I ride every week.

ghaff•28m ago
That's a sad story though getting a bit far afield from young kids taking public transit or otherwise traveling away from their homes. At 17 I was in college and taking urban transportation (and flights) all the time.
weakfish•20m ago
I’m also curious why you write “we in Phoenix are dealing with…”

I’ve noticed a trend of people attaching a sort of personal identification with headlines

NordStreamYacht•31m ago
Japan is a monocultural civilisational state. That is a big factor.
garbawarb•28m ago
American children are in more danger because the country's more diverse?
paulryanrogers•19m ago
Diversity doesn't make places more dangerous (if i understand the stats). But humans are naturally tribal and fear those who look and act significantly different.
xavortm•19m ago
To his point - I would say, it's a bug factor BECAUSE on average their culture seems more safe. But it's not because it's monocultural. Bad "monoculture" is bad, good one is good, nothing complex there. Simplifying, but that's pretty much what is said
sfifs•13m ago
Russia is fairly mono cultural too. Is it safe?
GerryAdamsSF•2m ago
Yes. Russia is inarguably safer in terms of street crime than the USA.

Philadelphia in 2025 had a higher murder rate than Belfast during the height of a civil war.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_countries_result.jsp?co...

tayo42•34m ago
Plenty of trouble for a 13 year old in Manhattan. Even if it's not dangerous, you can find your own problems easily enough.
Mordisquitos•18m ago
> It's like dumping kids on a 5 acre farm and saying they can do whatever they want.

What do you mean it's like dumping kids on a farm? Are the suburbs really THAT lethally dangerous?

Source [22 minutes]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLAfDrFUBkA

yieldcrv•16m ago
> and yet Manhattan is safer than most American suburbs

[something traumatic happens and 50 people run for their safety]

see and as proven, only 1 person was assaulted!

zabzonk•15m ago
> my personal litmus test is if you'd let your 13 year kid explore Manhattan alone during the day

My parents let me (14) and my brother (9) explore central Paris on our own when my Dad was working at the Paris air show for the RAF. No problems at all even though this was just after the student protests in the 60s, and so things were a little tense.

I think Manhattan would be OK too, though I've only been there as an adjust. Certainly, you see kids running around London.

xtiansimon•1h ago
My free range childhood friends and I would have been all _get bent_ to that lady—even at 6 yro. I can tell you this because I was also getting a whooping at home from da for saying the same to my ma. I was a dreadful child.
jl6•1h ago
It’s easier to let kids play around the neighborhood when you know who the neighbors are.
amazingamazing•42m ago
most acts of abuse to family members are by other family members. ironically strangers are more likely to leave your kid alone than extended family.
phyzix5761•35m ago
That's a problem of access not familiarity.
paulryanrogers•12m ago
Know which of your neighbors have unsecured firearms lying around. Sadly all to common where I am.
homeonthemtn•1h ago
I think this is more a data point towards the quiet disappearnce of community / the steady march towards pervasive isolation
Loughla•1h ago
Correct. There are no communities anymore, just groups of houses. You see it in the death of social and civic organizations, churches, and other community groups.

Everybody is an island. I don't know what has caused this, but it seems like it's happening in most 1st world countries. Anyone have insights about this?

lencastre•31m ago
and yet everybody is one discoord channel away from everybody else hundreds if not thousands of km away, eager to talk, voice their opinions etc… crossing the street, meet your neighbor, too much hassle
metalman•1h ago
here in Canada, social service "baby snatchers" have destroyed basic community cohesion and along with many other wildly out of control beurocratic policing forces, such as the spca making having animals a huge liability, litteral special subdivisions, chicken police, horse police, and an enacted rock police to prevent the totaly illegal practice of picking rocks off a beach, but hey it is legal to pack granma into the back of a motor home and drive her to the government canabis store, get her wrecked, and then take her in so she can ask to be euthanized. cant make this shit up as they say.
scelerat•1h ago
My biggest fear of letting my young kid play alone outside is getting hit by a car.
neogodless•58m ago
When I was a kid I was taught not to walk in the street.

When you walk, you go in the opposite direction of cars and can see them coming and, if necessary, move off to the side more.

I know it's survivorship bias, but it worked for me.

Now I get that population density is increasing, and probably so is traffic. Though so are automatic safety features that cause cars to brake rather than hit things.

Are there statistics on vehicular fatalities in suburbs?

tomasphan•45m ago
Pedestrian traffic deaths are going down again after peaking in 2022. Accidents are less survivable in the US due to bigger cars and higher hoods.

Quote from CDC

During 2013–2022, U.S. traffic-related death rates increased a relative 50.0% for pedestrians and 22.5% overall, compared with those in 27 other high-income countries, where they declined a median of 24.7% and 19.4%, respectively. Across countries, U.S. pedestrian death rates were highest overall and among persons aged 15–24 and 25–64 years.

bojan•15m ago
The cars are getting bigger. That means that the impact is more deadly, and the line of sight is higher - making it easy to overlook a child. The sensors often won't react at low speeds which are common for residential neighborhoods, and at high speeds they are late anyway.
delichon•54m ago
That's why you have an emergency backup child for redundancy in case of failure of the main child.
NordStreamYacht•27m ago
Ah, the Spare. You must be British royalty.
mynegation•19m ago
The only people who find this joke funny don’t have any children.
procaryote•15m ago
You can have humour and children at the same time...
ocdtrekkie•59m ago
I remember when I was a kid I would bike to a park around a half mile away by myself, definitely before I was 13, and I admit it feels weird to suggest a kid can go to the park down just a single block alone today.

The funny thing is it'd be safer: Kids have cell phones now by like 7 or 8 in a lot of cases and can call for help! Back when I was that age if I got injured or something I might've had to knock on strangers' doors!

gehsty•41m ago
As a parent you feel the push and pull of not ignoring your child while also not mollycoddling them. For me let the kid do what they want - if your kid wants to stay home let them, if they want to climb trees and go off on their bike let them. Help them learn what is safe (which rods can they cross), what are their boundaries. Hopefully they get it, maybe they don’t. Don’t restrict access to devices or screens too harshly. Encourage games of any kind. Wear sunscreen.
kannanvijayan•27m ago
I have a 10 year old boy and I'm facing these issues right now. I'm also in Canada so culturally adjacent to the US and similar enough with regards to this topic.

I don't see child welfare agencies personally as a particular threat when it comes to this topic. Maybe they ARE more likely to get involved in cases of more free range parenting where before they weren't, but it doesn't register as a real worry.

The major difference I see between when I was growing up and now is that when I went out onto the streets, there were other kids on the streets. My parents didn't know exactly what they were sending me out to, but they knew that there as a general crowd of kids that would be out on the street until some point in the evening, and that they would all go home at around the same time, and that's also when you were expected home.

The draw of smartphones and video games as indoor entertainment can't be understated, but I can exercise some parental tyranny here and always kick him out of the house to go play like my folks used to do.

But there are no other kids out there. I'm sending him out into streets empty of kids.

To mitigate this I'm trying to nudge things in the direction of him and his friends forming some sort of after-school crew that finds outside activities to do together, undirected. There are other like minded parents that I've found that are also interested in enabling something like this.

On the subject of risks - I strongly believe that the role of parenthood is to mediate a child's exposure to the real trauma of a hostile, often absurd reality that they will grow up into. Controlled exposure to risk, to self-directed decision making in times where they feel like someone won't be there to help them out and they need to figure things out on their own, these are critical requirements in parenting IMHO. And all risk comes with some small chance of tragedy, and that's a burden we as parents have to bear: to expose ourselves to the emotional trauma of the possibility of our children getting hurt, however small the chance, so that they are able to grow into healthy well-adjusted adults.

I feel like I have to work a lot harder than my parents did to enable that exposure.

testing22321•20m ago
Small town Canada here. In winter all the kids above school toboggan and slide down the roads (GT racers). All the kids below trudge up carrying their slider of choice. In the afternoon the roles are reversed. Not an adult in sight.

At the ski hill kids 5+ roam free- it’s always fun getting on the chairlift and a little kid says “ can you help me get on?” And you have to physically pick them up onto the moving (fixed grip) chairlift. There’s no cell service.

Mountain bike trails around town are full of groups of kids 5+.

My advice: move to a small town, it’s like going back in time in a very good way.

MichaelRo•13m ago
>> But there are no other kids out there. I'm sending him out into streets empty of kids.

This. It's a number's "game".

My father, born in rural Romania, had 8 siblings, one of them died of an accident in his childhood (yeah, during "free range stuff"). I was born in a town and have 2 brothers. Live in a city and have one kid.

I can't send my kid out carelessly because I don't have a backup.

givemeethekeys•24m ago
Blame a litigious culture where agencies have far too much power to "fix" other people. People in many places in America live with a fear of losing their children or getting sued and losing everything.
eweise•4m ago
When my child was an infant, my wife parked in a parking lot and starting chatting with a friend about 10 yards away. Minutes later a woman came by and starting claiming the child was not safe and was going to call protective services. This freaked both of us out that a stranger could potentially have the power to cause the government to become involved with our family. Fortunately, we didn't let that experience prevent us from letting our kids wander freely. But it does just take one over-concerned parent, to get you into trouble.