Google stole open source code without crediting the authors (Artemis/Minitap)

https://www.minitap.ai/blog/i-expected-better-from-google

88•MysteryPancake•1h ago

Comments

pmkary•39m ago

When you say "don't be evil"; just where is your threshold Google?

cortesoft•38m ago

They removed that years ago.

dietr1ch•33m ago

Not around since 2015, and desperately needed since around 2018-2019 with those military contracts and silos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_evil

dataflow•37m ago

> The author history was harder to understand. An earlier package file listed Pierre-Louis Favreau, Jean-Pierre Lo, and Nicolas Dehandschoewercker. The version that replaced it removed all three names and substituted another author. The only change to the files was the author list. GitHub’s activity record shows that the replacement happened through a force push in August, before our investigation this September.

Wow, this looks pretty damning. I can't imagine Google seeing this as worth the risks. Is an innocent explanation possible here?

gr71•13m ago

This !

VoidWhisperer•9m ago

If there is an innocent explanation, I'd love to hear it, because it kind of reads like the force push was done to move the commit with the attribution change out of the public eye so it wasnt clear what they had done.

eadwu•7m ago

Not Google or related to any of the projects.

This is normal (specific to pyproject.toml overwriting authors). I am not sure about pyproject.toml conventions but I would have done the same. This is the equivalent of telling you who the maintainers of the project are.

Usually what you see in the code is the retention of Copyright statements on source code and LICENSE with some reference on README.

harshavamsi•29m ago

https://github.com/google/artemis/commit/371aa6df56880643da5...

They're trying to cover it up now

rkagerer•24m ago

Is that a coverup - eg. are they retroactively rewriting old comments - or are they simply jumping on this and trying to correct the problem?

(Although I would say it isn't a very good-faith effort to address the issue if they don't put back the author attributions they removed).

lunchbucket•15m ago

And if they had instead chosen to remain silent on the origin of the code, how would you have characterized their actions then?

m00x•5m ago

They only did it because minitap called them out? It's in the post.

They were in clear violation of Apache 2.0

jimrandomh•14m ago

That's not "trying to cover it up", that's a link to them adding credits that were missing, which is the main corrective action to get into compliance with the source project's license.

m00x•7m ago

de6u99er•28m ago

I'd like to know how many imposters work in big tech.

bilekas•17m ago

Well I am shocked, who would have thought, an advertising company who prides themselves on not being evil, used code that wasn't credited. I mean, if that's the case, we better start a revolution.

RossBencina•10m ago

Flagging because the title here on HN is editorializing. The actual page title is "I expected better from Google"

I was going to comment on the title's perpetuation of big IPs stealing/theft meme but it turns out that TFA did not use those words.

neilv•5m ago

Regardless of whether or not Google is liable, what would be interesting to me is how this happened, the role(s) at Google that were involved, when each knew of the problem, and what each did.

Google no longer provides direct URLs in search results

A misalignment of AI in mathematics

I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

Pandas Should Go Extinct

A Design Space Exploration of Async/Await

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

GrapheneOS' rewritten Messages app is released

Mind-altering drugs played key role in rise of Andean civilization

Project Blinkenlights

Litelm: LiteLLM Without the Bloat

Hepburn Romanization: How to Read Japanese in the Latin Alphabet

Show HN: ResolveHQ – A Helpdesk Built on Cloudflare Workers, D1, R2 and Queues

Λ Snap – An inviting programming language for kids and adults for CS study

AlphaGenome maps 9B DNA variants

I've operated petabyte-scale ClickHouse clusters for 5 years

Rune is now open source

The EPA is planning to scrap public review rules for data center pollution

Great Lakes sturgeon may be 400 years old:Scientists rethinking how to save them

AI researchers debate how close we are to recursive self-improvement

Show HN: Graphify C# – Compiler-accurate Find Usages for coding agents

Logo Programming Language

Testing Race Conditions

Starlink Signal Leakage Threatens Radio Astronomy's Most Critical Frequencies

Show HN: Bodily Oddities

Claude is only available to people over 18 years

How we rebuilt complex permissions without migrating to Zanzibar

Zep AI (YC W24) Is Hiring a Head of Forward Deployed Engineering

Ask HN: Did Google kill its enterprise workhorse model?

QueryBrew: System-Agnostic SQL-to-SQL Query Optimization [pdf]

RTK reports token savings, but our cost benchmarks disagree