frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

A 3D voxel game engine written in APL

https://github.com/namgyaaal/avoxelgame
18•sph•39m ago•3 comments

Developers don't understand CORS (2019)

https://fosterelli.co/developers-dont-understand-cors
172•toilet•7h ago•83 comments

Zigzag Decoding with AVX-512

https://zeux.io/2026/06/17/zigzag-decoding-avx512/
62•luu•3d ago•4 comments

Loupe – A iOS app that raises awareness about what native apps can see

https://github.com/mysk-research/loupe
262•Cider9986•20h ago•84 comments

Renting a sewing machine from the library

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20260618-the-weird-and-wonderful-libraries-of-finland
218•sohkamyung•9h ago•109 comments

Epoll vs. io_uring in Linux

https://sibexi.co/posts/epoll-vs-io_uring/
142•Sibexico•9h ago•37 comments

Public Service Announcement: Don't Say You Use AI for Writing

https://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/488148
31•satisfice•3h ago•14 comments

Slow breathing modulates brain function and risk behavior

https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(26)00339-9
180•croes•10h ago•38 comments

Show HN: TownSquare, a tiny presence layer for websites

https://townsquare.cauenapier.com/
160•cauenapier•20h ago•83 comments

Building reliable agentic AI systems

https://martinfowler.com/articles/reliable-llm-bayer.html
82•sarangk90•4h ago•19 comments

15-minute at-home Lyme disease tick test

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/06/17/business/lyme-disease-tick-test/
101•bookofjoe•2d ago•50 comments

The 100k Whys of AI

https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/the-100000-whys-of-ai
92•surprisetalk•2h ago•45 comments

SMPTE Makes Its Standards Freely Accessible

https://www.smpte.org/blog/smpte-makes-its-standards-freely-accessible-openingstandards-library-t...
256•zdw•15h ago•76 comments

Guide to the TD4 4-bit DIY CPU

https://www.philipzucker.com/td4-4bit-cpu/
30•andrewstuart•2d ago•3 comments

UHF X11: X11 Built for VisionOS and Apple Vision Pro

https://www.lispm.net/apps/uhf-x11/
202•zdw•15h ago•37 comments

DOS Game "F-15 Strike Eagle II" reversing project needs DOS test pilots

https://neuviemeporte.github.io/f15-se2/2026/06/20/needyou.html
246•LowLevelMahn•17h ago•64 comments

Excessive nil pointer checks in Go

https://konradreiche.com/blog/excessive-nil-pointer-checks-in-go/
22•ingve•2d ago•16 comments

Unauthorized alert sent to cell phones across Brazil

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/20/americas/brazil-hackers-unauthorized-alert-latam
127•zdw•12h ago•89 comments

Your brain was never designed for this much bad news

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/06/260614012006.htm
160•colinprince•4h ago•106 comments

When I reject AI code even if it works

https://vinibrasil.com/when-i-reject-ai-code-even-if-it-works/
169•vnbrs•7h ago•93 comments

Running MicroVMs in Proxmox VE, the Easy Way

https://taoofmac.com/space/blog/2026/06/18/1845
18•zdw•1d ago•1 comments

Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41551-026-01660-4
67•lnyan•2d ago•11 comments

Armstrong Effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armstrong_effect
25•userbinator•4h ago•2 comments

Linux eliminates the strncpy API after six years of work, 360 patches

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.2-Drops-strncpy
193•simonpure•11h ago•165 comments

The Lost Story of Alan Turing's "Delilah" Project

https://spectrum.ieee.org/alan-turings-delilah
15•asdefghyk•3h ago•1 comments

Project Fetch: Phase Two

https://www.anthropic.com/research/project-fetch-phase-two
57•stopachka•8h ago•21 comments

Alice is impatient

https://brooker.co.za/blog/2026/06/19/waiting.html
91•birdculture•12h ago•26 comments

Temporary Cloudflare accounts for AI agents

https://blog.cloudflare.com/temporary-accounts/
206•farhadhf•21h ago•109 comments

Proportional-Integral-Derivative Controllers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller
23•dhorthy•1d ago•9 comments

Show HN: StartupWiki – A Free Alternative to Crunchbase

https://startupwiki.tech/
194•shpran•16h ago•60 comments
Open in hackernews

Public Service Announcement: Don't Say You Use AI for Writing

https://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/488148
31•satisfice•3h ago

Comments

ElProlactin•1h ago
AI could have helped the author write what he's trying to say in one three word sentence: don't use AI.

Because in his view, if you use AI and don't disclose it, you're a liar. And if you use AI and disclose it, he won't trust you anyway.

throwawaysoxjje•57m ago
That summary makes the point but doesn’t communicate the meaning
ElProlactin•49m ago
You're right, but I don't think there's anything particularly insightful about the author's perspective.

People are allowed to set their expectations/standards but in 2026 taking the position that use of AI is lying (when not disclosed) and trust destroying (when disclosed) is basically going to set you up for a lot of disappointment. It's just unrealistic.

For better or worse, AI is being used everywhere and it's harder and harder to spot, especially when the use is "thoughtful". Your only real defense is to think critically about the content you're consuming to determine whether it's accurate and has value.

BrenBarn•41m ago
> People are allowed to set their expectations/standards but in 2026 taking the position that use of AI is lying (when not disclosed) and trust destroying (when disclosed) is basically going to set you up for a lot of disappointment. It's just unrealistic.

Better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.

ElProlactin•33m ago
Or you could engage with content critically, understanding that in this day and age, you can't be 100% sure of its provenance. Decide whether it's accurate, insightful, worth thinking about and researching further, etc. based on its substance, not who you think produced it and how.
fragmede•2m ago
Ugh that sounds like a lot of work. Are you sure we can't just throw shallow dismissals around and feel smug about it, rather than interacting with the contents of what something is saying?
nkrisc•52m ago
It’s a perfectly reasonable position, though that may be because I share it.

If you’ve “written” something with AI, I have idea if you even read it, thus I have no idea if it even really reflects your thoughts. And I don’t care what a computer has to say, I care what a human has to say.

locknitpicker•34m ago
> If you’ve “written” something with AI, I have idea if you even read it, thus I have no idea if it even really reflects your thoughts. And I don’t care what a computer has to say, I care what a human has to say.

At a more fundamental level, if AI generated it then I have no trust it is actually true or reflects facts or matches reality. It's insulting to throw AI slop at us because you expect us to read something you didn't bothered to write or perhaps even read. The text is probably all wrong with a veneer of well sounding verbiage, and potentially is created to drive engagement instead of actually communicating useful information.

diydsp•5m ago
That's an argument against people actng lszy, not against them using ai.
kennywinker•48m ago
And the great gatsby can be summarized as “rich guy throws parties and then dies” - but sometimes saying something slowly is the point. Sometimes doing something slowly is the point too.
anupshinde•18m ago
When I write something heavily edited by AI - I mention that I use AI assistance (not AI led thinking). I will probably remove that because the perception is quite different. Its like applying one applying to an engineering job but write "a pychic, a medium" in a corner of their resume.

It is very common to see that any interesting thought gets immediately tagged like AI slop and the real AI slop wins. Try an A/B test and you shall see that AI actually wins because of the people who hate AI. Most people cannot distinguish between a human and a AI written post and yet those same people want to be judgemental. And the people who are against AI and say "its just the next token generator and I don't use it" and yet use autocomplete on their mobiles are just duplicit. And yes AI is the next-token-generator, we have no proof that most humans were not brainwashed to become the same.

f4stjack•12m ago
The problem lies with people trying to claim credit without doing the work: writing. AI is a fantastic tool that catches flow errors, grammar problems and punctuation misuse, just like a copywriter. But copywriters don't get bylines.

My line is clear, if you use copy paste the AI output that's not your writing. I am okay with AI collaboration - it detects the errors, you decide what to do with them.

torben-friis•7m ago
I think the argument is misguided, even if I agree with the principle: it is based in the effort one puts in and how it's similar to a sport.

I don't care whether my favorite author sweated for months facing a typewriter, of he effortlessly dictated the final form of the book in one sitting to a secretary while sipping mojitos.

I think my issue with AI has more to do with the signal it sends: reading takes effort, particularly literature, and I use the author's name as a proxy to judge whether to invest that effort myself. Nothing bad in selling dollar store crap, but it's bad to put 'Nike' on it.

Your individuality is what you sell as an author. I can get access to the LLM without you.