I get the pitch, but this feels like yet another attempt to automate something that fundamentally only works because it’s human.

Warm intros aren't just about “matching nodes on a graph.” They’re about credibility and skin in the game. When an actual person introduces you, they’re implicitly staking their reputation. An AI “superconnector” can’t do that — at least not in a way investors or founders will trust when the stakes are real.

Also, the trend of turning personal networks into monetizable data graphs is getting pretty dystopian. We keep saying “privacy matters” while happily piping personal+contextual trust data into the next startup. I’m sure the intentions are good, but this is the kind of tool that looks harmless until it isn’t.

HN crowd will hate me for this, but if your startup only works when you get early density from elite gated networks (IIT/IIM/YC/etc.), the “ democratizing access to opportunity” narrative rings a little hollow.

Not saying this can’t become useful — but I’d want to see:

Crystal-clear privacy commitments Evidence that investors actually trust AI-mediated intros Proof it works beyond curated privilege clusters

Right now it feels closer to automating the illusion of warm intros than the real thing.

On first glance, this seems very gimmicky. The whole wolf fursona thing does not make sense. What's the logic here? That wolves are social animals? I digress.

There is nothing on the website that works to remove this initial skepticism. Your AI maybe actually wonderful but atleast for me, it is hard to trust it - it is purely because you have chosen to present it in a way that is basically a cosplay. If I trust an AI to connect me with VCs and potential employers / clients, I definitely expect it to be a lot more serious in presentation. Right now it looks like a furry's personal website. No shade to furries but it simply does not win my trust. Please re-consider the way you are branding this if you want people to use it like a serious tool.

Having said that, the core idea seems interesting to me. LinkedIn has become a cesspool of AI slop. People writing posts with AI and then people commenting on those posts with AI. Funny enough, AI itself seems to be the thing that will end up saving us from that non-sense.

I was going to try this but I do not have WhatsApp. Most people in North America don't. So I can't even access your product. Thanks for wasting my time.

1. Cool but very ambitious idea. Will I use it? Yes, if it really works. But I'm not really optimistic about Vance working because when humans intro someone, they’re putting reputation on the line which in this case Vance don't have. 2. The explanation on the applications about not storing or selling data helps, but in Vance's case, it might be worth surfacing how context is inferred, e.g is the matching based on declared intent ("I’m raising for X") or behavioural data (if yes, how are you getting it?)