frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

mitmproxy adds --emudhra option

https://github.com/mitmproxy/mitmproxy/commit/169234499088fc2c414644a67efaed3d64ae2e3b
308•ahlCVA•3h ago•81 comments

The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]

https://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~davidharvey/research/subnlogn.pdf
36•craigcitro•1h ago•20 comments

Epic vs. Apple AU:Court Orders Alt App Stores,Sideloading and 3rd Party Payments

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2026/2026fca1552
77•Mayzie•1h ago•24 comments

There isn't an easy exploit for this PHP vulnerability

https://eliastaylor.com/noexploit/
254•zkldi•4h ago•130 comments

Security Disclosure

https://blog.railway.com/p/security-disclosure-wednesday-october-21st
358•passenger•5h ago•207 comments

Rust Style Guide

https://google.github.io/styleguide/rustguide.html
236•kaycebasques•8h ago•130 comments

GitLab critical patch release

https://docs.gitlab.com/releases/patches/patch-release-gitlab-19-5-1-released/
267•artooro•8h ago•65 comments

Compromised LiteLLM 1.107.0 on PyPI Installs a Credential Stealer and Backdoor

https://safedep.io/litellm-pypi-compromise-credential-stealer-backdoor/
455•abhisek•13h ago•155 comments

Using LLM for confidence scoring is a bad idea

https://rumple.github.io/blog/2026/10/20/asking-llm-for-confidence.html
21•jimauthors•23h ago•12 comments

Beyond the &

https://lwn.net/Articles/1096028/
25•PaulHoule•1d ago•0 comments

LLM Agents Play Pokemon Showdown

https://olivergrabner.com/research/pokemon/
14•grabnero•1h ago•10 comments

Chain of Thought for Humans

https://www.boristhebrave.com/2026/10/18/chain-of-thought-for-humans/
45•ibobev•2d ago•24 comments

Meta ordered to pay $25B penalty in New Mexico Cambridge Analytica case

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/10/21/meta-new-mexico-cambridge-analytica-penalty.html
422•cbg0•10h ago•274 comments

PingCap TiDB Leaks

https://fulcrumsec.vg/pingcap/
248•swyx•1d ago•35 comments

Today's PHP security release, and how we're strengthening security

https://thephp.foundation/blog/2026/10/21/todays-php-security-release-and-how-were-strengthening-...
697•ejohnso49•11h ago•343 comments

Tiny possum and glider thought extinct for 6000 years found in remote West Papua

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp814l80pw2o
165•bryanrasmussen•1d ago•28 comments

Code is clay now

https://www.albertodenia.com/writing/code-is-clay-now
113•albertodenia•2d ago•61 comments

Show HN: Omnara – Open-source alternative to Claude Managed Agents

https://github.com/omnara-ai/omnara
34•kmansm27•11h ago•11 comments

OpenAI models are coming to Google Cloud

https://openai.com/index/openai-models-google-cloud/
256•armcat•14h ago•107 comments

No more icons in every menu by default

https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2026/icons-in-every-menu/
211•riffraff•1d ago•150 comments

DuckDB 2.0.0 LTS “Cinnamon Teal”

https://duckdb.org/2026/10/21/announcing-duckdb-200
383•nnx•13h ago•49 comments

Why Windows 11 still ships with Windows 95's memory manager hidden inside it

https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/10/19/why-windows-11-still-ships-with-windows-95s-memory-manag...
148•khalidkhair•2d ago•101 comments

Patch the Planet: global response coordination as agents uncover vulnerabilities

https://openai.com/index/coordinated-disclosure-of-critical-vulnerabilities/
239•nr378•13h ago•163 comments

Postgres recovery_prefetch can cause outages

https://ardentperf.com/2026/10/20/postgres-recovery_prefetch-considered-harmful-and-causing-outages/
6•plaur782•5h ago•0 comments

I reverse engineered a board game

https://wuemeli.com/blog/reversing-hitster-game/
7•wuemeli•14h ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-built browser games, collected in one place

https://playgroundarcade.com/
10•richleigh•1d ago•0 comments

Oregon lawmakers approve money to buy an iconic waterfall listed on Redfin

https://apnews.com/article/oregon-waterfall-for-sale-lawmakers-996de63462d49ec3ad9bee1629fb9488
175•surprisetalk•12h ago•87 comments

EA is shutting down BioWare

https://www.theverge.com/games/1015647/ea-is-shutting-down-bioware
566•aaronbrethorst•10h ago•343 comments

Show HN: Can you tell an AI's real 30-day memory from a fabricated one?

https://kairos-experiment.com/distinguish.html
5•gcolella•2d ago•0 comments

Launch HN: Alter (YC S25) – Access control for multi-user agents

https://alterauth.com/
55•simfinii•21h ago•24 comments
Open in hackernews

The recently proposed o(n log n) integer multiplication algorithm [pdf]

https://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~davidharvey/research/subnlogn.pdf
36•craigcitro•1h ago

Comments

flebron•57m ago
Note in this case the title says "O(n log n)", but the important part is this is "o(n log n)", not just "O(n log n)'. The former is a strict subset of the latter. We already knew how to multiply two n-bit integers in O(n log n) time, via the FFT.
onionisafruit•53m ago
For those of us uninformed, what’s the difference between O and o?
theokrueger•48m ago
Big O basically drops constants

O(2n+1) = O(2n) = O(n)

o(2n+1) > o(2n) > o(n)

Both define upper boundary, but big O can read like "the function is generally proportional to ___" and little o can read like "the function is never more than _____"

bobmarleybiceps•35m ago
that's not the convention I know... (from CLRS algorithms book).

Big O is sort of like <=. little o is sort of like <.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1008328.1008329

npinsker•27m ago
yes, GP is slightly off, but the idea of <= and < is accurate.

O(n) is: "there exists a K such that, for sufficiently large n, K*n is always larger".

o(n) is: "for every K, for sufficiently large n, K*n is always larger". (So o(2n+1) and o(2n) and o(n) are the same thing.)

boothby•48m ago
If f is O(g) and o(h) then

  Lim f/g -> C a constant
And

  Lim f/h -> 0
appplication•44m ago
Lmao! If someone is asking the difference between big and little o notation this is absolutely not the right way to clarify it.

If you were joking then maybe you got me

boothby•26m ago
I do hope you can find and reattach your ass; that does sound painful.
adgjlsfhk1•18m ago
> Lim f/g -> C a constant.

This isn't quite correct. O(g) doesn't require the limit to exist.

Ygg2•45m ago
Both are upper bounds. But small o is strictly smaller than upper bound. Big O is not greater than upper bound.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1364444/difference-betwe...

ruined•41m ago
f(n) = O(g(n)) means as n increases, f(n)/g(n) must not grow beyond a constant

f(n) = o(g(n)) means as n increases, f(n)/g(n) must shrink

jhanschoo•18m ago
Nitpick:

s/must shrink/must eventually shrink, after finitely many n/

Equivalently, must go to zero in the limit.

bobmarleybiceps•30m ago
Knuth originally defining them https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1008328.1008329
craigcitro•49m ago
ty, fixed. (ahh, copy paste.)
ComplexSystems•35m ago
Roughly speaking, O(n log n) means "grows no faster than k(n log n) for some k", whereas o(n log n) means grows strictly more slowly* than k(n log n) for all* choices of k.
jdb1729•44m ago
> The new result does not directly imply new complexity bounds for polynomial multiplication over a fixed finite field, say multiplication in F2[x]. The state of the art for this problem is an algorithm that multiplies polynomials of degree n in time O(n log n 4^log*(n)) [HvdH19].

@platypii and I obtained a Lean proof of the same improvement for DFT over prime-order finite fields (yielding polynomial multiplication via the convolution theorem): https://github.com/platypii/integer-mult-bounds-lean/blob/ma...

ajkjk•30m ago
Really enjoy the writing style here.
yaoke259•17m ago
Awesome write up and intro by a fellow Sydney-sider, kept me hooked! As someone who's not a maths wizard, the technical details flew by my head but the prose allowing me to empathise deeply with those in the field was very enlightening. I never realised how big of a deal the maths dump was and how much it has shaken up the field. I guess we are all just trying to figure out this whole "intelligence on tap" thing together.
m00dy•7m ago
You don’t need to be a math wizard. Just upload the paper to an AI and ask, “Explain this like I’m five.” Then, with each follow-up prompt, increase the age and level of expertise you want it to assume.
Kapura•4m ago
> I have not actually read the paper. In fact, there are three closely related papers [TC26a], [TC26b], [TC26c], and I have not read any of them. I tried, but soon gave up. The math(s) dump does not appear to be strong on exposition. Instead, I asked Fable to explain [TC26a] to me. Fable seems to understand the argument and thinks that it is correct.

this does not feel like a healthy place to be