If we assume the real numbers exist, then perhaps the paradox resolves because there are uncountably many reals and only countably many nameable things, but then perhaps the paradox does not resolve because we assume ZFC is true and we can well order the reals, hence name the first unnameable real.
curtisblaine•9m ago
How is it a paradox? Isn't this just a proof that there are many unnamed things, but no unnameable ones?
snapcaster•40m ago
loa_in_•16m ago