The malware installed by LG on Microsoft PCs and the spying by smart TVs are both despicable. But I couldn’t get through this article.
Even if they were convenient shenanigans, in the longer term:
Political action > Purchasing Choices > Individual modifications
A non-cohesive angry rant
[Sceptre](https://www.sceptre.com/TV/4K-UHD-TV-category1category73.htm...)'s 4K series is sold at Wal-Mart, often for under half the web-listed prices. I’ve bought a few at the 42” scale for like $180 shipped. They’re fine and they’re incapable of all the spyware bullshit.
I don't know where you are, so I can't say what availability is like there. But it's worth doing a basic search.
What is it talking about? What boom?
If anything it's the opposite, as memory components become obscenely expensive.
roscas•1h ago
That is just stupid to give internet access to a "smart" tv or a "smart" phone. You have zero control over it.
____tom____•54m ago
You can do things like physically modifying your TV, or seeing if there are undocumented settings to disable things.
margalabargala•40m ago
Ancalagon•25m ago
drnick1•21m ago
Is this for real? This does not affect me as I use my own equipment, but I still find it hard to believe.
WalterGR•15m ago
Instructions for disabling it: https://www.xfinity.com/support/articles/disable-xfinity-wif...
akiselev•14m ago
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xfinity#Xfinity_WiFi
Terr_•13m ago
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/06/comcasts-new-neighborh...
ButlerianJihad•7m ago
Every Cox customer has a Panoramic WiFi router that advertises as a member of the “CoxWiFi” SSID, and other customers can authenticate there and access the Internet through your connection. This is on a strictly opt-out basis.
I’ve opted-out, and also my router is permanently in Bridge Mode, so there is no technical way for me to provide anyone a WiFi connection. But all my neighbors do, even if they are blissfully unaware.
skizm•53m ago
drnick1•24m ago
On a related note, you should absolutely remove the cellular modem from your car as well.
dylan604•5m ago
blitzar•52m ago
The smart here really isnt the issue.
groby_b•37m ago
And so your TV does need Internet access.
The same holds for many other devices, in different shapes. Sure, you can opt out of civilization completely to avoid all the side effects of late stage capitalism, but maybe it's worth applying a bit more nuanced thinking to find a balance that doesn't throw you back to the 1800s. (Unless you like the 1800s, in which case, enjoy)
drnick1•16m ago
Linux mini-PC running Bigscreen Plasma. No, it can't be used to stream Netflix at native resolution because of DRM. But if you can't live without Netflix content, you can use alternative sources and save money in the process. VacuumTube for YT instead of the official app.
Yes, this is an additional device, but it is not unlike a streaming stick or Android shitbox.
thwarted•5m ago
fusslo•21m ago
We collected such minimal information. Basically only enough to allow for OTAs, functionality, and debugging. Thinking back, we could've collected so much more.
I remember when Alexa hit the market and we (as a company) thought there's NO WAY amazon was making any money on them.
Today... NO WAY. Along the way the value stopped being "This product is priced so we can make a profit" and became "The data we collect is more valuable than the sale".
afarah1•21m ago
You might say it's naive, but is it really naive to buy a TV and expect it to be a device to display audiovisual content and not a spyware/adware machine?
I feel like it's not the user's behavior that should be put into question here, but the borderline criminal behavior of the manufacturer.