frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: I Built a Tool to Sync Spotify "Now Playing" to Telegram

https://github.com/therepanic/spotify-telegram-sync
1•therepanic•3m ago•0 comments

Social Cooling

https://www.socialcooling.com/
1•laurex•3m ago•0 comments

The latest Hunger Games novel was co-authored by AI

https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/1no45rn
1•ghghgfdfgh•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Nani? – AI translator that teaches you while translating

https://nani.now/en
1•catnose•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pixel Kit – Build Mobile and Web Interfaces Visually

https://pixel-kit.vercel.app/signup
1•ivanglpz•16m ago•0 comments

Way past its prime: how did Amazon get so rubbish?

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/05/way-past-its-prime-how-did-amazon-get-so-rubbish
19•sandebert•17m ago•4 comments

Nintendo Reportedly Lobbying Japanese Government to Push Back Against Gen AI

https://twistedvoxel.com/nintendo-reportedly-lobbying-japanese-government-to-push-back-against-ge...
3•krs_•19m ago•0 comments

OpenAI is staffing up to turn ChatGPT into an ad platform

https://searchengineland.com/openai-staffing-chatgpt-ad-platform-462554
3•grech•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pngmeta – a Python library to edit metadata in PNGs

https://james-see.github.io/pngmeta/
1•jamescampbell•26m ago•0 comments

Anthropic Release Memory API

https://www.anthropic.com/news/context-management
2•benzguo•44m ago•0 comments

Meta could owe billions for Flo class action verdict

https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/meta-could-owe-billions-flo-class-action-verdict-2025-10...
2•1vuio0pswjnm7•56m ago•0 comments

Scores of Bollywood AI videos vanish from YouTube after Reuters story

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/scores-bollywood-ai-videos-vanish-youtube-after-re...
1•thunderbong•58m ago•0 comments

MathArena Apex: Unconquered Final-Answer Problems

https://matharena.ai/apex/
1•frozenseven•1h ago•0 comments

Is Chase Bank Down?

https://community.designtaxi.com/topic/17988-is-chase-bank-down-october-4-2025/
1•caminanteblanco•1h ago•0 comments

Scientists debunk claims of seed oil health risks

https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/scientists-debunk-seed-oil-health-risks/
4•thelastgallon•1h ago•0 comments

Reddit is winning the AI game

https://www.cjr.org/analysis/reddit-winning-ai-licensing-deals-openai-google-gemini-answers-rsl.php
1•thm•1h ago•0 comments

Amazon's Prime Video rolls back controversial James Bond thumbnails without guns

https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/25/10/05/0418224/amazons-prime-video-rolls-back-controve...
2•MilnerRoute•1h ago•1 comments

Many Debian/Ubuntu Packages for Intel Accelerators and More Have Been Orphaned

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Intel-Debian-Packages-Orphaned
1•exploraz•1h ago•0 comments

UK Renews Clash with Apple over Encrypted Data Access

https://www.esecurityplanet.com/news/the-uks-renewed-clash-with-apple-over-encrypted-data-access/
2•vednig•1h ago•0 comments

Beat the spinal condition affecting three million Britons a year

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-15162069/cure-sciatica-WITHOUT-drugs-experts-reveal.html
1•wahvinci•1h ago•1 comments

Gmail business users can now send secure encrypted email to anyone

https://mashable.com/article/gmail-business-encrypted-emails-everyone
2•vednig•1h ago•0 comments

Powell warns stocks 'fairly highly valued', sparking selloff

https://www.perplexity.ai/page/powell-warns-stocks-fairly-hig-1Ru_K5uKSpGJaT_WK3SbnQ
2•porridgeraisin•1h ago•1 comments

I just made my first IQ test

https://cait-nv.vercel.app/
1•WxKno•1h ago•1 comments

Delhi Metro Text Map, Context-Engineered for LLMs

https://github.com/firasd/delhi-metro-text-map
2•firasd•1h ago•2 comments

FontOps: Font Development at Scale (2024)

https://simoncozens.github.io/fontops/
2•jfil•1h ago•0 comments

China's new pharma API war, and lessons from its last strike

https://the-ken.com/newsletter/make-india-competitive-again/chinas-new-pharma-api-war-and-lessons...
2•alephnerd•1h ago•3 comments

Taskwarrior CLI – Workflow Examples

https://taskwarrior.org/docs/workflow/
1•walterbell•1h ago•0 comments

Mole – Dig deep like a mole to clean your Mac

https://github.com/tw93/Mole
1•quyleanh•1h ago•0 comments

Ambigr.am

https://ambigr.am/hall-of-fame
2•surprisetalk•1h ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How to generate FFMI accurate photos of models?

1•faangguyindia•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Americans increasingly see legal sports betting as a bad thing for society

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/10/02/americans-increasingly-see-legal-sports-betting-as-a-bad-thing-for-society-and-sports/
39•aloukissas•2h ago

Comments

SilverElfin•1h ago
Why is it any different than betting on the stock market? Buying a house is also a bet. Even if Americans view it as a bad thing, it should be allowed.
bberenberg•57m ago
Because the outcomes and demographics for sports betting vs the other two show different aggregate money movements and we make judgements about what we consider to be acceptably and unacceptably informed and consenting risk accepting behavior.
Isamu•46m ago
The odds are manipulated to give the gambling company the advantage. Big winners are identified and dropped. It is designed to drain money from gamblers.

Stocks are not that, in general. A particular fraudulent investment could be that. Crypto investment comes to mind.

SJC_Hacker•34m ago
I’m not sure what you mean by odds being manipulated. The bookmaker will generally adjust odds to where the money is being placed. Example, in American football if a team opens up as a 7 point favorite and betters put more money on the underdog than the favorite, the line gets smaller so more will take the favorite. Generally the opening line is what the book will think half the betters are willing to place on the favorite, and half on the underdog. Doesn’t always work out that way which is why you see lines move.

Also not sure what you mean by winners

c6400sc•29m ago
Listen to season 4 of Michael Lewis' podcast. He covers the downsides in detail.

https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/against-the-rules

I think this is the ep that gets into the most detail, but I haven't read the transcript.

https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/against-the-rules/vegas-spor...

IIRC, if you're too professional or too lucky, the betting apps will restrict you and then lock you out. They only want the dumb money playing.

TimorousBestie•27m ago
> Also not sure what you mean by winners

https://www.vegas-aces.com/articles/how-betting-sites-limit-...

Various forms of this have been practiced in traditional casinos for almost a century with increasing sophistication, it’s a well-established art by now.

Hamuko•33m ago
You don’t need to even win to get banned (limited from making bets larger than a couple of dollars). You just need to make bets that look too smart and might result you winning in the future.

https://youtu.be/XZvXWVztJoY?t=667

Sports betting is just looking for chumps that have little to no chance of winning.

pinkmuffinere•45m ago
I think this is a good question, I’m sorry you’re being downvoted.

I think the difference is that buying/betting on a house or stocks are not a zero-sum game. It is feasible for everyone to buy a house, all the houses to increase in real-world value, and everyone benefit. Likewise with stocks. And on top of that effect, the bets being made are useful for society at large to make better plans, because they are a measure of society’s best predictions. Sports betting on the other hand, is truly zero-sum (although I think you could make an argument that it's actually worse than zero sum). Additionally, it is not useful for society to predict which team will win some set of games. This is just wasted effort on a curiosity. There’s nothing wrong with that effort as entertainment, but it is bad to incentivize our minds to take up sports betting, as opposed to say finance, engineering, art, or anything productive.

SJC_Hacker•33m ago
Options markets are zero sum.
fullshark•34m ago
Stocks have positive expected returns: the risk premium. Sports bets have negative expected returns in aggregate and if you are good enough to only bet the ones you can spot with positive expected returns they ban you from the platform.
charcircuit•24m ago
>they ban you from the platform

Use a respectable platform that doesn't do that then.

WarOnPrivacy•18m ago
> Why is it any different than betting on the stock market?

We could honestly say gambling and investments were similar - if they typically had similar outcomes.

In late 1990s, I set up two customers (in retirement) with PCs and internet. One was a day trader and the other did online casinos. After a year they were both about as good as their contemporaries.

The day trader made more money than he lost but I don't know how much.

The gambler hid his habit from his wife. He lost their entire retirement savings, maxed out their credit cards, got more cards and maxed those out - and took out 2 mortgages on their formerly paid-for house. It ended their marriage.

These truly aren't similar outcomes.

bruce511•26m ago
Is it bad for society? It's certainly bad for individuals, and by extension their families. I guess if it scales up such that a serious chunk of society is affected, then yes its bad for society.

Let's start with the obvious- in all forms of gambling the gamblers make a net loss. The games are hosted by very sophisticated companies, that have better mathematicians, and make money.

$x is pumped into the system by the punters, $y is extracted, $z is returned. The 'house' is the only winner.

All those TV ads you see? Funded by losers.

Is it light entertainment? Similar to the cost of a ticket to the game? For some sure. But we understand the chemistry of gambling- it's addictive and compulsive.

If we agree it's generally bad, then what? Lots of things are known to be bad, but are still allowed (smoking and drinking spring to mind, nevermind sugar.)

It could be banned. Would that stop it? Probably not. Perhaps ban advertising? Perhaps tax gambling companies way higher (like we do with booze and smokes.) Perhaps treat it as a serious issue?

All of which is unlikely in the US. Business rules, and sports gambling us really good business.

creato•19m ago
> Let's start with the obvious- in all forms of gambling the gamblers make a net loss. The games are hosted by very sophisticated companies, that have better mathematicians, and make money.

It's not impossible to beat them consistently, but if you do, they'll limit how much you can bet or just ban you.

tokioyoyo•19m ago
> It could be banned. Would that stop it? Probably not.

Was not that big of a thing 15 years ago. The goal of a ban is not to reduce the consumption to 0, but try to lower it a significant amount. Although, since people are generally aware of it and participated in it, it might not be that easy to go back to beforetimes.

Terr_•16m ago
I'm imagining mandatory disclosures like on cigarette packs, except it's some distribution chart or percentile figure for bankruptcy.
jacquesm•23m ago
That's always an interesting thing. Where does autonomy end and the right of the government to intrude into your private life begin. The bottom line, that something is bad for you seems to be so logical. But when you think about it a bit longer you see that there are so many things that are bad for you that it would be next to impossible to regulate all of them. Ok, so you only do it for the things that are really harmful. But then you're still left with smoking, alcohol, obesity, the state's lottery and casinos (always legal, for some weird reason, but just as bad as other forms of gambling), parachute jumping, social media, free climbing and a whole raft of other items that have the potential to massively ruin your (or even someone else's) life. And then there are the things you could do but that are illegal, such as speeding and drinking and then getting into the driver's seat of a vehicle.

I find this one of the most difficult to answer questions about how you should run a society. In practice, we aim to curb the excesses and treat them as if they are illnesses but even that does not stop the damage. In the end it is an education problem. People are not taught to deal with a massive menu of options for addiction and oblivion, while at the same time their lives are structurally manipulated to select them for that addiction.

In the UK for instance, where sports betting is legal (and in some other EU countries as well) it is a real problem. But the parties that make money of it (and who prey mostly on the poor) are so wealthy and politically connected that even if the bulk of the people would be against it I doubt something could be done about it. If it were made illegal it would still continue, but underground. It's really just another tax on the poor.

Sports betting is problematic for the sports too. It causes people to throw matches for money and it exposes athletes to danger and claims of purposefully throwing matches when that might not be the case. This isn't a new thing ( https://apnews.com/article/sports-betting-scandals-1a59b8bee... ), it is essentially as old as the sports themselves.

Terr_•11m ago
> Where does autonomy end and the right of the government to intrude into your private life begin

I think there are really three questions bundled in there:

1. At what point is it not really free-will anymore, and more like your brain being hacked?

2. At what point can the government step in to rescue you from #1?

3. At what point can the government step in to defend others from what you do, voluntarily or otherwise?

angarg12•21m ago
I left my home country over 10 years ago, and ever since I've travelled back once every 1 or 2 years.

Since 4-5 years ago I started to notice these betting houses cropping up where my family and friends live. They are impossible to miss, with big pictures of different sports and no windows.

The most important thing to notice is where these place are and are not. They proliferate in working class and less well off neighborhoods, while they tend to be absent from more affluent ones.

These places get a lot of foot traffic, all the locals barely making ends meet, blowing a few tens of euros here and there, with the eventual payoff. It's not difficult to hear stories of people getting into the deep end and developing a real addiction with devastating consequences.

And it's not only the business itself, but what they attract. All sort of sketchy characters frequent these places, and tend to attract drugs, violence...

Legal or not these places make the communities they inhabit worse, not better. I personally would be very happy if family didn't have to live exposed to them.

kriops•12m ago
Guilt by association: If, e.g., violence is a problem, then one needs to deal with the violence. In general, law-abiding citizens are—and should—be free to congregate and partake in their bad habits wherever they please. And even though gambling is generally immoral, it does not infringe on anyone else's God-given rights and has no business being made illegal.

Gambling is emphasized above to emphasize we are talking about individuals who are not sufficiently skilled to argue they are not essentially partaking in pure games of chance.

bravetraveler•17m ago
If you want to bet on your ball, do it at the counter like the rest of us degenerates. Something, something, water cooler chat.
Gunax•8m ago
I happen to enjoy sports gambling and would be sad to see it disappear.

I'm writing this because I want you to know what you're depriving me of. Because _other_ people make poor decisions, we need to take that decision away from everyone.

eggsandbeer•6m ago
What an incredibly selfish attitude.
Animats•5m ago
If only this had been figured out before the gambling industry became too big to fail.