There is a full Ars Technica article about this one [1]. Already posted to HN few hours before [2].
[1]: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/10/software-is-over-bold-ai-...
I compiled and ran the macOS version in a sandbox, and it's indeed a working Photoshop clone, all the features I expected were there.
I only played with it for 10 minutes, and I did not use regular PhotoShop for some time, but this felt very similar to me.
When trying to Export my DNG as a JPG, the file is not being written and there is no error message. It might be because I'm running it in a sandbox.
This claims to be that.
It's relevant for discussion here about the quality of vibecoded software.
I have seen zero discussion on HN previous to this post. A working photoshop clone should have been discussed earlier and extensively.
Now we have a post with 28 votes and it's already Flagged.
Which is why people still go to Adobe products despite similar products exist, especially for people who are getting paid to use software. They want things to simply work.
I very much doubt a vibe coded application can achieve that, but I'll be happy to be proven wrong.
armcat•1h ago