frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

AI agents aren't 'going rogue.' Frontier labs are skipping security basics

https://www.csoonline.com/article/4234854/ai-agents-arent-going-rogue-frontier-labs-are-skipping-...
251•latexr•54m ago•97 comments

Better HTTP/1 connection reuse in Go 1.27

https://go.dev/blog/http-connection-reuse
84•allddd•2h ago•13 comments

Submarine cable resilience

https://blog.apnic.net/2026/10/14/submarine-cable-resilience/
81•speckx•3h ago•16 comments

Iosevka is an open-source, sans-serif and slab-serif monospace font

https://typeof.net/Iosevka/
599•otobrglez•10h ago•250 comments

Do dentists know what they're doing?

https://mapwriting.substack.com/p/dentists
73•doitLP•2d ago•44 comments

ICE Planning $100M 'Nightmare' Domestic Spy Program

https://prospect.org/2026/10/14/ice-planning-nightmare-domestic-spy-program-ero-one/
261•bhrlady•2h ago•107 comments

Neckbeard – a DevOps/platform/SRE plugin for your agent

https://github.com/bealesh/neckbeard
12•bealesh•54m ago•0 comments

Pg_vectorsearch: An index that is faster than pgvector's IVFFlat and HNSW

https://github.com/timescale/pg_vectorsearch
153•jascha_eng•6h ago•43 comments

LittleJS is 2D and 3D now

https://frankforce.com/littlejs-is-2d-and-3d-now/
37•dmit•1d ago•6 comments

Google is silently linking your phone number across all signed-in accounts

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-auto-phone-number-verification-android-3723117/
105•Brajeshwar•2h ago•25 comments

Amazon pushes up prices across the Internet

https://www.not-ship.com/how-amazon-pushes-up-prices-all-across-the-internet/
572•sighborg•9h ago•521 comments

Show HN: Graphicle, a Rust port of Graphify with memory for coding agents

https://github.com/graphicle-ai/graphicle
29•KarLexAI•3h ago•7 comments

Running Windows desktop tests from Linux with disposable VMs

https://www.qawolf.com/blog/how-we-solved-windows-desktop-automation
54•jadenlemmon•3h ago•22 comments

Linus Torvalds's first LLM-assisted patch series

https://lwn.net/Articles/1100449/
88•janvdberg•1h ago•40 comments

Tesla's Robotaxis Blow Through School Zones, NHTSA Petition Alleges

https://www.extremetech.com/cars/teslas-robotaxis-blow-through-school-zones-nhtsa-petition-alleges
41•speckx•1h ago•26 comments

America Didn't Lose Its Rare Earth Industry. It Sold It

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/america-didn-t-lose-its-rare-earth-industry.-it-sold-it
16•speckx•49m ago•1 comments

The Gold-Bug: Edgar Allan Poe's story that taught me about cryptography (2024)

https://robotsinplainenglish.com/e/2024-01-21-gold-bug.html
50•ripe•2d ago•12 comments

US report details extent of 'devastating' dating-app scams

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/14/dating-app-scams-us-congress
32•PaulHoule•1h ago•21 comments

The Origin Story of Kid Pix

http://red-green-blue.com/kid-pix-the-early-years
153•MBCook•1d ago•32 comments

TV4 postpones show after AI agent erases edited material

https://swedenherald.com/article/tv4-postpones-the-challenge-until-2027-after-technical-failure-e...
117•tobr•8h ago•68 comments

Sound (2022)

https://ciechanow.ski/sound/
256•dverlaeckt80•3d ago•28 comments

Has AI Tells

https://theconsensus.dev/blog/2026/10/14/has-ai-tells.html?focus=1
41•7777777phil•1h ago•36 comments

OpenAI claims employee sent secret device information to Apple

https://www.ft.com/content/18b65495-9e2a-45d6-be85-7641442ab61a
18•rndsignals•1h ago•3 comments

Scientists Are Teaching Birds to Sing Lost Songs

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/teaching-birds-lost-songs
27•speckx•5h ago•2 comments

Nvidia's first GPU: GeForce 256

https://dfarq.homeip.net/nvidias-first-gpu-geforce-256/
39•ibobev•6h ago•22 comments

Show HN: A guided 3D Leonardo da Vinci museum, built in code

https://museumofages.org/w/vinci
82•micstradev•8h ago•33 comments

Strands Decider: Why Not an Encoder?

https://brooker.co.za:443/blog/2026/10/04/encoders.html
18•surprisetalk•3h ago•0 comments

Pulsar at ESUG 2026 (new Smalltalk IDE)

https://blog.lorenzano.eu/pulsar-at-esug-2026/
70•mpweiher•8h ago•16 comments

Show HN: I wrote an email app that accepts only one sender per inbox

https://clova.email/
12•edpin2000•1h ago•6 comments

ASML's strong orders ease fears AI spending boom is running out of steam

https://www.reuters.com/business/asml-forecasts-q4-sales-above-expectations-ai-chip-demand-2026-1...
151•tartoran•4h ago•142 comments
Open in hackernews

US report details extent of 'devastating' dating-app scams

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/14/dating-app-scams-us-congress
31•PaulHoule•1h ago

Comments

Simulacra•50m ago
The dating apps have zero incentive to change. Bandaids like photo verification are minimally effective at best.
baron816•40m ago
There is an incentive: if people know your platform is riddled with scammers, they’re not going to use it. There are hundreds of dating apps out there that people just don’t use because they’re not trustworthy.
HPsquared•34m ago
Simply buy up all the dating apps and sites under a single company.
akellermann•28m ago
This mostly exists and is called Match Group! Owners of Hinge, Tinder, OkCupid, Match.com and a bunch of smaller, specialized dating apps.
garciasn•25m ago
I absolutely feel for 'Mary', but to get sucked into a $100K in fraud over a period of time seems to only be something an app could possibly control for.

> In total, Mary said she sent the man about $100,000 in cryptocurrency payments. After realizing he was a scammer, she blocked his number. He would then switch phone numbers and contact her again.

If this works anything like a real-world scenario, the scammer would connect with the mark in the app and I could only imagine it would seem perfectly benign to the app. The scammer and mark would connect off-app and then the scam would continue and get deeper.

I haven't used dating apps in 2.5y, but when I did, it was already incredibly annoying to get logged in due to the barriers they had in place (phone, social accounts, etc). At what line does an organization's responsibility end and a person's own personal responsibility begin?

I don't recall having any spam or scammers interact with me when I used them, but I have the wherewithal to detect when something is scammy. This is happening all over the Internet (LinkedIn / SMS / Email scam jobs). If anything, perhaps Congress should be working on ways to educate the public through PSAs that aren't political pieces attempting to shore up a failing leader and instead shore up the public's ability to learn how to stop the scams from swindling them out of a ridiculous amount of money.

Tangurena2•13m ago
Dating apps are only interested in making people pay. As long as the bots and scammers are willing to pay one or 2 months subscription, the apps are never going to change because that would reduce their "numbers" and make Wall Street anxious.
orangedog•32m ago
Why would you send somebody that much money?
Tangurena2•14m ago
They are good at convincing you that they have some immediate financial need.

Many people on dating apps are so lonely that anyone who can pretend to be interested, friendly can easily manipulate a lonely person into falling for them. Basically, the scammers are using the same techniques that con-men use to fleece their marks.

I got so many bots and romance-scammers that I quit all dating apps years ago.

bell-cot•11m ago
Having known scam victims here & there since before there was an internet - the short answer is that some people's heads are just wired differently. In a high-enough-trust society, they may be model citizens. But watch 'em interact with a shyster, and you'll understand the old saying about "a sucker born every minute".
retrac•4m ago
Because someone you love or at least have become fond of is (pick one):

Trapped in a foreign country because their credit card got stolen and now they have no money.

Needing help to pay for a lawyer to deal with their mother's estate but they'll pay you right back after.

They want to send you an expensive gift but the item is stuck in customs so can you just help them with releasing it.

Why do people fall for it? All examples are based off real requests real friends have made from me.

hn_throwaway_99•26m ago
I think it sucks the we don't provide comprehensive "scam education" in schools. The effects can be devastating but the rules to prevent them are actually quite simple (I really hate the common framing of "look, anyone can be a victim" - it makes it sound like these scams are hard to prevent when they're usually not).

For example, the "hang up, look up, call back" rule (or analogous rules if you are texted/emailed) is simple to remember and prevents the vast, vast majority of cases where a scammer is contacting you while pretending to be someone else (your bank, the IRS, etc.) While that wouldn't prevent this particular dating scam, there are other simple rules that could prevent these scams.

Scammers take advantage of human social instincts that developed over millennia and were based on face-to-face contacts. That's no longer viable in a remote contact world, so people need to be educated specifically on how to curb their natural instincts.

wing-_-nuts•23m ago
Given the steep fall in relationship formation, and birth rates, I honestly think the government should spin off a non profit org that runs it's own dating app. Make it independent of the government, like the federal reserve, require people to upload their drivers license or other docs to prove who they are (Yes, yes, privacy concerns, people smarter than me will have to figure out how to address this). Allow people to report bad behavior and give out bans for egregious stuff. Heck, maybe auto enroll folks unless they opt out. That would solve the gender disparity.

I'm sure someone smarter than me could poke holes in the above idea, or make it better, but look at the state of things now. We hand over all sorts of sensitive data to private companies, who have fundamentally misaligned incentives. I would think some sort of non profit app would have to be better.

verteu•20m ago
Why would it be any more successful than the privately-owned dating apps?
deaton•17m ago
Because the privately owned dating apps measure their success in profits, which gives them a misaligned incentive to ensure people don't meet anyone. Its not crazy to say a nonprofit dating app wouldn't face the same problem.
bell-cot•20m ago
Con artists have been fleecing people since before there were railroad trains for them to skip town on. While I'm sure the dating apps could do far more to discourage scams, there simply is no viable level of effort on their part which would fix things. (And the more that they did, the higher the "it was reasonable to assume that..." threshold, for vulnerable people regarding random strangers on the platform as trustworthy.)

Maybe the least-bad solution would be a low, gov't-mandated level of effort, combined with blunt disclosures of what that did, and didn't cover?

Gualdrapo•19m ago
I recall a post here on HN from a few days or weeks ago where someone said they wished online dating was like in 2010-2012 okcupid, and someone else replied that it still worked that way.

But they conveniently forgot to mention now it is a ghost town with sooooooo many bots and scam accounts and, like in the local case, many of the actual human accounts are just selling so-called "content".

WalterBright•13m ago
I receive pig butchering emails and phone calls all the time.
WalterBright•10m ago
I'd like an email system where it costs a penny to send an email. That would make the mass email spams & scams unprofitable. (I receive well over a hundred emails a day.)