frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

OverpAId – Fire your CEO. Hire the future

https://overpaid.lol
384•ignaloidas•2h ago•172 comments

Back to Kagi

https://blog.melashri.net/micro/back-to-kagi/
55•speckx•40m ago•34 comments

Businesses with ugly AI menu redesigns

https://blog.fiddery.com/businesses-with-ugly-ai-menu-redesigns/
43•speckx•59m ago•16 comments

OpenAI and Hugging Face address security incident during model evaluation

https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/
1371•mfiguiere•17h ago•917 comments

Introduction to Formal Verification with Lean Part 1

https://hashcloak.com/blog/tutorial-introduction-to-formal-verification-with-lean-(part-1)
118•badcryptobitch•2d ago•10 comments

Kimi K3 Is Competitive with Fable; Kimi K3 and Fable Is SoTA

https://fireworks.ai/blog/kimik3-fable
757•piotrgrabowski•15h ago•397 comments

Why Do You Suck at Juggling?

https://pgadey.ca/notes/suck-at-juggling/
8•surprisetalk•1w ago•0 comments

Intel Starts Shipping High-NA EUV Silicon

https://morethanmoore.substack.com/p/intel-starts-shipping-high-na-euv
147•zdw•3d ago•57 comments

Original Apollo 11 Guidance Computer source code for command and lunar modules

https://github.com/chrislgarry/Apollo-11
116•noteness•8h ago•34 comments

Advertise in ChatGPT

https://ads.openai.com/
926•montecarl•18h ago•714 comments

Cornell's Interactive Wall of Birds

https://academy.allaboutbirds.org/features/wallofbirds/?_hsmi=428996456
17•yareally•3d ago•3 comments

10 REM"_(C2SLFF4

https://beej.us/blog/data/mystery-comment/
15•ingve•1h ago•1 comments

FreeInk: Open ecosystem for e-readers

https://freeink.org/
637•FriedPickles•19h ago•132 comments

Judge approves $1.5B Anthropic settlement for pirated books used to train Claude

https://apnews.com/article/ai-anthropic-copyright-settlement-claude-books-bartz-74b140444023898ae...
460•BeetleB•18h ago•420 comments

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X3D Review: 3D V-Cache Gaming Performance for Less – HotHardware

https://hothardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-7-7700x3d-gaming-cpu-review
30•rbanffy•3d ago•30 comments

Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber

https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flas...
726•logickkk1•22h ago•544 comments

Late.sh – a command-line Clubhouse for computer people

https://late.sh/
243•itherseed•11h ago•84 comments

A digestion of the Jacobian conjecture counterexample

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/07/21/a-digestion-of-the-jacobian-conjecture-counterexample/
285•jeremyscanvic•16h ago•117 comments

Ten Steps Towards Happiness (2015)

http://hintjens.com/blog:99
179•emerongi•12h ago•74 comments

ScreenWall – Turn old phones into synced widgets for your space

https://screenwall.app/
58•buibuibui•5d ago•26 comments

Jack Dorsey launches Buzz to combine team chat, AI agents and Git hosting

https://runtimewire.com/article/jack-dorsey-block-buzz-team-chat-ai-agents-git
346•ryanmerket•20h ago•302 comments

"Drawing" the Mona Lisa with GPT-5.6, Claude, Gemini, and Grok

https://www.tryai.dev/blog/ai-drawing-arena-colored-pencils-claude-gpt-grok
226•hershyb_•16h ago•79 comments

Long presumed dead, a thriving coral reef is discovered in West Africa

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/benin-coral-reef
367•speckx•22h ago•83 comments

Never Enough

https://dark.ronacher.eu/2026/7/21/never-enough/
92•reasonableklout•10h ago•30 comments

Apple defeats liability for not scanning iCloud for CSAM

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2026/07/apple-defeats-liability-for-not-scanning-icloud-for...
435•speckx•23h ago•465 comments

It's a shame what's happened to radio

https://blog.jimgrey.net/2026/07/21/its-a-shame-whats-happened-to-radio-3/
159•sonicrocketman•14h ago•169 comments

Overload and insight look identical from the outside

https://pilgrima.ge/p/what-the-wire-knows
8•momentmaker•3d ago•0 comments

Laguna S 2.1

https://poolside.ai/blog/introducing-laguna-s-2-1
369•rexledesma•20h ago•68 comments

Map of the world's great castles and fortresses

https://thecastlemap.com/
282•marklit•21h ago•180 comments

So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

https://www.cole-k.com/2026/07/21/reddit/
104•montroser•1h ago•100 comments
Open in hackernews

So Reddit has decided that plain HTML is unsafe

https://www.cole-k.com/2026/07/21/reddit/
104•montroser•1h ago

Comments

khurs•45m ago
Reddit has licensing deals with OpenAI and Google, so is likely trying to keep other AI companies out

https://mediaandthemachine.substack.com/p/reddits-new-ai-lic...

willis936•30m ago
Any plans for reddit to compensate their contributors?
inigyou•28m ago
Of course not, are you crazy?
tweakimp•13m ago
The contributors are already compensated by the ads the are allowed to see.
hathym•27m ago
that's good, open weight models do not need degenerate comments to advance on AI
LaurensBER•21m ago
It would be interesting to hear if the addition of Reddit data makes LLM stronger or weaker.

Outside of some (technical)subs most of the comment seems to be of a far lower quality than what you find in books or in websites.

NitpickLawyer•17m ago
Someone did a finetune w/ data from 4chan and found improvements on several popular benchmarks, so ... maybe?
dd8601fn•4m ago
For years before LLMs got big a comment I would often see was, "Google search is worthless now. I basically solve all my problems by searching reddit."
superkuh•44m ago
This is the second death of reddit, the penultimate one. But it stems directly from the first death in ~2015 when they accepted the massive venture capital investment and then had to try to monetize the facebook refugees which meant clearing out all the business appropriate "undesirables" including firing many beloved long time corporate employee, and switching to model where people and corporations posted to their profiles (like facebook) instead of subreddits set up by the existing userbase. It hasn't been reddit since. And they're making that very clear as of yesterday.
nobleach•36m ago
I always considered the massive digg.com revolt to be the "beginning of the end". It was between Reddit and Kuro5hin in those days. Who was going be the next "Slashdot"? It's the same story over and over though. Site reaches critical mass, it needs to afford hosting, infra, salaries.... what do they do? Monetize.
mh2266•28m ago
iirc they removed “fat people hate”, a variety of subreddits named after racial slurs (including literally /r/<n-word>s) and a subreddit for “well it’s not technically porn” of children

new Reddit remains awful both design and implementation wise but the content they cleaned up wasn’t a big loss, and there’s still plenty of “non-desirable” content (so many porn subreddits, to start) on there

superkuh•26m ago
That actually happened much later. I am talking about examples like r/gundeals being removed, lots of accounts asking about it then getting banned, etc. Please don't try to imply that "undesirables" means just actually offensive or illegal behavior, though there was that on reddit too. Much like what the environment of a public bar would be: informal and varied.

It is not controversial to say that the corporate environment style social rules implemented in ~2015 went far beyond gnerally offensive content to the point where it was obviously catering to whims of the advertisers demanding they not be beside content their target demographics would just not like (ie, for political reasons or whatever).

m0llusk•44m ago
This is hyperbolic. Users that started with the older interface often prefer that. Humans do not like change. This is a trap that many software developers offering prereleases also fall into. The safety claim has as much to do with maintaining only one stack at a time. Keeping an older interface around extends vulnerabilities and generates ongoing maintenance costs. Referring to old Reddit as plain, safe HTML is not an accurate characterization.
echelon_musk•43m ago
I look forward to New HN.
busymom0•37m ago
The new interface is filled with dark patterns meant to make you waste as much time on the site. The huge amount of wasted white space making you having to scroll more and constant clicks ensures you spend more time on site and this watch more ads.
nhinck2•36m ago
Name one vulnerability
krapp•28m ago
> Keeping an older interface around extends vulnerabilities and generates ongoing maintenance costs.

For the backend, sure. But HTML is HTML. HTML doesn't have "vulnerabilities" (unless you want to count javascript, which can be updated without changing the HTML) and doesn't have "maintenance costs." Nothing about updating the site for vulnerabilities requires changing the actual layout of the site.

inigyou
msny•43m ago
I only used old.reddit, it's a sad day as I say goodbye to reddit because the new layout is terrible and since they killed open reddit clients there is no alternative.
IrishTechie•37m ago
You can still use old.reddit, you just need to be logged in. That said, if old.reddit ever went away altogether I would stop using it too.
NordStreamYacht•18m ago
I'm able to browse old.reddit.com without logging in right now.

Maybe it's for specific subs?

sphars•13m ago
Not yet, but it's coming to old.reddit.com globally soon: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/06/reddit-will-require-...
therealpygon•16m ago
For you to give that good-good user tracking data you do.
silon42•40m ago
I am not logged in into Reddit at work or on my phone. But I have redirect to old.reddit.com enabled.
_sys49152•38m ago
i feel like the old.reddit feeds lately are.....engineered to be slower refreshing throughout the day? does this make sense
BenFranklin100•38m ago
How did you do this? The in-house setting will revert back to new reddit.
busymom0•40m ago
> This is because appending site: reddit.com to a search query is basically a surefire way to find results written by genuine humans.

I don't think this has been true for a while now. Reddit has been filled with bots and shill accounts for a while.

corbet•39m ago
I am hard put to defend reddit and a lot of the things they do ... but I can attest, from personal experience, that scrapers are a huge problem for anybody trying to keep a complex site working. Withholding the display of the comments will significantly reduce the database traffic needed to satisfy a request; I can see why they would want to do that for anonymous readers.
rob•32m ago
Agreed; we have a Linode VPS for some small WordPress websites and it was grinding to a halt after an AI crawler started iterating through every possible date in "The Events Calendar"’s URL structure, sequentially scraping calendar pages all the way back to like 1970. I'm sure that's partially my fault for not putting it behind Cloudflare or anything though.
account42•8m ago
The response to that should be to restrict the events calendar and similar dynamic functionality, not to restrict the 99% of users who are accessing what should be 100% staticly cached HTML.
rob•1m ago
[delayed]
inigyou•28m ago
Well Reddit would have a lot less scraper traffic if it hadn't shut down the feed API 3 years ago in an attempt to keep its data closed and only distributed to Google (which paid money for it). Self-inflicted. No sympathy.
corbet
tempfile•39m ago
I expected this to go for a long time. It's the only way to anonymously browse 18+ subreddits. I would not be surprised if reddit accounts are effectively (if not always) connectable to a legal identity.
inigyou•22m ago
They require email and phone verification to sign up now. And if you want to view NSFW you have to verify with Persona.
felooboolooomba•38m ago
Meta has spent $2B on verification lobbying. Very successfully it seems.

In 1-2 years, you won't be able to browse the internet without scanning a body part and providing a ID for your ass.

https://www.gadgetreview.com/reddit-user-uncovers-who-is-beh...

masfuerte•34m ago
My mother tried to buy something on Amazon yesterday. It wouldn't let her check-out until she'd entered a code sent via WhatsApp. Which she doesn't have and doesn't want. She'll be buying her tat on eBay in future.

I dream that Amazon will lose lots of sales and backtrack, but I don't suppose they will.

NuclearPM•6m ago
What is a tat?
walrus01•5m ago
Are you sure it was actually via whatsapp, and not just a six digit code sent via regular SMS to the phone number on record for her account? It's possible whatsapp on her phone has simply hijacked the SMS client functionality and set itself as the default.
iugtmkbdfil834•34m ago
While your post is joking in tone, depending on how much we push back now is the exact level of delta between actual future and 'drink verification' copypasta[1].

[1]https://www.reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/1dfea32/drink_ve...

LaurensBER•37m ago
For users, Reddit has been in a downwards spiral since the IPO.

It's pretty clear that their focus is no longer on providing the best communities (see the many examples of power hungry mods, see below) or the best UX (see the deprecation of the API or the recent changes to old.reddit.com described in the post).

The "product" is now selling data to LLM companies, everything else is clearly a secondary concern. It's a shame because at some point I really enjoyed participating on Reddit and it was a good source of valuable information.

to give some examples of mod abuse:

- /r/energy used to (or still does?) ban anyone in favour of nuclear power

- /r/ubisoft and /r/assasinscreed do not allow any posts criticizing the writing or characters, these are clearly run by the company

- /r/unitedkingdom is famous for shadow banning everyone who's critical of some government program (I got a ban for criticizing motability cars)

- /r/europe banned me 1 minute after submitting a chat control post that got 1.5k upvotes before it was removed

- some vaccination subs ban anyone who posted in anti-vaccination subs (irrespective of what they post)

khurs•25m ago
Same with many/all news paper website comments, there is a preferred narrative that is controlled.
rjh29•20m ago
You can still enjoy Reddit and it's still a useful source of information. Just avoid the popular subs (including those you mention) or anything with 100k users or more. It's not difficult.
wraptile•17m ago
> For users, Reddit has been in a downwards spiral since the IPO.

I'd argue since redesign that introduced old.reddit

> to give some examples of mod abuse

You're barely scratching the surface. Many subreddits are directly astroturfed and sold out. The most clear indicator is when a subreddit links to alternative communication platform like Discord - it's there to signal that mods are selling out. This is particularly noticable in any entrepreneur/sass based subreddit.

Other subreddits like /r/worldnews are clearly propaganda operations.

All of these are solvable problems but Reddit simple has no one left who'd care to solve them.

I suggest decentralized Fediverse alternatives like Lemmy https://lemmy.world/ as Reddit will never get better.

tassadarforaiur•36m ago
I don't care about any of reddits social features anymore, I logged out a long time ago, but where do we go now for the knowledge base of old reddit how to questions / recommendations / guides? Good forums with trustworthy guides are hard to find for niches you're newly learning about. Discord is it's own problem. I haven't explored mastodon / blue sky / etc. in a while. Do we have to find an old dump of reddit html, and self host a snapshot of days before the front page of the Internet went behind a login page?
tastyfreeze•22m ago
What niche are you looking for? I usually append "forum" to topic searches when I am looking for humans with similar interests. I have found communities for all the niche topics I have looked for so far.
yesmens•21m ago
I predict that we will see people flocking to altnets such as i2p or tor.
skydhash•21m ago
I spent my whole childhood without computers and a good chunk of my teenage years without stable internet connection. Now, I have both, but due to the state of the internet, I'm returning to my old routine: A load of books to learn from and hopefully finding some time to apply the knowledge.
jdw64•34m ago
It seems like the community business itself is dying. Not just Reddit, but other communities and forums are all in decline. I thought it was because of LLMs, but they were already dying before LLMs appeared. Though LLMs did accelerate the decline.

The business model where a company owns a public community and monetizes through ads and search traffic seems to have just been a failed model.

The value of a community comes from the conversations and knowledge that users accumulate for free. But when the content company lowers accessibility under the pretense of protecting that content, new members stop coming in.

Platforms try to protect their assets, but in doing so, they end up damaging the ecosystem that created those assets in the first place.

Gareth321•29m ago
Cloudflare recently reported that the majority of internet traffic is bots now. It wouldn't surprise me if the vast majority of traffic and comments on Reddit is now bots. Those organic conversations you're having? Bots. Those arguments with annoying people? Bots. All those positive comments and stories about the latest product/movie/politician/party/company/country? Bots. The entire front page is most likely owned and controlled and paid for by the highest bidders.

I think people are becoming more cynical about "social" media. It's far less social now and mostly anti-social. Maybe the new term should be rage-media or consumption-media. Either way I don't need more outrage in my life. I say good riddance to social media.

inigyou•26m ago
Note that Cloudflare is the least reliable source for who's a bot.
jdw64•25m ago
I think it's not so much a problem with social media itself, but rather a phenomenon that occurs when consumption points converge. Anger is great for grabbing attention, and for newcomers trying to get noticed at a converged consumption point, generating anger or outrage is just the easiest way.

At first I thought it might be a problem with social media, but it seems more like a problem that arises when groups converge in one place. So these days, I just write my thoughts on my own homepage. That way I can write my own thoughts without getting angry at other people's posts.

traceroute66•34m ago
YouTube have also become very aggressive in forcing you to have a Google account and to watch videos to allegedly "help protect our community".

I avoid YouTube like the plague, but sadly there are lots of people out there who don't know anything other than YouTube exists and so they post their videos there (e.g. conference presentation recordings etc.).

khurs•24m ago
If you use DuckDuckGo and use the video search, you can watch many YouTube vids embedded

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=rickastley&ia=videos&iax=videos

Fun fact: some countries have no YouTube ads, so if you use Tor/VPN to change to an ad free country, then can watch ad free without an adblocker.

traceroute66•21m ago
Yeah, I find it intermittent as to whether it works or not. I'm guessing YT are playing whack-a-mole on that one.
imzadi•34m ago
If the login nag bothers you, narrow the screen until it disappears. You'll then have access to a hamburger for navigation
Gareth321•33m ago
I don't mind logging in, but when they remove old.reddit altogether, I'm just going to stop using Reddit. The new interface is the slimiest culmination of all the worst dark patterns and manipulative algorithms. I gave up on Facebook and I'll give up on Reddit. I have so many games and books and magazines to consume which I just don't because of this awful habit of picking up my phone to doom scroll. In fact, bring it on. Turn it off. I dare you. I need an excuse to log off Reddit forever. It's a toxic cesspit of the very worst people on the internet. Worse than 4chan. Worse than Kiwi Farms. When I look back on my time on Reddit I have almost only disdain. It is a supreme waste of my life.
inigyou•26m ago
They're requiring "age" verification via Persona on old.reddit now for some accounts.
Gareth321•18m ago
That would be a hard no for me.
account42•32m ago
I noticed they logged me out when I happened on a link recently. I don't think this change will make me log back in. The value of the site has already crashed, now the only question is which site will manage to capture the mainstream link/image discussion next.

> This is because appending site: reddit.com to a search query is basically a surefire way to find results written by genuine humans.

This hasn't been true for a while now. A lot of what you find on reddit these days feels incredibly fake. It's like there should be a variant of Goodhart's law: Once a forum becomes known for genuine human writing it stops being a forum for genuine human writing.

Klonoar•22m ago
Reddit has almost 20 years of comments.

You could certainly argue that it's less true now that there's legitimate people commenting, but there are years old threads on there with very helpful and valuable information that you can only really find via some incantations of Google search.

account42•20m ago
Have you ever looked at an old reddit comment thread.

  + Hey how do you do thing?
  |
  -+ [deleted]
   |
   -+ Thanks, that's just what I needed.
doubled112•6m ago
Some of that was a reaction to Reddit closing the APIs and blocking apps.
mothballed•4m ago
Reddit will delete anything remotely controversial if it contains referenced facts. They banned and deleted my account for simply stating the 5th amendment prohibits requiring incriminating yourself to exercise a right. An Ivy League educated lawyer dug up the comment one year after I posted it, told reddit I was distributing illegal legal advice, and had my whole account nuked.
wwalexander•31m ago
Another fun New Reddit quirk: on iOS, the un-dismissable “better in the app” popover makes scroll stop working, meaning you can’t scroll up to get the iOS-native “Open in App” toolbar that actually opens the app, so your only option is to click their hand-rolled button that just opens the App Store listing, or reload the page and tap the native “Open in App” button before the popover reappears.
tastyfreeze•13m ago
Its the same on Android now. Just another self inflicted gun shot from reddit. I now actively avoid reddit search results. Its unfortunate. Reddit had some toxic subs but at least you could expect mostly humans participating.
inigyou•29m ago
There is a Nitter for Reddit, called Redlib, correct?

Best to treat Reddit archives as read-only and modern Reddit as a marketing slopfarm. It mostly consists of bots trying to get their brands into AI training data.

throw7•29m ago
old reddit is broken... the message/mail notifications don't work/go away.
nottorp•28m ago
> is basically a surefire way to find results written by genuine humans

Was a surefire way?

inigyou•27m ago
Yep. In 2023. Now it's an AI bot farm
BryantD•28m ago
“Safety” is overloaded here. I agree with the author; the new front end doesn’t seem safer for end users. It probably does make it safer for Reddit in that it’s harder for scrapers to do their thing.
knorker•24m ago
I assume this is another push to force people onto the terrible "new" UI.

When they eventually remove the old reddit, they'll lose this 18 year reddit veteran. No way in hell am I using that infinite scroll abomination.

decimalenough•24m ago
> This is because appending site: reddit.com to a search query is basically a surefire way to find results written by genuine humans.

This is, sadly, not even remotely the case anymore.

ditchfieldcaleb•8m ago
Still works as long as you don't care about recent results and are okay with filtering for pre-2023 answers.

(So like, 20% as useful, but still...)

pwndByDeath•23m ago
I've not been a fan of Reddit in a while, but I do appreciate a useful asynchronous human interaction. I think reddit lost the useful humans a few bad ideas ago but I'm not well versed in that drama.

I'm curious what HN minds would consider a useful fix to this cyborg Internet problem. It seems having humans and bots coexisting is problematic.

If you had to start over knowing what could happened and what we should avoid, how would you do it?

Right now the reticulum network stack has my vote, it enables and cripples just the right things to make me think it might help.

But I don't earn my living from the commercial form of the Internet, I find I blame the commercial interest for the bulk of the problems (enabled by human fragility)

But I may just be a crusty old mind.

fidotron•19m ago
The problem isn't "Is this human or AI?" it's "Do we trust the entity with this identity or not?" meaning it's entirely possible to be anonymous but use a web-of-trust style system to promote/demote stories.

Part of the problem with that suggestion is everyone likes to tell everyone else who it is they should and shouldn't be trusting, so that dataset and acting on it would become a huge hot potato.

Klonoar•15m ago
There's a third theory of why they're doing this that I don't see discussed too much.

Behavioral tagging of bot traffic is actually easier when you're not serving plain HTML pages, because the number of signals thrown off by bad bots that don't exactly replicate browsing habits goes through the roof. The larger anti-bot implementations do a lot of this type of thing nowadays.

Bot authors no doubt have their own incentives for using old.reddit (lower bandwidth, conceptually simpler to crawl, etc) but it would not surprise me to learn that Reddit wants exactly one door for bots to have to shuffle through. They also don't work on old.reddit much at all these days, so any effort they have to put in to handling bot traffic is kept to one route.

Pretty dumb era of the internet we've wound up in.

benjiro29•15m ago
As somebody who did plenty of scraping for his own little projects, lets just say that reddit their security concerns are just PR for "we do not want to keep supporting old.reddit".

While yes, you can not simply scrap new reddit as easily as a pure html scraper is cheaper to run. And while the new reddit its js "slow down" scraping as it need to run over a headless browser. Do you slow scraping down a lot?

No. Because you can simply spin up more instances and route over more proxies. Given the fact that you can scrap millions of pages per day, on a single cheap 1 CPU node...

The limiting factor for scraping a website is not html vs js / client vs headless browser. Its avoiding detection by running from different ips, faking browser information and masking your traffic to not give off the smell of automatization (and avoiding tls fingerprinting).

I wrote this type of stuff before we had AI to help write it, in a few days time. Now with a LLM at your fingertips in a few hours, you will have a complete working version with cloaking build in.

And the larger size difference does not matter, you can block irrelevant files via faked cache responds, to give the server the impression that your a repeat client, and no need to flood your browser instance with images, fonts etc. Some think that this is a defense, aka throttling you with increased bandwidth usage lol

So in my personal opinion, its not about dealing with scrapers, but trying to push people to new reddit, so they can finally phase out old reddit.

PS: So much fun reading new reddit on your phone browser, to have it pop-up a "use our app" banner, that prevents you from interacting with the website anymore. And even blocks firefox its scroll ability (and thus accessing to the browser its nav bar). Tip for people: delete the sites cookies and cache regularly, to prevent this usage tracking, so the banner newer shows.

giancarlostoro•10m ago
I assume they are being screen scraped by LLMs even though you can find exports of reddit posts elsewhere. I can't blame them for trying to charge for API usage, it was never a cheap cost to them to begin with.
ChrisArchitect•10m ago
Cannot duplicate.

What I'm getting is a temporary/false "You've been blocked by network security" page but refreshing then brings up the reddit page as per usual.

https://old.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/1ujtebf/logging_in...

ChrisArchitect•9m ago
An earlier thread:

Tell HN: Old Reddit Now Requires Login

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48983857

ChrisArchitect•9m ago
Related:

Reddit will require you to log in to use old.reddit.com

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48740217

(Source: https://old.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/1ujtebf/logging_in...)

dust-jacket•8m ago
I feel like this is a deliberately obtuse response to a real and irritating change.

Old reddit is going to be MUCH, MUCH easier to scrape. Scraping has the potential to bring down the site. Gating old reddit to logged in users will massively mitigate that.

I don't like it either. But it's not hard to see a good reason why doing so helps "keep reddit safe"

Even if it also coincidentally makes it easier for them to make more money. Grr.

ChrisArchitect•6m ago
IF you're an actual user of the site, like, logging in and what not, you can still just set your preferences to use the old design. Never need to go to old.reddit
inigyou•25m ago
I thought the 2023 API lockdown was a very significant point. That's the first time they tried to block the site from being mirrored.
•
23m ago
Old Reddit is objectively a better interface. I agree that "it's HTML so it's safe" is bullshit.
•
26m ago
I doubt it. The scraper botnets aren't going to bother with niceties like APIs, they just come in over HTTPS and grab anything they can.
inigyou•21m ago
There was a whole mini-industry around scraping specifically Reddit using the API feed because it was so open. AI companies first trained on Pushshift, which is like Common Crawl for Reddit, which is why Reddit shut down Pushshift (with legal threats IIRC) at the same time.
uhhhhwhaaaa•27m ago
I personally don't like it, but hard to blame them.

Outside some Stoic altruists, this is their advantage and I'd do the same.

NitpickLawyer•26m ago
I don't understand why sites like reddit need to do any work on (unauthd) GET. They are not instant messaging platforms, they are forums. You can live with a ~1-2-5 minute delay on forums. So POSTs (from logged in users) append to a queue, and a worker does work at regular intervals, creates the HTML and that gets sent to a cache + distributed to a CDN if needed. There's no need to do work on unauthd GETs for a forum.
uhhhhwhaaaa•28m ago
I would view a website that requires users to go through a lengthy verification process.

Given all the astroturfing from companies and governments, this would give a bit of trust.

antihipocrat•21m ago
Would it? Or would it just open up another revenue stream for websites? Verified corporate accounts sure, but with prices set per number of usernames per account, billed monthly.
dzhiurgis•1m ago
Wasn't twitter/x meant to be that? Pay and verify to enter members club. Didn't quite take off all while destroying goodwill that blue badge used to have.
Aurornis•28m ago
Meta has not spent $2 billion on ID lobbying.

That bogus number came from a complete AI slop Reddit post that was later removed.

That’s why the only references you can find to it are from sites like your gadgetreview.com link that repost clickbait without fact checking anything.

nottorp•26m ago
It doesn't matter what they spent excatly but it's in their direct interest to raise legal moats for competitors. Kind of like what Allegedly Open AI tried with the "AI will kill us all" threats.
Aurornis•21m ago
> It doesn't matter what they spent excatly

If the number didn’t matter then the comment above wouldn’t have led with it to make their point.

The flaw in the original study was that someone started with a premise that Meta was at the heart of this and all spending could be traced back to Meta. They made Claude generate a report but they didn’t read any details, so they didn’t notice that Claude couldn’t access the actual documents. So it started guessing and hallucinating until it came up with the scary number that Meta was spending $2B on lobbying.

The entire premise that Meta is driving this with $2B of lobbying is an AI hallucination.

Reddit obviously is adding login gates to combat AI scrapers.

nottorp•7m ago
> he entire premise that Meta is driving this with $2B of lobbying is an AI hallucination.

I guess the $2B is hallucination. But it makes sense for them to do the "think of the children" lobby.

Scubabear68•4m ago
I disagree a little bit, but only for this reason: the amount matters because it is invariably very, very small compared to the revenue/profit of the company and the impact the lobbying has.

It is shocking what politicians will do for just five or six figure donations to their campaigns.

walrus01•25m ago
(13 years ago)

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/632877-halo-4/66477630

dzhiurgis•2m ago
And ~20 years ago computer riddled with porn malware was kinda normal.

Times change, so does certain expectations.

Gareth321•19m ago
What a lovely idea. Maybe I should try this.
jdw64•17m ago
Personally, if you need a moderate level of connection, there's something called the IndieWeb. Of course, sometimes you just need your own world without any connection at all.

Either way, I think creating your own digital garden is a valid approach. Thanks for agreeing with me, and have a good day :)

inigyou•24m ago
Good. The community business needs to die, and we need to return to actual communities. Since those are dead due to the previous transition to community businesses, it may take some time to recover.