And, assuming that the article is accurate, obviously they shouldn't have banned an account for posting "Can't handle a pool, but wants our lake?". I think everyone would agree outside the Facebook team. That would be a classic Facebook over-moderation. Extreme to the point where I'm going to assume there is more to the story.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media_use_by_Donald_Tru...

And please, no fake canned complaints about "politicizing." The story is nakedly political from top to bottom (no pun intended).

Incidents like this are common enough, that this is what the system does. If it’s AI, or rogue mods, or zuck himself, it doesn’t matter because this is what the system is doing - and if this wasn’t an acceptable outcome to meta the system would be changed.

1. A Canadian business posted an image of a sign criticizing the US administration

2. Soon after, their Instagram account was suspended.

3. This has happened before with their Twitter account, which they were able to get restored after a week.

But you already knew that, and instead are making passive-aggressive insinuations. If you want to make an actual argument, make it.

As for me, that along with the other facts I know about the Trump administration are more than enough to form an opinion: this isn’t evidence of a politically-motivated takedown, but it certainly fits the administration’s character, and I’m not going to give them the benefit of the doubt.