frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Isar Aerospace reaches orbit and deploys payloads on second flight

https://isaraerospace.com/press/history-for-european-spaceflight-isar-aerospace-reaches-orbit-and...
131•mpweiher•2h ago•12 comments

Cloud in a Bottle: making self-hosting accessible to everyone

https://cloudinabottle.org/blog/launch-post
406•zplizzi•10h ago•190 comments

Play GTA Vice City in the Browser

https://quenq.com/apps/vice-city-online/
46•rzk•2h ago•19 comments

You Don't Have a Right to Safe Drinking Water, US Court Rules

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/drinking-water-mississippi-lawsuit/
64•vrganj•50m ago•19 comments

Music Theory for Programmers

https://runjs.app/blog/music-theory-for-programmers
134•birdculture•3d ago•56 comments

The revolt of the reader

https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2026/09/05/the-revolt-of-the-reader/
357•chmaynard•12h ago•149 comments

IBM Quantum Nighthawk R2

https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/nighthawk-r2
11•fuglede_•3d ago•0 comments

The ColorChecker, photography's most important 24 squares, turns 50

https://www.dpreview.com/news/the-colorchecker-photographys-most-important-24-squares-turns-50/
62•sohkamyung•4d ago•9 comments

AI, Tools and Transformation

https://www.ben-evans.com/benedictevans/2026/9/3/ai-tools-and-transformation
60•firexcy•7h ago•21 comments

OpenBSD Stories: Strange Medieval Devices

http://miod.online.fr/software/openbsd/stories/smd.html
62•zdw•3d ago•12 comments

Watch the 'Eclipse of the Century' Next Year When Spain, Egypt and More Go Dark

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/13/travel/solar-eclipse-2027-morocco-egypt.html
27•bookofjoe•3d ago•35 comments

AMD Based FreeBSD Desktop Reloaded

https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2026/09/06/amd-based-freebsd-desktop-reloaded/
53•vermaden•7h ago•4 comments

Discovery of a new OpenAI agent message board

https://collusion.wiki/
2187•moultano•1d ago•1545 comments

Learn Programming with OCaml

https://usr.lmf.cnrs.fr/lpo/
255•elvis70•17h ago•93 comments

Chrome again exempts Google from user site data settings

https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2026/9/1.html
406•ExMachina73•10h ago•60 comments

The "$60 Gaming PC" – AMD BC-250 (2025)

https://devquasar.com/hardware/the-60-gaming-pc-amd-bc-250/
344•networked•20h ago•99 comments

Private German rocket makes history, reaches orbit from European soil

https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/isar-aerospace-second-launch-norway-a...
605•bookmtn•13h ago•319 comments

Actively exploited sandbox RCE in all Chromium versions

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-85046
775•negura•1d ago•467 comments

Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

https://codeberg.org/mv12star/shitter/wiki/Instances
680•Cider9986•1d ago•346 comments

A Computer History Time Capsule

https://blog.archive.org/2026/08/27/a-computer-history-time-capsule/
7•mooreds•4d ago•0 comments

Visualizing Rust's Vtables: How dyn Trait Works In Memory

https://sofiabelen.github.io/projects/visualizing-rusts-vtables-how-dyn-trait-works-in-memory/
173•torutofu•20h ago•33 comments

GPT-6 Astra on robot arms

https://openai.robocurve.org/gpt-6-astra/
182•Anon84•8h ago•136 comments

Topologist's Map of the World

https://www.futilitycloset.com/2026/09/01/small-world-20/
91•beardyw•4d ago•25 comments

LLMs as a Cognitive Virus

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03344
272•canjobear•14h ago•198 comments

RecurseCenter.return()

https://mm-dev.rocks/series/recursecenter.return/
51•evakhoury•4d ago•8 comments

How Swiss tables work in Go built-in map

https://victoriametrics.com/blog/go-swiss-table-map/index.html
79•valyala•2d ago•5 comments

Balrogg: Demonically compacting (up to 15%) lossless Vorbis/Opus recompressor

https://github.com/iczelia/balrogg
84•palaiologos•2d ago•11 comments

Delidded Intel I9-14900KS CT Scan

https://www.lttlabs.com/articles/2026/09/02/delidded-intel-i9-14900ks
105•willx86•3d ago•9 comments

Site Is Closed on Sundays

https://v7.robweychert.com/
84•edent•3h ago•97 comments

Matching Puzzle Pieces and Disappointing Benchmarks

https://llogiq.github.io/2026/03/20/case.html
5•speckx•2d ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

You Don't Have a Right to Safe Drinking Water, US Court Rules

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/drinking-water-mississippi-lawsuit/
62•vrganj•50m ago

Comments

randyrand•18m ago
I'm not sure what a right to water really means.

A lot of rural cities don't even provide water. People have wells and you pay for them yourself.

OJFord•12m ago
I suppose it means that has to be available to you somehow, the easiest example perhaps being that if you're renting in such a place, the landlord is obligated to ensure access.
exe34•9m ago
The first paragraph of tfa:

> lawsuit against the city of Jackson, Mississippi, which alleged the city knowingly let residents drink lead-contaminated water.

The "right" here is about other people not contaminating your well for their profit. You don't have that right. They can contaminate your well for their profit and you have to find another source of water at your own cost.

passwordreset•9m ago
I think it's covered under that "right to life" section of the Constitution. Deliberately poisoning people through their water supply seems like a sure-fire way to deny the right to life of your citizens.
latexr•3m ago
Could we please not? For heaven’s sake, the first line of the article:

> (…) alleged the city knowingly let residents drink lead-contaminated water.

Knowingly let residents drink unsafe water. Can you not see an issue there? Can you not read past the title?

If you don’t know what “a right to safe water” means, then could you please do a web search to try to be informed about the matter before commenting? Took me two seconds to find a UN page.

https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/human-rights-water-and-s...

Again, on the first sentence, in bold:

> Access to water and sanitation are recognized by the United Nations as human rights – fundamental to everyone’s health, dignity and prosperity.

And on the second paragraph:

> Governments must take a human rights-based approach (HRBA) to water and sanitation improvements

There. There’s your right to water. It’s means that because it’s something fundamental, nations have an (at a minimum moral, but often legal) obligation to provide it to everyone under them that lacks it.

Just for good measure, here’s the Wikipedia page on Human Rights too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights

Again, the first sentence already explains a lot.

impossiblefork•15m ago
I think this is a ruling that's hard to justify. There are many frameworks under which the judge could have chosen to rule, it could be treated as assault, or some type of aggravated assault/battery, if the lead can be measured in the people who consumed it, it could be treated as fraud, since the water is presumably sold, etc. and reasoning about that it would ordinarily be a punishable tort would make it clear that the government can't impose that sort of thing either, just as it can't send anyone out to punch people.
JackFr•9m ago
The argument is the choice of the plaintiff. It’s not the role of the judge to argue the plaintiff’s case and find the most compelling argument.
Smaug123•14m ago
Misleadingly provocative headline, right? The actual ruling from the article is that the US Constitution does not by itself grant US citizens that right. As the article itself points out, there’s nothing stopping other agreements from granting the right, and indeed several states do so explicitly.
IsTom•10m ago
On the other hand it means that states can just not do that and leave their citizens without clean drinking water.
Smaug123•6m ago
Does it? I think that conclusion requires observing additionally that all federal law also fails to grant a right to safe drinking water, doesn’t it?
ianjbutler•5m ago
> Defendants’ actions allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of clean water and guileless information. These deprivations, while grievous, do not infringe upon any deeply rooted constitutional right.”

Nah, headline is optimistic actually: no right to clean water, to water tests, or to the truth about the tests if they occur. No right to healthcare, schools, or even deliverable mail either. But surely some of these are just the kind of thing you might expect as an absolute minimum everywhere if you have to pay taxes.

Smaug123•3m ago
Sorry, I think your pull quote is actually contradicting your gloss. Again, the pull quote states that it doesn’t infringe any constitutional right, not that it doesn’t infringe any rights granted for any other reason?
metalman•13m ago
Guess what folks, you now have anti rights.Sometimes I hate America and some americans for the bad things they do, but not like that. A good deal of what america is doing to itself these days looks just as insane as what they are doing to other countrys, or at least other countrys that are not doing it to themselves. There used to be metaphors about poison, and wells, but no one imagined that is could or would leap past that, and become ledgislated policy.
mschuster91•2m ago
> A good deal of what america is doing to itself these days looks just as insane as what they are doing to other countrys, or at least other countrys that are not doing it to themselves.

America voted for unrestrained rabid turbocapitalism not just once but twice. They knew what MAGA and Project 2025 were about, both announced their intentions clear as day, and now they're getting unrestrained rabid turbocapitalism - a world where corporations can do whatever the hell they want and people either have no rights at all or the rights they have on paper are de facto meaningless.

mbeavitt•10m ago
This headline is not correct. The ruling was that a constitutional lawsuit was not successful, not that the the US government has carte blanche to poison its citizens drinking water…

So, the correct headline would be “safe drinking water ruled not to be covered by the US constitution”. There are other binding agreements and regulations than the constitution in the US.

mdp2021•6m ago
Still not that simple:

> The Jackson plaintiffs alleged that their city government deliberately withheld information about the water’s toxicity, and exacerbated the problem through a series of boil-water notices - a practice that can eliminate some bacterial contamination, but also concentrates lead in water. Engelhardt stated there is no “constitutional right to truthful information from officials during a public health crisis”

lukan•5m ago
"Engelhardt stated there is no “constitutional right to truthful information from officials during a public health crisis.” "

" “Defendants’ actions allegedly deprived Plaintiffs of clean water and guileless information. These deprivations, while grievous, do not infringe upon any deeply rooted constitutional right.”"

He basically says, the constitution does not care, whether the government lies to citizens, so they continue to drink poison water.

Well, I always though trust of citizens in government is the main thing a constitution should provide and establish, but the "Donald Trump-appointed judge Kurt Engelhardt" apparently thinks different.

icedrift•3m ago
The headline look pretty accurate to me. Under this ruling, being a US citizen does not guarantee you a constitutional right to safe drinking water; that right would depend on state legislation.

I think the bigger deal is that the people of Jackson were lied to and this sets the precedent that there is no recourse. It's not like someone in Flint knowingly drank contaminated water, the city withheld the fact that their water was contaminated with unsafe levels of lead.