I fully expect this.
Based on industry experience, where vendors were hired (and paid well) so that there would be, and I quote, "a throat to choke" when needed.
There were training corpus in English, Hebrew and Farsi. I guess it means the US had access to Iranian communication means. I wondered how it was possible to rely on a LLM to carry international relations. It seems a new low in stupidity.
The request was made on Innocentive (an open innovation website).
https://cttso.community.innocentive.com/challenge/487ad0cf48...
And yes, there could be problems with the implementation. in particular the chance of having many false positives are one reason many people are opposed to such tech.
Please cite that talk. Fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance is not the same as "adopting LLM technology". Please be precise.
not_your_vase•18h ago
farseer•14h ago