Morewrong is pretty good lol https://morewrong.lol/?post=replaceability-best-friends-wife

Amazing website: https://morewrong.lol/?post=im-huffing-computer-duster-becau...

LOL..

It's amazing how easy it is to lie with numbers. This guy hyper-focused on one single metric to justify his current "career." His numbers are all about his direct contributions to a fund based on the continued degradation of people around him.

No, you aren't a quant. You are a drug dealer with an education.

I like the idea, but it's a little too obviously AI written for my taste.

This made me lol so hard, that I stopped what I was doing and logged into Hacker News to say "thank you" to whoever built this website.

This is perfect:

Against Taking My Son To Soccer Practice: A Bayesian, Longtermist, Updateless, Game-Theoretic, Kelly-Optimal Steelman of the Opportunity Cost of Reallocating My Son’s College Fund, My Ex-Wife’s Child Support, and the Proceeds of My Second Divorce Toward Methamphetamine, Escorts, Polymarket Positions, Grandma’s Pain Pills, and an Acausal Trade With Roko’s Basilisk Under Coherent Extrapolated Volition, Short Timelines, and a p(doom) I Will Not Be Updating at This Time (Part 1 of 7)

Imagine the rapid progress we could make in energy generation, pharmaceuticals, self driving cars, roller coasters, gladiatorial entertainment and AI, just by leveraging low cost life offsets.

> Sam Bankman-Fried’s mistake was operational, not philosophical. He was right that a serious altruist goes where the money is.

AI-written satire, but reasonably funny.

The math doesn't work, though: 21k bags at $1.80 donated is $37,800 in donations, but you could clearly donate much more than that working at Jane St.

"He went to crypto. I went to the El." Crypto ain't got the birds. Good move, OP.

The top comment discussing how price inelasticity means it is the drug users who are donating the money and deserve the moral credit made me appreciate my economics minor.

> That isn’t ethics. It’s a skincare routine.

The best use of this style I have ever seen.

if you squint, it's a halfway compelling argument to legalize and regulate. that $1.80 in tax revenue could pay for treatment programs.

(i do not think the second order effects can be ignored so totally; nothing ever goes as planned in this world of madness. don't at me.)

This is the first machine generated text I have seen that I would call genuinely hilarious. A little eerie