Then again, people willing to make these comments aren't people that I tend to understand or empathize with anyway, so using a chatbot shouldn't be something I should expect to understand either.
many people are using chatbots as personal therapists, a friend to vent to, a diary that provides feedback, etc.
People are putting a weird amount of moral weight on LLM prompts that they don't apply to other programs.
Uh, there's no laws on hacking systems in your country?
Software behaving differently than intended is therefore not a crime under these laws.
If you think they intentionally had their model hack third-party systems, you could do a criminal investigation.
I do not think that this is reasonable to believe given that clearly the VMs were not intended to have internet access and that committing such crimes wasn't in anyone's interest.
Which part of the UK is "Florida" in?
God knows how many thousands of reports like this these platforms send out in a given week. Nobody is following up on some peasant scheming up ways to kill his brother for stealing his inheritance or whatever But you threaten the building inspector and the cops will jump at the chance to knock on your door and "remind" you who has all the power.
Also, is chugging clown juice a mainstream hobby now?
Perhaps the headline grabbing claims of OpenAI "hacks" are overblown? If they are causing bedlam with such glee why is no one suing them for damages? Perhaps the criminal case you envisage is less clear than the layman news is leading you to believe.
I'm still not clear where most of the alleged cases fall in terms of criminality. Yet I also know here in the United States a government tried to criminally prosecute a reporter for "computer hacking" for finding data using client-side inspect element.
Maybe encouraging the government to prosecute these "crimes" is not the virtue you think it is. Why are the counterparties not seeking a civil remedy if they think they have been a victim of a crime? Perhaps that is a more telling sign than all the people imploring the government to "do something" and come up with criminal charges.
This is something Silicon Valley likes to tell itself. OpenAI being subpoenaed in multiple jurisdictions lays bare its falsehood.
Unless specified clearly and plainly (not obscure TOS), everything should be private by default and require a warrant. If that's not possible because "the data can live forever/be copied", then we need data laws that make holding data on cosumers so radioactively dangerous the companies are forced to adapt. It's not their decision to make, it's the people od the country where the live, work, and do business.
How do you differentiate?
timpera•1h ago
Archive link: http://archive.today/mwico
ilt•42m ago
sgc•16m ago
righthand•34m ago
anewhnaccount2•27m ago
thesdev•18m ago
azernik•12m ago
cubefox•11m ago
timpera•23m ago
righthand•8m ago