frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: Snapdeck – Build slides with open-source LLMs and agent routing

https://www.snapdeck.site/
1•unsexyproblem•18s ago•0 comments

Workers fear for their jobs as Jaguar Land Rover's latest shutdown extended

https://www.theregister.com/2025/09/23/jaguar_landrover_shutdown_extended/
1•rntn•2m ago•0 comments

The Internet Phone Book is a step back to the 90s

https://livingweb.metalabel.com/internetphonebook
1•speckx•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Surchee – check how AI search engines view and search your site

1•surchee•3m ago•0 comments

Advanced Debugging in Elixir with IO.inspect

https://blog.appsignal.com/2025/09/23/advanced-debugging-in-elixir-with-io-inspect.html
1•amalinovic•3m ago•0 comments

Bach Cello Suites

https://bachcellosuites.co.uk/
1•bondarchuk•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Kvatch – query APIs, CSVs, Google Sheets, and databases as one source

1•squeakycheese•6m ago•0 comments

How A Billionaire's Plan to Reach Another Star Fell Apart

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-quiet-demise-of-breakthrough-starshot-a-billionair...
1•croes•6m ago•0 comments

US Secret Service dismantles imminent telecommunications threat NY tristate area

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2025/09/us-secret-service-dismantles-imminent-tel...
1•bookofjoe•8m ago•0 comments

UK Startup Unveils First Quantum Computer Built with Standard Silicon Chips

https://ts2.tech/en/quantum-breakthrough-uk-startup-unveils-first-quantum-computer-built-with-sta...
1•rayanboulares•8m ago•0 comments

Silicon Valley hiring in turmoil after new H-1B fees, move spurs offshoring talk

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/sustainable-finance-reporting/silicon-valley-hiring-turmoi...
2•alephnerd•9m ago•1 comments

Mesh: I tried Htmx, then ditched it

https://ajmoon.com/posts/mesh-i-tried-htmx-then-ditched-it
1•alex-moon•10m ago•0 comments

Comet

https://www.perplexity.ai/comet
1•krisag•11m ago•0 comments

Oura ring maker raising $875M Series E, bringing valuation to $11B, report says

https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/22/oura-ring-maker-raising-875m-series-e-bringing-valuation-to-11b...
1•bookofjoe•14m ago•0 comments

Deaths Rose in Emergency Rooms After Hospitals Were Acquired by Private Equity

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/deaths-rose-emergency-rooms-after-hospitals-were-acquired-private-eq...
1•geox•15m ago•0 comments

Lark 1.3.0 – Introduces text-slices, Earley fix, and various small improvements

https://github.com/lark-parser/lark/releases/tag/1.3.0
1•todsacerdoti•15m ago•0 comments

Elon Musk's Father Accused of Child Sexual Abuse

https://www.nytimes.com/video/business/100000010404622/elon-musks-father-accused-of-child-sexual-...
2•donohoe•16m ago•0 comments

Insights from the UN Open Source Conf: Reclaiming the Internet's Foundations

https://pulse.internetsociety.org/blog/insights-from-the-un-open-source-conference-reclaiming-the...
1•danyork•16m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What type of CRM re u using?

1•orbanlevi•16m ago•0 comments

Crowdsource Myth-Busting, Facts, and Wild Debates with the Community

https://truth-wave.lovable.app/
1•liltofu•18m ago•1 comments

The Good, the Bad, and the Iffy: is there such a thing as an ethical designer?

https://www.itsnicethat.com/features/is-there-such-thing-as-an-ethical-designer-creative-industry...
1•speckx•21m ago•0 comments

Did I Just Make Quantum Dots?

https://chillphysicsenjoyer.substack.com/p/did-i-just-make-quantum-dots
1•crescit_eundo•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Why clone GBs when you need KBs? Surgical GitHub downloads

https://github.com/AllDotPy/Forklet
1•Einswilli•22m ago•0 comments

Discovering Observers – Part 3

https://www.sandordargo.com/blog/2025/09/17/observers-part3
1•ibobev•22m ago•0 comments

Amazon faces off against FTC over 'deceptive' Prime program

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/23/amazon-faces-off-against-ftc-over-deceptive-prime-program.html
2•belter•26m ago•1 comments

Power Law Worlds and AI?

1•bsuki•26m ago•0 comments

Exemplars in OpenTelemetry

https://oneuptime.com/blog/post/2025-09-22-connecting-metrics-to-traces-with-exemplars/view
1•ndhandala•30m ago•0 comments

How the World Became x86-64 Inside

https://computerparkitecture.substack.com/p/the-long-mode-chronicles
1•ibobev•30m ago•0 comments

Qdrant: High-Performance Vector Database and Vector Search Engine in Rust

https://github.com/qdrant/qdrant
1•klaussilveira•31m ago•0 comments

Who knows what actors lurk in the hearts of movies? The LLM knows

https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2025/09/21/who-knows-what-actors-lurk-in-the-heart-of-movies-the-llm...
1•internet_points•38m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Europe's EV sales surge 26% in 2025 while Tesla faces decline

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Europe-s-EV-sales-surge-26-in-2025-while-Tesla-faces-decline.1121077.0.html
43•doener•1h ago

Comments

anovikov•1h ago
Too little and too late. Draconian measures are necessary to push automakers into compliance and to push consumers to buy. It's expensive unless we want to sell out to China completely, but necessary and in the end, affordable.
aurareturn•1h ago

  sell out to China completely
Let China sell tens of billions of affordable EVs to Europe. Let Europe sell tens of billions of ASML EUV machines and Airbus planes to China.

Sell what each region is best at. Mutual benefits. Crazy idea right?

porridgeraisin•48m ago
EUV machines are not europe's to sell. It's all american owned IP and the "EUV part" itself is american manufactured.
pjc50•43m ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASML_Holding

> ASML Holding N.V. (commonly shortened to ASML, originally standing for Advanced Semiconductor Materials Lithography) is a Dutch multinational corporation

yostrovs•23m ago
You missed this part in the History section: "In 1997, ASML began studying a shift to using extreme ultraviolet and in 1999 joined a consortium, including Intel and two other U.S. chipmakers, in order to exploit fundamental research conducted by the US Department of Energy. Because the Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) it operates under is funded by the US government, licensing must be approved by Congress."
FirmwareBurner•16m ago
ASML just makes the steppers. The EUV secret sauce is made by Cymer in the US and uses US R&D licensed of Sandia Labs. US can always retract the EUV license and sell the Cymer light sources to Canon or Nikon if they wish. ASML has no EU golden goose of its own that's why it has to obey US rules and policies.
prmoustache•42m ago
This is not relevant. With AI, US Big-Tech made sure to show the world that IP is not a thing anymore.
FirmwareBurner•16m ago
People are downvitng you even though you're right.
lm28469•48m ago
It's always the same, free market when it goes my way, fuck you if it goes your way.

In 50 years there will be literally nothing left that China doesn't do better than the west, it would be better to build trust and commerce now than attempt to delay it with artificial borders (tariffs, export bans, &c.), we're just delaying the inevitable and making a (commercial) enemy for no reason

myrmidon•32m ago
> In 50 years there will be literally nothing left that China doesn't do better than the west

This is not at all obvious or inevitable. The exact same concerns where voiced when much of the electronics industry moved to Japan 30 years ago, but "Japan doing everything better than the west" never really happened.

China is facing the exact same challenges that made US, EU, Japanese and Korean industry stumble before: Your own success raises wages and living standards, which inevitably decreases competitiveness. China still has a lot of catching up to do (in living standards/median income) and despite that it already struggles in some sectors to compete with countries like Vietnam or Indonesia.

Luker88•25m ago
More shortsighted than crazy, imho.

EU tried that with Russia, then we were dependent on oil/gas, and somehow the dictatorial regime fscked us on Ukraine, and now all of us are wasting so much more time and money.

Everybody already knows China is going to invade Taiwan. The global chip market is not going to like that, and this will happen only because we played the good guy with a dictator.

And then all of this will be retroactively be seen as aiding and collaborating with evil, again.

"Curse your sudden and inevitable betrayal", again and again.

saubeidl•18m ago
Why does Europe need to care about Taiwan? Ukraine I get, it's a security concern for us. But some island far away with a tenuous independence claim?
constantcrying•17m ago
>Let China sell tens of billions of affordable EVs to Europe.

The German economy can not survive that. There is no "mutual benefit" when what you are doing is an existential risk to the other side.

ioteg•1h ago
Into compliance? Compliance of what? Also why do you want draconian measures to push consumers to buy? Shouldn't you let consumers buy whenever they can afford to change their cars? What kind of draconian measures are you thinking of, emission regulations that make it impossible for poor people to drive their cars?
anovikov•30m ago
Certainly, to limit oil imports and consumption, we should ensure that poor people can't drive gas-powered cars.
fidotron•23m ago
It's not at all clear why poor people should ever want to leave their allocated urban subdivision. We certainly don't want them clogging up tourist spots that should be kept for appreciation by sophisticated wealthy foreigners.
epolanski•48m ago
I don't understand your narrative.

We Europeans have sold tens of millions of cars in China for decades. The string attached was that you had to make a joint venture with a local company (which, by the way, shared the risks and increased the margins).

Why can't they do so the same here?

And I don't want to hear no "because Chinese EV industry got help by government, it's unfair", so what? In Italy alone we've given more than 200B euros to Fiat, which milks governments from Serbia to Poland out of taxpayer money. Tesla has received 16B+ in direct funding from taxpayers in US alone, got more in foreign countries to open plants there.

European and American auto industries shouldn't rely on artificially gatekeeping foreign automakers.

We've tried with Japan in the 80s forcing them to produce here, now it's China.

I don't like any of this, it's against taxpayers, it's against consumers. Free market goes both ways.

FirmwareBurner•26m ago
>Why can't they do so the same here?

They .. ARE?

Dacia Spring is essentially a Chinese EV from Renault's joint venture with eGT New Energy Automotive.

VW's Cupra Tavascan is made in China and is the product of VW's joint venture with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group.

And many EU EVs that are of domestic design and production use Chinese developed and manufactured powertrains and batteries.

EU EVs are using more and more Chinese tech.

pjc50•44m ago
The carrot will be much more well received than the stick. Price cap chargers and make sure they're everywhere, including kerbside.

Convert public fleets. It's much more reasonable to mandate that local councils and public servant staff cars should be EV-only first; these tend to have short turnover periods of three to five years anyway. That forces the public bodies to actually address the details of adoption.

Not to mention buses and public works vehicles like refuse lorries. Expensive, but if the transition has to happen it has to happen.

But I think the momentum is there on its own:

> In August alone, 154,582 EVs were snapped up, accounting for 20% of all new car sales. Analysts note that a 20–25% share is enough to meet the EU’s emissions targets for 2025–2027 and Europe has just reached that milestone.

There's a self-reinforcing circle that as more people have EVs, they become more "normal", and the more car-centric policy caters to their needs. People who are irrationally scared speak to friends who own one or ride in EV taxis (actually, taxis are nearly always hybrids at the moment?)

ioteg•30m ago
Nobody is "irrationally scared" of EVs. We are rationally scared that, once enough well-off people have switched to EVs, this market share will be used as an excuse to stop poor people from driving their petrol or diesel cars. ("Rationally" because this is already happening.)
saubeidl•28m ago
Why would that be a bad thing?
FirmwareBurner•25m ago
So fuck the poor people, according to you?
saubeidl•20m ago
Fuck everyone driving. It's just politically easier to ban ICEs first.
potato3732842•17m ago
This is all fine and well, but eventually once the peasants have taken enough fuckings on enough axis over enough people's pet issues they will realize the trend and you and all your buddies who think it's ok to just fuck people will lose your heads or get to share a hole or whatever. Maybe it'll be offset by productivity gains and take a few generations to get there but fucking the peasantry because the rulers know better, or whatever the argument is, isn't a sustainable way to run societies.
saubeidl•8m ago
Anyone owning a car is a bourgeois enemy of the people.
potato3732842•3m ago
I honestly can't tell if this is satire.
ZeroGravitas•19m ago
Well if you think that EVs cost more to run than ICE and are generally worse cars then this would be a punishment for the poor.

Since they cost less to run and are generally better than the alternative, poor people will appreciate the step up just as everyone else does.

rmu09•6m ago
Europe is not the US, we have somewhat functional public transport in most parts of the continent, you are not _that_ dependent on a car. Also, EVs will become cheaper than ICEs, with or without subsidies or tax incentives, it's only a matter of time. Battery prices on a cell level approach €40/kWh. A new drive-train incl. battery will be < 2000€.

Also, given that polluted air affects poor people the most, getting rid of all that exhaust of old worn out cars with ICEs will be a good thing in any case.

myrmidon•16m ago
> We are rationally scared that, once enough well-off people have switched to EVs, this market share will be used as an excuse to stop poor people from driving their petrol or diesel cars.

I don't think that is rational at all. Have you ever looked at vintage car regulations in Europe? There are none, basically-- if your car is old enough, neither accident nor emission mitigation/prevention are required at all.

Why would you expect that this is going to change?

Sankozi•11m ago
Where is it happening?

Where buying a car is really expensive? The only places that come in mind are those packed cities that require a parking place for a car. Nothing to do with EV.

gmac•38m ago
Some automakers are doing better than others. Renault has a range of well-reviewed EVs that aren't so far off the value of Chinese imports.
waysa•17m ago
> that aren't so far off the value of Chinese imports.

That is with EU import tariffs of up to 45.3% on "non-cooperating companies" (such as SAIC Group aka "MG").

ViewTrick1002•4m ago
To compensate for Chinese subsidies/state-aid tilting the market in the Chinese companies favor.

It is not Trumpian completely insane tariffs applied without thought. It is a scalpel applied to ensure fair competition.

constantcrying•20m ago
How do you want to push Automakers into compliance? Every single European Automaker is begging people to buy their EVs, yet the amount of buyers is no where near where regulators want them to be. What would you do to Automakers?

Making cars in Europe is getting near impossible, "draconian" measures mean that indeed no European Automaker will make ICE cars any more, because they will all be bankrupt.

The real problem regulators can't regulate away is that people are not buying EVs, even when manufacturers are selling them at prices where they barely break even.

storus•6m ago
Electric grid is incapable of 1:1 switching to EVs from gas/diesel vehicles. If you want to collapse economy, just enforce it with your draconian measures.
rmu09•30m ago
US made cars had the reputation of being low quality, too big, too heavy and too inefficient for european cities.

Tesla was somewhat different. People bought Teslas not for their promised "self driving" capabilities (I know no Tesla driver that took those promises at face value or got the FSD option FWIW), but one motivation was to "stick it" to snobbish arrogant european manufacturers wanting to develop "clean" ICEs with "green fuels" or other non-sensical crimes against thermodynamics like H2-cars.

Now, Tesla (and the US in general) has a brand toxicity problem, and it is worsening. People I know that would consider a Tesla some years ago now drive electric VWs or BWMs or KIAs, often times much more expensive cars than the comparable Tesla 3 / Y model.

This trend will probably continue the next years, and I don't see a way for Tesla to repair the brand image.

estearum•25m ago
For what it's worth, Tesla is by a gigantic margin the lowest quality-for-dollar American vehicle you can buy. The EV thing was unique until it wasn't.
potato3732842•19m ago
All the manufacturers are closer together in pretty much every attribute than car-illiterate internet fanboys and haters make it out to be.
estearum•11m ago
You don't need to be car literate to know that a $90,000 Tesla interior feels on par with a bottom of the line Nissan Sentra. I'm not sure you can even buy another American-made car that feels so cheap? Curious if people have an idea of what American make/model feels worse to sit in.
fouc•12m ago
[citation needed]
bayindirh•18m ago
Tesla killed its brand reputation thrice.

- First they went "camera only", alienating people who knows the tech.

- Then they mocked car industry for so long. It was a necessary poke at first, but they didn't get prepared, and the elephant proved that it can run.

- Then Elon's Trump affair and all the shebang happened.

The broken FSD promises, using non-auto rated parts (and related failures), being negligent of their own errors and acting like they are deaf to the criticism is the cement between the layers.

storus•9m ago
They had camera-only tech employing multiple 4k cameras running at over 2000fps. Not your grandma's 480p/25fps webcam many car manufacturers use as parking cameras. 2000fps gives you enormous safety margin even in case of individual frame misdetection. The long-tail issues they hit are present on LiDAR vehicles as well but LiDAR is much slower, more difficult to process and sensor fusion adds its own errors.
bayindirh•4m ago
2000 FPS is impressive.

Not detecting overturned semis, road debris, and swerving to road dividers is even more impressive with that tech.

Where a relatively simple radar can prevent without running a slow-motion camera rig and a wannabe supercomputing cluster on the car.

To be frank, I'm not against 2000 FPS cameras, but I can't come into terms with not adding a simple radar to detect something unknown is dangerously close and the land missile needs to stop.

storus•14m ago
I think it's more like that before only Tesla had working lane following system on highways that allowed one to do mostly hands-free driving during long drives but nowadays even the cheapest KIA has it working well so no need to spend extra money on Tesla. I know working-class EU folks driving Teslas who couldn't care less about any perceived toxicity of the brand typical for German green party voting snobs.
prmoustache•13m ago
> US made cars had the reputation of being low quality, too big, too heavy and too inefficient for european cities. Tesla was somewhat different.

How so? Tesla doesn't produce a compact car by any european standard. Their smallest car, the Model 3, is the same size of a VW Caddy, an utilitary/7s seat Family VAN, bigger than a more refined VW Touran, another 7 seater family van or the popular VW Tiguan, a large (by euro standards) SUV.

m101•28m ago
Electric car sales were 20% of all sales, so 26% increase is hardly a "surge". Going from a low base this is supposed to be higher.

I think what we are seeing is that electric car interest isn't as strong as governments hoped for. I used to own an electric car now I'm back to a hybrid.

Q4 sales in the US will be interesting because of the removal of the tax credits and the increasing electricity prices that AI is causing. Low prices of fuel in the US means that it's not exactly cheaper to run an electric car in the US.

maelito•20m ago
> I think what we are seeing is that electric car interest isn't as strong as governments hoped for. I used to own an electric car now I'm back to a hybrid.

In France, there is a wide anti-electric campaign. From the "leftist-green" media such as Reporterre, to the right wing ones.

Same for political parties, from the left PCF to the right RN.

It's a battle.

phtrivier•7m ago
I don't know how much the battle matters, compared to pure money.

For example, according to this source, people bought less BEVs in May because... they want to benefit from the government subsidy later this year. So maybe the headline will read "incredible success" six months after having read "terrible failure". [1]

Surprisingly, BEVs are _more_ visible in the country side (where many smaller models make complete sense as a "second car" for a household that needs to drop kids at school, get the groceries, etc...) than in cities. Never mind.

Even more surprisingly, people do buy some French EVs, even though, well... our glorious national brands have spent the last few years working hard on removing the knobs from the autoradio, and that justified all the "R&D tax rebate" they could get, but sadly none was left for chemists and physicists to increase range, lower prices, etc... Again, go figure.

[1] https://www.go-electra.com/fr/newsroom/ventes-voitures-elect...

orwin•2m ago
The PCF is arguing for development and of a subsidized Kei-like electric car (basically a 10k€ EV), and a retraining of car manufacturing workers before any punitive incentive (ZFE, carbon tax on car fuel). This is hardly anti-electric.

I don't know about reporterre though, I've heard of them but I don't think they really have any influence on anyone other than Greenpeace afficionados.

Also? The R5 is great, and I bet the backlog is really long.

orwin•13m ago
I agree with the spirit of your comment, but I disagree on the first sentence. If EV were 1% of all sales, a 26% increase would be very low indeed. A 26% increase when you have 20% of a stable market is basically a company getting from a fifth of the market to a fourth, in a year. That's _absolutely_ a surge. Increase 5% of your market share is crazy high.
onlyrealcuzzo•12m ago
Rome wasn't built in a day.

You have to start somewhere.

26% growth on 20% pace is incredible market share gains in one year for virtually any market or company.

There are no ICE manufacturers reading this news and genuinely saying, "oh wow, who cares, this is nothing, only started at 20%, next."

ViewTrick1002•11m ago
Does not take many 26% yearly increases from 20% to make up the entire market. 7 to be exact.

Continuing the trend only BEVs would be sold by 2032 which is in line with goals to phase out production of new ICEs.

Sharlin•11m ago
Well, in this economical situation it absolutely isn't in most people's immediate plans to buy a new expensive car.

But yes, also, the naive hope of many politicians was that the huge, thorny issue that is traffic emissions would just resolve itself by everybody magically switching to EVs, because actually effective measures to curb emissions are rather unpopular.

storus•1m ago
Much of PM2.5 particles is generated by tires. EVs are much harder on tires, often needing tire replacement after just 1 year. So on one hand, you get rid of PM2.5 from fossil fuels, on the other hand you increase tire PM2.5 five fold.
ebisoka•28m ago
>as more people embrace electric mobility.

As companies embrace tax-exemptions for company cars and people who get them are limited to choose EV only.

Free Government Regulated Capitalism.

maelito•22m ago
Still, Europe has no electric-only brand.

We need it. Let the thermal engine models die.

FirmwareBurner•20m ago
EU doesn't really like to do start-ups in traditional fields dominated by century-old players, so the policies all focus on protecting those monopolists and not helping create startup to disrupt them or that could threaten them.

That's why they were anti-EV for so long, since that threatened their lucrative ICE dominance.

maelito•14m ago
Well that's a problem.

But I believe you're wrong. Lots of startups tackle old problems and succeed.

The best example would be Alan, for health insurance. They're a startup in a traditional field dominated by half-a-century players.

Indy is another example : enterprise accounting is very old. It wasn't industrial, now it is, online.

Decathlon's bikes did destroy old players of this field.

Mistral crushed every French decade-old IT companies in the LLM domain. Etc.

pjerem•19m ago
It seems like Renault is going into this direction. Slowly but surely.
maelito•13m ago
Almost. Their R5 is a best-seller, but they could have launched it as a separate company.

You cannot invest in Renault's electric line. Investing in Renault means investing in new thermal cars.

prmoustache•11m ago
I think by 2030 new ICE passenger vehicles are supposed to be banned.

There are a few electric-only brands but for smaller vehicles.

JensRantil•18m ago
In Sweden, Tesla is also involved in a conflict with our Unions. https://www.transport.se/publicerat/info-english-tesla-confl... This has an added bad smell for Tesla, on top of the bad reputation that Musk already has associated the brand with.
vessenes•15m ago
Question - anyone here have one of those “most popular” VWs? The article says they’re called id.3 id.5 and id.7. I’ve ridden in an e-Golf (California compliance car basically), but not the newer ones. The e-Golf did not impress, so I’m curious if the new ones are any good; range, noise, fit and finish, basically.
lnsru•10m ago
First generation of ID.something was bad joke. Second generation is all right. Some people still complain about software, but I don’t have first hand experience anymore.
ljf•9m ago
Not sure which of the three, but afriend bought one new here in the UK for around £22k - which at the time the dealer assured him he could sell back to them at £15-18k a year later.

He needed the car to tide him over to a work based EV scheme.

A year later the dealer said he'd be lucky to get £8kfor private sale and that the dealership didn't want the car as had 5 on forecourt already.

He's kept the car and loved it, but 2nd hand EV prices here can be great (or bad if you are a seller) - I saw a 10year old Nissan Note EV for £1K the other day - if I already had a charger I would have snapped it up, even if the range was less than 50 miles now.

constantcrying•8m ago
>I’ve ridden in an e-Golf (California compliance car basically), but not the newer ones.

It wasn't (just?) a compliance car. It was a testbed for EV development by VW. The ID Models have had serious software problems, the ID.7 is the newest and best one. An even smaller car than the ID.3 was announced some weeks ago.

fifilura•2m ago
[delayed]
seanalltogether•9m ago
I don't know anything about Tesla cars or how good they are, and I don't know anything about BYD cars or how good they are. But I can say that 4 door BYD cars are advertised around here for less then £20,000. While 4 door Teslas appear to start around £40,000. That's a pretty big difference when considering a first time electric car.
joakleaf•4m ago
Here is a list of EV sales in Europe by country first half 2025:

https://www.best-selling-cars.com/europe/2025-half-year-euro...

This gives a much much more nuanced look, and it doesn't look as completely clear cut as the headline implies.

For example: Spain saw an increase of 83.9% and France a decline of 6.9%

... And then you see that Denmark bought as many EVs as spain, although Spain has 10x population.