frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Waymo recalls 3,800 robotaxis after they drive into flood waters

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/waymo-recalls-3800-robotaxis-after-able-drive-into-standing-water.html
47•drob518•1h ago

Comments

Animats•1h ago
That's a tough problem - distinguishing wet pavement from deep water. Humans make that mistake frequently. Autonomous vehicles should probably be equipped with a water sensor. (We did that in our DARPA Grand Challenge vehicle back in 2005). Then they can enter water very cautiously and see if it's too deep. This may make them too cautious about shallow puddles on roads, though.
wombat-man•57m ago
If they have a laser measurement of the road from before, couldn't they see that the level of water vs the expected road surface?
AnimalMuppet•54m ago
If they have a pre-existing database of every road, sure. And if it's kept up-to-date at all times in all vehicles.
mortenjorck•44m ago
Isn’t that the Waymo data model, though? They extensively pre-drive every new market, building dense volumetric maps of the entire service area before they begin service, so they essentially do have that database of every road (that they drive on).
filoleg•16m ago
Granted, I am not sure exactly how Waymo operates, but I thought that the extensive testing was mostly for legal reasons+just handling edge cases.

I am saying this, because I noticed that they typically start with a low-tier restrictive permit to operate (with a rather small number of cars in the fleet). Then they run it for a year or two, iron out edge cases particular to a given city (e.g., climate particularities, crazy spaghetti junctions in ATL, etc.), and log a lot of data. Then they take that data, go to the city/state, say "we have all this data that demonstrates we were very above the board while running the test pilot program, we are safe, and now we want to expand out of a very limited test pilot program."

And then it either goes well (Bay Area, LA, etc.) or goes off the rails for other reasons (often failing earlier for entirely unexpected reasons, like the pushback against it from taxi driver unions in NYC).

My point being, I could be entirely wrong, but I don't think that they literally map every single inch of the road before being allowed to operate. I just don't see it as being possible in any large populated city, given how often things change there. Just in 3 years living at one apartment in Seattle, I had a road directly adjacent to me changed from 2-way to 1-way, and then had 3-4 lanes that were basically highway entrances/exits (a block away from me) created and the whole area being rerouted entirely.

tintor•49m ago
Such detailed database of fine grained road geometry gets stale very quickly, due to road maintenance and road construction. In US highway lanes are shifted sideways frequently.
dietr1ch•35m ago
But are they not continuously updating the road database with their fleet?
nomel•17m ago
For common routes, yes. For getting to John's house, where the path there sometimes floods, no.
kpw94•44m ago
That seems a very risky assumption for any car (self driving or human driver) during flash floods. "Turn around don't drown":

You think you know how deep it is under because you've taken that road many times before (or in your case you have historical laser measurement)

But you don't know:

- Maybe the road under fully collapsed

- Maybe the flow of water is extremely strong, so you need to accurately estimate that too.

OptionOfT•48m ago
Doesn't Land Rover historically have like a wading sensor?
drob518•44m ago
It’s a particularly hard problem in Texas. We get torrential rains and the landscape is relatively flat. Couple that with shallow soil over lots of limestone and it means flooding is really common. We also have roads that have a “low water crossing,” where a road crosses a creekbed that is normally dry but which will flood. There are often water depth signs there (basically a vertical ruler with feet marks so you can see where the water is up to). We lose people to this scenario (driving into flood waters) every year. It’s particularly problematic when it’s dark and you miss a warning sign. Before you know it, you’re in deep water and the flow can sweep the whole car downstream until it gets pinned against a tree, possibly with water forcing its way into the car.
mmooss•35m ago
> frequently

I've never made that mistake; I'm not aware of anyone I know doing it. I very rarely see it myself, except on news footage. Of course it happens some time somewhere but that says nothing about frequency.

> That's a tough problem

Not really. Don't drive where you don't know it's safe. Definitely don't drive into moving water - puddles only, and only if not too deep: I can usually figure it out based on the rest of the road - unless it's a sinkhole, the geometry is somewhat consistent - and especially by looking at objects in the water such as other cars driving through it. Sorry your friend isn't competent to figure it out.

People here are always quick to defend the autonomous cars, like a close friend. How often will we fall in love with a technology or company? It always distorts the truth.

amluto•33m ago
By a water sensor do you mean a sensor to detect the water level relative to the chassis? It seems like a very inexpensive downward-facing ultrasound sensor could work.
computomatic•18m ago
Is ultrasound less expensive than a moisture sensor?

The problem with both is they effectively require the vehicle to be in the water already. They need something that can tell depth before the vehicle has to slow down.

gib444•1h ago
This is ok though because humans drive into flood waters too.

Look, you can't make progress without getting your feet wet and then diving straight into the deep end.

foobazgt•19m ago
Maybe you drive into flood waters, but I don't. That's not a difficult skill to pull off.

We're still in the early days of self driving cars, and as much simulation and miles as they have, they're still constantly getting exposed to real world conditions that are new to them. The world is dynamic, so this will always remain true.

It remains to be seen where we'll converge on capability, incident rate, and acceptance.

bethekidyouwant•58m ago
What is a recall in this case? Is them getting a software update a recall now?
svachalek•53m ago
I think so. For some kind of legalese reasons that's generally what a Tesla "recall" amounts to these days.
superfrank•49m ago
They suspended service areas they deem high risk until the software update can be applied. So while, yes, it's just a software update, it's a recall in the sense that they've temporarily pulled all the cars off the road in certain areas
SpicyLemonZest•46m ago
Yes, this is a common terminology issue. "Recall" is legally defined in terms of the kind of problems that require one, not the solution to those problems, because the relevant regulations were written when there was no way to fix consumer products other than physically delivering them to the manufacturer or an authorized repair person.
srameshc•57m ago
Does anyone with a better understanding about LIDAR vs camera approach to autonomous drivng explain how would Tesla handle such situation ?
xnx•55m ago
Waymo has LIDAR and cameras, so it is better equipped for every situation.
lizardking•43m ago
Unless the power is out

https://abc7news.com/post/san-francisco-leaders-press-waymo-...

xnx•27m ago
Kind of unrelated. That issue was due to a misguided effort to be cautious by having vehicles requesting human-review when they didn't really need it. Waymo fixed the issue by allowing the vehicles to operate in their normal, independent, mode.
tintor•53m ago
LIDAR isn't helpful for water. Standing water behaves like a mirror on LIDAR.
throwway120385•48m ago
Could you use a different spectrum of EM radiation to detect water? There are parts of the microwave band that attenuate the signal by absorption and I wonder if you could use that. The only clue a human driver has in that situation is in the visible spectrum. The lines of the road disappear from view, which can be challenging to see at night.
amluto•32m ago
If the LIDAR can sense the road close enough to the front of the car, then it could estimate how far underwater the car is.
Desafinado•57m ago
FFS, can we just go back to talking to each other in person and driving our own vehicles? Where'd the 90s go?
Analemma_•54m ago
Just this morning I was almost killed twice on my bike ride to work by two separate drivers, one of whom looked to be 80 and could barely see over the dashboard, and one who was on their phone. I didn’t even bother trying to remember the plate numbers, knowing that the odds of any kind of consequences are absolute zero. No, we can’t go back to driving our own vehicles. Waymo everywhere and human driving outlawed, ASAP.
qwerpy•51m ago
Agree. Multiple people I know have bought Teslas because they don’t trust themselves or their spouses to drive safely, and want them to use FSD. There should be incentives to get people onto self driving.
mikem170•42m ago
If self-driving is better, then presumably cheaper insurance costs would be an incentive.
flextheruler•35m ago
Tesla cars are not capable of driving autonomously according to the company and regulators.
qwerpy•5m ago
My dad doesn't care what the regulatory definition is, he just presses "Start Self-Driving" and off he goes.
superfrank•47m ago
> can we just go back to talking to each other in person

He posts on an internet message board

vachina•43m ago
If the car drives itself we will have more time to talk to each other in person.
cryo32•34m ago
Or invest in public transport instead
xnx•56m ago
"recall" = applies software update
paconbork•27m ago
Gah, thanks for this. Thought I was used to that slight-of-hand but this one got me
fudged71•13m ago
Also I think it's wrong to call something a recall if it's not owned by customers. Waymo is a service.
jagged-chisel•13m ago
aw, I was having fun imagining 3,800 Johnny cabs just immediately changing route to go to headquarters.
dawnerd•9m ago
Recall makes for better headlines.
steele•36m ago
Go fish
moribvndvs•34m ago
Waymo: *locks doors, chorus to Floods by Pantera starts playing, guns it into the water*

“Wash away maaaaan, take him with the floooood”

sunrunner•27m ago
How about a Mastodon, Lamb of God take with Floods of Triton:

  Heap data upon this modern age
  All human drivers now phased away
  A lidar's glow, the soft wheel's echo
  Autonomous force of code remains
  
  We are last of the before rides
  Now hear the robot cars rise
  Hum into eternity
  Remember this, all roadways lead to the fleet
blueskies1029•27m ago
They are rolling these out in New Orleans soon. Standing water is everywhere, and sometimes you have big hidden potholes. You just need to know the roads. Should be fun.
robrain•27m ago
Article's current (possibly original), less ambiguous title: "Waymo recalls 3,800 robotaxis after glitch allowed some vehicles to ‘drive into standing water’"

IOW 3,800 Waymo vehicles aren't currently sat spinning their wheels in water.

giacomoforte•26m ago
LeCun is right.
alex1138•19m ago
About what
Zigurd•14m ago
It's an interesting case of whether it's possible to infer the condition of wading and avoid having to install a sensor specific to a one in a million trips circumstance.

The inference would come from standing water slowing down the vehicle and likely require steering correction, in combination with some machine vision for identifying standing water.

Then there's the advantage of being Google and having hundreds of thousands of people in the same area using Google maps and navigation. Accelerometers in phones can detect crashes pretty reliably. There's a good chance they can reliably detect deceleration from standing water and report the location of the hazard.

Project Gutenberg – keeps getting better

https://www.gutenberg.org/
398•JSeiko•3h ago•120 comments

A 0-click exploit chain for the Pixel 10

https://projectzero.google/2026/05/pixel-10-exploit.html
248•happyhardcore•5h ago•103 comments

Bun Rust rewrite: "codebase fails basic miri checks, allows for UB in safe rust"

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/issues/30719
219•ndiddy•2h ago•137 comments

I designed a nibble-oriented CPU in Verilog to build a scientific calculator

https://github.com/gdevic/FPGA-Calculator
40•gdevic•2h ago•4 comments

U.S. DOJ demands Apple and Google unmask over 100k users of car-tinkering app

https://macdailynews.com/2026/05/15/u-s-doj-demands-apple-and-google-unmask-over-100000-users-of-...
168•tencentshill•2h ago•86 comments

Image-blaster: Creates 3D environments, SFX, and meshes from a single image

https://github.com/neilsonnn/image-blaster
59•MattRogish•3h ago•11 comments

Show HN: Watch a neural net learn to play Snake

https://ppo.gradexp.xyz/
71•c1b•1d ago•16 comments

I built Zenith: a live local-first fixed viewport planetarium

https://smorgasb.org/zenith-tech/
51•surprisetalk•3h ago•7 comments

Explore Wikipedia Like a Windows XP Desktop

https://explorer.samismith.com/
419•smusamashah•10h ago•104 comments

O(x)Caml in Space

https://gazagnaire.org/blog/2026-05-14-borealis.html
202•yminsky•8h ago•49 comments

Hightouch (YC S19) Is Hiring

https://hightouch.com/careers
1•joshwget•2h ago

ASCII by Jason Scott

https://ascii.textfiles.com/
111•bookofjoe•5h ago•19 comments

Radicle: Sovereign {code forge} built on Git

https://radicle.dev/
175•KolmogorovComp•7h ago•46 comments

ABC News has taken all FiveThirtyEight articles offline

https://twitter.com/baseballot/status/2055309076209492208
34•cmsparks•31m ago•6 comments

High dimensional geometry is transforming the MRI industry (2017) [pdf]

https://www.ams.org/government/DonohoPresentation06-28-17Final.pdf
65•nill0•6h ago•25 comments

A new book on Steve Jobs at NeXT

https://spectrum.ieee.org/steve-jobs-next-computer
135•rbanffy•9h ago•117 comments

Feedr v0.8.0 – a TUI RSS reader, now read the full article from your terminal

https://github.com/bahdotsh/feedr
13•bahdotshxx•2h ago•4 comments

Amazon workers under pressure to up their AI usage are making up tasks

https://www.fastcompany.com/91541586/amazon-workers-pressured-to-up-ai-use-extraneous-tasks
253•hackernj•6h ago•251 comments

Show HN: Sx – an open-source package manager for AI skills, MCPs, and commands

https://github.com/sleuth-io/sx
18•detkin•2h ago•9 comments

Waymo recalls 3,800 robotaxis after they drive into flood waters

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/12/waymo-recalls-3800-robotaxis-after-able-drive-into-standing-water...
47•drob518•1h ago•49 comments

The nuclear-physics infrastructure behind PET scans

https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/1663/proton-power-for-public-health
6•LAsteNERD•2d ago•0 comments

A few words on DS4

https://antirez.com/news/165
403•caust1c•21h ago•169 comments

Ask HN: How to be SOC2 Type 2 compliant as a solo-entreprenuer?

99•sochix•12h ago•91 comments

Details of the Daring Airdrop at Tristan Da Cunha

https://www.tristandc.com/government/news-2026-05-11-airdrop.php
241•kspacewalk2•15h ago•90 comments

NanoTDB – Golang Append-Only Time Series DB

https://github.com/aymanhs/nanotdb
46•aymanhs72•9h ago•7 comments

First public macOS kernel memory corruption exploit on Apple M5

https://blog.calif.io/p/first-public-kernel-memory-corruption
428•quadrige•1d ago•122 comments

Building ML framework with Rust and Category Theory

https://hghalebi.github.io/category_theory_transformer_rs/
86•adamnemecek•1d ago•19 comments

Codex is now in the ChatGPT mobile app

https://openai.com/index/work-with-codex-from-anywhere/
451•mikeevans•23h ago•227 comments

New Nginx Exploit

https://github.com/DepthFirstDisclosures/Nginx-Rift
427•hetsaraiya•1d ago•97 comments

Gyroflow: Video stabilization using gyroscope data

https://github.com/gyroflow/gyroflow
150•nateb2022•3d ago•26 comments