Search engines and answer engines are quickly approaching a point of functional perfection. Whether it’s Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, or others, they can already find the “right” answer to most queries in seconds. The bottleneck is no longer finding information—it’s how that information is delivered.
The next competitive edge won’t be about a better algorithm or a bigger index. It’ll be about speed, clarity, and aesthetic presentation. Imagine search results where:
You instantly get the key takeaways in a clean visual grid.
Data-heavy queries automatically generate interactive charts or maps.
Long-form answers are chunked into scannable visual blocks.
In other words, instead of scrolling through text-heavy results, you’re navigating a beautiful, intuitive interface where the answer feels obvious the moment you see it.
This shift feels inevitable: when the “backend” intelligence plateaus, the “frontend” experience becomes the differentiator. Whoever nails visual-first search could pull ahead of even the most established players—because humans remember how information felt just as much as what it was.
I’m curious:
What examples have you seen of this already?
Is this the natural next step in the search evolution, or just another UI fad?
PaulHoule•1h ago
Boy that's a lot of twisty little iPhones that all look alike.
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
Did you try searching? Yep landing on this is probs overwhelming
latexr•1h ago
I’m not the person you asked, but I did try searching and it was pretty bad. Tons of repeated results (why would I care if they look infinite if they are all the same?) and clicking on any doesn’t send me to the page. How is this “Google’s next big rival” if we can’t even open a result?
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
Good feedback! Yep we can all agree it's not optimized for functionality, and in fact it's quite dysfunctional right now. I guess the open question is whether search results will be displayed in a list of blue links, in a text snippet answer, or in a different UI that still hasn't been discovered.
latexr•1h ago
> they can already find the “right” answer to most queries in seconds.
Why is “right” in quotes? The point of searching is (should be, if you care even remotely about truth) to find accurate information. I don’t want “right” information that is actually wrong, I want correct information.
> The bottleneck is no longer finding information—it’s how that information is delivered.
Considering the amount of disinformation out there and the concerted efforts to propagate more, the world you’re describing is awful and leading us rapidly into a bad path.
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
That's a very good point! I was assuming all tools will converge to the similar answers because we're reaching a point of convergence where all models are similarly capable and use the same web sources.
In that world where correctness is no longer a competitive advantage because all of the alternatives are correct, I do thing aesthetics play a bigger role. But I agree with your point is right that sacrificing correctness for aesthetics brings us to a bad path.
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
The next competitive edge won’t be about a better algorithm or a bigger index. It’ll be about speed, clarity, and aesthetic presentation. Imagine search results where:
You instantly get the key takeaways in a clean visual grid.
Data-heavy queries automatically generate interactive charts or maps.
Long-form answers are chunked into scannable visual blocks.
In other words, instead of scrolling through text-heavy results, you’re navigating a beautiful, intuitive interface where the answer feels obvious the moment you see it.
This shift feels inevitable: when the “backend” intelligence plateaus, the “frontend” experience becomes the differentiator. Whoever nails visual-first search could pull ahead of even the most established players—because humans remember how information felt just as much as what it was.
I’m curious:
What examples have you seen of this already?
Is this the natural next step in the search evolution, or just another UI fad?
PaulHoule•1h ago
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
latexr•1h ago
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
latexr•1h ago
Why is “right” in quotes? The point of searching is (should be, if you care even remotely about truth) to find accurate information. I don’t want “right” information that is actually wrong, I want correct information.
> The bottleneck is no longer finding information—it’s how that information is delivered.
Considering the amount of disinformation out there and the concerted efforts to propagate more, the world you’re describing is awful and leading us rapidly into a bad path.
maxmartinezruts•1h ago
In that world where correctness is no longer a competitive advantage because all of the alternatives are correct, I do thing aesthetics play a bigger role. But I agree with your point is right that sacrificing correctness for aesthetics brings us to a bad path.