frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: HackerBooks – HackerTube, but for books mentioned on HN

https://hackerbooks.org
535•roansh•4h ago•133 comments

HackerTube: YouTube built from videos recommended by HN

https://karpathy.bearblog.dev/hacker-tube/
2021•karpathy•1d ago•501 comments

Mathematics has changed. Let's act like it

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2026/11/01/mathematics-has-changed-lets-act-like-it/
89•smilelamp•2h ago•99 comments

Copper – A minimal low-level programming language with OOP and generics

https://tibleiz.net/copper/
85•bogdanoff_2•2d ago•44 comments

Tips for more effective fuzz testing with AFL++

https://nullprogram.com/blog/2025/02/05/
12•luu•4d ago•0 comments

It wasn't AI that flipped Proton's charge

https://blog.raed.dev/posts/proton-loser-thinking/
72•Raed667•1h ago•28 comments

Proving and improving the Platonic Representation Hypothesis with JEPAs

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39302
85•Anon84•7h ago•47 comments

Bidirectional charging during grid outages

https://www.jefftk.com/p/bidirectional-charging-during-grid-outages
62•luu•1d ago•80 comments

An Italian farmer found some unknown seeds in his attic and planted them

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/italian-farmer-found-unknown-seeds-attic-with-nothi...
708•ecares•21h ago•191 comments

Lenovo's 'encrypted' fingerprint USB is just an unencrypted SD card in a case

https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1xl2pr3/lenovos_encrypted_fingerprint_usb_drive_is_j...
280•entryleveljobsc•6h ago•105 comments

Novellas with Groff

https://movq.de/blog/postings/2026-10-31/0/POSTING-en.html
82•dverlaeckt80•6h ago•33 comments

Seoul Viosys begins production of rare-earth-free white light emitter

https://www.semiconductor-today.com/news_items/2026/oct/seoul-291026.shtml
98•gmays•4h ago•17 comments

One-minute frequency disturbances from synchronization in power systems

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-026-02144-0
91•croes•1d ago•36 comments

Ask HN: Which TV do you recommend for privacy?

21•LecroJS•59m ago•26 comments

Frontier Airlines Likely Breached

https://www.reddit.com/r/frontierairlines/comments/1xl20e8/psa_email_scam/
122•999900000999•3h ago•31 comments

Patrick Stewart taught us what good men do with power

https://www.vox.com/politics/508526/patrick-stewart-jean-luc-picard-star-trek-liberalism
243•rhaynes•3h ago•168 comments

Show HN: OmniDiff – Opensource, super fast, content aware Git difftool, in Rust

https://github.com/ivankovic/omnidiff
73•FabCH•7h ago•29 comments

The AI cost of JavaScript frameworks

https://nolanlawson.com/2026/10/28/the-ai-cost-of-javascript-frameworks/
250•luu•14h ago•172 comments

Brazilian Court Sanctions Lawyers for Prompt Injection in Court Filing

https://jetstream.security/insights/brazilian-court-sanctions-prompt-injection-filing/
280•doodlesdev•18h ago•163 comments

Radiation Map of the World

https://radiaverse.com/
96•slater•4d ago•30 comments

TCP Use-After-Free: CVE-2026-98432 / CVSS 9.8

https://atlasum.net/blog/cve-2026-98432-linux-ipv4-tcp-uaf
651•oger•1d ago•313 comments

Show HN: I rebuilt my old canvas 3D library as a small WebGL 2 library – phoria2

https://kevs3d.co.uk/phoria2/
56•kevs3d•1d ago•8 comments

Memdoor: A team of 5 Qwen3.8-27B models beats Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard

https://github.com/guregodevo/memdoor/tree/main/examples/workflows/team-solve
398•guregodevo•21h ago•197 comments

Parchment Paper History: How We Got Paper Perfect for Baking (2019)

https://tedium.co/2019/11/21/nonstick-parchment-paper-history/
11•colinprince•1d ago•9 comments

Show HN: Point your camera at a landscape to learn about its geology

https://outcrop.rocks/
118•headsupernova•3d ago•32 comments

US Jobs Pickup May Keep Fed on Track to Hike Rates Again

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-10-31/us-jobs-pickup-may-keep-fed-on-track-to-hike-r...
20•frank_clover•1h ago•8 comments

Nurses Sound Alarm as 'Uber for Nursing' Apps Push to Deregulate Healthcare

https://nurse.org/news/uber-for-nursing-gig-apps-report/
109•ravetcofx•1h ago•95 comments

Understanding Email Encryption

https://www.fastmail.com/blog/email-encryption/
106•nmjenkins•1d ago•22 comments

Running a bootstrapped SaaS for 20 years with my brother

https://blog.zamzar.com/2026/10/30/20-years-766-million-files-two-chameleons/
219•whyleyc•2d ago•50 comments

Leaking Secrets from Air-Gap Computers by Spelling Radio Signals from RAM (2024)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02292
169•hapax_legomena•18h ago•89 comments
Open in hackernews

Nurses Sound Alarm as 'Uber for Nursing' Apps Push to Deregulate Healthcare

https://nurse.org/news/uber-for-nursing-gig-apps-report/
109•ravetcofx•1h ago

Comments

bagels•1h ago
Seems like illegal wage fixing collusion by employers with the extra step of technology.
Avicebron•58m ago
Another torment nexus banger.
changoplatanero•57m ago
Everyone wants healthcare expenses to go down but the biggest healthcare expense is the salaries of providers. So, hard to give the masses what they want without making a smaller group of people who benefit from the status quo angry.
jtmarl1n•51m ago
I’m sure there is some savings to be found within the insurance industry who regularly reports earnings in the billions.
kraken_cult•50m ago
How about we gut the insurance companies that are blowing the price of everything in healthcare and not leverage the desperation of nurses?
Nifty3929•49m ago
Much like home prices. Everybody says they want homes to be more affordable, but all actions are designed to keep them high and if they did actually fall it would be treated as an emergency.
5mk•45m ago
Physician and nurse salaries account for only 15% of healthcare spending.

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2...

responder41•29m ago
to be a bit pedantic, that says they account for only 15% of the excess healthcare spending, relative to other countries. It's not surprising given doctors in the united states have a higher level of training compared with many peer countries, and _all_ salaries are much higher in the united states compared with almost any country.

The 15% extra administrative cost of insurance and 15% extra administrative burden of applying care are the big culprits, in addition to extra costs on medicine and machinery. But it's interesting. Why is it that a comparatively deregulated and privatized system has so much extra pricing cost from bureaucracy?

boredatoms•43m ago
The whole ecosystem of companies trying to make a profit from each thing along the way isnt efficient. Other countries just nationalize instead
0xbadcafebee•35m ago
Physician salary is only 9% of total healthcare cost. The rest of the labor pool is administrative - clerks, management, etc.

Physicians also make 2-3x more than physicians in other countries. Why? Their education cost is also 2-3x higher than in other countries.

Hospitals and procedures are expensive, in part because of insurance. Insurance is high because our society is too litigious. It's also expensive because of consolidated private healthcare systems that can control and mark up prices due to lack of competition.

Other countries spend half what we do on healthcare. And their people are often healthier.

Ccecil•31m ago
Hospital administration costs are 20-30% of healthcare costs. [1]

[1] https://www.trillianthealth.com/market-research/studies/hosp...

BurningFrog•30m ago
We just need to educate a lot more doctors and nurses. That would lower salaries and provide a lot more care.

Last I heard the AMA controls how many doctors can be educated.

BoardsOfCanada•12m ago
In Sweden we had this in the news: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/uppsala/hon-pendlar-860-mi... A US nurse moved to Sweden and preferred to fly to San Fransisco to work ten days at a time, then fly back to be off for six weeks, rather than taking a job as a nurse in Sweden. The salaries are very different.
74948494i4•55m ago
Apparently most hospitals make low margins. If this is true, and the goal is to make healthcare more affordable, something has to give, no?

https://www.kff.org/health-costs/key-facts-about-hospitals/?...

It is also unclear how this is any different than traveling nurses which operate similarly.

What is the solution that doesn’t result in at least some large group of people making less money?

gambiting•51m ago
Yeah, maybe it's the idea that hospitals should make profit that should give?

Like, sorry, but not being from the US the whole idea of a "margin" when running a hospital is insane. Hospitals are paid from our ample taxes and the patient pays nothing - there is no room for profit there, not should there be one.

74948494i4•48m ago
How much does your country’s medical professionals make, how long do patients wait for care and what is the level of care as measured by variety and efficacy? Seems hard to compare without normalizing these things.
jazmichaelking•26m ago
>How much does your country’s medical professionals make

Let's assume UK. Less. US physicians earn about twice what their UK peers do, US RNs about 1.5x https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2...

>how long do patients wait for care

About the same or longer, in general UK consumes less healthcare per person, but...

>what is the level of care

Better outcomes in the UK https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-the-us-healthcare-syst... and longer UK life expectancy https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/11/health-at-a-gla... (and of course US has higher levels of chronic illness https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/how-has...

All for far less (share of GDP) than US https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS?locat...

jareklupinski•55m ago
> A companion Roosevelt Institute brief found that some platforms "use data-brokers to determine nurse debt levels and offer lower wages to those with highest debt loads."

thanks free market

antonvs•33m ago
I'm investing in guillotines. I have a feeling they're going to be hot.
im3w1l•2m ago
When something sounds too bad to be true, I think it's fair that we should ask for some kind of evidence to be produced. They cite a Roosevelt Institute article that says

"Gig nursing apps MAY [my caps] determine pay by what the firm knows about how much a nurse was willing to accept for a previous assignment, how often they bid for shifts, or how much credit card or other kinds of debt they might hold."

That kind of sounds like they are overselling a hypothetical. Even just an "insiders familiar with the matter have told us that it IS happening", would make me believe it more.

thomasdziedzic•55m ago
Nurses already deserve higher wages than what they already get, but introducing "dynamic pricing" and competition to under-bid each other is just disgusting.

Nurses form the backbone of healthcare. Treat them as such.

Edit: To those downvoting me, talk to a real nurse and I bet you wouldn't take twice the pay to do half the work they have to deal with.

arjie•27m ago
There's no concept of "deserving higher wages". It's a popular online meme but what on Earth does it even capture? If you value the work higher, then pay them more and you'll win the market for that labour.

There's a good argument to say that sufficiently aggregated marketplaces can launder price collusion, and if we were in such an aggregated marketplace then you could make that argument. But we're not in that situation right now.

The 'Edit:' is even more confusing. If I talk to someone in a profession and I wouldn't take twice the pay they receive to do half the work they do then they deserve higher wages? But that list is huge. Congressmen, Senators, many CEOs, Wagner-group mercenaries, ICE officers, drone pilots. In fact, almost every profession has this 4x effective slippage you're talking about.

le-mark•55m ago
> found that some platforms "use data-brokers to determine nurse debt levels and offer lower wages to those with highest debt loads."

We can assume all gig economy companies do this? Brave new world indeed.

neal_jones•27m ago
Wondering if regular companies are doing this as well.
monster_truck•26m ago
yes
supertrope•7m ago
Uber checked the first few digits of your debit card to filter out police officer credit unions to evade taxi regulation enforcement. They use your phone’s battery level as one factor to estimate your elasticity of demand. They have teams of economists to adjust personalized prices to as high as you can bear and pay for drivers as low as possible.
buran77•55m ago
It was only a matter of time and I said (half) jokingly at the time that Uber is breaking the dam for everyone else to follow. Any regulated system will have its day in front of "disruptors" where the disruption is simply ignoring the regulation with some flimsy excuse, supported only by the money and lack of morals of VCs and startup combinators.

Uber took an axe to taxi drivers which weren't a popular group to begin with so that was easy. With the "disruption" perfected, next up are doctors, nurses, lawyers, electricians, cooks, engineers, the sky is the limit.

Ccecil•34m ago
It has been my observation that the companies all had plans to "disrupt"...but it seems they never had a solid "profitable" plan past when the VC money ran out.

Aside from turning employees into contractors...most of which have not done the math on how much they are losing through having to use your own car with no employee benefits. Doordash/Uber start looking a lot less attractive if you figure in the $.65/mile costs (fuel, repairs, insurance, car purchase price) that you would be paid by most govt or "real" companies. Almost everyone I know who does Doordash makes about $20/hr (which isn't good anyways) and they are not figuring in the costs of the vehicle.

SoftTalker•28m ago
If you set yourself up as an LLC for your uber driving, can you take the standard mileage rate as an expense?
onedognight•23m ago
You don’t need an LLC to do this. Just filing a Schedule C will do.
tasty_freeze•
0xbadcafebee•53m ago
The entire 'gig economy' model is exploitation. It only works because of income inequality. It requires a large pool of workers who don't make enough money to support themselves (due to insane healthcare and housing costs, and low wages and benefits) and thus will take any money they can get, despite the poor pay, long hours, and lack of benefits. It's taking a person slowly dying of thirst and offering them a thimble of water in exchange for knitting a sock.
kraken_cult•39m ago
In the case of Uber it's bring your own thimble too
SoftTalker•26m ago
Could not the IRS fix this in one swoop by declaring that "gig workers" are employees?
kraken_cult•23m ago
Presumably, but what do you think the lobbyists are for?
Shank•52m ago
To what degree is this just another symptom of the US healthcare system being flawed and in need of rework? To what degree would anyone use such a service if the costs remained high?

I used Zocdoc in the past to find a doctor and ended up with a doctor who just charged out-of-pocket instead of insurance, and it worked great. Would an app that shows up-front pricing be better for the consumer?

codeddesign•42m ago
This is marketed to hospitals to fill shifts rather than nurse-to-consumer which has been available for a long time.
tantalor•38m ago
The costs are not high. It's the prices that are too high.
skybrian•34m ago
I don't really know, but according to one graph, US nursing salaries are second only to Luxembourg:

https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/11/health-at-a-gla...

7777777phil•31m ago
Ratio to average wages is 0.9 last with Switzerland.
croes•14m ago
wewewedxfgdf•50m ago
Tech bros: "It's Uber and Doge for nursing!"

Like nurses are just an expense.

CapmCrackaWaka•50m ago
Could I use this app to hire a nurse and get a diagnosis from home? If we can start getting even meagre medical treatment to skip insurance / other middle men, I could see this having a great impact on healthcare prices, especially since AI is such a good information extractor, which is 90% of the role doctors play anyway.
responder41•35m ago
Generally speaking nurses in the united states cannot provide a diagnosis, at least without jeopardizing their license. You can already find a doctor using a service like Zocdoc who may cut out middlemen, though regulatory capture has made it close to impossible to meaningfully reduce costs in this way. I would not recommend using AI to diagnose or treat yourself (https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/27/well/ai-chatgpt-medicatio..., for instance) without the help of somebody highly trained to interpret this information and make good decisions.
lukan•34m ago
Nurses don't really do diagnosis, but follow the ones doctors give. (Except for trivial things)

Otherwise I unfortunately know plenty of doctors that could easily be replaced by an LLM, but for now I prefer a diagnosis from a real doctor (who may use AI as a tool).

nradov•10m ago
If you really believe that information extraction is 90% of what doctors do then you're deeply ignorant about how healthcare actually works and not qualified to even have an opinion on this subject.
za_creature
theo939eirn•43m ago
To be fair US health care system is sort of similar to old NYC taxi driver cartels before Uber. Just try to get price quote ahead of procedure...

Ripe for disruption!

jon128•42m ago
Does this mean that as a customer I can select only nurses that don't have fake degrees?
andyjohnson0•35m ago
You'll only get that option on the Premium tier.
dyauspitr•30m ago
Go ahead and downvote me for this, but the medical field in the US especially when it comes to RNs needs a shake up. This is going to sound very crass, but the only skill that your average person on the street doesn’t have that nurses have is to stick a needle in a vein and that’s something that can be taught to a lay person over a week. Pretty much everything else are skills that any person off the street possesses and we would do well to have a lower bar for entry for it.
newyankee•30m ago
While I do understand the importance of training, degrees and experience I see that people in the medical field beyond Doctors seem to have a very holier than thou attitude probably because they have 10 edge cases of how MRI can go wrong drilled into them (MRI technicians), not everyone is comfortable with needles and human body (nurses) and because it seems that only Pharmacists can sort and provide us the right medicines when in fact it can be easily done by some robots.

In before someone says that your reasoning is flawed because that is very incorrect perception of the field. All I see is that regulatory capture has worked very well here and is simply stopping totally novel and practical ideas which work on tradeoffs from even taking off

F7F7F7•9m ago
This sounds like pure insecurity with a sprinkle of Dunning Kruger. Unless I'm missing the joke somewhere? Nurses don't mind needles is the only difference? I must be missing the joke.
phoghed•26m ago
Uber for talk therapy / psychology is dog shit, I’m sure this will be too.
doomspork•26m ago
Lord have mercy. The last thing you want is under paid, lower quality nurses. If you're for that, you've never had a hospital stay.
gxs•6m ago
I feel really conflicted on nurses

On the one hand, a good nurse is invaluable. They do the hard work that doctors won’t/don’t do, and can be so kind and generous during your time of need.

On the other ones, there are so many who mail it in and are just milking the system

Healthcare is so expensive - some nurses are making 500k a year - their union contracts base vary from 200k to 300k for something like 32-36 hours per week

On top of that, they can pretty much work unlimited overtime with zero restrictions. They can work enough overtime hours such that they can nearly double their salary. And that’s how you come up with the 500k figure I posted

Granted, that’s at the top of the range, I’m talking about somewhere like the Bay Area, and does require a ton of overtime, but those extra 100s of thousands add up. These hours can’t be spread around to minimize the amount of time and a half or double pay paid out, per contract they go in order of seniority

This is just nurses and I imagine it’s something similar but with higher rates for specialists like anesthesiologists and still beyond that doctors and surgeons

I don’t begrudge anyone’s salaries, but it’s a zero sum game. There’s a reason why, aside from typical corporate profit maximization, you wind up with a 30k bill for a short visit. Even if you account for the lower rates insurance companies pay, it’s still in the thousands of dollars for treatment where you were seen for less than 30 minutes

Like I said, to be clear, I don’t begrudge anyone’s salaries - this is just an under discussed point when we talk about healthcare costs

Labor is generally reported as 60% of the costs of hospitals - so if you’d ever want to talk about making healthcare affordable you’d have to address this which I feel like is a bit of a taboo subject. Many nurses are in a union which makes it an even more difficult conversation

All that is to say, I can see the motivation behind stuff like this, even if I don’t agree with it

nradov•12m ago
Trying to compare national healthcare systems based on life expectancy is a total non sequitur. Most of the factors which limit US life expectancy relative to other developed countries have little or nothing to do with healthcare (or lack thereof). It's mainly other problems like car crashes, suicide, violence, substance abuse, and sedentary lifestyles.
JoshTriplett•49m ago
Among the things that need to give are 1) insurance companies making no money because there's no margin left in the system for them, and 2) several times as many doctors, which means breaking the protection racket that intentionally limits the supply.
nradov•18m ago
What is the protection racket that intentionally limits supply? The primary bottleneck to producing more physicians is lack of available residency slots. Teaching hospitals are free to add more but for various reasons choose not to. In part I think they're waiting and hoping that Congress will kick in more subsidies through the Medicare program.

https://savegme.org/

Even if financial constraints were removed, the notion that we could produce twice as many physicians is ludicrous. There simply aren't enough attendings able to supervise a lot more residents, nor are there enough patient cases coming through the teaching hospitals to give that many residents the practical training they would need.

howunfortunate•9m ago
> What is the protection racket that intentionally limits supply?

It's the AMA.

"Free to add more" is hiding a LOT of important nuts and bolts of the guild system that discourages new entrants.

nradov•6m ago
Nonsense. The AMA doesn't limit the number of residency slots. Did you even read through the website I linked above?
thaeli•14m ago
#1 seems like a feature, not a bug. The real problem is that health insurers in their current form exist at all.
dividefuel•3m ago
A much larger supply of doctors would presumably lower their pay significantly, right? Will people still want to put in the years and years of training to become a doctor if the pay drops significantly?
lifeisloving•48m ago
Traveling nurses make more than lots of doctors though, so I dont think they're being taken advantage of. However, Im sure this company is trying to take a piece of that traveling nurse pie.
thatfrenchguy•41m ago
It’s a complex problem because a lot of those hospitals are non profit, so they have zero incentives to have high margins because no shareholders to return money to. Higher salaries for executives though…
BurningFrog•32m ago
It's REALLY important to understand that non profits have just as much incentive to maximize their income as for profits.

They have no stock holders to pay, but the people running them will pay themselves multi million dollar wages if they can!

moi2388•24m ago
It’s important to note that in most countries the law even states that they need to pay competitive salaries for these positions, so they can’t even pay them much lower amounts than their non profit counterparts
nradov•24m ago
Most hospitals (both for-profit and non-profit) are terribly inefficient. They burn up clinician time on administrative tasks that could be automated or performed by cheaper office staff or not done at all. And employees often waste a lot of time just waiting around because no one has optimized workflows to shorten queues or eliminate bottlenecks. The incentives are structured in a such a way that there's often little reason to improve.
za_creature•16m ago
Most software development shops (both for-profit and non-profit) are terribly inefficient. They burn up programmer time on administrative tasks that could be automated or performed by cheaper office staff or not done at all. And employees often waste a lot of time just waiting around because no one has optimized workflows to shorten queues or eliminate bottlenecks. The incentives are structured in such a way that there's often little reason to improve.
nradov•7m ago
Ha ha, but it's a matter of degree. Every organization has some level of inefficiency but having seen how the sausage is made I can guarantee you that the average software development shop in a US tech company is significantly more efficient than the average hospital. It's not something that you can quantify in a directly comparable way but anyone familiar with the industry will tell you the same.
za_creature•5m ago
I made a lot of sausage, including for US companies. My personal preference is smoked, not dried.
alliao•23m ago
check the admin headcount vs healthcare worker last time I looked up admin grew exponentially
joe_the_user•22m ago
The exact profit margins of hospitals as a whole doesn't matter. Hospitals are where health care happens but financially, they are simply a platform for a multitude of other private entities which make profits on top of the simple hospital fees - the "Uber For Nurses" thing is just one of many ways this happens, you have everything from data management companies to separately own MRI machines adding to the patient's bill and having a voice in the management of the hospital.
15m ago
My wife volunteers during tax seasons to do tax returns for low income people. It always depresses her when people on the lower runs of the ladder come in and have been doing uber, lyft, doordash, etc or some combination and have nothing more than a hand wave estimate of how many miles they drove. She is the one who has to tell them just guesstimating is not allowed and what might have been a $1000 check back to them is instead a $2000 check they need to write to the government. 9 times out of ten they say, "but I don't have that money" and it crushes her. More than a few get mad at her for not being willing to just enter their guesstimate into the form.

I'm not sure if it is because uber (or whomever they work for) didn't make it clear enough to track it properly or if they simply didn't take it seriously.

nradov•4m ago
Uber give drivers tax summaries with miles driven.

https://help.uber.com/en/driving-and-delivering/article/wher...

alliao•25m ago
so either people aren't mathing or the frictionless experience is actually of value...
mristin•20m ago
I have heard a couple of times -- Uber, but for prostitution.
Avicebron•15m ago
Pretty sure the app is called Seeking.
mrtksn•20m ago
TBF it’s also an engine to push for regulations review. Awful lot of regulations are written for an age that no longer exists and just as many are to make management easier therefore startups pushing the boundaries actually are a correcting mechanism.

Unfortunately some harm can be inflicted bur IMHO it’s better than the alternative.

kotaKat•18m ago
... funny thing, that. How about Uber for Amazon? Literally just gigwork in the warehouses at this point, in four hour shift chunklets.

https://hiring.amazon.com/promotions/anytime-shifts

Glyptodon•15m ago
Not only were taxi drivers not popular but it also wasn't and isn't obvious to most people exactly how or why they were regulated. Especially to people outside of major urban areas.

I do not think this will hold with nursing.

howunfortunate•14m ago
Don't confuse "regulation" with "guild systems".

Taxi drivers were not more "regulated" in any meaningful way, in fact oversight of them was significantly worse than the community-driven Uber rating system (not that that doesn't also have flaws).

Some regulation is bad, some regulation is good. There's basically nothing at all that's good about guild systems and I will celebrate each of them facing open market competition.

hackingonempty•4m ago
> Taxi drivers were not more "regulated" in any meaningful way, in fact oversight of them was significantly worse than the community-driven Uber rating system (not that that doesn't also have flaws).

Taxis have standardized rates set by the municipality and use standardized meters that are periodically inspected. Ride sharing apps have dynamic pricing and no transparency.

nradov•2m ago
Taxis have (almost) no transparency. Outside of a few limited places where there are fixed fees for certain routes, you never know how much you're going to have to pay when you get in. With ride share apps the pricing is upfront and transparent.
noir_lord•2m ago
> Taxi drivers were not more "regulated" in any meaningful way, in fact oversight of them was significantly worse than the community-driven Uber rating system (not that that doesn't also have flaws).

You are defaulting to the US here (and I doubt Taxi regulation in the US is that homologous either tbh given the complexity of 50 states and then cities on top of that).

Taking the country I'm most familiar with (the UK), Taxis fall into two categories (only one of which is technically a taxi by law if not convention - Hackney and private hire vehicles) both are licensed in different but similar ways by the licensing authorities (usually the local council but not always), some of those laws go back centuries.

bcvvvy•13m ago
That will only happen until they step on the wrong toes.

I can't wait until they disrupt something a cartel or the mafia are in on.

US not UK
Lammy•28m ago
Red herring; high salaries are fine for people who actually directly interact with patients https://hmpi.org/2026/07/10/the-growth-in-healthcare-adminis...
damascus_kei•21m ago
Breaking: Richest Country has higher wages.
responder41•13m ago
Overall US salaries are also second only to Luxembourg (https://www.statista.com/chart/13093/the-countries-with-the-...)
howunfortunate•12m ago
Evidence?

Every serious analysis of the US healthcare system I've ever seen comes away with the takeaway "Americans consume a lot of healthcare services and the expensive part of that is the providers' salaries"

za_creature•29m ago
> another symptom of the US healthcare system

You know the videos of those couriers eating your food and claiming that it was delivered?

see also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath

aliasxneo•26m ago
Maybe we'd have more money to fix the problem if "nursing at home" wasn't one of the main medicare fraud schemes that has persisted for years now.
croes•12m ago
It’s the symptom of a system where more and more wealth goes to few people and the rest has to fight for the rest of wealth
•
7m ago
You are deeply ignorant about how healthcare actually works and not qualified to even have an opinion on this subject.