That said, if no AI is really important, I guess it's worth $29, though I can't tell if you used AI to build it or not from here.

Like, I just one-shot a script that does the same with Claude, after it listed 5 free projects that do the same, including one GUI. The whole thing took less time than writing this comment.

Now, if it were $2.99, I probably would have just paid you.

Deselect everything, select "Mail", create export, wait until it's done, and then download the zip.

Also is it not doable with Google takeout ( with Gmail )?

The world needs more of this

Be honest, is "Emily D" a real person you got organic feedback from? Small thing that makes the vibed site off-putting.

It says "Storage: 1.3 GB saved", but then says it is Read-only.

For example I'm always 1-2 GB away from my Google account being full. I've pruned Google Drive to the absolute bare minimum.

I've had my Google account for a really long time. There's tens of thousands of emails since day 1. However, there's many emails that have attachments.

For example my friends or someone might have sent me a bunch of images and there's a very long email thread going on with them. I want to delete the 300 MB of photos without deleting the email thread. I don't think Google has a way to do this. I'd easily be able to free up multiple gigs of space if this were possible.

I've already bit the bullet and deleted the biggest offenders but I have a ton of emails with 1-2 attachments (pdfs, zip files, some images, etc.) that might "only" be 15 MB but I definitely don't want to delete the email since it has a record of something. Not just the attachment but the corresponding email chain.

function autoExtractGmailMedia() { const START_TIME = Date.now(); const TIME_LIMIT = 1000 * 60 * 5; // 5 minutes (leaves a 1-minute safety buffer) const BATCH_SIZE = 50; const FOLDER_NAME = "Gmail_Media_Export";

  // 1. Retrieve our current position from the script's property store
  const scriptProperties = PropertiesService.getScriptProperties();
  let startIndex = parseInt(scriptProperties.getProperty('START_INDEX')) || 0;

  // Locate or create the destination folder
  let folder;
  const folders = DriveApp.getFoldersByName(FOLDER_NAME);
  if (folders.hasNext()) {
    folder = folders.next();
  } else {
    folder = DriveApp.createFolder(FOLDER_NAME);
  }

  // 2. Process batches in a loop
  // Updated search query to ignore USPS and non-primary tabs
  const searchQuery = 'has:attachment -from:usps.gov -category:promotions -category:updates -category:social (filename:jpg OR filename:jpeg OR filename:png OR filename:zip)';
  
  while (true) {
    const threads = GmailApp.search(searchQuery, startIndex, BATCH_SIZE);
    
    // If the search returns empty, we've hit the end of the inbox
    if (threads.length === 0) {
      console.log("Extraction completely finished.");
      scriptProperties.deleteProperty('START_INDEX');
      deleteTriggers(); // Clean up so it doesn't keep running
      return;
    }

    for (let i = 0; i < threads.length; i++) {
      const messages = threads[i].getMessages();
      for (let j = 0; j < messages.length; j++) {
        const attachments = messages[j].getAttachments();
        for (let k = 0; k < attachments.length; k++) {
          const attachment = attachments[k];
          const name = attachment.getName().toLowerCase();
          const type = attachment.getContentType();
          const size = attachment.getSize();
          
          // Apply size threshold (102,400 bytes = 100KB) and file type filter
          if (size > 102400) {
            if (type.includes('image/') || name.endsWith('.zip')) {
              folder.createFile(attachment);
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }

    // Increment our starting index for the next batch
    startIndex += BATCH_SIZE;

    // 3. The Stopwatch Check
    if (Date.now() - START_TIME > TIME_LIMIT) {
      console.log(`Approaching timeout at index ${startIndex}. Saving state and passing the baton...`);
      scriptProperties.setProperty('START_INDEX', startIndex.toString());
      scheduleNextRun();
      return; // Exit to avoid the hard timeout exception
    }
  }

function scheduleNextRun() { deleteTriggers(); // Prevent duplicate overlapping triggers ScriptApp.newTrigger("autoExtractGmailMedia") .timeBased() .after(60 * 1000) // Fire a new execution 1 minute from now .create(); }

function deleteTriggers() { const triggers = ScriptApp.getProjectTriggers(); for (let i = 0; i < triggers.length; i++) { if (triggers[i].getHandlerFunction() === "autoExtractGmailMedia") { ScriptApp.deleteTrigger(triggers[i]); } } }

What a day. I was told my landing page looks like an AI wrote it, got roasted for a confusing illustration metric (and rightly so), and received the ultimate rite of passage: being told my app could be replaced by a couple of Linux CLI commands.

Unironically, thanks everyone. Because of your feedback, the site copy's a little tighter, and the Windows installer no longer throws a scary UAC prompt. I couldn't have asked for a better (or more intense) test.

The biggest pushback seemed to be the price: people are upset it's priced at $30. Some suggested $3. A few suggested open sourcing it under MIT and moving on.

The primary argument was that there are already existing, free tools that can be chained together to do exactly what Mail Memories does. The secondary argument was that LLMs can already code this up, implying the OP was rentseeking.

IMHO, this comment (now dead) from the OP was on point and ironic:

> My target audience isn't engineers who know how to parse maildirs, it's everyday people (and busy devs) who just want a secure, 1-click interface that downloads their family photos into a folder on their computer (without touching a terminal).

This is entirely true - this thread is strong indication that this tool wasn't appreciated by the HN crowd (lots of engineers and technical people)! I noticed most of OP's comment went gray and then dead in a matter of minutes. The OP must have had a real hard time even responding to comments before HN throttled them from responding, asking them to "slow down".

But this raises a question - what if I one-shot something that my non-technical parents and family members would find incredibly valuable and so I'm hoping yours does as well? If an LLM could absolutely one shot it, perfectly, should I never post it on HN at all, in fear of the wrath that would be unleashed?

Anyone here can slap together a breakfast sandwich for ~$3 in ingredients. Is it blasphemy that you can't buy the same from a McDonald's or your neighborhood Deli for less than $15?