frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom

https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/24/openai-unveils-its-first-custom-chip-built-by-broadcom/
429•jamdesk•5h ago•280 comments

Qualcomm to Acquire Modular

https://www.reuters.com/business/qualcomm-buy-ai-startup-modular-2026-06-24/
95•timmyd•9h ago•24 comments

RubyLLM: A Ruby framework for all major AI providers

https://rubyllm.com/
325•doener•8h ago•50 comments

Elastic lays off 7% of employees

https://www.elastic.co/blog/ceo-ash-kulkarni-announcement-to-elastic-employees
55•dakrone•1h ago•22 comments

We’re making Bunny DNS free

https://bunny.net/blog/were-making-bunny-dns-free/
817•dabinat•14h ago•250 comments

PR spam today looks like email spam in the early 2000s

https://www.greptile.com/blog/prs-on-openclaw
159•dakshgupta•8h ago•91 comments

Computer use in Gemini 3.5 Flash

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/introducing-computer-use-...
134•swolpers•5h ago•83 comments

The Xteink X4 E-Ink Reader

https://blog.omgmog.net/post/xteink-x4-e-ink-reader/
134•felixdoerp•6h ago•99 comments

Robotics Teams Are Rebuilding the Data Stack from Scratch

https://rerun.io/blog/data-layer-tax
11•Tycho87•3d ago•1 comments

Crawling BitTorrent DHTs for Fun and Profit [pdf]

https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/woot10/tech/full_papers/Wolchok.pdf
34•dgellow•3d ago•18 comments

There are a few things that I look back on as my mistakes in the early days

https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/2069799283369345247
461•shadowtree•7h ago•231 comments

45°C cooling design cuts data center water use to near zero

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/liquid-cooling-ai-factories/
116•nitin_flanker•8h ago•87 comments

PostgreSQL Is Enough

https://gist.github.com/cpursley/c8fb81fe8a7e5df038158bdfe0f06dbb
4•Imustaskforhelp•26m ago•0 comments

GLM-5.2 is a step change for open agents

https://www.interconnects.ai/p/glm-52-is-the-step-change-for-open
76•vantareed•1d ago•26 comments

Show HN: Nub – A Bun-like all-in-one toolkit for Node.js

https://github.com/nubjs/nub
184•colinmcd•8h ago•51 comments

Show HN: LookAway, a Mac break reminder that knows when not to interrupt

https://lookaway.com
43•_kush•9h ago•5 comments

GitHub shouldn't be a dependency for publishing Rust on crates.io

https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/116806641273303255
110•speckx•3h ago•38 comments

Stealing Is a Skill

https://ben-mini.com/2026/stealing-is-a-skill
192•bewal416•9h ago•120 comments

Krea 2: SOTA open-weights 12B image model

https://www.krea.ai/blog/krea-2-technical-report
309•mattnewton•1d ago•35 comments

I can haz smoller NixOS ISOs?

https://natkr.com/2026-06-19-nixos-but-smol/
61•logickkk1•5d ago•20 comments

How the Fifth Lateran Council unlocked financial theory

https://sebastiangarren.com/2026/06/17/lending-is-meritorious-and-should-be-praised-how-the-fifth...
40•momentmaker•4d ago•4 comments

Pondering routing more of my traffic via nodes outside the UK

https://neilzone.co.uk/2026/06/pondering-routing-more-of-my-traffic-via-nodes-outside-the-uk-beca...
42•ColinWright•3d ago•30 comments

A Practical Guide to SSH Tunnels: Local and Remote Port Forwarding

https://labs.iximiuz.com/tutorials/ssh-tunnels
244•signa11•4d ago•52 comments

Running Windows Games on a Hobby OS with Wine

https://astral-os.org/posts/2026/04/03/wine-on-astral.html
93•avaliosdev•8h ago•30 comments

Show HN: Monolisa v3 – a typeface for developers and creatives

https://www.monolisa.dev/
146•bebraw•2d ago•49 comments

Exploiting vulnerabilities in Johnson and Johnson web apps

https://eaton-works.com/2026/06/24/jnj-webapp-hacks/
50•EatonZ•6h ago•1 comments

Thomann takes legal action against Fender

https://www.thomann.de/blog/en/inside/thomann-takes-legal-action-against-fender/
163•Audiophilip•3h ago•100 comments

Big AI labs are hiring philosophers

https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2026/06/24/why-big-ai-labs-are-hiring-so-many-ph...
101•Brajeshwar•6h ago•88 comments

NSA lost access to Mythos amid Anthropic dispute

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/23/us/politics/nsa-lost-access-anthropic-tool.html
199•thm•11h ago•182 comments

I taught a bucket to speak Git

https://www.tigrisdata.com/blog/objgit/
70•xena•7h ago•16 comments
Open in hackernews

GLM-5.2 is a step change for open agents

https://www.interconnects.ai/p/glm-52-is-the-step-change-for-open
75•vantareed•1d ago

Comments

Balinares•1d ago
I can't help wondering what kind of models we'll see coming out of China once it gets its own chip fabs up and running. Right now it sounds like the US's export ban is not slowing them down a whole lot.
ceejayoz•1h ago
> Right now it sounds like the US's export ban is not slowing them down a whole lot.

It may wind up being a massive boost to them in the long run, even.

Necessity is the mother of invention.

pkroll•1h ago
If this pans out, you're not at all kidding: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ekndZwyOzo
jerojero•1d ago
Open weight models from Chinese labs tend to be significantly cheaper.

I think theyre absolutely needed. I can't afford 200 USD a month for personal use of coding AI, and I don't think such prices are reasonable for most of the world economy anyway. Not to mention US firms might be giving their employees a lot more than that.

It's increasingly feeling, to me, that theres a gap building up between haves and have nots. But then, we get news of these open weight models that are reasonably priced in inference with reasonable capabilities. Yes, they take maybe 6-9 months to get there, tbh, that's not a bad trade off at all.

ttoinou•1d ago
200 is much less than the value you’re supposed to get out of it. If it’s not then yeah go ahead and use cheaper models with worst quality
Dayshine•1d ago
I'm not sure how I'm supposed to get $200 of value out of personal use!
LPisGood•1h ago
Note that 200 dollars of value is different than 200 dollars of profit.
devmor•1h ago
I personally don’t find it that useful for most tasks, but if say, you get paid $50/hr for your work and it saves you more than 4 hours of work in a month, there you go.
holoduke•53m ago
Here most of my colleagues have +200 dollar rates. It's really a no brainer. But sure, in south America or some Asian countries maybe it is. But still most devs need it anyway. Also in the poor regions.
HDBaseT•22m ago
$200/h is on the extreme end and I would argue most people here aren't anywhere close to that.

The median hourly wage in the US is $28/h, this equates to nearly 7.5 hours. A full day of work a month for the average person to use Claude with reasonable limits.

Yes, the people on $28/h may not be the software development types, so their income might not be as high, but these are the people who would probably be vibe coding the most since they aren't day to day programmers!

themgt•1h ago
I just tested GLM 5.2 out via Z.ai in pi for a little one-off project that was already scoped. It actually did a relatively decent job starting out, and figured important things out from context.

But the reasoning traces became increasingly hilarious, with it getting confused and going in loops, doubting itself. I began to feel almost sad, it was like listening to the internal monologue of someone with anxiety disorder.

It made pretty good progress but wound up going in a lot of goofy loops and doing things a bit "off" from standards I'd hoped it would infer, and finally started going a bit nuts, "This is very confusing.", "OH WAIT", seemingly hallucinating a whole side-quest that didn't make sense and looking at making internal system changes to try to achieve its (now very confused) goal when I pulled the plug.

Without seeing the reasoning traces from Claude/GPT it's hard to really know, but it definitely didn't feel like the same quality of reasoning, even if dogged persistence does wind up actually working eventually.

jauntywundrkind•58m ago
I think the self-doubt might actually be a very crucial part of it's capability. I often feel compelled to interrupt when I'm watching it think (which thank the stars it let's us do, unlike the big American models!!), but usually it makes the right pick!

Being willing and able to reconsider seems very good. Going around and around, pulling in more thinking, integrating it: maybe that's why it is as good as it's good.

I want to emphasize again how excellent it is that we can see the thinking. I think this makes GLM so much better an experience for me. It gives me such insight into what is being considered, helps me see where things go wrong. It grounds me, gives me the notion of where the results come from. It was so jarring to switch to GPT and Opus and find that they won't discuss with me, won't reveal their thinking: that feels fundamentally unsafe, for me, for society, to have such a severe black box. I don't think it should be allowed, honestly.

Many thanks to this recent submission, which is the first time I've seen anyone blog about this core difference: The text in Claude Code’s “Extended Thinking” output is not authentic. https://patrickmccanna.net/the-text-in-claude-codes-extended... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630535

citizenpaul•57m ago
Ive been using glm5 since its release and still prefer it to glm5.1 and so far to glm5.2

Perhaps it is just my harness and workflow, but the older model still seems to work better. Also the token cost is significantly lower. I rarely spend more than $20 a week with $50 cap. Not even half claudes ambiguous minimum $200 a month plan.

timcobb•21m ago
Can people share their GLM and open model setups in general please? What provider do you use. Why do you trust it with serving full quality? What harness do you use? Why do you trust it not to have malware (most harnessed are TS apps). I am just trying GLM 5.1 from Nvidia build in open code would love to hear how you all do it, thanks.
rainmaking•12m ago
GLM 5.2 coding plan- I'll post the agent as soon as I can! But opencode works and their own zcode is really good as well.
aunty_helen•12m ago
I signed up to a z.ai max account, $144. Hardly been able to use it as it 429s on most requests. They’re also refusing to refund me.
martinjc•1h ago
Are you aware of how much purchasing power 200 dollars is in china, brazil, thailand or india is? This is an extremely arrogant take.
uberex•56m ago
Unless that value is $200 cash in hand it will be hard to afford it for people who just don't have $200.
smrtinsert•22m ago
I've actually come to believe the overwhelming majority of use cases require nowhere frontier quality so there's that. Much faster execution is just a bonus on top of the much reduced cost
margalabargala•12m ago
Last time you bought a computer, did you buy the absolute fastest best CPU available?
girvo•6m ago
Yes, but that was because I could see the writing on the wall with respect to hardware prices being cooked by AI demand, so I built the best computer possible at the time knowing it'd probably need to last me the next 5+ years

So not really comparable. I use Step 3.7 Flash locally, models are good enough for so many coding tasks even at the lower end! (Though I note that calling a 200B model "lower end" is kind of amusing)

tacomagick•16h ago
DeepSeek through their own API has saved me tons of tokens honestly. Even though it is not as smart as Kimi or Claude, their level of entry is very low with a top up of 2$ and Pay as you go compared to the subscription of Claude or 20$ top up of Kimi
praveer13•1h ago
For personal use I’m considering using the frontier models from openai or anthropic to create a plan with research and brainstorming etc with enough details for cheap models to be able to follow (glm, deepseek etc) - with openrouter - will monitor how cheap and effective that turns out to be.
wuhhh•27m ago
Your post made me laugh because I experienced the same as you but the other way around. I switched from Claude to a multi model harness a couple of days ago and the first model I tried was GLM5.2.

I gave it some simple code porting exercises and watched dumbfounded at the reasoning, which was more like the ravings of a lunatic - but lo and behold, after much confusion and a dizzying number of eureka moments the task was completed very successfully.

I tried Kimi on a similar task, much faster, a little more reassuring somehow in its ramblings, also surprisingly good results.

To be clear, I’m not surprised the results were good because they’re not GPT or Claude, but because the line of reasoning was so bonkers. Coming from Claude, I was just not used to seeing this, but I’ll bet it’s just as nuts with the frontier models and we’re just not allowed to see it (I’m about to read the links you shared).

Agree wholeheartedly that transparency is of grave importance.

rainmaking•8m ago
Yeah isn't that thinking weird?

Now I see the issue clearly! But wait... now I have the full picture! But wait... Found it!

I gave up a few times because of it at first until I realized I just had to let GLM get on with it and what came out was great!

But once it was outright endearing- challenging bug, it said: I have been very thorough. Then it escalated where to look and aced it. Built in confucian values