Please don't change my mouse cursor. It is unexpected; disorienting; it is unnecessary; there were probably more pressing areas to focus attention; if the project is successful at some point, you will wind up having to work on it again; and until then you will spend mental energy responding to or ignoring complaints about it.

Good luck.

Hey, Embedded Dev here, i will suggest my team to use and i will test it out as well. but honestly i feel more than embedded developers it will be more useful for solution engineers who work with direct customers. Regardless i will my feedback here after testing it.

Does it support Imperial units?

I've seen slighly similar presentations in LabView and/or Matlab. How does your project compare to them?

HN found the cursor bug faster than any QA team could. Cool idea though, who is the main user: students, makers, or embedded engineers?

Mostly unrelated, but what is going on with the "I specifically approve section ... of the terms and conditions" when you sign in without an account. Is this a new requirement somewhere?

Other than that, seems interesting! Simulink could always do with a competitor, although I'm always saying Simulink needs a text-based interface. Same signal flow programming model that supports scopes and continues time integrators, just with text instead of drag-and-drop.

Someone already mentioned the mouse cursor... is it supposed to be solved? Now I see... none, which is kind of pointless on desktop.

stop fucking with my scroll and mouse pointer (overriding mouse sensitivity is crazy)

I wish that people would not use AI to generate copy or websites, at this point it induces an almost instinctual negative reaction: 'What Modelloop does -- in three movements' is a classical example of AI lingo. I don't have proof but I feel that the most recent models have gotten worse. The rhetorical devices they use are tiring and off-putting at this point.