I must say a web/world without them and the quatari /iranian influence operations would be pleasant.
These are the large clusters of antennas that communicate with the satellites and connect the Starlink network to the Internet on Earth. Looks like one of these was set on fire.
https://starlink.com/support/article/45d1d256-171e-0f67-4895...There's a lot of RF emissions right there.
Edit: oh I think? I understand now, these basically relay the internet itself up to the satellites - so your individual starlink dish is still talking directly to a satellite but the satellite resolves your request for a website through these ground stations. I think?
Shank•33m ago
newsclues•30m ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unrestricted_Warfare or hybrid warfare is designed to avoid full military action. But the tit for tat escalation in kind can lead to real war.
arethuza•27m ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04g5x1wq5vo
WJW•23m ago
vintermann•2m ago
Kinrany•27m ago
One thought is to pretend to not know that it's Russia, and invoke it against an "unidentified adversary".
ElProlactin•27m ago
Probably not as likely as you think.
First, these things intentionally fall short of clear "armed attacks" and are designed around plausible deniability.
Second, Europe/NATO are not looking for a fight. Russia is in a bad spot right now, but NATO is not in a great spot for a kinetic conflict with Russia either.
Lastly, I don't think NATO countries are eager to test America's willingness to defend Europe under the Trump administration because they already know the likely answer when they call for help.
Loughla•18m ago
It is a sad state of affairs.
jwr•20m ago
What we have been seeing is this gradual escalation. It's like boiling a frog slowly. Each escalation is too small to trigger a significant response, but after a while you suddenly notice that your country is burning.
I expect more of this in the near future. I wish the world stopped treating Russia as "just another business partner".
vintermann•9m ago
Russia could hit back in the same way easily, and to some degree they do. But their problem is that the equivalent weapons factories, refineries etc. often aren't in Ukraine, but in NATO countries supplying Ukraine and giving Ukraine explicit permission to use them against targets inside Russia - until they got that in May 2024, Ukraine understandably did not risk alienating their suppliers by doing that.
There aren't very many new lines of escalation crossed here. Russia views it as NATOs proxy war against them now - many hawks in the west haven't been shy about describing it as such either.
applfanboysbgon•4m ago
lnsru•3m ago
fidotron•17m ago
The Nord Stream incident being a fine example.
XorNot•12m ago
No one wants to go near that because everyone will reliably die.
nikanj•9m ago
[1] https://youtu.be/yg-UqIIvang
vlyan•4m ago
did America's current Special Military Operation not made it clear that missiles and jets alone don't win wars?