frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Studio Canal Movies purchased on PlayStation Store removed without refund

https://www.playstation.com/en-gb/legal/psvideocontent/
60•kugelblitz•1h ago

Comments

HelloUsername•1h ago
Discussion: "PlayStation Is Deleting 551 Movies from Customers' Accounts" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48691346 26-jun-2026 208 comments
throw0101d•53m ago
"Purchased".
tribal808•40m ago
silk road... torrent...
nativeit•24m ago
I get the latter, but were you also looking to buy some drugs?
pavel_lishin•16m ago
You expect them to sit through "Big Ass Spider!" sober?
CivBase•36m ago
"I buying isn't owning, piracy isn't stealing."
mghackerlady•36m ago
Why do people buy movies digitally anyway? I can understand digital movies (they are convenient) but renting or streaming seems far more reasonable. If you truly want to own a movie as I suspect people who buy them digitally do, the only way to ensure that is to buy it on DVD/Blu-ray and rip (or redeem the digital code version that often comes with modern releases, though those tend to have DRM). Even then, why do people buy from the playstation store? I could maybe understand that when the Vita was still around, but nowadays it seems like an odd choice
fullshark•34m ago
I "bought" a few digital kids movies because kids want to watch them over and over and I didn't want to deal with handling physical media.
LollipopYakuza•17m ago
Yes, it doesn't sound like a wise decision given what we know about the usual practices of those services. But the average consumer is not as savvy as us HN users. I would not blame someone for expecting to own permanent access to the content if they purchase it. This only happens because big Sony and such are not held accountable of their actions, they are the one to blame.
pavel_lishin•17m ago
Convenience is 99% of the answer.

Plus, when "renting" a movie costs $3.99, and "buying" it costs $5.99, there's not a particular reason to not click the "purchase" button.

com2kid•4m ago
I don't own any way to play physical disc media anymore, and for the handful of movies I watch multiple times (so far 2), it made sense to buy them.

I only buy through Amazon Videos, with the logic being Amazon is going to be around awhile.

yardie•26m ago
I don't consider anything digital as being bought unless I own it free and clear, unencumbered of any encryption. Not interested in anyone's "digital locker" or storage scheme. I have 20 years of music bought digitally through iTunes and Amazon. I can still play them to this day without needing to check-in with a licensing server. That is ownership. That is why I don't buy encrypted movies.
pavel_lishin•15m ago
I think Heinlein said, "You do not truly own anything that you can't carry in both arms at a dead run."

I think something similar applies to digital media - you don't truly own anything that's not stored in bits on a hard drive that you can pick up and put in your pocket.

Wowfunhappy•26m ago
> due to our content licensing agreements

Aka, due to their mistake. Sony should be insisting on a perpetual license for anything already in the customer's library.

I was initially inclined toward some minimal sympathy for Sony here, but I see no good faith reason why they'd sign a licensing agreement which allows the other party to do this.

TheCondor•19m ago
A friend and I were talking about this. What would you pay for it?

When iTunes + came out, you had 2 options, you could buy a song for $0.99 or you could be the plus version for more, I don't remember but it was like $1.35 or something. Plus had a higher bit rate and it wasn't encrypted.

Suppose you could buy a movie for $12.00, how much would you pay for the forever version? $30?

jerf•7m ago
I feel like you're kind of making this more complicated than it actually is, either because you're overcomplicating it or because you're trying to tee up some rhetorical point, but the answer to your question is really quite simple and objective: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=movie&rh=p_n_format_browse-bin%3A...

You don't need to ask a hypothetical, the market has an answer.

To the extent your reply is "but that's not exactly what my question is", my point is that the market is already pricing all sorts of situations and the market would have no problem pricing just one more possibility into the already complicated market. Including "piracy", and people like me who are treating the vast majority of DVDs and BluRays as just a delivery mechanism for streams rather than "discs".

nekusar•
crooked-v•22m ago
I have to wonder what small claims court judges would think of it. Get a few hundred cases filed across the US and the travel expense for Sony could be significant.
nekusar•10m ago
And this smells of fraud.

If it was a real sale, then they could not do this remote control/deletion at a distance.

Shit I buy at Walmart can't be physically taken away from me later on. Its legally mine.

This? Its fraudulently sold as a "sale" but is really an indefinite rental with the terms of "fuck you I'll do what I please when I please".

And on top of fraud, I'd also throw in the CFAA as well, a criminal statute. Its established law that if I set a timebomb in software at $company where if I'm fired/laid off, that's criminal access. No boilerplate from some shitty clickwrap can excuse criminal law.

Time to start jailing Sony execs and the like.

7m ago
Right now, I won't pay a fucking cent.

I'll pirate it off of Usenet or Torrents.

I get a strictly better experience if I pirate. Whereas I'm treated like a criminal and sold a much worse experience if I pay.

So, fuck paying. I'm not going to pay for abuse.

wat10000•10m ago
A mistake suggests that it's accidental and they didn't mean it. To the extent a corporation can know things, they knew exactly how this was set up. This is fraud.

Mag 7 starting to underperform [pdf]

https://www.apollo.com/content/dam/apolloaem/pdf/daily-spark/2026/jun/28/062826-Mag7.pdf
71•mooreds•1h ago•31 comments

RocketLab Acquires Iridium

https://investors.rocketlabcorp.com/news-releases/news-release-details/rocket-lab-acquire-iridium...
32•everfrustrated•1h ago•19 comments

What happens when you run a CUDA kernel?

https://fergusfinn.com/blog/what-happens-when-you-run-a-gpu-kernel/
46•mezark•2h ago•3 comments

Building Principia for Windows XP

https://voxelmanip.se/2026/06/28/building-principia-for-windows-xp/
47•LorenDB•1h ago•8 comments

Sandia National Labs SA3000 8085 CPU

https://www.cpushack.com/2026/06/03/sandia-national-labs-sa3000-8085-cpu/
97•rbanffy•4h ago•26 comments

Tidal AI Policy

https://tidal.com/ai-policy
146•hn8726•2h ago•166 comments

HackerRank open sourced its ATS. My resume scored 90/100. Oh wait 74. No – 88

https://danunparsed.com/p/hackerrank-open-source-ats
753•sambellll•13h ago•323 comments

Instagram is incorporating users' photos in ads for Meta Glasses

https://twitter.com/i/status/2071277885646868536
93•notRobot•1h ago•28 comments

GLM 5.2 beats Claude in our benchmarks

https://semgrep.dev/blog/2026/we-have-mythos-at-home-glm-52-beats-claude-in-our-cyber-benchmarks/
1011•jms703•21h ago•465 comments

A field guide to the modern front end for developers who hand-wrote HTML

https://davidpoblador.com/deep-dives/the-descent/
37•nirvanis•50m ago•23 comments

Rebuilding the Computer Room

https://alexwlchan.net/2026/computer-room/
42•ingve•3h ago•16 comments

I Am Behind on C# 14 Features, and I Can't Prove It but Does It Matter?

https://medium.com/c-sharp-programming/i-am-behind-on-csharp-14-features-and-i-cant-prove-it-but-...
6•sukhpinder0804•3d ago•3 comments

Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship

https://thomasdullien.github.io/guides/entrepreneurship/
94•nekitamo•3d ago•25 comments

Pollen tried to remove my article and Google is assisting with it

https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/pollen-tried-to-remove-my-article-about-callum-negus-fancey-an...
589•taubek•5h ago•83 comments

Type-checked non-empty strings

https://exploring-better-ways.bellroy.com/haskell-koan-type-checked-non-empty-strings.html
30•surprisetalk•2d ago•10 comments

Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron Sued in US over Memory Price Fixing

https://en.sedaily.com/international/2026/06/29/samsung-sk-hynix-micron-sued-in-us-over-memory-pr...
100•donohoe•3h ago•34 comments

NUMA: Cores, memory, and the distance between them

https://edera.dev/stories/numa-part-1-cores-memory-and-the-distance-between-them
84•sys_call•4d ago•14 comments

How we made WINDOW JOIN parallel and vectorized

https://questdb.com/blog/window-join-parallel-vectorized/
13•tosh•3d ago•0 comments

Studio Canal Movies purchased on PlayStation Store removed without refund

https://www.playstation.com/en-gb/legal/psvideocontent/
61•kugelblitz•1h ago•20 comments

Dissecting Apple's Sparse Image Format (ASIF)

https://schamper.dev/dissecting-apples-sparse-image-format-asif/
125•supermatou•23h ago•18 comments

Age verification is just a precursor to automated attribution of speech

https://nonogra.ph/age-verification-is-just-a-precursor-to-attribution-of-speech-06-29-2026
772•arkhiver•11h ago•470 comments

Data breach exposes up to 14.2M email logins at six ISPs

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/data-breach-exposes-up-to-142-million-email-logins...
17•Brajeshwar•46m ago•0 comments

Federating Clusters for Zero-Downtime Kubernetes

https://linkerd.io/2026/06/24/federating-clusters-for-zero-downtime-kubernetes/index.html
23•PagCatOli•4d ago•1 comments

Herdr: Agent multiplexer that lives in your terminal

https://github.com/ogulcancelik/herdr
111•mzehrer•10h ago•72 comments

Historical memory prices 1960-2026

https://dam.stanford.edu/memory-prices.html
366•vga1•20h ago•139 comments

We found a bug in the hyper HTTP library

https://blog.cloudflare.com/hyper-bug/
129•Pop_-•4d ago•60 comments

5k menus from the New York Public Library’s Buttolph Collection (1880-1920)

https://pudding.cool/2026/06/menu-story/
393•xbryanx•1d ago•104 comments

I used Claude Code to get a second opinion on my MRI

https://antoine.fi/mri-analysis-using-claude-code-opus
515•engmarketer•22h ago•644 comments

1.38 Millimeter Microcontroller

https://www.ti.com/product/MSPM0C1104
32•kristianpaul•2d ago•56 comments

Why did this journal retract two 1940s papers by Max Planck?

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/why-did-this-journal-retract-two-1940s-papers-by-max-planck/
194•DR_MING•6h ago•22 comments