frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

ChatGPT told me I should quit my job

https://medium.com/@fluxusars/chatgpt-just-told-me-i-should-quit-my-job-13798241a601
1•fluxusars•1m ago•0 comments

Starbucks CTO resigned Monday amid tech revamp

https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/starbucks-cto-resigned-monday-interim-named-2025...
1•xwowsersx•3m ago•0 comments

The Incentive Failure of Contemporary Art Market

https://arminbagrat.com/modern/
1•_false•3m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: SciFi Recommendations

1•Awesomedonut•4m ago•0 comments

Swiss voters back e-ID and abolish rental tax

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-politics/swiss-voters-have-decided-on-electronic-id-and-abolis...
1•YakBizzarro•6m ago•0 comments

Planetary Pixel Emporium

https://planetpixelemporium.com/planets.html
1•staplung•7m ago•0 comments

Tracing the forgotten path of the first wagon train to cross the Sierra

https://www.sfgate.com/renotahoe/article/stephens-townsend-murphy-sierra-nevada-california-210576...
1•Stratoscope•8m ago•0 comments

'Biometric Exit' Expands Across U.S. Airports, Unnerving Some

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/26/travel/airports-biometric-exit-program.html
1•clanky•11m ago•1 comments

David Heinemeier Hansson at Startup School 08 [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CDXJ6bMkMY
1•tosh•12m ago•0 comments

The Making of a Market Maker

https://joincolossus.com/article/thomas-peterffy-market-maker/
1•Luc•13m ago•0 comments

What Are 'World Models'? The Key to the Next Big AI Leap

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/world-models-ai-evolution-11275913
1•Bostonian•13m ago•0 comments

Emacs Man Page from 9front

https://man.9front.org/1/emacs
1•kaladin-jasnah•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Built an MCP server using Cloudflare's Code Mode pattern

https://github.com/jx-codes/codemode-mcp
1•jmcodes•16m ago•0 comments

Frankfurt Airport Live Traffic

https://franom.fraport.de/franom.php?lang=en
1•muzzy19•18m ago•0 comments

How I make CI/CD (much) faster and cheaper

https://martinalderson.com/posts/how-i-make-cicd-much-faster-and-cheaper/
1•martinald•18m ago•3 comments

Why aren't companies speeding up investment? An answer to an economic paradox

https://theconversation.com/why-arent-companies-speeding-up-investment-a-new-theory-offers-an-ans...
1•rntn•20m ago•0 comments

Visual Studio 2026 Insiders is here

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/visualstudio/visual-studio-2026-insiders-is-here/
2•robenkleene•21m ago•0 comments

Goodbye, glaciers. Hello, engineered ice cones?

https://thebulletin.org/2025/09/goodbye-glaciers-hello-engineered-ice-cones/
1•pseudolus•26m ago•0 comments

Packing Squares Inside the Smallest Square Possible [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL5wuiy34rs
1•ivanjermakov•26m ago•0 comments

Choosing Email over Messaging

https://www.spinellis.gr/blog/20250926/?hn
1•DSpinellis•27m ago•0 comments

The American system is badly broken

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/sep/24/bernie-sanders-opinion-billionaire-politics
6•measurablefunc•28m ago•1 comments

The risks in the protocol connecting AI to the digital world

https://thebulletin.org/2025/09/the-risks-in-the-protocol-connecting-ai-to-the-digital-world/
1•pseudolus•28m ago•0 comments

Characterizing the Latency and Power Regimes of Open Text-to-Video Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19222
1•bikenaga•29m ago•0 comments

Re: CVE-2023-51767: a bogus CVE in OpenSSH

https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/28/7
1•eyberg•29m ago•0 comments

Let's Write a Database

https://danieljharvey.github.io/posts/2025-07-26-fuck-it-lets-write-a-database.html
1•azhenley•31m ago•0 comments

From Waku to Next.js to Phoenix

https://yoginth.com/writings/phoenix-migration
1•yoginth•31m ago•1 comments

Version Sort

https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/Version-sort-overview.html
1•azhenley•33m ago•0 comments

Build Your Own Commodore 64 Cartridge

https://spectrum.ieee.org/commodore-64-cartridge
1•rolph•34m ago•0 comments

FCC Leaks iPhone Schematics

https://fccid.io/BCG-E8726A
3•skilled•35m ago•0 comments

Narrow-linewidth laser on a chip sets new standard for frequency purity

https://phys.org/news/2025-09-narrow-linewidth-laser-chip-standard.html
1•PaulHoule•35m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Apple threatens to stop selling iPhones in the EU

https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/26/empty-threats/#500-million-affluent-consumers
33•troupo•1h ago

Comments

jacquesm•1h ago
Oh no, how will we survive? Everybody knows that these threats are hollow (Apple's stock price would take a gigantic hit) but even if they followed through I'm pretty sure we would hardly notice. If both Apple and Google stopped trading here then that might actually be good and create enough oxygen for local competition to flourish.
AAAAaccountAAAA•51m ago
Realistically, it would be local competition completely under Brussels' thumb.
troupo•44m ago
Ah yes, the heavy Brussels thumb of ... checks notes ... "don't track your users, don't hinder competition and let people chose if they want algorithmically generated slop"
gruez•43m ago
Don't forget chat control! We would want pedophiles and criminals to have access to phones, now do we?
wizzwizz4•40m ago
Chat Control hasn't happened, and if it does, the court will shut it down. (It's still worth fighting, but it's not something that non-activists need to worry about.)
gruez•50m ago
Europeans would "survive", but end up with crappier phones. There's a reason why nobody buys nokia anymore.
aaa_aaa•44m ago
Pixel is superior.
ranger_danger•43m ago
Because it was sold to Microsoft whose only strategy was to kill it off?
gruez•39m ago
And why was it sold off? Winners don't tend to get offloaded to other companies.
ranger_danger•35m ago
Not only did Apple and Google divebomb their sales, but Nokia's own hardware was plagued with bugs and comparatively inadequate features, like small displays and slow CPUs.

MS would later re-sell Nokia to HMD in 2016, who still release some feature-phones, including ones running an "S30+" OS that has nothing to do with Symbian.

jacquesm•41m ago
Funny, I have an android phone because I need it for one particular project but otherwise my Nokia N-800 serves me very well. It is entirely distraction free, has insane battery life (easily more than a week even when used intensively) and it can serve as a WiFi access point for my laptop in case I need to use the internet while on the go. It is also indestructible, and that's one reason why I don't buy a new phone every year or two, the one I have 'just works' and has done so for years. I got it just before COVID hit so it's probably close to 6 years old now.
gruez•27m ago
>but otherwise my Nokia N-800 serves me very well

I'm nowhere near a 2 year upgrade cycle but the fact that you think a 18 year old phone serves you "very well", and therefore Nokia phones aren't crappy shows how out of touch you are. There's zero chance the average person would think the same.

jacquesm•8m ago
The only thing that you demonstrate here is a complete lack of reading comprehension as well as the inability to do basic arithmetic.
rjsw•36m ago
I have a Nokia, works fine.
perching_aix•32m ago
Crappier being an opinion of course.

As for what people are buying and not buying, according to statcounter [0], the smartphone market in the EU is a third Apple, a third Samsung, and then the final third is a scattershot of other Android devices, primarily Xiaomi.

This is in contrast with a 57.27% foothold in the US. It's a different world.

To put it into perhaps an even more grappling perspective, that whole green bubble vs blue bubble thing? I've first heard of it only just a few years ago from Marques Brownlee on YouTube. Never encountered it in real life prior or since.

[0] https://gs.statcounter.com/vendor-market-share/mobile/europe

gruez•22m ago
>Crappier being an opinion of course.

Funny you're invoking that when the fact that someone chose to buy apple at all means they thought it was the best option, according to their opinion. By banning apple you're necessarily making those people buy a crappier phone.

perching_aix•19m ago
Right, because people totally buy things based on the merits of brands, not based on e.g. what they're used to buying or were recommended...

You do realize by the way that this would mean the majority of people here then consider iphones the crappier option by your logic?

gruez•14m ago
>You do realize by the way that this would mean the majority of people here then consider iphones the crappier option by your logic?

And that's fine. Most people don't but Porches or Subarus. That doesn't mean they're "crappier"

singpolyma3•29m ago
The reason is that Nokia sold their phone division so they don't make phones anymore?
StopDisinfo910•29m ago
Asian brands dominate the phone market in Europe with phones spanning the whole gamut of quality and flagships which are in every way comparable if not superior to what Apple offers.

Honestly even if Google somehow decided to stop selling Android to Europe, something which seems extremely unlikely, it would swiftly be replaced by Chinese alternatives with no obvious loss of functionality.

Apple has zero leverage with the "we will stop selling" strategy. It’s just there so they look less pathetic when it comes to what they are actually doing: bribing Trump so he intervenes for them. We really have come a long way from the "Think different" company.

gjsman-1000•50m ago
Or, as Apple and Google may bet, the EU does not have the talent required to make a good smartphone without reliance on China, the US, or other unfavorable parties, which defeat most advantages of supposedly local development.

They are calling the EU's bluff, and it's possibly a smart business decision to do so.

sroussey•46m ago
Eh, plenty of Chinese companies very used to government regulation that would thrive in the EU and not be bothered by their (relatively lesser) regulations.
gjsman-1000•45m ago
It's not that China won't thrive in the EU; it's that from the EU's perspective, reliance on China may be even worse. Especially morally, considering China has no problem trading with Russia.
CafeRacer•41m ago
As if europe has a lot of problems trading with russia.

I mean, realistically, most of the loud words are just that.

pembrook•23m ago
I think you would be surprised to learn China has far less regulation than the EU.

Part of this is China being a far more dynamic, high risk, Wild West-style capitalist system that’s communist only in very specific areas.

The other part being, you don’t really have to write stuff down as much when you can just manipulate subjects of your authoritarian regime at will.

LunaSea•36m ago
Smartphones? Like Android, the OS based in Linus, a European OS?

Or built by Nokia, a European firm that was bought by Microsoft?

gjsman-1000•32m ago
Linus Torvalds moved to Portland in 2004, and is now a US citizen.
ranger_danger•45m ago
> gigantic hit

I don't think so... EU is only 7% of their revenue globally according to their CFO, and DMA can fine them up to 10% of global revenue, so it may actually be cheaper to just leave the market.

troupo•42m ago
Their execs are not above lying under oath.

I hardly believe that a wealthy continent with a population of 450 million is just 7% of their revenue.

gjsman-1000•42m ago
The simple but unpopular answer is that the EU is no longer a wealthy continent. The EU is finding this out on a daily basis.
troupo•41m ago
Which is, of course, a bullshit answer.
gjsman-1000•35m ago
Actually, it's far closer to the truth than you may think.

France? Their debt is killing their country and causing escalating political crises.

Germany? Energy costs are killing their competitiveness. Hard to compete with energy costs of $0.44 per kWh on average; before labor costs.

Italy? Need I say more? Their economy is notoriously stagnant.

The remaining 24 EU countries make up less than 50% of the EU's GDP. Meanwhile, US and EU GDP went from almost 1:1 in 2008, to 1:0.65 and still declining.

To give you a sense of how severe Germany's problems are, the US state of Mississippi is almost ready to pass Germany's GDP per capita.

troupo•28m ago
1. So much emotion

2. None of that says that the EU isn't rich

3. None of that proves that the bullshit about revenue

Do you know how I know that? Because that "7%" comes from this quote: "Just to keep it in context, the changes apply to the EU market, which represents roughly 7% of our global App Store revenue."

App Store revenue is not all of Apple's revenue. Oh, and those same execs claim they don't even know if App Store makes money or loses it, so how would they know.

jacquesm•20m ago
You seem to enjoy making nonsense comparisons. But I wonder why you do this, is there something in it for you to make it seem as though the USA is doing fine when the EU is - according to you - not?

I've actually lived on both sides of the Atlantic. And there is wealth on both sides and there is poverty on both sides. But the gap between rich and poor is much more pronounced on the US side than in the EU. Energy costs are a small fraction of the total expenses. Mississippi is not a good comparison to Germany and if you just stare at the GDP you will miss a lot of quality-of-life indicators that would make me choose to live in Germany long before I would want to live in a backwater state in the USA. And that's assuming the USA will survive the current onslaught on its institutions.

So stop bullshitting and start thinking about what the real world differences are between countries and then strive to improve the one you can have an effect on rather than just seeing this as a numerical game of put-downs that make absolutely no sense at all.

jacquesm•38m ago
The bullshit you read on HN knows no bounds.
steve_adams_86•36m ago
What data would you use to substantiate this claim? What's your criteria for a continent to be wealthy?
gruez•33m ago
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/gdp-per-capita-worldbank
jacquesm•27m ago
You are making the common mistake of comparing countries and continents.
gruez•18m ago
>per capita
jacquesm•10m ago
Yes, per capita per country versus per capita per continent. The two simply are not comparable. You keep arguing in bad faith, please stop doing that, it is degrading the level of discourse here.
gruez•3m ago
>Yes, per capita per country versus per capita per continent. The two simply are not comparable

As opposed to comparing a country of 340M with countries with populations anywhere between 33k to 143M?

gruez•37m ago
>Their execs are not above lying under oath.

Given the threat of securities fraud lawsuits, I'm liable to believe them over some random commenter casting doubt with zero evidence.

jacquesm•25m ago
Well, guess what: you should have because the evidence actually shows that indeed, that 7% number was taken out of context. But it suited your narrative and so you adopted it and came up with a rationalization for that adoption.
gruez•18m ago
>Well, guess what: you should have because the evidence actually shows that indeed, that 7% number was taken out of context.

It was taken out of context by some random blogger, whereas the gp was implying company executives were lying. My point that we should trust company executives over random internet commenters still holds.

jacquesm•13m ago
That wasn't your point, and you are well aware of it. Why not simply apologize, say you got it wrong and move on? After all, you chose to believe the random blogger before. Besides that, believing execs of large US companies is a thing that I would not do without applying my critical thinking skills and a 7% figure is so ridiculously low that even if an exec said it it should still give you pause as to its correctness because even at face value that seems quite unbelievable.
gruez•8m ago
>That wasn't your point, and you are well aware of it.

No you. You're well aware that wasn't my point and are trying to put words in my mouth in a pathetic attempt to save face.

> After all, you chose to believe the random blogger before.

I made no such implication. In fact I specifically quoted the part that I was responding to.

o11c•14m ago
You do realize Apple literally was referred by a judge for contempt of court for lying under oath in one of their recent trials?
lysace•34m ago
7% is the app store revenue.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/01/apple-says-eu-represents-7...

> Apple says EU represents 7% of global App Store revenue

Europe (not EU, but close enough) represents about a quarter of the total Apple revenue. (https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-how-apple-makes-its...)

ranger_danger•29m ago
Apparently my source is a big fat liar then, my apologies.

https://daringfireball.net/2024/03/eu_share_of_apples_revenu...

> But the EU represents only 7 percent of Apple’s revenue

lysace•28m ago
> [Update 29 March: See transcription correction here. Maestri said “App Store revenue”, not “absolute revenue”.]
troupo•25m ago
> Apparently my source is a big fat liar

He is very uncaring when it comes to defending Apple and to smearing EU.

Even when shown that his reading is incorrect, he wrote a long article basically saying "so what I was still right" https://daringfireball.net/2024/03/more_on_the_eus_market_mi...

beezlewax•1h ago
Yeh I think we'll survive.
andrewmcwatters•1h ago
Hahahahahahahahahaha! Yeah. OK.

“Stop. Don’t. Come back.”

Hahahahahahaha.

stavros•53m ago
I hope the EU doesn't flinch. I'm on the side of the DMA on this particular issue, and would very much like to see Apple get its bluff called.
deadbabe•26m ago
The EU has to flinch. Sure the entire HN demographic may not give a shit, but they literally don’t matter. The masses of constituents will be pissed.
stavros•20m ago
Depends on whether we'll be more pissed about not having an iPhone or about having to give 30% of all purchases to Apple.

It'll also take a lot for Apple to be able to spin this as "the EU is banning us from selling iPhones" when it's their decision.

drexlspivey•9m ago
Let me break it to you, Play store also has a 30% tax. So does Steam, Playstation store, Xbox store, Meta quest store, Nintendo, Samsung etc. Why do people only complain about Apple and everybody else gets a pass?
stavros•6m ago
Because I have the option of using an alternate app store on my Android phone or computer, and I do. Meta, PlayStation, Nintendo, all companies that force me to pay them a cut to install something on my device need to go the way of Apple.

I'm not sure why you thought your point was such a checkmate, as if I have a problem with the company itself, rather than the practice.

CafeRacer•43m ago
Musk talked a lot and now there is an influx of chinese ev's replacing teslas.

Iphones will he gone, there will be an influx of meizu or whatever chinese alternatives are.

They'll simply loose some market share.

pembrook•17m ago
Yes, would be wonderful to get Europe fully on Chinese hardware and away from those evil Californians.

I can’t see any potential issues with that, China and Russia are great friends of Europe!

pmontra•42m ago
Samsung and Chinese phone makers will happily sell their phones to former Apple customers.

Are Macs next in the line?

NorwegianDude•34m ago
Yeah yeah.

Nobody believes what Americans say, be that Trump, Elon or Apple. They're all full of shit, and they rarely do what they say. The average junkie is a more reliable source on what Apple will do than Apple itself.

exabrial•33m ago
Do it. It would be the beginning of the end which needs to come. The only market they would have monopoly left would be USA, due to the lock-in of iMessage and encouragement of kids to bully others who can't afford expensive iPhones.
fxtentacle•30m ago
That threat is as hollow as it gets.

Public companies will happily can the entire management team if they cause as little as a 5% dip in stock price. Apples EU revenue is larger than China and Japan combined. Voluntarily forfeiting that is like the modern management equivalent of ritual self-sacrifice: afterwards, they would have so much unsold stock on their hands that it’s going to tank prices worldwide.

krona•22m ago
> Apples EU revenue is larger than China and Japan combined.

I think you've confused 'Europe' in Apple's reporting (which actually includes all of the middle east) for the EU (which notably excludes the UK, Norway, Russia, etc.)

Apple doesn't report it's EU revenue (and there's confusion about numbers reported on an analyst call in 2024.)

juliusceasar•27m ago
I beg Apple to do it. Spare us the money for overpriced phones they sell.

It will actually help the EU companies to fill in the gap.

Y-bar•22m ago
Do it. Pansies. I’m calling your bluff.

Signed from my iPhone, with an iPad on the table next to me, and a Mac Studio and Apple TV at home.

1970-01-01•22m ago
Sounds like Apple are out of touch with how this game works. Apple, the EU took away your lightning port. They are not afraid to take the entire device away. Playing chicken with your best selling devices cannot end well for you.
mettamage•21m ago
Fuck Apple!

My love will turn to hate of they do this. That’s the danger with building something people love, it can flip to hatred. They should wield that responsibility carefully.

Sent from an iPhone 15 Pro.

josho•21m ago
The EU should go even farther. Force hardware vendors to decouple from services.

Eg. AirPods work better with iPhones than Bluetooth. Why? Because of software integration. Apple Photos works better than third party photo management apps because of the OS to application integration.

The EU should require hardware makers to define compatibility tests and anyone that passes the compatibility test can become a drop in replacement for the vendor’s own apps.

This would increase consumer choice, competition, and reduce ecosystem lock-in. All of which will make things better for consumers.

wtallis•19m ago
The headline currently reads: "Apple threatens to stop selling iPhones in the EU".

The blog post cites an article from The Guardian, with the headline "Apple calls for changes to anti-monopoly laws and says it may stop shipping to the EU". In that article, nothing is mentioned about ceasing iPhone sales. It does say: "warning that unless it is amended the company could stop shipping some products and services to the 27-country bloc" and elsewhere: "It did not specify which products could in future be prevented from being distributed in the EU, but said that the Apple Watch, first released a decade ago, might not be released today in the EU"

The actual press release from Apple seems to be https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/09/the-digital-markets-a... and if there's anything in there that supports the headline of this HN submission, it's too subtle for me to find. I think this submission is unreasonably sensationalized, with the predictable effect that the comments here are mostly knee-jerk reactions to the (false) headline instead of discussion of the validity or lack thereof of any specific complaints from Apple.

What's news to me is apparently the European Commission is required to conduct a review of the DMA every three years, including collecting feedback from the public (both users and businesses). So Apple's complaints aren't coming out of the blue; they're part of that feedback process.

akmarinov•10m ago
“Hey, we’ll willingly cut our revenue by 25%”

I bet the investors and the stock price would LOVE that

myflash13•4m ago
This is more than just about revenue. There is massive engineering cost and complexity involved to support the EU’s demands. Interoperability is not easy to build. It slows down worldwide development pace too.
myflash13•7m ago
I don’t think it’s a bluff. This is more than just a revenue calculation, this is about giving up control of how your hardware and software can be built. If the EU can dictate what features should be included in a software release, that has massive engineering implications for an ecosystem as vast as Apple’s. Simple features like Live Translation or iPhone Mirroring become 10x more complex to build when you need to test and support other vendor devices. In fact some features become downright impossible if you require interoperability. I’m with Apple on this one. If a country could dictate to me that I need to make my engineering 10x more complex to support their whims and can’t build certain features, then I would seriously consider quitting that country regardless of revenue. This is about slowing down the pace of development and adding engineering complexity to everything worldwide, not just revenue.
Gys•50s ago
> the EU can dictate what features should be included in a software release

This is about Apple excluding features specifically in the EU.

throw0101c•2m ago
[citation needed]

No where does any of the reports linked to mention iPhones specifically. The first story has:

> Apple has called for the European Commission to repeal a swathe of technology legislation, warning that unless it is amended the company could stop shipping some products and services to the 27-country bloc.

That could be AirPods and other accessories. It could be perhaps features, like has already been done with recent live translation.