frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Nokia Design Archive (2025)

https://nokiadesignarchive.aalto.fi/index.html
68•pillars•1h ago•25 comments

Linux support is coming to Snapdragon X2 Series

https://www.qualcomm.com/news/onq/2026/09/snapdragon-summit-agentic-ai-pcs-linux
444•aaronday•12h ago•187 comments

Claude discovers a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-discovers-novel-enzyme-system
665•raahelb•17h ago•680 comments

Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspected arson attack

https://notesfrompoland.com/2026/09/24/starlink-ground-station-in-poland-hit-by-fire-in-suspected...
71•giuliomagnifico•1h ago•25 comments

Ideas on modernizing the open-source desktop

https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1095425/2d9f411252325784/
163•signa11•8h ago•166 comments

RAM: the forgotten history (2024)

https://blog.coredump.cx/p/memory-the-forgotten-history
34•Luc•1d ago•0 comments

Meta takes down a critical video about meta AI Glasses after filming at Meta

https://www.reddit.com/r/facebook/comments/1wotwrk/meta_takes_down_a_critical_video_about_meta_ai/
194•pieterr•3h ago•77 comments

ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit

https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/09/23/arxiv-receives-multiyear-investment/
200•JohnHammersley•12h ago•24 comments

Contrastive Language Models

https://contrastive-lm.notion.site/
86•erichocean•7h ago•18 comments

Early rogue AI agent activity and attempts to hack found on urlquery.net

https://transluce.org/agent-activity
148•snikolaev•6h ago•121 comments

VSCode's SSH Agent Is Bananas (2025)

https://fly.io/blog/vscode-ssh-wtf/
243•Rapzid•14h ago•152 comments

The "Windows XP Box" (2003)

https://www.mini-itx.com/projects/windowsxpbox/
162•doubletwoyou•2d ago•29 comments

Virtio-nvgpu: Near-native Nvidia GPU access inside a KVM guest

https://github.com/nestrilabs/virtio-nvgpu
109•WanjohiRyan•10h ago•46 comments

Fixing the Portobello Police Station Clock

https://pointinthecloud.com/2026-04-11-211700.html
457•avidly•20h ago•103 comments

OpenAI agent hacked Australian government website, PM says

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgl73pxgndwt
84•rudy6912•8h ago•45 comments

Women Who Sold Books Door to Door

https://daily.jstor.org/the-women-who-sold-books-door-to-door/
32•herbertl•2d ago•0 comments

Why 'What's Opera, Doc?' looks like that

https://animationobsessive.substack.com/p/why-whats-opera-doc-looks-like-that
71•CharlesW•19h ago•16 comments

Making portable my unportable transputer C compiler

https://nanochess.org/transputer_c_compiler.html
51•nanochess•2d ago•4 comments

Mercury 2.5 LLM hits 770 tokens per second

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/mercury-2-5
120•Retro_Dev•13h ago•68 comments

Meta VR Glasses

https://www.meta.com/vr-glasses/
419•polymorph1sm•11h ago•370 comments

AI has no intent and no motivation

https://www.i-programmer.info/news/245-view-point/19164-ai-has-no-motivation.html
36•aquastorm•2h ago•39 comments

Making Tailscale Faster

https://tailscale.com/blog/making-tailscale-faster
176•yarapavan•17h ago•69 comments

Automated optimization of a molecular simulation program

https://shishir-iyer.medium.com/automated-optimization-of-a-molecular-simulation-program-4a28a2bc...
3•shishir03•1d ago•0 comments

Looks promising for document editing with your agent

https://www.paperinstruments.com/blog/introducing-paper-office
5•nvmdbljstm•2h ago•0 comments

The mystery animal on an ancient god's head

https://signoregalilei.com/2026/09/13/the-mystery-animal-on-an-ancient-gods-head/
114•surprisetalk•1d ago•35 comments

A brief history of Windows scroll bar shortcuts

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260922-00/?p=112719/
146•tybulewicz•17h ago•85 comments

Tokens too cheap to meter

https://jyn.dev/tokens-too-cheap-to-meter/
305•teoruiz•1d ago•207 comments

Solving for faster SHA-1 collision detection

https://sam.dev/blog/faster-sha1-collision-detection
45•srijs•2d ago•9 comments

Italian parliament votes for return to nuclear energy

https://apnews.com/article/italy-nuclear-chernobyl-4891b6b7c7791ae84db6b0bf0f7cf567
807•geox•18h ago•640 comments

Show HN: An open-source manufacturing ERP/MES/QMS

https://carbon.ms/self-hosted
40•barbinbrad•10h ago•17 comments
Open in hackernews

Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspected arson attack

https://notesfrompoland.com/2026/09/24/starlink-ground-station-in-poland-hit-by-fire-in-suspected-arson-attack/
69•giuliomagnifico•1h ago

Comments

Shank•33m ago
It feels like it’s very, very risky territory for these activities to be “occurring” in a NATO country. I’m sure everyone else is thinking the same thing, but at what point does Article 5 get invoked?
newsclues•30m ago
Unlikely given that disposable cutout agents or useful idiots are used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrestricted_Warfare or hybrid warfare is designed to avoid full military action. But the tit for tat escalation in kind can lead to real war.

arethuza•27m ago
Sounds very like what happened in London a couple of years back:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04g5x1wq5vo

WJW•23m ago
It would be interesting to see graphs of how similarly "unprovable" sabotage actions have developed in Russia over the past few years. I doubt we'd ever see accurate reporting out of Russia, but it seems like an obvious thing to do for both Ukrainian intelligence and also for the wider West. It's also be likely to be underreported on because neither the perpetrator nor the victim gains all that much from reporting these kind of things.
vintermann•2m ago
I see it as obvious that the Nord Stream pipeline was not blown up without US permission at the very least. (And the media's insistence that it was probably Russia which blew up their own pipeline convinced me beyond doubt that they see loyalty to the war effort as trumping any obligation to the truth). Of course there are going to be sabotage actions the other way too.
Kinrany•27m ago
Undermining article 5 is the goal, so NATO needs to figure out how to invoke it gradually.

One thought is to pretend to not know that it's Russia, and invoke it against an "unidentified adversary".

ElProlactin•27m ago
> ...but at what point does Article 5 get invoked

Probably not as likely as you think.

First, these things intentionally fall short of clear "armed attacks" and are designed around plausible deniability.

Second, Europe/NATO are not looking for a fight. Russia is in a bad spot right now, but NATO is not in a great spot for a kinetic conflict with Russia either.

Lastly, I don't think NATO countries are eager to test America's willingness to defend Europe under the Trump administration because they already know the likely answer when they call for help.

Loughla•18m ago
The last one is the strongest one. Our prior allies know they just can't count on us at all, when it comes to Russia, especially.

It is a sad state of affairs.

jwr•20m ago
It's a typical Russian strategy: gradually increase the intensity of operations, while pretending you have nothing to do with it. That is exactly how war in Ukraine began (way back with the first incursions of "little green men").

What we have been seeing is this gradual escalation. It's like boiling a frog slowly. Each escalation is too small to trigger a significant response, but after a while you suddenly notice that your country is burning.

I expect more of this in the near future. I wish the world stopped treating Russia as "just another business partner".

vintermann•9m ago
Ukraine is currently striking facilities deep inside Russia.

Russia could hit back in the same way easily, and to some degree they do. But their problem is that the equivalent weapons factories, refineries etc. often aren't in Ukraine, but in NATO countries supplying Ukraine and giving Ukraine explicit permission to use them against targets inside Russia - until they got that in May 2024, Ukraine understandably did not risk alienating their suppliers by doing that.

There aren't very many new lines of escalation crossed here. Russia views it as NATOs proxy war against them now - many hawks in the west haven't been shy about describing it as such either.

applfanboysbgon•4m ago
GTFO, Russian propagandist. If Russia dislikes the state of affairs there's a reallyyy easy solution: don't invade other countries baselessly. "NATO's proxy war" is a really funny way to describe the Russian war of aggression.
lnsru•3m ago
I am pretty sure every bigger German company has active sales team waiting for the end of the sanctions to fly on the same day to Moscow and continue/start new business. Construction materials, cars&trucks, oil refinery equipment, new deeper bunkers… everything is needed in russia. The west doesn’t see an enemy. Enemy of freedom, free speech and free thinking. Freedom to be a gay or autistic person in public. Euros and dollars matter though.
fidotron•17m ago
Let's cut to the chase here: the root problem is now a critical mass of the population simply won't believe the government blame for virtually any incident since false flags are now such a widely recognized concept.

The Nord Stream incident being a fine example.

XorNot•12m ago
We're nowhere near it. Article 5 is armed conflict between nuclear armed nations.

No one wants to go near that because everyone will reliably die.

nikanj•9m ago
Trump considers the EU to be his enemy and Putin is a master of salami tactics [1] so the answer is ”Probably never”

[1] https://youtu.be/yg-UqIIvang

vlyan•4m ago
what exactly do you think is going to happen if article 5 gets invoked?

did America's current Special Military Operation not made it clear that missiles and jets alone don't win wars?

joinHNtheysaid•32m ago
The incident rate should rise drastically the more russia gets closer to loosing. https://acleddata.com/report/testing-waters-suspected-russia...

I must say a web/world without them and the quatari /iranian influence operations would be pleasant.

yanis_t•24m ago
For anyone interested, there’s another part of the Starlink besides the satellites and your dish - ground stations (gateways) [].

These are the large clusters of antennas that communicate with the satellites and connect the Starlink network to the Internet on Earth. Looks like one of these was set on fire.

https://starlink.com/support/article/45d1d256-171e-0f67-4895...
chinathrow•18m ago
Are they required to have precise locations listed?
embedding-shape•8m ago
How would you know you live close enough to one for a physical link with it otherwise? I guess they could put "General 10km area here" but would still be kind of bad for people living on the opposite end of the "general area".
toast0•3m ago
In many jurisdictions, you need a license to operate a teleport, and the applications are public and require a precise location.

There's a lot of RF emissions right there.

kamranjon•13m ago
Huh… I always thought direct satellite connection was one of the things that distinguished starlink from cellular tech like 4g or 5g, and that low earth orbit was what made it possible… what actually makes starlink different?

Edit: oh I think? I understand now, these basically relay the internet itself up to the satellites - so your individual starlink dish is still talking directly to a satellite but the satellite resolves your request for a website through these ground stations. I think?

HackerThemAll•3m ago
This ground station provides connectivity to Ukraine, therefore it's easy to imagine that russia the aggressor is trying to disable it to take down drone air defense and impede the ability of Ukraine to hit targets in the aggressor's territory.
spockz•10m ago
It is. But at some point traffic had to hit the ground to connect to other parts of the internet. That happens at these ground stations.