I count myself to the pro crypto camp but some of this ask is inviting criminals more than supporting legitimate use.
photios•17m ago
> I'm pro-crypto camp, yet I misquote and post misleading titles about it.
What did he mean by this?
woah•24m ago
This is a heavily editorialized and misleading submission title. The only thing on this page that could be construed to have anything to do with the submission title is that this organization appears to be lobbying the EU not to make self-hosted wallets (where you control your own keys) illegal.
solumos•19m ago
I agree — I don’t see the connection between the items mentioned on the page and flat out AML/CTF evasion as the title suggests. If I’m wrong, someone please connect the dots.
seany•16m ago
To be fair ditching AML/CTF would be _good_, but that isn't what is going on in this article.
MASNeo•7m ago
That argument can well be made, given how (un) effective it is. But what would be the alternative?
MASNeo•11m ago
The concerning aspect is 1 of 6 objectives so it’s no minor goal. The transmission to self-hosted anonymous wallets is what makes crypto so effective for fraud, sanction evasion, money laundering and other crimes. It clearly fails FATF Recommendation 16 and virtually all KYC standards. Seeing Coinbase and a German exchange support such an objective is rather unexpected.
MASNeo•46m ago
photios•17m ago
What did he mean by this?