What is the new widely accepted theory for how humans first arrived in the Americas, if not for the traditional Bering Land Bridge hypothesis?
ianburrell•24m ago
The new theory is that they came along the coast. Clovis culture arrived 13-16,000 years ago through corridor in ice sheets. But earlier sites, including these footprints, suggest that people arrived another way. These footprints are 21-23,000 years ago. I don't think there is any evidence how they got there, but the coast is plausible explanation.
tempestn•13m ago
When you say "the coast", do you mean travelling south down the Pacific coast after crossing the Bering land bridge?
My lay understanding is that the theory is that these earlier humans crossed the Bering land bridge but that they didn't proceed through a inland ice-free corridor (as there was none then). They likely traversed the pacific coast, which was not at the same position it is today and so would leave no evidence.
I have also seen discussion of sea arrivals, but they are much more hypothetical.
Also worth noting as the earlier arrival doesn't rule out the later ice-free corridor traversal as having also happens - it just means it wasn't the first people to arrive in the Americas.
o11c•8m ago
It's not that different. There's just dispute over when exactly between 30kya and 11kya people first crossed.
__cxa_throw•29m ago
ianburrell•24m ago
tempestn•13m ago
Edit: ah, the earlier discussion covers this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44319585
advisedwang•13m ago
I have also seen discussion of sea arrivals, but they are much more hypothetical.
Also worth noting as the earlier arrival doesn't rule out the later ice-free corridor traversal as having also happens - it just means it wasn't the first people to arrive in the Americas.
o11c•8m ago