Love these but curious: they sell access to this UI but can't I point an agent at this and have it copy these? Or is it better quality outputs to use the MCP?

Some of these are genuinely nice. I really like the action slide-out, the wall reveal, and the slide-off reveal.

Unfortunately for a thing whose core job is polished UI, there's still quite a lot of polish needed before I would be willing to implement any of this in my UI To name a few : - the swap icon state theme preview switcher cascades the element brightness rather than fading them together. - The confirm reveal has something wrong with the spring every third or fourth click, which is strange - Cards: the stacked deck cycle. When you click Next, it doesn't draw the top card. - The shared element expand option: when you minimize, the spring dampening pushes the components outside of the container. - Swipe to dismiss causes the container to temporarily show a scroll bar.

"It's one of the resources I used recently. -shadcn" being the top testimony is so funny.

I do love some of these examples, but, and as others noticed, they do lack polish.

I just set up penpot on a fly.io and connect to it with mcp -and- a browser-use-tool.. because of network weirdness and serverles platforms.. and then i can get the best of both worlds, of a structured ui design tool, and a flexible adaptive chat interface. couple that with .. image generation tools, and code execution for converting generated pngs to svgs, and I think I came up with something pretty neat.

$30/month for a button on web page?

these look great