Funny how times have changed and more or less everyone on every side is fighting for the strength and survival of their own groupthink and little more.
They realize the majority of their beliefs already existed before they were born and will continue on after they're dead. They have nothing to add to the conversation while they are too busy fighting. They turn their focus to developing their ideas peacefully and let their subcultures flourish once again.
This isn't the first cycle and won't be the last. The last major cycle was in the 20th century due to broadcast media. I think people sometimes forget how relatively young the internet is.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/we-are-monumentally-ba...
Juxtaposed with: https://youtu.be/8adu_rSMdXM?si=GZSeKWodp3ivFZyo
Your tax dollars, hard at work!
tl;dr Modern art existed before the CIA and even CIA predecessors did not originate it, but they did push it abroad to show that America is great because we put up with modern art made by socialists depite most americans disliking both the art and the artists
Some previous discussion:
Barbing•59m ago
gigatree•57m ago
math-man•55m ago
NordStreamYacht•41m ago
https://www.npr.org/2024/11/21/nx-s1-5199568/a-duct-taped-ba...
innis226•27m ago
NordStreamYacht•11m ago
https://smarthistory.org/andres-serrano-piss-christ/
evanjrowley•8m ago
evanjrowley•8m ago
bigstrat2003•41m ago
karmakurtisaani•37m ago
nine_k•16m ago
The dynamics are similar in Twitter today, too.
greenavocado•35m ago
colechristensen•24m ago
The morality in it comes from your motivation and methods. Secretly giving piles of money to the weirdos you successfully identify as being the leaders of artistic movements to amplify those movements can't be all that bad.
The question of the day is if you were the CIA trying to do the same thing today, who and what would you fund?