I've added 393 nodes and 562 edges to capture other supply / physics constraints as well.
There's no sign up, and no pay wall, it's all free.
Please let me know what you think!
I've added 393 nodes and 562 edges to capture other supply / physics constraints as well.
There's no sign up, and no pay wall, it's all free.
Please let me know what you think!
I don’t think this is true if finance is included in economics.
… unless of course by physics you also mean metaphysics.
My only suggestion would be to tone down rhetorical phrases like “science dictates economics.” The tool is strong enough to stand on its own, and I think presenting the data more neutrally would make it even more persuasive.
Of course, it's impossible to know for sure what was LLM processed or not, but some of your posts (like this one) are getting classified that way.
For example, I recently discovered this site https://bomwiki.com/ which attempts to make a giant dependency graph of all the parts used to make large machines. This would not be possible without it being a wiki.
uberex•2h ago
antisyzygy•2h ago