Then at one point changed it to a reflect the local price of the print edition in your country. I live in NZ so price was relatively high. To reduce my costs I changed my address to the US (my employer at the time).
Here is a post I did 10 years ago on their pricing:
https://blog.darkmere.gen.nz/2015/03/parallel-importing-vs-t...
[0] - https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2017/05/how-the-economis...
It’s equally as meek a counter-argument as, “trust me because I hold degrees in this topic.” Good. Then it should be easy for you to make a well-reasoned argument.
As someone who is a Yale educated leftist and believes that markets do not work Robinson is upset.
Meanwhile, when employers of his own magazine wanted it to become a worker owned socialist cooperative he got them to resign. Socialism for thee, not for me.
Imagine if someone says "I spent the last week reading about the history of the Levant and I know how to implement peace in that region".
I mean... kinda? Switzerland has 9 million total people, and more millionaires than India and Pakistan combined.
But anyway this post is saying that Indians have the cheapest subscriptions, not taking purchasing power into account.
tracerbulletx•4h ago
bdangubic•4h ago
odo1242•54m ago
The general idea is based on charging people based on how much they can pay. There are reasonable ways to execute this (I’d argue localized pricing is among them, along with things like open source software and donations, and financial aid at colleges) and unreasonable ways (like Kroger’s bid to use facial recognition to do it in their stores)
lotsofpulp•38m ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_discrimination
Bottom line is collect more money from those able and willing to pay you more, and collect less from those less able and willing to pay you, as long as it is above the cost of goods sold.
At some national parks or attractions in poorer countries, they will ask to see your passport and collect more money if you are from a richer country.