frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Epic Games announces Lore version control system

https://lore.org/
356•regnerba•2h ago•180 comments

Want your images back? Sure... That'll be $5!

https://www.lutr.dev/want-your-images-back-sure-that-ll-be-5-dollars
448•lutr•3h ago•190 comments

Volkswagen started blocking GrapheneOS users

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/35949-volkswagen-app?page=3
144•microtonal•1h ago•79 comments

French physicist and media star loses doctorate after plagiarism investigation

https://www.science.org/content/article/french-physicist-and-media-star-loses-doctorate-after-pla...
44•bookofjoe•1h ago•27 comments

GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/glm-5-2-is-the-new-leading-open-weights-model-on-the-artif...
547•himata4113•7h ago•294 comments

Launch HN: Adam (YC W25) – Open-Source AI CAD

https://github.com/Adam-CAD/CADAM
18•zachdive•26m ago•2 comments

Sixty percent of US consumers say 'AI' in brand messaging is a turnoff

https://wpvip.com/future-of-the-web-2026/
671•thm•4h ago•367 comments

RFC 10008: The new HTTP Query Method

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc10008/
189•schappim•5h ago•87 comments

Agentic coding deserves more than a chat box bolted onto VS Code

https://github.com/evanklem/polypore
22•evanklem2004•1h ago•9 comments

MicroUI – A tiny, portable, immediate-mode UI library written in ANSI C

https://github.com/rxi/microui
96•peter_d_sherman•4h ago•34 comments

Hacker News but for Independent Blogs

https://bubbles.town/
364•headalgorithm•8h ago•119 comments

Show HN: Inkwash, a watercolor sketching app and explanation

https://johnowhitaker.github.io/inkwash/about
66•Yenrabbit•3d ago•15 comments

AI demands more engineering discipline. Not less

https://charitydotwtf.substack.com/p/ai-demands-more-engineering-discipline
125•BerislavLopac•2h ago•44 comments

GrapheneOS has been ported to Android 17

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/36469-grapheneos-has-been-ported-to-android-17-and-official-rele...
947•Cider9986•20h ago•505 comments

Running local models is good now

https://vickiboykis.com/2026/06/15/running-local-models-is-good-now/
1485•jfb•1d ago•566 comments

Image Compression

https://www.makingsoftware.com/chapters/image-compression
71•vinhnx•3d ago•8 comments

Why stdx is not on crates.io

https://kerkour.com/stdx-cratesio
38•Keyb0ardWarri0r•1h ago•35 comments

Show HN: High-Res Neural Cellular Automata

https://cells2pixels.github.io/
147•esychology•7h ago•37 comments

Abandoned and Little-Known Airfields

https://airfields-freeman.com/
108•wizardforhire•2d ago•24 comments

Open-source React UI and D-pad focus engine for Meta Ray-Ban Display

https://glasskit.app/ui
7•Jeries•2d ago•2 comments

Why thinking out loud with someone beats thinking alone

https://www.thesignalist.io/s/the-dialogue-dividend/
20•kodesko•3h ago•4 comments

The Rise and (Potential) Fall of Letterboxd

https://www.statsignificant.com/p/the-rise-and-potential-fall-of-letterboxd
23•speckx•1w ago•9 comments

GLM 5.2 Performance Benchmarks

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/glm-5-2
110•theanonymousone•9h ago•37 comments

Show HN: Capacitor Alarm Clock

https://github.com/ArcaEge/capacitor-alarm-clock
109•arcaege•3d ago•33 comments

Pentagon boasts of using AI to write reports mandated by Congress (1.5mil users)

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/06/pentagon-boasts-of-using-ai-to-write-reports-mandated-by-congr...
45•FrustratedMonky•2h ago•30 comments

Map Clustering Is Not My Favorite

https://blog.greg.technology/2026/06/12/map-clustering-is-not-my-favorite.html
96•gregsadetsky•4d ago•35 comments

Subterranean fungi networks more than 100 quadrillion km in length

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/jun/11/arbuscular-mycorrhizal-fungi-plant-life-climate-g...
148•tosh•5d ago•36 comments

Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

https://mll.sh/humiliating-iis-servers-for-fun-and-jail-time/
338•denysvitali•17h ago•82 comments

TIL: You can make HTTP requests without curl using Bash /dev/TCP

https://mareksuppa.com/til/bash-dev-tcp-http-without-curl/
511•mrshu•23h ago•221 comments

Show HN: I built 184 free browser tools – PDF, image, dev, AI tasks, no upload

https://brevio.pro
70•ruimbarreira•6h ago•16 comments
Open in hackernews

ICE Appears to Be Buying Immigrants' Tax Identifiers from a Data Broker

https://www.404media.co/ice-appears-to-be-buying-immigrants-tax-identifiers-from-a-data-broker/
104•ilreb•2h ago

Comments

Simulacra•1h ago
So much is available via the data brokers, for companies, governments, really anyone. Maybe this will lead to greater privacy across the board against these brokers.
claaams•1h ago
It's been like this for a long time and nothing has changed. In fact I would argue that consumer and citizen privacy has gotten much, much worse. It is extremely wishful thinking (in typical hackernews commenter fashion) that the "free" market will generate consumer protections.
frankharv•51m ago
Surveillance Capitalism is an apt description.

No one voted for it but here we are. Flock on every strategic corner.

SilverElfin•1h ago
The government should not be able to outsource things they cannot do themselves. This is a loophole in our laws.
delichon•1h ago
They shouldn't buy socks for the army, they should make the socks themselves?
pavel_lishin•1h ago
Can't buy the wool second-hand, gotta have government-owned sheep.
Albatross9237•1h ago
Thankfully, the pentagon should already have some sheep specs on hand
throwway120385•1h ago
I believe that's covered under MIL-SPEC-M00-BAAA
Brendinooo•1h ago
Has the army been restricted from making socks?
rlt•1h ago
I believe the original commenter meant "The government should not be able to outsource things they are not allowed to do themselves."
nilamo•27m ago
Buying, making, and owning socks are not against the law in the usa, so socks are already compliant with the suggestion.
fhdkweig•1h ago
Creating chilling effects of registering to pay taxes. What could possibly go wrong?
SilasX•1h ago
I mean, this has long been a loophole in US law. Generally, you can't be compelled to testify against yourself (5th Amendment). But when it comes to taxes:

1) You have to declare all income, even from illegal activities.

2) The declarations can be used against you in court (IIUIC with the caveat that they need an independent reason to get a warrant for those tax records).

eschulz•1h ago
What are some data erase service(s) that you guys recommend?
kgwxd•1h ago
Just tell Siri "Erase all pictures of Ron!"
frankharv•1h ago
Surely you are joking.

Once collected why would a data broker want to purge your record?

There is no escape.

morkalork•59m ago
Residents of California have the right to opt out, no?
runako•46m ago
In theory, they also don't get spam calls.
frankharv•44m ago
Opt out from snake oil salesmen.

Yea sure. If it helps you sleep better. It is the law.

In reality the data is already 'grey market' so I doubt the law matters to them.

Disappear and new data broker sets up shop. You think these people are regulated? I bet they swap datasets like Pokemon.

yabones•59m ago
msie•1h ago
ICE funding was boosted by billions of dollars. The supposed loss of jobs and services by illegal immigrants is easily surpassed by governmental waste.
shevy-java•1h ago
ICE reminds me of what I read about the 1930s era - but it is really stupid on top of that. So basically this then screams of a money machinery for a few. Taxpayers money goes into private pockets here, all under the disguise of "EVIL MIGRANTS".
wat10000•1h ago
The 1930s stuff was really stupid as well.
noman-land•59m ago
Does anyone know where your average citizen can buy this data?
diebillionaires•27m ago
This was covered in NOH's data broker article. But mostly Snowflake or AWS.

https://nooneshappy.com/article/data-brokers-unregulated-for...

dwa3592•39m ago
Why is this data even being allowed to sell? Isn't this private data? Okay, i understand selling users data is pretty common here but i thought it was limited to "someone liking icecream or someone liking ford better than honda". but legally selling tax identifiers seems too much!
frankharv•29m ago
It should not be sold. But it is.

https://epic.org/issues/consumer-privacy/data-brokers/

Consumers are the product.

MikePlacid•18m ago
Could not gisagree more. Nobody can harm me much by knowing my ITIN. But government surely can torture me in prison by depriving me of my favorite ice cream brand. I have a right to keep it private!
Cider9986•13m ago
Our voting records and DMV records are also often sold by your state or even local city government.
dkobia•36m ago
The open secret here is that we have a system that collects billions (~$100 billion annually[1]) in unclaimable taxes while keeping the labor force just vulnerable enough to stay cheap. That said, ICE's actions seem like self sabotage.

[1] https://itep.org/undocumented-immigrants-taxes-2024/

Danox•29m ago
Stereotype says Immigrants don't pay taxes?
Cider9986•15m ago
This is the bill that would stop this from happening, conveniently the rep who proposed it was voted out in the republican primary by a 10% margin, rip: https://www.surveillanceaccountability.com/
pavel_lishin•1h ago
Wouldn't that just lead to a whole parallel economy of government-owned infrastructure & manufacturing?
dheera•1h ago
Not a bad thing at all.

When the government buys a piece of steel, a chunk of that is property taxes of the owner of the factory building, a huge chunk of that is business taxes, a huge chunk of that is income taxes of the workers that work there.

If the government can own that infrastructure as a fully nonprofit entity that pays zero taxes, the government can buy the steel for $50 instead of $100. That means our income taxes can also be much lower, because the government can be more efficient.

Right now a huge chunk of the taxes you pay to the government go toward paying second-order taxes.

pavel_lishin•1h ago
Would the government be buying that steel, if they own the infrastructure for it? When I grab a cucumber from my garden, I'm not exactly paying myself for it.

And the property, business and income taxes still need to get paid.

dheera•1h ago
That's the point. Instead of buying it, they can just have it. By $50 I meant that they're buying everything at-cost internally. Only $50 of taxpayer money is needed to procure that steel, instead of $100.

> And the property, business and income taxes still need to get paid.

Not if the government owns it and they decide it's tax exempt. They can also build it on government land, and decide that government land is property tax free.

ajju•1h ago
Buying state owned enterprises and running them more efficiently to double their valuation (or more) has been a reliably profitable business in many countries. This suggests to me that government bureaucracy, lack of accountability etc. could result in “at cost” trending to $100 or more if government buys private companies, or starting close to $100 if government starts a new one.
kevin_thibedeau•1h ago
This scheme didn't pan out for the Soviets.
derf_•37m ago
> ... the government can buy the steel for $50 instead of $100.

And also lose $50 of tax revenue. I do not see how the government is any better off here.

undersuit•25m ago
$50 of gross revenue discounted is not $50 of tax revenue lost.
wat10000•1h ago
I don't think they mean "cannot do" as in "don't have the capability." But rather "cannot do" as in "are not allowed to do." If the government can't (is not allowed to) surveil me without a warrant, it shouldn't be able to (be allowed to) buy surveillance of me from a private party either.
pavel_lishin•2m ago
Ah, ok, I wildly misread/misunderstood that. Thanks!
pixel_popping•1h ago
Could they do CPU chips?
estearum•1h ago
We already have a tool for dealing with this as it pertains to cell tower data.

SCOTUS determined that merely having a cellphone, which is a modern necessity, creates too much privately held data that the telcos shouldn't be allowed, even when they want to, to hand it over to the government without a warrant.

Basically all we have to do is expand the types of data that land in this zone.

While there might be some benefit, most of them are snakeoil. Effectively they're just sending polite emails to "people search" websites to remove you from search results. The real, very harmful, data brokers are background check systems (LexisNexis), credit bureaus (Equifax), and insurance industry registries, which there is effectively no way to opt-out short of faking your death.
Cider9986•30m ago
Harm depends on your threat model. For a streamer wanting to avoid being swatted then the typical data broker removal service could be quite helpful. I agree a big part of the problem is lack of understanding that the removal services only work at one layer.

There's probably even more than these, but here are some from the video: Healthcare data brokers, fraud data brokers, financial data brokers, marketing data brokers, people search data brokers.

Good video explaining the situation with data brokers and the removal services: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX3JT6q3AxA

diebillionaires•26m ago
Opt outs don't even exist at the top level, only on the people search ones utilizing the data.
Cider9986•17m ago
Manually opting out is probably the most effective, but obviously it's manual. Privacy guides recommends EasyOptOuts as the only paid service and manual and Google's tool for free methods.

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/data-broker-removals

pimterry•3m ago
Never used them, but I ran into https://incogni.com/ yesterday.

It's a paid service, they track data brokers datasets (I assume they just act as a buyer for as many as they can) and then manually request your removal from all of them, and then aggressively follow up and chase it for you. Interesting business model, even if it's annoying that the world means you need it.