frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Replacement of petroleum based products with plant-based materials (2025)

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70108
38•thelastgallon•2h ago•7 comments

Run Qwen 3.8 Flash Next (125B) on consumer hardware (RTX 4090) at 100T/s

https://github.com/Niko1221/Strata
742•snehesht•18h ago•333 comments

We ported the original Doom to SQL

https://cedardb.com/blog/sqldoom/
41•Vaslo•1d ago•5 comments

In the wake of closure, a digital archive of animated materials appears online

https://filmstories.co.uk/news/tippett-studios-in-the-wake-of-its-closure-a-digital-archive-of-an...
109•rdmuser•10h ago•11 comments

A 40ms Go garbage collector pause caused by swap

https://frn.sh/go-gc/
66•shellpipe•6h ago•30 comments

Infidel goes wild

https://blog.zarfhome.com/2026/10/infidel-goes-wild
122•tobr•1d ago•19 comments

A browser-native classic Visual Basic VB6 IDE

https://wieslawsoltes.github.io/VB6/
168•wiso•12h ago•65 comments

The Tao of Backup

http://www.taobackup.com/index.html
111•vntok•2d ago•27 comments

Powerless F1 drivers frustrated by Bahrain F1 software glitch

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/horrible-totally-unacceptable-powerless-f1-drivers-frustrated-...
179•llm_nerd•5h ago•117 comments

Turn off Apple Intelligence on macOS 27 and get its disk space back

https://github.com/omlahore/RemoveMacAI
519•privacyisntdead•11h ago•327 comments

Gods in the Classroom: Religion and Education in First Millennium BCE Babylonia

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/iraq/article/gods-in-the-classroom-religion-and-education...
16•pseudolus•3d ago•0 comments

Tell HN: Bob Cringely has died

856•paveworld•1d ago•182 comments

Improper redaction reveals Google Data Center water and electricity usage

https://www.1011now.com/2026/09/30/more-questions-than-answers-about-lincolns-google-data-center-...
358•sensanaty•11h ago•462 comments

Safe Optimistic Lock Coupling

http://databasearchitects.blogspot.com/2026/04/safe-optimistic-lock-coupling.html
5•greghn•3d ago•0 comments

Self-hosted HTTP tunnels with SSH and Nginx

https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/blog/2026-http-over-ssh
122•renehsz•8h ago•30 comments

Automating my 35mm film scanning pipeline

https://shannadige.com/blog/darkroom/
66•shannadige•1d ago•47 comments

Demystifying Tufte's data-ink ratio

https://tuftesrazor.scienceux.org/
31•s4074433•2d ago•10 comments

Interview with Chicken Scheme Maintainer Sjamaan/Peter Bex

https://alexalejandre.com/interviews/peter-bex/
33•veqq•2d ago•7 comments

Watson Jr. memo about CDC 6600 (1963)

https://www.computerhistory.org/revolution/supercomputers/10/33/62
37•mooreds•1d ago•21 comments

'Neanderthals Among Us' review

https://www.historytoday.com/archive/review/neanderthals-among-us-peter-sahlins-review
69•pepys•1d ago•59 comments

Xray-core concealed a certificate verification bypass vulnerability

https://github.com/net4people/bbs/issues/672
75•timbill•13h ago•10 comments

Homa: The end of TCP for AI clusters [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZ8WWZzoaR0
70•signa11•11h ago•35 comments

All I wanted was a custom domain email

https://jacobg.co/emails-at-jacobg-co/
59•jgx0•13h ago•82 comments

Nearly 200 people under observation after Irkutsk lab worker dies from plague

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2026/10/02/nearly-200-people-under-observation-after-irkutsk-lab-w...
192•ericmay•4h ago•156 comments

Show HN: Glashütte Trash Clock – A 30-minute pendulum clock made from trash

https://niklasroy.com/gtc/
185•r0r0•3d ago•26 comments

Bill Draper has died

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/30/technology/william-draper-dead.html
115•bookofjoe•18h ago•36 comments

What is going on with ceiling fans

https://mcmansionhell.com/post/829127919552151552/what-is-going-on-with-ceiling-fans
279•colinprince•4d ago•249 comments

How to scale intent, quality, and artistry with AI [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLvFTMtw4Jk
75•simonjgreen•22h ago•25 comments

Fixed Points and Strike Mandates (2012)

https://pvk.ca/Blog/2012/02/19/fixed-points-and-strike-mandates/
12•luu•4d ago•1 comments

Results from the ASIC puzzle

https://blog.janestreet.com/asic-puzzle-results/
85•eru•2d ago•42 comments
Open in hackernews

Anthropic reported diary entry to police, woman faces felony charge

https://www.techspot.com/news/114091-florida-woman-used-claude-diary-anthropic-reported-shoot.html
49•emptybits•1h ago

Comments

altmanaltman•56m ago
> Heller faces a charge of making a written threat of violence under Florida law. Florida Statute 836.10 makes it a second-degree felony to send, post, or transmit a written or electronic record threatening to kill or injure someone, carry out a mass shooting, or commit an act of terrorism. The communication must be made in a manner in which another person may view it.

Thought crimes are real when you're sharing your thoughts with Claude

Guvante•48m ago
Auditing logs is a crazy interpretation of "another person may view it"
danpalmer•44m ago
I wonder if "criminal intent" may be missing here given that most people probably operate under the assumption that Anthropic are not reading their messages.
bossyTeacher•40m ago
I think people have a binary understanding on this. Someone is either reading their messages or not. While the reality is that all the messages are read by a machine (not unlike GMail and Outlook) and anything suspicious gets flagged up so a human can read it. This obscure the concept of "reading" as most laypeople understand it.

Summary: don't type in Claude anything you wouldn't like a human to read.

jimbob45•38m ago
It tells you exactly what it does with your information if you ask it, including this exact scenario, and has for at least four months now (when I asked).
calgoo•28m ago
Yes but you are someone (i assume because you are on HN) that at least understands this point. There are A LOT of people that use it as their confidant, expecting it to be private. There is a massive education issue going on as its not in the interest of these Corpos to make you fear sharing all your details with them. Because, then you wont get Dot or whatever Anthropic comes up with and share all your personal info with it.
danpalmer•15m ago
You're not wrong, and it may come down to this in court, but there's a difference between what people think happens, or the reasonable expectations, and what actually happens, and I think it's important to recognise that difference and why it comes about.

I don't think someone is an idiot for thinking that the information they type into their private Claude account is private. I also don't think people are idiots for thinking their phone is listening to them and giving them targeted advertising based on that. Both are reasonable deductions from their lived experiences. Both are wrong.

foolfoolz•46m ago
this has nothing to do with claude. “thought” is fine. “written and shared” is illegal all over

https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/everyone-deserves-to-die...

https://www.wdsu.com/article/maryland-high-school-student-ch...

https://www.pinellassheriff.gov/21-023-deputies-arrest-pinel...

danpalmer•39m ago
I think it's a reasonable point to make. Writing things down is a part of "thought" for many, including those who keep diaries/journals. If you write in a private journal you do so with the expectation that is not shared, and that wouldn't seem to break this law (with my naive reading).
JumpCrisscross•37m ago
> “written and shared” is illegal all over

I think it’s valid to ask if tapping something into Claude is legitimately sharing a threat.

I don’t think it is. I also think the sheriff could have found more-substantial evidence if she was actually planning domestic terrorism.

That said, if the shooting happened and we were looking at this before? It’s a tough balance without an easy answer.

rimliu•26m ago
Should CEOs of Antrophic and OpenAI be reported too then? They cannot stop saying that AI will destroy humans.
quadhome•39m ago
It is unlawful for any person to send, post, or transmit, or procure the sending, posting, or transmission of, a writing or other record, including an electronic record, in any manner in which it may be viewed by another person, when in such writing or record the person makes a threat to: (a) Kill or to do bodily harm to another person; or (b) Conduct a mass shooting or an act of terrorism.

— via https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Disp...

The DA is serious about "in any matter."

tkel•31m ago
Except if you're one of the "warfighters" that Anthropic supports
dotancohen•30m ago
Is the LLM now "another person"?
elil17•23m ago
I suppose since Anthropic's T&Cs allow them to have a person read your chats, that makes it violate the law. Of course, if Anthropic didn't have that in their T&Cs, it wouldn't have been illegal to write.
andylynch•23m ago
The company that runs it is
1659447091•
socializer•39m ago
I have some sympathy for Anthropic here because I've seen the headlines after OpenAI failed to report a shooter in a similar situation. So from their perspective, it's damned-if-you-don't, damned-if-you-do.

However, people need to get it in their heads that they're not chatting with their secret BFF, they're chatting with Big Tech. Before LLMs, Big Tech had no way to scrutinize the bulk of what was going on within their services, so you could have a secret hate diary in Google Docs. Now, everything you say or write can be automatically screened for red flags on a planetary scale, and probably will be because that's what the regulators and "concerned citizens" will demand. In a couple of years, you'll be biting your tongue a lot more often in private chats.

vulcan1964•25m ago
And such was the case for a man who snapped a photo of his own child to send to the doctor which got uploaded to his Google photos resulting in his Google account of over a decade getting shutdown for CSAM.

As another commenter said, you're not chatting with a friend; you're chatting with Big Tech.

How much do you love Big Brother?

JumpCrisscross•23m ago
> people need to get it in their heads that they're not chatting with their secret BFF, they're chatting with Big Tech

Yup. And with zero privacy protections in statute for AI chat, there is nothing to prevent an AI CEO looking to curry political favour from e.g. handing over the private correspondence of an opponent or an entire district’s residents.

krzat•22m ago
I suspect it will go further: imagine giving an mp3 to LLM to clean up some noise. It detects it was illegally downloaded from youtube, deletes it and automatically fines you via attached credit card.
thih9•34m ago
In any case this is proof that law and negative PR can influence tech companies, including frontier AI providers.

Then again, I wish this worked in a way that would give users more privacy and agency, instead of less.

Muromec•32m ago
They are good at keeping notes on your criminal conspiracy
Anoian•26m ago
I have told llms all kinds of stories to find out what its answers would be. I always make it sound like it is the truth to make sure the AI answers in a way that it would if somebody actually said this. I also tested internal flagging systems of the ai company I work at with the most evil things a person can ever say to find out if it would flag them.

Of course I did not mean any of that stuff, but how can you make sure a human reviewer knows you did not mean it while the llm does not know that you did not mean it.

I guess its a miracle I am not in jail yet.

Flagging people for anything said to an llm sounds wrong to me because an LLM is not a real person and while some people put in their internal thoughts, others just roleplay and the two are inseparable just from reading it.

adrianN•19m ago
Don’t worry, they’ll store those messages forever and incarcerate you at their convenience.
CrzyLngPwd•26m ago
Oh man, what a crazy time to be alive.

Over in Europe they want to read all ofd our private messages, yet these chatbots, pretending to be our friends, will snitch on us just for our thoughts.

It's getting pretty orwellian out there.

vulcan1964•22m ago
I once had a copy of 1984 in my checked baggage returning home to the USA and when I was unpacking the bag at home, the book had a notice inside the book that my bags had been inspected by TSA...
Dig1t•22m ago
The future is incredibly dark if they manage to ban open source models.
dabinat•21m ago
This kind of thing will get worse with humanoid robots because they have cameras and microphones. Will they be programmed to tell on you if you break any kind of rule in front of them because their owners are terrified of being sued?
feverzsj•20m ago
If only the woman hosted open-weight model in her house.
shlant•19m ago
this feels very thought-crimey to me, but I think I'd have to actually see that chats to really decide. Like is she making plans/asking for advice? is she just talking about her feelings exactly as if it's a diary?
olalonde•19m ago
> The communication must be made in a manner in which another person may view it.

How does a LLM prompt satisfy this? I guess it'll be an easy win for her.

hackernud3s•17m ago
AI snitches don't get stitches.
vasco•14m ago
I guess it's time to come up with a more plausible explanation about why I asked how to make nuclear weapons almost every month to test LLM refusals.
apparent•11m ago
I don't understand how she violated this law:

> Heller faces a charge of making a written threat of violence under Florida law. Florida Statute 836.10 makes it a second-degree felony to send, post, or transmit a written or electronic record threatening to kill or injure someone, carry out a mass shooting, or commit an act of terrorism.

She didn't threaten anything, she wrote down that she was going to do it. A "threat" is more than a mere statement, especially when written in what is described as a "diary".

> A Florida woman is facing felony charges after she used Claude as a diary and allegedly wrote that she planned to "shoot up" the Sheriff's office.

Obviously I don't want anyone to shoot up anything, but this seems like a weak case legally speaking.

Havoc•6m ago
> making a written threat of violence under Florida law.

A diary constitutes making a threat?

Oh boy the roleplaying part of LLM world is in for a bad time

19m ago
Depends on how good her lawyer is now
gr_norm•15m ago
I'll be glad for open models when the day (inevitably) comes that the proprietary LLMs no longer work in my interests.
vincnetas•10m ago
Unless it becomes a requirement to be licensed to be able to use any kind of ai model. You know, for safety and stuff. And of course with appropriate reporting to institutions.
rowanG077•8m ago
That day was yesterday. LLMs from big tech regularly refuse to do what you want.
veltas•10m ago
Wouldn't they have to fine themselves first?
badatnames•8m ago
It's a byproduct of the nannyism safety marketing from the AI companies. I'm glad these cases were caught, but disagree with how they were disposed of. If the automated flagging is good, enforce it by default. If it's noisy, refine the tech then enforce it by default. This middleground where everything going through the platforms is subject to training and arbitrary human inspection in the midst of an acrid cloud of marketing-driven fearmongering is unacceptable, and it reinforces the idea the fearmongering is legitimate.

Somehow humanity survived the past 40 years without Microsoft Word and Excel phoning home and shopping users to the feds at random, I don't see why the standard should be any different for this new class of tooling.