frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Building an HTML-first site doubled our users overnight

https://mohkohn.co.uk/writing/html-first/
414•edent•3h ago•175 comments

AMA: I'm Eric Ries (The Lean Startup) & Author of New Bestseller Incorruptible

84•eries•1h ago•55 comments

Apache Burr: Build reliable AI agents and applications

https://burr.apache.org/
24•anhldbk•48m ago•5 comments

Mercedes‑Benz starts large‑scale production of electric axial flux motor

https://media.mercedes-benz.com/en/article/bebac2af-acdc-465a-9538-adb0bf3d8ccf
342•raffael_de•8h ago•197 comments

PgDog is funded and coming to a database near you

https://pgdog.dev/blog/our-funding-announcement
96•levkk•1h ago•59 comments

All 9,300 Japanese train station, animated by the year it opened (1872–2026)

https://jivx.com/eki
92•momentmaker•3h ago•34 comments

macOS Container Machines

https://github.com/apple/container/blob/main/docs/container-machine.md
1030•timsneath•15h ago•358 comments

Claude Fable 5

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5
2461•Philpax•22h ago•1954 comments

Buy a train, bridge or tracks from the Swiss Railway

https://sbbresale.ch/
96•kisamoto•2d ago•51 comments

Who Runs Your Rust Future? Hands-On Intro to Async Rust

https://aibodh.com/posts/async-rust-chapter-1-hands-on-intro-to-async-rust/
52•febin•2d ago•5 comments

A €0.01 bank transfer could compromise a banking AI agent

https://blue41.com/blog/how-we-helped-bunq-secure-their-financial-ai-assistant/
47•tvissers•2h ago•23 comments

Smudging the game disc to make speedrunning 'SpongeBob' faster

https://www.inverse.com/input/gaming/the-dirty-secret-that-makes-speedrunning-on-spongebob-a-lot-...
9•pncnmnp•13h ago•2 comments

'They take you out of life, out of time': a journey into Spain's cave paintings

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/jun/02/journey-into-spain-palaeolithic-cave-paintings-al...
20•NaOH•1d ago•3 comments

AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models

295•TomAnthony•7h ago•184 comments

Reviving Papers with Code

https://paperswithcode.co/
132•nielz_r•2d ago•27 comments

The iPad was on Tailscale: a WebRTC debugging story

https://p2claw.com/blog/2026-06-09-the-ipad-was-on-tailscale/
6•syllogistic•36m ago•0 comments

Hacking for Defense Stanford 2026 – Lessons Learned Presentations

https://steveblank.com/2026/06/08/g-for-defense-stanford-2026-lessons-learned-presentations/
59•sblank•1d ago•30 comments

I Hate (Most) Keyboard 'Fn' Keys

https://danq.me/2026/06/09/fn-keys/
130•speckx•2h ago•136 comments

Upcoming breaking changes for npm v12

https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-09-upcoming-breaking-changes-for-npm-v12/
443•plasma•18h ago•180 comments

US Consumer Price Index up 4.2%

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
23•ortusdux•39m ago•3 comments

Magnetoelectric antennas could transform how underwater robots talk

https://newatlas.com/engineering/magnetoelectric-antennas-submarine-robots-communications/
55•breve•3d ago•23 comments

German ruling declares Google liable for false answers in AI Overviews

https://the-decoder.com/landmark-german-ruling-declares-googles-ai-overviews-are-googles-own-word...
832•ahlCVA•14h ago•465 comments

Rich Sutton on AI creativity and discovery

https://twitter.com/RichardSSutton/status/2061216087744946656
184•yimby•13h ago•94 comments

RIP software hackathons. Long live the hardware hackathon

https://blog.oscars.dev/posts/rip-software-hackathons-long-live-the-hardware-hackathon/
243•ozcap•17h ago•118 comments

Notes on DeepSeek

https://twitter.com/NikoMcCarty/status/2064686557400100884
57•vinhnx•1h ago•37 comments

Surprise, pay $1000

https://forestwalk.ai/blog/surprise-blacksmith-costs/
300•apike•17h ago•141 comments

Show HN: macOS menu bar gauges for your Claude Code quota

https://github.com/grzegorz-raczek-unit8/claude-quota
48•grzracz•6h ago•31 comments

What it feels like to work with Mythos

https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/what-it-feels-like-to-work-with-mythos
341•swolpers•22h ago•302 comments

Ultrafast machine learning on FPGAs via Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

https://aarushgupta.io/posts/kan-fpga/
267•ag2718•20h ago•45 comments

I thought I knew how electrolysis worked [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eq7fR9ISuCw
88•tambourine_man•5d ago•10 comments
Open in hackernews

Britain Became as Poor as Mississippi

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/07/uk-productivity-economy-reform-party/687303/
53•SanjayMehta•1h ago

Comments

inglor_cz•1h ago
Anecdotally, I meet some Polish returnees from the UK when I am in Poland.

You can often tell by something like a small Union Jack hanging by the checkout bar etc. (they seem to cherish the memories), and I like to ask them about their experience.

The consensus seems to be that it does not make sense to bear British costs of living for British wages anymore, and that the living standards have reached approximately the same level here at home.

Something very similar was said to me in 2023 by a youngish barista in Riga, Latvia.

gadders•57m ago
At a large company I know, offshored Polish developers now cost more than ones in the North of the UK. So I think Poland has come up as much as parts of the UK have gone down.
inglor_cz•50m ago
Oh yeah, Poland has grown tremendously. I still remember Poland at the end of the 1980s when the Jaruzelski junta relinquished power: poor, shabby, nothing in the shops, badly dressed people looking for oblivion in wodka wyborowa.

Nowadays it is an optimistic and rich country. A few weeks ago, I walked around Chalupki, a relatively unknown small Silesian town on the border. I noticed that most of the family houses just shone with new facades and generally had the "we are fairly wealthy" look; they could have stood in Switzerland. And you could find all sorts of high-brow food in the local Zabka store, like seven types of Kombucha.

ch4s3•1h ago
It's odd to me that there's only a passing mention in one paragraph about energy costs effecting places like Stoke-on-Trent, and dwelling on austerity as though government cuts caused industry to leave. England has the highest electricity prices in Europe and that is surely what has been driving industry out of the country in the last 30 years.
gadders•1h ago
Honestly at this point if we found out Ed Milliband was a Chinese/Russian agent trying to damage the UK economy I wouldn't be surprised.
fssys•1h ago
energy prices are firmly david camerons fault!
gadders•53m ago
He might have been a Net Zero nut, but I don't think he's the one stopping people fracking or drilling the North Sea. And it was Nick Clegg who said "no point building a new nuclear plant as it will take ten years to deliver"(about ten years ago).
fssys•36m ago
Im referring to brexit and to his "cut the green crap" which left us horribly exposed to energy price shocks caused by Putin. North sea barely has any gas left and is not economically viable. And yes as you have alluded, most of the NZ policies the rw populists are raging about were drafted years ago under the conservatives.
gadders•
applfanboysbgon•1h ago
> living standards fall well below Mississippi’s

GDP is not a measure of living standards. The NHS alone puts even the poorest Brit's living standards above Mississippi.

ReptileMan•1h ago
A lot of fellow Eastern Europeans travel back home to get medical care. This is good testament about the quality of care and personal in UK - since ours are like take out of a horror movie
f6v•1h ago
Eastern Europeans doing "medical tourism" is often powered by higher salaries in the West and lower living standards in the East. That's true not only for healthcare but for majority of services. You absolutely can get quality private care in the West - it's just much more expensive. The private care is also much less affordable for the locals in the East.
ReptileMan•51m ago
Since when is NHS private care?
Yizahi•21m ago
While true, isn't that a rich life benefit in general? E.g. Brits can choose (important hat they have options) to trade some time to get even cheaper and just as good healthcare services compared to Mississippians who don't have such an option at all. So an aggregated quality of life for Brits is even higher because of that.
jtbayly•
jmyeet•1h ago
So I've long had the theory that the primary cause of economic malaise is high housing prices. It makes labor more expensive. It makes everything more expensive. Treating houses as investments actually kills the economy.

I recently came across an actual economist who has been saying the exact same thing, which he calls the Housting Theory of Everything [1]. He has written a number of papers on this doing the math and has a bunch of videos around this topic.

For example, this gap with Missouri actually goes away when you consider purchasing power [2].

Fudge himself is a capitalist but he points out what I think a lot of capitalism defenders don't know, and that is that Adam Smith hated "rentiers", saying they got unearned income by essentially hoarding land. That's a problem we have now.

His theory uses a term he calls the "rentier black hole" [3] and the premise is essentially that the returns on property are too good such that it sucks away any investment on productive ventures. Instead of building a factory in Manchester, you park your money in Knightsbridge property. And that's where all the money is going. It increases the returns and sucks away all money.

[1]: https://henryfudgeofficial.substack.com/p/the-housing-theory...

[2]: https://www.tiktok.com/@henryfudgeofficial/video/76490164617...

[3]: https://www.tiktok.com/@henryfudgeofficial/video/76404878354...

applfanboysbgon•1h ago
I'm not at all convinced that reasonable housing prices are a magic bullet for the economy. Housing in Japan is treated as a depreciating asset rather than an investment and is dirt cheap (outside of the most desirable parts of Tokyo, of course, but even then it's a pittance compared like-for-like with, say, desirable parts of NYC), and Japan's economic stagnation for decades is nonetheless well-known; it could be the dictionary illustration for "economic malaise". Of course, reasonable housing policy should still be pursued... just with basic human living standards being the justification rather than "it'll make our economy numbers go up" justification.
alephnerd•59m ago
1. Both the US and the UK are large countries with significant federalism and devolved powers. I think subnational HDI is a better metric [0] instead of GDP per Capita.

Once you remove the outliers that are London and the Southeast (there isn't a similar subnational comparison that can be made within the US), developmental indicators between much of the US and the UK are the same.

2. After seeing the riots in Belfast last night where rioters specifically targeted and burned the homes of Black residents [1], I'd be inclined to agree that the United Kingdom does have some hallmarks of Mississippi, and in some sense is worse. We haven't had targeted race riots in the US for decades. The UK has had 3 in the last year.

[0] - https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/USA+GBR/?levels=1+...

[1] - https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cr47x99k5n6t?post=asset%3Ab5f8...

dofm•50m ago
Including that middle-aged white supremacist American citizens with money or power like Musk and Vance are actively using their media mouthpieces to stir the pot.

I mean, if the US argument is, as a friend, things are not working out well and they hope for better, that's one thing.

But actually prominent Americans are agitating for violence and backing extreme right-wing parties like Restore. It's appalling and it goes beyond unfriendliness to hostility.

(And do you really need targeted race riots when you can just sign up as police and kill Black people with impunity?)

theghostboi•13m ago
Well the thing is the US more or less has a larger diaspora population that became integrated and successful and actually had good social mobility regardless of background. The UK has a lot of areas where mobility has been rather difficult.

You look at every diaspora group and they have some level of success in reaching some good levels in business, politics, and culture. Even for groups that only arrived around 50 years ago they managed to become so ingrained into their communities that they pretty much can get respect.

swishbx•54m ago
GDP is a measure of economic output only. It doesn't say if that output is actually efficient or useful. For example, if everyone in a country is in perfect health, they might have a very small medical expenditure, which would negatively impact GDP.
lucasRW•51m ago
True of course, this is ONE indicator, but a key one, and what matters is not so much that the metric now matches Mississippi. It is that it used to match the wealthiest states in the US, and now it matches the poorest.

The metrics are similar for most of western europe, which objectively destroyed its economies over the past 30 years throught "social-democracy", 50% taxes, crazy state expenditures, bureaucracy, etc.

havblue•43m ago
The article never said poverty is only a function of gdp, so I'm not sure who your comment is directed to. The article discusses gdp per capita, the devaluation of the pound, declining wages and the decline of health care all in the free paragraphs. If those things go in the wrong direction you can indeed be as poor as Mississippi.
dofm•53m ago
I love the Atlantic but here we go again: Americans defining Britain in American terms as if they are the ineffable, indisputable default.

The USA, right now, is heading into its own Suez crisis, with a de facto king attacking its democracy, and literally cannot even organise a proper birthday party at the most prestigious address in the world.

The UK has many problems we must grapple with, but I think, maybe, right now is not the time to argue from a US default position. Not least while your three vice president ghouls (Musk, Vance and Rubio) are so loudly cheering for us and all of Europe to fail.

To quote your first king, clean up your own backyard.

lucasRW•46m ago
Musk, Vance and Rubio are cheering for Europe to wakeup. Quite the opposite of what you say.
dofm•23m ago
Explicit US foreign policy seeks to undermine the EU — literally meddling in favour of people who wish to see the EU federally weakened.

And Musk argues for violence, including at far-right rallies.

This is not some positive, friendly, brotherly call for us to wake up — it's an argument for white supremacy (as most recently outlined by Pete Hegseth, weekend TV anchor turned defence secretary).

pb7•38m ago
You have a literal king, so maybe you shouldn't criticize them lest the coppers show up at your doorstep. Our "king" was democratically elected and has so little power he can't even organize a birthday party as you say, let alone do anything else.
dofm•33m ago
blini-kot•49m ago
I can't really even be smug about the framing anymore, this is like a developer deflecting blame for a bug by saying "oh I don't know, it was cursor/claude"
fl4regun•48m ago
In spite of this, I think I'd rather live in the UK than in Mississipi.
CalRobert•45m ago
Is it possible that maybe Mississippi.... isn't terrible? I've never been there but is it just a given that it's a horrible place to live? I understand their schools have improved a good bit, at least. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Miracle
cyanydeez•43m ago
educating 10 years of children isn't going to erase generations of doing nothing.
glimshe•41m ago
Like most of the South, where I proudly live, it's a place where the poor and rich live very different lives. It has pretty bad places (just like the UK), but it has areas with great quality of life and is far from "horrible".
black6•39m ago
I've lived in Mississippi Hill Country, the Delta, and the Mississippi coast. The Delta is awful. Mechanization in farming and fleeing industry left the population behind to wither. North MS and the coast both have great things going for them and are relatively nice places to live, especially when cost of living is taken into account.
alephnerd•39m ago
> Is it possible that maybe Mississippi.... isn't terrible

Pretty much. Mississippi does have significant issues (it's HDI [0] is significantly lower than anywhere else in the UK or US), but is comparable to peers in Metropolitan France [1] like Normandy and Italy [2]. Basically, not great but also not some third world despair of darkness.

Most likely, if a deeper subnational analysis was done of Mississippi, there would be a stark difference in HDIs between the unindustrialized Delta and industrialized North and Gulf Coast.

That said, at least it's been decades since Mississippi has seen a race riot where rioters were purposely burning black people's houses like what we saw in Belfast last night [3].

Plenty of Brits need to do some soul searching. There's a reason why even despite Trump, everyone who is eligible for an O1 tries to come to the US over London. Comparing the UK with Mississippi based on GDP per Capita is facetious, but the UK is similar to Mississippi in many other ways.

[0] - https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/USA+GBR/?levels=1+...

[1] - https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/FRA/?levels=1+4&ye...

[2] - https://globaldatalab.org/shdi/table/shdi/ITA/?levels=1+4&ye...

[3] - https://time.com/article/2026/06/10/belfast-protests-erupt-k...

27m ago
Oil companies seem awfully keen to drill in somewhere that is not economically viable. Net Zero has left us more exposed to Putin, not less as we don't produce much of our own energy and are in fact buying Russian oil via India, rather than drilling out our own.
roryirvine•12m ago
If Clegg erred, it was by being overly optimistic.

Approval for Hinkley Point C was indeed granted ten years ago but it has not, in fact, delivered. Unit 1 is currently estimated to begin production in 2030 at the earliest.

If the projected £48bn cost had instead been invested in building out new wind and solar projects, they'd be online now and would already be producing more electricity than HPC ever will, even when taking the differences in average capacity factor into account.

gadders•10m ago
...when it is sunny and windy.

I honestly don't know why anyone is arguing against nuclear at this point.

kergonath•53m ago
Sorry, when was Ed Milliband in power again?
gadders•47m ago
Oh look: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/ed-miliband

"Ed Miliband was appointed Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero on 5 July 2024. He was elected MP for Doncaster North in May 2005."

spacedcowboy•16m ago
Ed Milliband for PM!

He's about the only one of the lot of them that actually understands that the point of being in power is to change things for the better. He's done an absolutely smashing job with energy, and I'd love him to get the opportunity to do the same sort of real improvements on the rest of the economy.

gadders•8m ago
Is this satire? We have steel plants and potteries closing down because they can't afford to be run due to energy prices.

But that's OK because we can import from China or wherever and it counts against their (dirtier) emissions than ours.

1h ago
Both GDP and living standards are discussed in the article. The NHS is addressed near the beginning as proof of the deteriorating condition of living standards. 1/10th of the population are on a waiting list for care. 1/10th have done DIY dental work.

You're right that GDP is not a measure of living standards. But neither is saying "NHS" a measure of living standards. Do you actually have a measure you could refer to in order to prove the article wrong?

bonzini•1h ago
Considering Mississippi has 7-8 years less of life expectancy than the UK, the onus of proving who has better healthcare is probably not on the Brits.
thatguy0900•1h ago
I don't think it's a matter of better or worse quality, the Healthcare being expensive and for profit in Mississippi leads to people just not going to the doctor at all
bonzini•22m ago
What matters is the outcomes. If nobody is able to use a world-class healthcare system (for whatever reason, could be affordability as in the US or availability as in the UK), then as a whole it's as good as no healthcare.
bborud•56m ago
To be fair, meaningful changes to life expectancy numbers tend to take longer to manifest.

For instance, if you cut preventive healthcare for younger parts of the population that will take longer to manifest.

I wish there were more modeling tools available to run what-if simulations on public data.

pb7•55m ago
It's because Mississippi is the second most obese state at 40% of the pop. Healthcare can't fix that.
bonzini•48m ago
Preventative interventions can; preventing obesity falls under the purview of healthcare departments like the NHS.

But neither private insurance nor hospitals have any incentive to operate preventatively because insurance can just increase premiums and everybody happily makes more money... Some might observe how that also increases the GDP...

georgeecollins•48m ago
Eli Lilly may have a different point of view on that!
readthenotes1•16m ago
Actual health care can fix obesity.

The USA doesn't do much of that though. It prefers medical care.

(E.g., adding a dose-dependent sin tax on food-like substances with added sugar, subsidizing real food for those on SNAP. Unpopular because who doesn't want their simple carbs?)

codeduck•1h ago
The unfortunate thing is though that general medical care under the NHS is a complete postcode lottery - if you're lucky enough to be registered with a decent practice you're okay, if you're not you're screwed.

On the other hand, emergency medicine through the NHS is probably just about the best you can get. I cannot sing its praises highly enough.

tajd•49m ago
Yes, cannot say highly enough of the emergency medicine. Timely and effective.
ch4s3•1h ago
I wouldn't be so sure about that. The article outlines how hard it is to get dental care in the UK, which just isn't going to be as difficult in Mississippi. Mississippi's Medicaid covers emergency dental care so it's available, you just probably have to drive, but that's true of most things in most of the US. The real healthcare issue in Mississippi is the shortage of providers, which is also an issue in most of the UK.
NopIdoN•51m ago
Emergency dental treatment is available in the UK "within 24 hours or 7 days, depending on your symptoms."

https://www.nhs.uk/nhs-services/dentists/how-to-find-an-nhs-...

ch4s3•39m ago
The article outline that 1 in 10 people in the UK have done DIY emergency dental care, wich suggests strongly that the availability is less good than advertised. In fact a large portion of the article is about growing NHS wait times.
spacedcowboy•25m ago
I know about 6-700 people over here in the UK, I live in a poor-ish Northern town and I don't know a single person who's done "DIY dental care". Not one.

Now 600 people is a lot smaller than 60 million, I don't doubt there are people who have pulled a tooth out, but to get those sorts of figures, you'd have to count all the kids who pull out a tooth with a bit of string to get £1 from the tooth fairy.

ch4s3•12m ago
I didn't write the article. But it would be similar to me saying that everyone I know in the US has access to pretty good healthcare.
greggoB•1h ago
This comparison of the large Western European economies (most frequently Germany) to America's poorest state based on GDP-per-capita is all the rage on the US right at the moment.

It's an eye-catcher, but obviously fallacious - the usual counter has been to point out the life expectancy difference of 10+ years.

Not that most people are particularly interested in nuance, smh

BoggleOhYeah•55m ago
Some people are just all-in on the moronic MAGA nationalism and refuse to earnestly engage with critiques of the US. America is always better than Europe, even when it's not.
CalRobert•53m ago
Life expectancy is complex and there's more to it than healthcare. Certainly habits, exercise, diet, etc. are a big part of it as well.
Yizahi•26m ago
Like allowing to spray lead from airplane exhaust over the populated areas, right? Oh wait...
pb7•45m ago
The gap is nowhere near that large when controlling for the difference in demographics. Despite that, America is undeniably obese which is easily the largest factor contributing to life expectancy.
roryirvine•24m ago
A comparison between the quality of life of someone on median income in Mississippi vs the equivalent in the UK / Germany / France would be an extremely effective counter, too.
indoordin0saur•58m ago
> GDP is not a measure of living standards.

An even stronger case is pointing out that Japan has a lower GDP per capita than Mississippi. But walk around Japan and try to claim that it's "poorer" than even a wealthy state in the US.

ecshafer•52m ago
Japan has less trading houses at increasingly high valuations to pump up their GDP.
paytonjjones•49m ago
> walk around Japan

Ok and then go into the average person's living quarters.

There are many non-trivial differences that make these comparisons complex; GDP is about as good as you can get.

inigyou•39m ago
GDP is one of the most meaningless ways to compare the standard of living in two countries. It can only compare their financial position and it's questionably good at that.
Macha•48m ago
Tokyo and Kansai, sure. But a lot of rural Japan is pretty clearly in line with rural US states.
Yizahi•28m ago
So the same quality and reach of the public transit in rural Japan and rural USA? The same percentage of net income spent on the similar healthcare procedures in rural Japan and rural USA? The same quality and percentage of net income spent on the education in rural Japan and rural USA? I have doubts.
this_user•57m ago
Maybe should actually read the article.

> The National Health Service, the celebrated pillar of the British cradle-to-grave welfare state, has a backlog of 6 million patients—almost a tenth of the population—waiting for treatment. The health service now has to spend more money settling maternity-malpractice claims than it does on actually providing maternity care. Many Brits can neither obtain an appointment with a publicly funded dentist nor afford a private one; in a 2023 survey, one in 10 reported doing DIY dental work, in extreme cases extracting their own teeth or gluing broken crowns back together.

applfanboysbgon•56m ago
It is paywalled. I only had access to the first two paragraphs. Regardless, that description changes nothing. "The NHS is overburdened" is a problem, but it is still better than not having the NHS at all.
cyberpunk•53m ago
https://archive.ph/FMSfO
OtherShrezzing•45m ago
>The health service now has to spend more money settling maternity-malpractice claims than it does on actually providing maternity care

This figure is from an article in the Times, and has no connection to official NHS figures. The Times just guessed how much it might be, and reported it as fact. Then, since The Times is a paper of record, other news outlets have run with it.

dofm•42m ago
That article fails to note that the USA lags behind the UK in global rankings of overall dental health. We are either joint fourth (Sweden) or fifth; the USA is ninth.

NHS dentists are scarce for policy reasons that are inexcusible. But private dental care here is not actually particularly expensive unless you want it to be, and it is good.

(Again, don't imagine that "private healthcare" in the UK is expensive in the way it is in the USA).

We have our problems and they are escalating in some ways, but my main issue with this article is that again US writers tend to assume that words and terminology have their US meaning and broader connotations.

Standard of living comparisons that use US concepts (car ownership, air conditioning ownership, even in the recent past comparing how many people dry their clothes outdoors, which is common American poverty indicator) just cannot capture the nuance in a way that makes sense.

grey-area•53m ago
To make it worse, this is gdp per capita, a pretty worthless statistic. Someone else below points out the comparison with Japan.
lucasRW•47m ago
It's fascinating to see to what lengths people will go to maintain their denial.

As someone who has been in and out, the poverty increase in Western Europe is astonishing. Whatever metrics I will show you, will meet something like "oh yeah but metrics X doesn't mean anything", but still, 20y ago buying a car was fairly standard. Going on holidays same. Let's not talk about buying a house. Nowadays, any of the above is considered as a sign of being "privileged", while it used to be middle-class before.

inigyou•37m ago
The same in the USA. The other day I saw someone claim that people have it better now because they have more phones and TVs, and that's good even though they can't get cars and houses.
jmyeet•51m ago
Japan's economic malaise is a big topic that's mostly driven now by a rapidly aging population. Why is it aging? Low fertility rates [1]. So why are fertility rates so low? It kind of started with the housing bubble in the 1980s that created a youth unemployment crisis (ie hikikomori), which has now come to the West where we now have a youth unemployment crisis (and thus NEETs). I found this [2]:

> Japan made the same discovery thirty years earlier. The hikikomori phenomenon (young men, predominantly, who withdraw from social life entirely, sometimes for decades) emerged in the 1990s, after Japan’s asset bubble burst and the lifetime employment compact dissolved. The cultural commentary at the time, both Japanese and Western, framed it as a peculiarly Japanese pathology, something about shame and conformity and the pressure-cooker school system. This was wrong. It was a structural response to the closure of the productive ladder, and it has now appeared in every developed economy that has reproduced the same structural conditions.

It's worth noting that the US fertility rate is alos below replacement levels (~1.54) but the only thing that props up our population is immigration. Japan eschews immigration as a de facto ethnostate. South Korea is further along in that crisis. China will need to find a solution too.

But there are cultural reasons here too. Japanese work culture, pay relative to work, etc.

[1]: https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/jpn/jap...

[2]: https://henryfudgeofficial.substack.com/p/degeneracy-is-a-sy...

applfanboysbgon•43m ago
Hikikomori are ~0.5% of the population according to a 2015 government survey's estimate. Blaiming fertility rates, a youth unemployment crisis, and economic stagnation on NEETs is literally insane. [2] is a completely LLM-generated blog post. Your pet theories about how economies work should probably be grounded in more than 5 minutes of taking whatever bullshit you read on the internet as truth.
win311fwg•20m ago
While the official youth unemployment rate in Niger is something like 0.5%, that includes things that wouldn't count by western standards (e.g. sustenance farming). The youth unemployment rate there, by how we measure it, is more like 50%. To call the situation in Japan or the USA a crisis compared to that is laughable. Yet they have a fertility rate of ~6 births per woman. You've come up with a fun theory, but it clearly doesn't work.

Fertility is on the decline, particularly in the west, although increasingly spreading, quite simply because it is socially unacceptable to have children. Society says you need to focus on your career instead. It creates TV shows, like "16 and Pregnant", designed to dissuade viewers from having children. So on and so forth. Social pressure is a powerful drug.

In fact, the pocket communities where certain religions that push a 'make babies' agenda are commonly observed, where the social pressure goes in the other direction, we find many families pumping out kids like there is no tomorrow. Social pressure works both ways, but the "having kids is cool" is not the prevailing social wind.

littlexsparkee•51m ago
High housing prices will kill a good economy but having moderate rents will not somehow jumpstart a bad economy. JP's slump isn't evidence against housing theory of everything.
indoordin0saur•51m ago
Japan makes me feel very confused about what economic statistics actually mean. People have great housing, beautiful and safe neighborhoods, ample access to the world's best transit, tons of entertainment and cultural products to access, excellent education and one of the longest life expectancies. Sure, they maybe have some minor problems. But I suspect that if an alien came down to Earth, toured all the countries and then was asked to rank which ones it thought were the richest without looking up economic stats I'd expect it would rank Japan near the top.
jeffbee•42m ago
Japan's "malaise" is fiscal, an outcome of one way to analyze the public balance sheet. Japan's standards of living remain exceptionally high.
applfanboysbgon•39m ago
I do agree. I'm actually of the opinion that the economy is in generally good shape and that "number go up" should not be the end goal. It is abundantly clear that real living standards on the ground are completely divorced from the obsession with infinite growth.
win311fwg•40m ago
> Treating houses as investments actually kills the economy.

Failure is always a possibility, but historically it hasn't killed the economy, it has rebalanced the economy; seeing businesses and people reduce their concentration in a specific area as they fan out into lower cost areas. Which is a rather useful function. This is why we're not all living in one giant heap somewhere in Africa.

alephnerd•8m ago
That does not justify a pogrom and collective punishment.
> so maybe you shouldn't criticize them lest the coppers show up at your doorstep.

Not sure what you imagine the UK is like but we literally don't have lèse majesté laws, so there is no legal basis for that to happen. It does not happen. (And no, merely saying it online isn't a basis either).

Apart from stupid comedy overreactions at the coronation protests that exasperated us all and saw significant pushback (our police lean so firmly against use of force at protests that they sometimes do silly things in the name of stopping "disruption"), we have a rich, varied, centuries-long tradition of being able to soundly criticise our monarchy.

Indeed we did so with such efficiency recently that our king actually listened and took his own brother's title, powers and roles away.

Meanwhile there are people in the USA fighting lawsuits over being falsely imprisoned for saying true things about Charlie Kirk.

codeduck•20m ago
You're arguing with people who don't understand the word Parliament in the term "Parliamentary Democracy". Just nod, tut, and move on, it will be better for your mental health.
dofm•11m ago
Funnily enough I am OK about this stuff, these days.

It would be absurd to pretend that we don't have problems; we obviously have problems. And things are extremely bad right now, especially with our former transatlantic friends actively agitating the situation.

But internationally it has got a lot easier to see our problems with clarity in the last year and a half, and a lot easier to argue that every significant country has its difficulties.

havblue•36m ago
I doubt there are many people at the Atlantic who voted for Trump and the author has worked for the Economist before. So I'm not sure what you're asking for, unless you're saying he should move back to London if he's to write about the UK.
dofm•28m ago
Ahh well if he worked for the Economist that explains it. Sorry, I didn't realise.

I didn't suggest that Trump voting was the problem. Americans of literally all political persuasions have simply no idea how this country actually works. There is a level of ignorance that is often comical.

The reverse is not true in quite the same way. If you were to ask an American to name UK political figures, most cannot. Whereas our coverage of your political system is such that anyone with a passing interest in politics can _really_ get into it on US politics; it's a very asymmmetric experience that is hard to explain.

pb7•19m ago
>Whereas our coverage of your political system is such that anyone with a passing interest in politics can _really_ get into it on US politics; it's a very asymmmetric experience that is hard to explain.

I don't share your enthusiasm in this being a good thing. In fact, this is a common problem I've noticed over the last decade in that Europeans feel like they know the US and are qualified to comment on issues by virtue of consuming movies and political media of a certain spin (like all media). You are simply consuming someone's opinion with little to no opportunity to validate it against day to day life.

dofm•7m ago
Oh I don't think it is a good thing, at all.

But this time round in particular, it is absolutely a thing. People in Denmark, for example, have no choice but to understand at some level the internal cabinet politics of the USA. Because they need to know, when JD Vance turns up, who is he actually talking for? What does it mean if he refuses to rule something out? What real power is there in his confidence?

It's the same as needing to know, if Biden offered something, what was the likelihood of it simply being torn up by a returning Trump.

The asymmetry comes from scale: the UK and individual EU countries needed to know a lot more about the internal directions of a country six times our size, because those internal directions will very much affect us.

It is changing, because the EU is finding its collective voice this time round, whereas in Trump 1 they still had to worry that individual countries might not wish to follow a party line. Now everyone understands the stakes of not having an aligned voice, and the UK is in a position to at least sing the harmony.

indiangenz•29m ago
UK!! where tweeting the "wrong" thing gets you longer prison sentences than violent criminals.
dofm•27m ago
It really does not. Honestly, seriously, really does not. There is such a profound international misunderstanding of the law here and what people who actually see prison time for online comments have to have done to get there.

Inciting violence online is taken really seriously. Unless it's Elon Musk where we appear to be powerless.

spacedcowboy•15m ago
As opposed to the USA, where having the wrong skin colour gets murdered by police, or shipped off to another country's jail even if you're a citizen.

I'm a dual citizen. I choose to live in the UK.