https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/no-heart-cancer-th...
I greatly resent having to be a biological organism and subject to all the poor engineering and design decisions that entails.
The first word of that sentence implies its absurdity quite beautifully. She resents, therefor she is.And then this:
Brains. After you reach adulthood, neurons don’t divide. If some of your neurons die—which happens every day—then they’re gone. If you get a brain injury, the other neurons will try to “learn around” the injury, but the neurons themselves are never replaced.
We need more neuroscience in schools! This summary is technically correct ofc, but to imply that the brain is missing some obviously-better option is absurd. We're meat that thinks, y'all; it's far from crap.Loss of neurons isn't disastrous as long as it's not too many. Babies are born with several times more neurons than children have, and spend a few months letting all the useless ones die. Apparently it's better to start with a random tangle and prune it to shape (like cutting a box hedge) than to make a hedge grow in a box shape to begin with.
And IIRC brains can grow more neurons under some circumstances (certain drugs?) - they just normally don't.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193459092...
We can expect evolution to do the right thing for the genes. Not for us.
That's it. That's the entire thing. Plus some nuance about things that self-replicate faster than other things...
It occurs at all levels. Amyloid protein in Alzheimer's patients is self-replicating. So are cells. So are individual parts of cells. Sometimes things replicate by being parts of a larger thing that replicates, sometimes they don't. It's all one big chaotic tangled mess with no particular purpose or design. Human cells evolve, so do humans, so do human societies. So do rocks.
The Greeks chose liver because it symbolized the defiance Prometheus had against gods.
In any case, what would you expect from such a platform? That would help with recomendations.
So by destroying Prometheus' liver, Zeus attempted to destroy his human emotions, including his pride and defiance against gods.
It could have been because the liver was regenerative and they were using the titan with the regenerating liver as another reference to humanity, or it could have been as someone pointed out because predators like to eat the liver first, or it could have been that you can take damage to the liver and live for hours afterwards in agony whereas the same amount of damage to the heart or lungs is apt to cause death to come much quicker.
Perhaps there are undiscovered variants out there were the eagle or a serpent or some other animal attacks his genitals, or his eyes.
But at any rate the Eagle ate his liver, it means nothing in particular, and at the same time it means every particular interpretation we can place on it.
schnuri•2h ago
chistev•1h ago
CookieCrisp•56m ago
EduardoBautista•55m ago
lukan•49m ago
(If we are talking about hunter gatherers, not poor exploited peasants)
1attice•35m ago
Fezzik•11m ago
If you made it past age 5 as a hunter-gatherer you’d likely live to 50-60 years of age.
1attice•5m ago
steve_adams_86•9m ago
markyc•1h ago
arcanemachiner•57m ago
dgunay•55m ago
micromacrofoot•42m ago
RobotToaster•55m ago
ericmay•45m ago