frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Better HTTP/1 connection reuse in Go 1.27

https://go.dev/blog/http-connection-reuse
51•allddd•1h ago•3 comments

Submarine cable resilience

https://blog.apnic.net/2026/10/14/submarine-cable-resilience/
66•speckx•2h ago•9 comments

Iosevka is an open-source, sans-serif and slab-serif monospace font

https://typeof.net/Iosevka/
569•otobrglez•9h ago•237 comments

ICE Planning $100M 'Nightmare' Domestic Spy Program

https://prospect.org/2026/10/14/ice-planning-nightmare-domestic-spy-program-ero-one/
148•bhrlady•1h ago•52 comments

Pg_vectorsearch: An index that is faster than pgvector's IVFFlat and HNSW

https://github.com/timescale/pg_vectorsearch
146•jascha_eng•6h ago•42 comments

LittleJS is 2D and 3D now

https://frankforce.com/littlejs-is-2d-and-3d-now/
25•dmit•1d ago•3 comments

Show HN: Graphicle, a Rust port of Graphify with memory for coding agents

https://github.com/graphicle-ai/graphicle
23•KarLexAI•2h ago•1 comments

Amazon pushes up prices across the Internet

https://www.not-ship.com/how-amazon-pushes-up-prices-all-across-the-internet/
536•sighborg•8h ago•495 comments

Running Windows desktop tests from Linux with disposable VMs

https://www.qawolf.com/blog/how-we-solved-windows-desktop-automation
49•jadenlemmon•3h ago•22 comments

US report details extent of 'devastating' dating-app scams

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/14/dating-app-scams-us-congress
19•PaulHoule•27m ago•1 comments

Google is silently linking your phone number across all signed-in accounts

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-auto-phone-number-verification-android-3723117/
55•Brajeshwar•1h ago•12 comments

Linus Torvalds's first LLM-assisted patch series

https://lwn.net/Articles/1100449/
51•janvdberg•1h ago•12 comments

The Gold-Bug: Edgar Allan Poe's story that taught me about cryptography (2024)

https://robotsinplainenglish.com/e/2024-01-21-gold-bug.html
48•ripe•2d ago•9 comments

Has AI Tells

https://theconsensus.dev/blog/2026/10/14/has-ai-tells.html?focus=1
34•7777777phil•1h ago•21 comments

The Origin Story of Kid Pix

http://red-green-blue.com/kid-pix-the-early-years
144•MBCook•1d ago•30 comments

Sound (2022)

https://ciechanow.ski/sound/
254•dverlaeckt80•3d ago•27 comments

Sally Rooney can no longer sell books in UK due to Palestine Action support

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/oct/14/sally-rooney-says-she-can-no-longer-sell-books-in...
11•gojiberries•21m ago•1 comments

ASML's strong orders ease fears AI spending boom is running out of steam

https://www.reuters.com/business/asml-forecasts-q4-sales-above-expectations-ai-chip-demand-2026-1...
145•tartoran•3h ago•128 comments

Scientists Are Teaching Birds to Sing Lost Songs

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/teaching-birds-lost-songs
21•speckx•4h ago•1 comments

Show HN: A guided 3D Leonardo da Vinci museum, built in code

https://museumofages.org/w/vinci
77•micstradev•7h ago•33 comments

Why do LLM pelicans look like this?

https://arcfu.com/post/the-emperor-pelican-has-no-clothes/
116•pcwelder•1h ago•99 comments

TV4 postpones show after AI agent erases edited material

https://swedenherald.com/article/tv4-postpones-the-challenge-until-2027-after-technical-failure-e...
112•tobr•7h ago•66 comments

900-Page Pre-Pantone Guide to Color from 1692 (With Complete High-Res Scan)

https://www.openculture.com/2026/10/a-900-page-pre-pantone-guide-to-color-from-1692.html
256•mdp2021•2d ago•44 comments

Pulsar at ESUG 2026 (new Smalltalk IDE)

https://blog.lorenzano.eu/pulsar-at-esug-2026/
68•mpweiher•7h ago•15 comments

Strands Decider: Why Not an Encoder?

https://brooker.co.za:443/blog/2026/10/04/encoders.html
15•surprisetalk•3h ago•0 comments

The Genealogy of Eliza

https://elizagen.org/genealogy.html
23•abrax3141•1d ago•1 comments

Nvidia's first GPU: GeForce 256

https://dfarq.homeip.net/nvidias-first-gpu-geforce-256/
33•ibobev•5h ago•21 comments

Tesla's Robotaxis Blow Through School Zones, NHTSA Petition Alleges

https://www.extremetech.com/cars/teslas-robotaxis-blow-through-school-zones-nhtsa-petition-alleges
16•speckx•1h ago•3 comments

Gemini 4 Argon

https://deepmind.google/models/gemini/
1418•737max•1d ago•1014 comments

The Four Colour Theorem: The first time machines mogged mathematicians

https://newsletter.pessimistsarchive.org/p/the-1st-time-machines-mogged-mathematicians
77•list•22h ago•47 comments
Open in hackernews

Americans' Social Activity Has Steeply Declined in the Past 30 Years

https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/9/29/americans-social-activity-has-steeply-declined-in-the-past-30-years
65•hubraumhugo•1h ago

Comments

jleyank•1h ago
This is more complex than you might thing. First, there's far more places to meet people - rather than having them over for coffee, we meet in a coffeeshop. Networks have provided a "together in time" alternative to "together in place", so people can game, talk, ... via voice and video rather than traveling to a common location. There's far more 2-working-member families than previously, so the ability to organize household events is reduced. Finally, there's far more organized sports activities that consume both child and parent time. These pull everybody out of the house.
BigTTYGothGF•45m ago
I can assure you we had "coffeeshop"s in the ancient times.
justinator•40m ago
Wait until they find out "coffee shops" preceded "coffee at home"
pessimizer•15m ago
Wait until they find out that commodities markets started off as coffee shops.
toomuchtodo•41m ago
Decline in religion + third spaces combined with socioeconomic system expectations of a 40 hour work week + two incomes needed to live comfortably. Places and time for community and social activities has declined, and so social activity has as well.

If more social time is desired at the macro system level, people need to have more leisure time (shorter work week, higher wages, good quality of life with more free time broadly speaking) and more third spaces to meet and socialize.

Citations:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49644650

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49644302

returningfory2•36m ago
Is there a citation for the decline in third spaces? I read such a claim often. But in my part of the US (Brooklyn NY) the number of third spaces like coffee shops and pottery studios is booming.
toomuchtodo•35m ago
legister's comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50091295 mentions it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowling_Alone

Additional citations:

https://ibs.colorado.edu/new-research-on-disappearing-third-...

https://www.aei.org/domestic-policy/americas-third-places-ar...

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13538...

https://esl.uchicago.edu/2023/11/01/third-places-what-are-th...

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/28/business/third-place-mean...

NYC is a thriving city of 8.5 million people and one of the most economically active cities in the world, so your experience may be different than say, Gary, Indiana.

Waterluvian•25m ago
I’ll never forget a conversation I overheard on a plane years back: a caricature of a man in his 20s failing repeatedly to explain to an older lady what a “gastropub” was. Each time, he rephrased his description, and each time she responded, “that sounds like a pub.”

“No, not exactly...,” he replied in an increasingly exasperated tone. I could hear the struggle in his voice as he recognized the cracks forming in the thin veneer of his identity. “It’s like a pub, but it serves food. Like, real food, thoughtfully considered by a gastrochef.” She returned the serve, now teetering on boredom at minute four of the flight. “At our pub we call him Kevin. He makes the best pot pie.”

He regrouped and they found truce in talking about the weather in Toronto. I resisted the urge to twist around to ask if they knew any good restaurants downtown.

dyauspitr•47m ago
Social media, smart phones, and all of that are heavily responsible for this, but at the same time I think the main crux of the issue, in my opinion, is that we don’t have a common culture anymore. As long as you don’t have a common culture and a common understanding of the basic rules that everyone agrees on, no one can spend time with each other comfortably.
estearum•41m ago
We absolutely do have a common culture. The fact so many people think we do not is derivative of social media and smartphones.

All but the most extreme far-right and far-left people in the country really do agree on 95%+ of anything with daily relevance to their lives.

HoldOnAMinute•36m ago
For a long time the number 1 song in the USA was "Choosin Texas" by Ella Langley.

I have no idea who that is and I've never heard the song.

estearum•34m ago
Is that the type of "culture" that this statement is referring to?

> As long as you don’t have a common culture and a common understanding of the basic rules that everyone agrees on, no one can spend time with each other comfortably.

Doesn't seem so to me.

bluefirebrand•9m ago
> Is that the type of "culture" that this statement is referring to?

Shared music is absolutely part of common culture

zarmin•44m ago
together we are alone
bluefirebrand•44m ago
I'm Canadian not American but I feel this keenly

I had a pretty busy social life in university, 20 years ago

The first city I landed in afterwards, I was able to make some connections and was lucky enough some of my uni friends were around too

But I moved for work to a much further away city and my social life has dropped to zero since then. The pandemic and lockdowns didn't help of course, but that was years ago. I don't have a single friend in this city and I've lived here almost 10 years now

Admittedly I'm kind of socially awkward and quite afraid of new groups, which has only gotten worse over the years. I also haven't had any luck making lasting connections through work or anything like that.

I tend to blame myself for this but it's not too surprising to hear many others are struggling too

ragall•42m ago
Americans are very intolerant of others, whether it's political convictions or food preferences; the few that have kids threat the little ones like fragile glassware that can't be moved or otherwise inconvenienced, so it doesn't surprise me that they meet others less. My wife and I meet with a varying group of friends every week, or even more, but we're all immigrants. We've tried to invite local acquaintances, but they always find a reason to say no and just stay home.
ajkjk•40m ago
Cause our culture is f'ed, lol. Everyone I know is unhappy. It's impossible to be happy when things are this messed up.
AznHisoka•36m ago
I think unhappiness is the default of human state. Or rather discontent. Its probably wired into us bc if we were ever content we wouldnt procreate, try to attain financial success, etc
HoldOnAMinute•31m ago
I guess we are different then. A non-stop state of panic/fear does not make me feel like procreating.
ajkjk•27m ago
I don't think so. Everyone was a lot happier 10-15 years ago when the culture felt less fucked. I think people can't feel happy if they don't feel basically safe, and the world's problems are so incomprehensible, and solutions to them see so impossible to imagine, that there is a background unsafety overlaid on everything, even if one's immediate conditions are pretty good.
scottndecker•41m ago
This was foreseeable. We all know it. We all know why. Yet we fail to do anything about it.
bluecalm•40m ago
It's happening in other countries as well. Any suggestions what could be done about it?
scottndecker•36m ago
Turn off all social media and organize around shared beliefs/interests
astura•30m ago
It's not just social media, it's all solo entertainment - streaming, cable, 24 hour news, video games, everything.
bluecalm•9m ago
I think turning off all social media would help if others do that as well but as an individual action it's likely to cut you off even more.
HoldOnAMinute•34m ago
Easy. Reduce our use of technology and stop consuming so much. It will require you to lower your standard of living.

Is your partner willing to do this with you? Probably not.

MadrasTh0rn•41m ago
Digital captupture of society
legitster•37m ago
This has actually been a trend since the 1960s: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowling_Alone

The simple answer is media. First television, then internet, then smartphones.

People used to actively seek the company of others - if for no other reason than out of boredom. Entertainment and parasocial relationships have filled that hole.

Another reason I might posit is declining birth rates and an aging population. Entire neighborhoods used to be filled with young families of roughly the same age. Now on any given city block in the US, there may only be 1 or 2 houses that have kids of any age in them. Smaller concentration of kids -> thinner market for playdates and sleepovers -> less interactions between families.

dayofthedaleks•33m ago
Yes the post's title calls to mind that 'Bowling Alone' was already detailing loss of cohesion nearly 30 years ago.

People are alienated, y'all.

dominotw•28m ago
> Now on any given city block in the US, there may only be 1 or 2 houses that have kids of any age in them.

Thats why we plan to move to the burbs. Lots of ethnic enclaves where kids go around the neighborhood on their own and play.

legitster•19m ago
My controversial idea for urban planning: age and demographic based zoning.

There is lots of urban planning in the US that is poorly optimized. Walkable neighborhoods close to parks and schools are often filled with retirees, whereas young families are often crowded into newer neighborhoods at the edge of town with little infrastructure nearby.

You wouldn't even have to do much pressure to move the needle. Cities are already putting in millions of dollars to place their parks and schools, and etc. Offer tax incentives that encourage young families to move into family areas, singles into single areas, and retirees into retiree areas.

It sounds kind of crazy, but we more or less do this for student areas around colleges.

AndrewKemendo•36m ago
In my experience it’s not because there’s lack of attempts to get people together

When given the option between: socializing with people in a shared space and being at home and entertaining yourself people are consciously choosing the latter.

When I ask why, this is what I hear from other people the most:

-I don’t have time

-I don’t have transportation

-Who else is going to be there

Etc…

There seems to be a genuine lack of desire whatsoever to simply get yourself to a place where there is a free event.

And to be clear this is not just talking about one particular type of event

I just went to a Democratic socialist of America event this weekend in support of Gaza, and the amount of people who showed up compared to the number of people who are on the list (even the organizing list) is some vanishingly small group.

If the plurality of individuals don’t want to join groups in person because they feel satisfied by themselves, then that’s a signal of some kind.

bcardarella•36m ago
Every single social event is a financial consideration now. Want to go out with the wife for the evening? It's going to cost $150+ for a baby sitter at $25/hour. The dinner + tip is going to cost $200. Parking is going to cost $50 - $100 if you go into a city. You could take public transportation but then you're loooking at that cost shifting back to the babysitter. Before you know it you're in for $300 - $500 just for a night off.
spencerflem•32m ago
Dinner + tip is not $200, parking is not $50, I live in a city lol
wahnfrieden•28m ago
Prices have risen faster than wages but $200 is a choice. They simply have high standards and treat it like poverty.
pixl97•28m ago
Which city? Downtown Austin? Seattle?
spencerflem•27m ago
Those are the exact two I’ve lived in actually
montyanne•28m ago
50 is steep for parking, but between dinner/drinks/rideshare, you can pretty quickly hit $250 on a nice-but-not-crazy date night in my HCOL city.
logicchains•32m ago
That should be "In-Person Social Activity Has Steeply Declined". While online social activity has increased significantly.
Terr_•12m ago
It saddens me that soon we'll need to split this out between actual human-to-human activity and parasocial bot-stuff. (Worse, covertly-bot stuff.)
justinator•32m ago
I remember when the iPhone first came out. I was at a bar, at a table with a few people I didn't really know. This was a pretty common occurrence.

You usually got a drank, talked. This was a kind of gothic-theme bar, all done up with spooky decorations, a good dj, interesting drinks. We'd host arts/culture slide show jams before the place really would get going for the night. The art was curated and swapped out monthly. There was a lot going on! The place did a lot to charge the space with energy and excitement, bringing a lot of different people together.

Then this guy at the table whipped out his phone and just ignored us all sitting there.

I knew right then and there that this was the beginning of the end.

FractalParadigm•16m ago
Even before the iPhone it started happening with the Blackberry, Palm, et. al. I distinctly remember the early-mid '00's when my aunt got her first BB, a 7250(?) and it quickly became more important than anything else. Family get-togethers started to consist of her sitting by herself on her phone while the rest of us enjoyed each other's company.
justinator•4m ago
My memory is that my phone was always on me, and I texted a lot on the go, but most of the texts were about meeting up, getting directions, or coordinating. After that, if a phone was brought out it was to do more of that in the group setting "Hey Sally is going to be here in 15 brining Jake"), then put back.

Now we're all dopamine seeking doom scrollers.

I've been out with a group of friends -- some I just met -- once this year. It also doesn't help that meals and drinks seem hard to justify for the price. I'm waxing nostalgia, but $30 of tacos used to be maybe $8; my $10 beer today was $3.

HPsquared•4m ago
Thinking back to when I got my first smartphone 15 years ago, it occupied just so much of my attention and I figured it was some kind of honeymoon phase with a new gadget. But it never got less, if anything it's increased since then.
0x1ch•31m ago
I'm 25. I go to work and then I go home. Same schedule since I got out of university. I do networking / IT. I usually buy a six pack of beer and then go to bed when I'm off, sometimes I'll stay up on my lab but I usually regret it because lack of sleep.

No bars, no dinners with anyone. I think the only blessing this lifestyle has given me is minimized impact from the failing economy we're in, at the cost of not seeing anyone or doing anything. I still have outside hobbies, but it's all too expensive to keep up with now, or being heavily regulated.

geodel•21m ago
At this point I think your experience can be multiplied by millions and still be quite accurate.
jahnu•16m ago
Do you want to socialise more but can’t or are you satisfied with how things are?
Uncle_Brumpus•30m ago
Just some personal anecdotes: I've come into the orbit of a local "no phones" meetup group in my city. I discovered it by seeing a black and white printed scan of a hand-drawn flyer on a pole by my apartment. Currently it's just organized by one guy who sends out random Signal pings for stuff to do like a potluck picnic, group trip to some free instructed yoga at a park, craft night at a local bar/bookstore, etc., and usually there's ~4-15 people that show up. I organized a World Postcard Day postcard writing party last week, found a venue that would host for free, donated some of my own dollars to provide free official WPD postcards to attendees, and had 7 people come write postcards with me, I convinced 4 of them to sign up for Postcrossing, it was a great time.

If anybody else is looking for change, try setting something like this up. It has so far been free, easy, relatively low stakes, and I think by virtue of the main focus being "no phones", you get some great people who are all tired of the same algorithmic churn.

I became very good friends with someone who I met at one of the meetups and we've done all kinds of things just the 2 of us and have had some really interesting conversations, which is something I haven't done in a LONG time.

AIorNot•29m ago
So here's the question:

in America we have had 20 years of "Tech Disruption"., making the world a better place and relentless technical innovation, combined with the 'corporization' of America

Has our day to day lives improved?

Do we work less, live healthier, have less stress?

Seems like this (the younger generation) is far worse off then pre-internet connected, smartphone generation

mrweasel•1m ago
[delayed]
dzonga•28m ago
because suburbs and housing models like it designed around a closed loop even some apartment building which have high population density encourage social isolation.

compare a 'luxury' Florida apartment vs the old New York apartments built in the 1800s. the NY apartments have narrow stairs, one way in.

likewise dense / small cities / villages in either africa/europe etc force more natural social interaction.

even for friends - easier to host friends when they can easily walk to your home & they don't have to drink & drive.

so blaming tv, social media, video games etc doesn't get to the root of the matter.

james_marks•14m ago
Last night I found a post-it note in my copy of _The Organized Mind_ by Daniel J. Levitin.

It says "Connect with Others. Learn. Be Active".

Strikes me as good advice 10 years ago when I wrote it, and just as good now.

arjie•10m ago
I can't square this with the fact that I have a perfect storm situation that should point me there. I am a foreigner of minority ethnicity to the United States living in a high-rise building of 600 people that has no Schelling point common-space to spend time in that's located in a city that is expensive and I have all the social contact I desire: family, close friends, more distant friends, neighbours, strangers in the building, familiar strangers in the area.

I talked about how relatively easy it is to have social contact here at all levels and so I must conclude that most people simply have better uses for their time (by their own judgment) than this. https://wiki.roshangeorge.dev/w/Blog/2025-10-09/Community

janalsncm•1m ago
It would be useful to know whether the same trends have happened in other places. If iPhones are causing people to be less social, we should see similar trends in France and Japan.

If we didn’t see the same trends, it points to reasons more specific to the US.

returningfory2•7m ago
Thank you! I skimmed these citations and I remain unconvinced. But I think really answering the question would be a real research project, not a HN back and forth :)

The first citation's relevant highlight is "All categories of third places experienced widespread closures from 2019 to 2021" which is obviously a COVID phenomenon and not a cultural trend. They admit so much. Data from that period I would say is generally irrelevant to discussing wider cultural trends. In fact a query to Gemini says that the number of independent (not chain) coffee shops is growing at 3.2% across the country and it gives this citation: https://www.locationscloud.com/research-report/us-coffee-sho...

The other Science Direct article says "Third places _may_ be closing in neighborhoods across the United States" (my emphasis).

The remaining articles seem to be opinion articles without hard data. They focus on the hypothetical problem of third places going away. In fact the AEI article talks about zoning which cannot possibly be of relevance to any decline in third places given that zoning is becoming less restrictive over time in the last decade.

bluefirebrand•10m ago
Does it count as a third space if you have to pay for it?

Coffee shops and such don't feel like good third spaces to me, because I don't always want to spend money just to exist

returningfory2•5m ago
> Does it count as a third space if you have to pay for it?

Yes, third spaces/places include places you need to pay for.

astura•4m ago
When I was a kid kids used to just hang out. We'd take a bus, ride bikes, or walk to the mall, the park, the woods, fast food restaurant, record store, dollar store, etc and just loiter. Nobody had any money to buy anything, but boy we'd browse and loiter. Sometimes we'd just walk for hours. We'd walk miles and miles and miles just to sit at a table at Burger King with a single small fry between our group and hang out there.

Children don't do that anymore; they basically don't leave the house because they have the Internet. They communicate through texting and Discord so they don't even have to "hang out." Beyond the social change, when I was a young adult most malls went 18+ (unless accompanied by parents/guardians) and most other businesses nowadays allow teens to loiter the way we use to. Businesses want people in and out once they are done.

Even if business allowed it, most parents don't allow their kids to go out unattended anymore.

SoftTalker•34m ago
The 40 hour work week is most assuredly not new in the past 30 years.

The households where both parents work full time probably have increased in that time, but I'd say you have to go back closer to 50 years to really get to a time where it was still common for a housewife to be home all day with the kids.

astura•21m ago
Dual income earners hasn't even increased that much, 44% in 1967 to 53% in 2011 - https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2014/ted_20140602.htm
swingandamiss•28m ago
regarding the 40 hour work week, I wonder what "always on" is doing to impact social activities. Meaning, you work 40 hours in the office, then you go home and get online and work a few more hours each night.
toomuchtodo•25m ago
The constant aggregate dopamine demand and chasing activities is certainly not helping, imho. "Work, home, doomscroll, repeat."
ryandrake•34m ago
I don’t think the “agreeing middle” is 95% anymore. Maybe this is a Chronically Online POV but it seems the extremes are growing quickly, the center is shrinking, and society is going bimodal.
estearum•30m ago
Society is going bimodal on the 1% of issues that bisect people. Those 1% of issues are consuming 99% of our mass-media airtime.

Talk to your neighbors and you'll find that everyone just cares about decent roads, decent schools, decent jobs, and decent healthcare.

pessimizer•4m ago
The central part of their identity is to assume that they're the vast majority of people. It allows them not to have to think about stuff too hard - it's all settled, and it's settled on what the people I'm exposed to (i.e. friends, family, and the television) think. I'm safe just repeating that and reporting people who deviate from that.

They don't realize how much the "moral majority" differs in town as opposed to the city, the coasts as opposed to the bulk of the country, in small private liberal arts colleges in the east and at Mormon universities in Utah, or in China, Russia, or Bulgaria as compared to the suburb they grew up in.

If all of those people simply follow the central tendency, and give mass media the same (or greater) weight as they give their neighbors, that guarantees war all the time. It will always be better to listen and try to understand points of view that you aren't familiar with, rather than to hide in the safe (and always untrue depending on the shape of the border you draw) assumption that you represent the vast majority. This, without even considering whether the vast majority are right or wrong.

I mean, some people are so impervious to reality with this that they can lose election after election and believe that they are still 95% of people. Then they start theorizing about mind control and supernatural entities, just to keep from opening their eyes and ears.

dyauspitr•33m ago
That 95% number is so far from the truth. Gen Z males are significantly (though not majority) right wing and Gen Z females are the exact opposite. Based on data, 67% of the time, Gen Z males and females do not agree on the same political issues.
estearum•28m ago
You are missing the point.

"Political issues" are by definition things that people disagree on. Saying people "disagree on political issues" is equivalent to saying "people disagree on things they disagree on."

But the vast majority of daily life is not driven by or meaningfully affected by any of these "issues on which people disagree." If you go and talk to your neighbors, even ones who you disagree with on disagreement-creating-topics, you will find you actually agree on nearly everything. The set of things you agree on is called "our culture."

SoftTalker•40m ago
The fragmentation of culture is also the fault of social media (and all media to a lesser extent). It's far easier to get sucked in to echo chambers where other opinions are mocked or shut out.

In the past we all got our news from Walter Cronkite.

logicchains•30m ago
The homogenization of culture was the fault of traditional centralized media. If you go back before the printing press, there was actually a much greater diversity of cultures and languages. Decentralized (social) media is bringing us back to how traditionally tribal humanity used to be.
SoftTalker•8m ago
I may be incorrectly inferring that you think this is a good thing, but "traditionally tribal humanity" were constantly at war with one another. I'm not sure that's something we want to go back to.
eitally•39m ago
Totally off-base projection based on your very small sample size.
bediger4000•33m ago
They're right about the intolerance, though. One tribe literally calls the other "Demon-crats", and has worked to reduce participation based on gender, sexuality and skin color.
ragall•22m ago
Both sides are at fault. Here in the Midwest many a supporter of the Democratic party are legitimately afraid of being fired if their support became public knowledge, while on the other hand in California (or other "Blue" states) it's the exact opposite. It's astonishing to see how much Americans relish oppressing their fellow citizens.
marcusverus•5m ago
The internet is awash with seething tribal hatred. It's impossible to honestly believe this is only an issue with the right. The "demon-crat" attack is roughly analogous to the left's "nazi" attack (nazis, after all, are the secular-progressive equivalent of demons, with Adolf Hitler being their Satan), and the latter attack is infinitely more common than the former, even on HN.
wil421•37m ago
You must live in a terrible place. That’s not my experience at all in a suburban neighborhood.

I’d imagine you don’t have any family around so the expats are sending time together instead of trying to assimilate.

ragall•25m ago
> You must live in a terrible place.

Dipends how you see it. For North American standards, it's a lovely suburban neighbourhood in the Midwest; for us it's suburban hell because we love cities.

> the expats are sending time together instead of trying to assimilate

What do you mean by "assimilate" ?

HoldOnAMinute•32m ago
"There are only two things I can't stand in this world: people who are intolerant of other people's cultures, and the Dutch."

-- Nigel Powers in "Goldmember"

sublinear•25m ago
I think the media influence went far beyond just pacifying or entertaining.

The relentless satire is what really did it. It was all written by some of the smartest yet depraved and depressed people who found a home in comedy. What did we think was going to happen?

Satire is all well and good, but what are we doing when we no longer take anything seriously anymore? Social media, but particularly reddit, continues to be an echo chamber for these mentally castrated and bitter people who couldn't challenge the comedy with a life that was actually any better than what was being mocked.

paimapi•24m ago
I think Bowling Alone did a great job of describing the phenomena. I don't think it did a great job of explaining why it was happening.

It doesn't, for example, cover the privatization of public spaces, it doesn't mention mass white flight from cities to suburban sprawl due to people wanting to preserve apartheid, nor does it cover the rise in wealth inequality or the weakening of labor laws or the obliteration of pedestrian friendly infrastructure.

Instead, it pins it all on 'television' which, sure, but there's a reason why people gravitate towards entertainment that is served to them much more cheaply per-hour than not. It's a little like saying the problem with small pox is that the boils are painful, not the underlying virus systematically destroying your body.

In my personal experience in community organizing, the main pain points people have are 1) that they have day jobs that exhaust them, 2) the traffic sucks and they don't want to drive to our meetings, or 3) they need to pick up a second shift or another job to cover their basic needs. And even to those points, it's hard to get a public space where you can regularly meet that doesn't charge a lot of money, to provide food/refreshment, to maintain an ongoing potluck which requires a lot of coordination especially when it comes to preferences/dietary restrictions, etc. It's almost never out of a lack of interest. People desperately want community but there are so many barriers in place.

orangedog•22m ago
Was the flight out of the cities to "preserve apartheid" or did many people simply want the suburban lifestyle with a yard and bigger house?

I don't thin racism was the dominant factor for people moving out of the cities. Today the suburb I'm in is packed with immigrants.

Regardless, I don't think you're being very charitable.

paimapi•8m ago
This has been written about broadly by social historians. This book, in particular, is illuminating: https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691133867/wh...

Some other links:

https://news.iu.edu/live/news/24906-research-ties-persistenc...

https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2021/10/white-flight...

https://psmag.com/news/ghosts-of-white-people-past-witnessin...

garciansmith•2m ago
In places like Detroit racism was very much the primary reason in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s at least. Some of it was just personal racism, pure and simple. See "blockbusting" techniques used by realtors who would hire a black mother to walk down the street with a baby carriage to give the impetus for white people to sell quickly and cheaply. Or a black family moving into a house, the white neighbors trying to push them out via lawsuit for breaking a racially restrictive covenant, then losing so that all the white people left the neighborhood (e.g. read about Orsel and Minnie McGhee in Detroit, I authored the National Register nomination for their house).

The racist pressure to move was also a structural issue supported by the Federal government. Redlining meant you couldn't get loans to buy houses in certain neighborhoods, and those neighborhoods were exactly where black people lived. Literal walls could be constructed between two similar communities of different races so that the white side could be higher rated and have better access to loans (e.g., the Birwood Wall in Detroit). A ton has been written about the topic, I can't really do it justice, but the idea that people just wanted a bigger house was not the case. A lot of Detroit actually consisted of single-family homes with yards anyhow, so it was literally white people leaving a house for a very similar one.

CooCooCaCha•24m ago
I don’t think it’s as simple as that. It seems like people are increasingly exhausted and disillusioned with life.

What you seem to be implying is people are lazy and choosing TikTok over real relationships. But I also think people choose TikTok because it’s low effort and they don’t have much gas left in the tank.

mrweasel•8m ago
> It seems like people are increasingly exhausted and disillusioned with life.

The interesting part is what causes what. Are people exhausted and disillusioned because they aren't experience life the same way as previously, or aren't they having these experiences because they are exhausted and disillusioned.

elcritch•21m ago
It's a negative feedback loop too. There used to be people out doing things so when folks got bored they'd go find them.

Now entertainment and social media sort of fill that gap (not really) but enough that there's less people out. Less people out mean it's less entertaining, so less people go out etc.

boogieknite•19m ago
my 94 yo gpa is calling his homies ALL DAY LONG. ill see my best friends between once a week to once a month and texting comes and goes. if i got a phone call i assume its an emergency

> First television, then internet, then smartphones

i like vr so i sometimes wonder if itll catch on and if were in the "we know one or two people with a tv" era of the early 40s. theres certainly seems to be a financial incentive since it seems like tvs and phones have gone about as far as we can take them. its also certainly seems like a another leap down the isolation path as well

luckily i think most people reject vr bc it sucks to wear something on your face

edit: grammar (still bad but better)

dw_arthur•15m ago
Older people grew up socializing constantly so they can just start talking to strangers like they've known each other for years, especially if they are from the same town.
mrweasel•12m ago
Media in general is probably the real answer. We lack boredom at home. Earlier you were bored, so you signed up for sports, went on cheap trips, camping, pretty much anything to get out. Talking to older people 60 - 70+, some of them spent three or four days at the clubhouse of their chosen sport, they where constantly out of the house, because that's were you weren't bored.
chneu•1m ago
Communal boredom is where a lot of our creativity comes from.
spencerflem•24m ago
Yeah, if you’re getting three drinks each and an uber sure. I don’t think it’s an insane amount to spend.

It was framed as ‘Every Activity’ costs that much though which is just not true.

mrweasel•27m ago
Depends on the city. Here you can have a really nice time out for two people for $250.
PyWoody•27m ago
I live in the boonies and dinner + tip (and drinks) for two can easily be $200. Parking is free here because, ya know, boonies and whatnot.
orangedog•25m ago
That's eating at an expensive place. I paid $60 for two at a local restaurant last week, that's including an appetizer.
Uncle_Brumpus•24m ago
See that's the problem, you live IN the city, and you're not afraid of the city, so you know how it really is.

I've gotten the "Parking is too expensive and hard to find" from friends when I try and get them to come into the city to hang out. No, come to my apartment, park in the plentiful free protected street parking right out front, and then we'll walk the 5 minutes to the center of downtown.

dave78•25m ago
I have often thought about how many movies and TV shows in my childhood (1980s) focused on plot lines of people regularly gathering at a bar after work. Did people really do that or is it just a Hollywood thing to put people in the same place? Now that I think about it, actually, I guess my department at work did this when I first started in the early 2000s, going out to the bar once or twice a week.

It's hard to imagine doing that nowadays. I have a family, so doing that instead of going home in the evening would be selfish (if done too often), but even if I were younger and had time, it would seem very extravagant now. When a beer is $8-10 or even more, it would be an expensive proposition to go to the bar every night after work. And if you order food it's even worse...

SoftTalker•15m ago
It was mostly a fiction to advance the plot. Going to bars after work has always been a thing for young singles or old alcoholics, but pretty rare for parents/married people to do routinely.
bluefirebrand•14m ago
> Did people really do that or is it just a Hollywood thing to put people in the same place

People really did that.

Maybe not every single night, but weekly for sure

geodel•4m ago
Agree.

I went first time with office team this year a couple of weeks back. Needless to say whole experience was atrocious. No common reference, movies, sports, TV and so on to talk about besides work. It was just: "Oh, what do you do on weekend? I do x,y,z " in a round-robbin manner.

It was definitely not good time, or even bad time one can remember, just an insipid gathering for 3 hours of doing nothing. $8 for a beer and $15-20 per person for lukewarm food not sure I'll be excited for another meet any time soon.

postingawayonhn•4m ago
Yeah, often once a week only team up until COVID.
mlhpdx•1m ago
A picnic is basically free, for those near enough to open spaces. Likewise for hikes, which I’ll happily pay to drive an hour or more to enjoy.

I don’t think money is a barrier to getting out.