So nothing was eased.
On the opposite end, if you don't buy the machines in time, mispredict the demand and can't produce, you lose tens of billions.
But if they're in FOMO mode, they might not be thinking about ROI at all. Or if they're in bubble-optimist mode, they would just assume their ROI will be good.
https://www.eetimes.com/record-orders-for-chip-gear-push-sem...
> Capital equipment suppliers have been increasing their forecasts for revenue growth in 2000 as chip manufacturers begin to add new wafer fabs and backend assembly plants. Last week, for example, Applied Materials Inc.–the world's largest semiconductor equipment supplier–announced it had increased its forecast for industry growth in wafer fab equipment sales to 46% from a projection of 19% at the end of last year (see Feb. 16 story).
> The strong wave of new orders “confirms the strength of the current market cycle,” said Stanley T. Myers, president of SEMI.
This time it's different.
Every time is different, that doesn't stop it rhyming.
Great strategy. Like growing a metric ton of HeLa cells in the hope someone will assemble a super brain out of them.
Similarly, I don't think the AI bubble popping will cause token demand to decline. On the contrary, I predict the bubble pop will happen because of a recognition that tokens are a highly competitive industry, thus the margins of frontier AI firms aren't sustainable, popping their valuations.
In the late-1990s companies were building out fibre optic networks, as they believed they would get a lot of ROI from all the Information Superhighway demand. The expected demand never came in the expected timeline.
Of course demand eventually used up all the dark fibre over the course of many moons, just not quickly enough to save many companies:
The peak is always before the fall by definition.
Just because something has peaked SO FAR is a very poor approximation that it has peaked completely.
dboreham•42m ago
baron3dl•33m ago
Good4boothee•22m ago