frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Map Age Guide

https://xkcd.com/1688/
1•taubek•24s ago•0 comments

How Long Does It Take to Plan a Bridge?

https://www.construction-physics.com/p/how-long-does-it-take-to-plan-a-bridge
1•crescit_eundo•32s ago•0 comments

Not the Same Kid

https://www.quarter--mile.com/Not-The-Same-Kid
1•surprisetalk•2m ago•0 comments

This Month in Agentic Coding: May 2026

https://www.agenticcodingweekly.com/p/acw-monthly-brief-may-2026
3•primaprashant•4m ago•0 comments

Google Employees Internally Share Memes About How Its AI Sucks

https://www.404media.co/google-employees-internally-share-memes-about-how-its-ai-sucks/
3•elorant•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Kyu Launcher – Roku Interface on Your Android and Google TV

https://kyulauncher.com/
2•avadhesh18•5m ago•0 comments

US tech sector cut 38,242 jobs in May, AI the most cited reason for layoffs

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/tech-sector-cut-us-jobs-by-382...
2•heresie-dabord•5m ago•0 comments

SpaceX CFO presents business drivers

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/2062548455570985377
2•__patchbit__•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: OMT – A simple Python CLI for testing local Ollama models

https://github.com/ulyssestenn/omt
2•bethanyhunt•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Mdrone – a microtonal drone instrument that runs in the browser

https://mdrone.org/
3•gizero•8m ago•1 comments

NASA Says Farewell to Maven Mars Mission

https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-says-farewell-to-maven-mars-mission-hosts-media-call-today/
3•the-mitr•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: NeuroAnswer – MCP server lets Claude navigate petabyte-scale brain maps

https://github.com/cjmielke/NeuroAnswer
2•subcosmos•9m ago•0 comments

Several Injured in Boeing 787 Nose-Gear Collapse in Frankfurt

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/lufthansa-787-jet-suffers-front-wheel-collapse...
8•karakoram•10m ago•0 comments

The Age of Fast Food

https://www.abareplace.com/blog/ai_fastfood/
2•meysamazad•11m ago•0 comments

The LLM warnings Google fired Timnit Gebru over have all come true

https://www.tumblr.com/dreaminginthedeepsouth/817865966907228160/darren-oconnor-timnit-gebru-was-...
5•thdr•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Taliesin – bit-exact KV-cache restore, 21x faster, cross-GPU verified

https://medium.com/@sietse_92846/a-big-chunk-of-ai-cost-is-just-the-model-re-reading-the-same-tex...
2•Wetime•12m ago•0 comments

Neuron-CLI – A fast, single-binary knowledge management tool written in Go

https://github.com/steevin/neuron-cli
2•steevin•13m ago•0 comments

The right tool for thinking and writing

https://zerokspot.com/weblog/2026/06/01/right-tool-for-thinking-and-writing/
2•meysamazad•14m ago•0 comments

Simplex- Binomial Engine – O(1)HighDim Meshing, Projective Q‑Analogs, Q Decoding

https://www.tiktok.com/@charles.tibedo/photo/7647159449706040606?_r=1&_t=ZP-96v4VW3CSsB
2•GeometryKernel•14m ago•0 comments

How to design pricing for AI APIs and LLM-powered products

https://www.solvimon.com/blog/how-to-design-pricing-for-ai-apis-and-llm-powered-products
3•arnon•17m ago•1 comments

Partial static single information form

https://bernsteinbear.com/blog/partial-ssi/
2•surprisetalk•17m ago•0 comments

Speculative KV coding: losslessly compressing KV cache by up to ~4×

https://fergusfinn.com/blog/kv-entropy-coder/
2•kkm•17m ago•0 comments

StructArrays.jl

https://juliaarrays.github.io/StructArrays.jl/stable/
2•tosh•18m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Bit-banged 10BASE-T Ethernet and Wi-Fi router in Rust on the Pico 2 W

https://github.com/mattdeeds/pico-10base-t-rs
5•mdeeds•19m ago•0 comments

Google Is in Damage Control over Its New Health App

https://gizmodo.com/google-is-in-full-on-damage-control-over-its-new-health-app-2000764027
2•brandonb•20m ago•0 comments

Academic Freedom Is a National Security Imperative

https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2026/june/academic-freedom-national-security-imperative
3•throw0101c•20m ago•0 comments

multi_array_list.zig

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/blob/master/lib/std/multi_array_list.zig
3•tosh•21m ago•1 comments

Using My AI Assistant to Automate Amazon Return Reimbursements

https://theautomatedoperator.substack.com/p/using-my-ai-assistant-to-automate
2•idopmstuff•22m ago•0 comments

Removable batteries in smartphones will be mandatory in the EU starting in 2027

http://www.benjaminoakes.com/2026/06/04/Removable-batteries-in-smartphones-will-be-mandatory-in-t...
2•speckx•22m ago•1 comments

Show HN: I embedded 685M public texts in 32 minutes (on 8x A100, Rust, TensorRT)

https://github.com/Artain-AI/ignite-ms
3•ddayanov•23m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

In a first, wind and solar generated more power than gas globally in April 2026

https://electrek.co/2026/05/20/in-a-first-wind-solar-generated-more-power-than-gas-globally-april-2026/
97•speckx•1h ago

Comments

jqpabc123•1h ago
Renewable energy offers a competitive advantage for any energy intensive activity --- like manufacturing or AI.

China gets it, the USA doesn't.

cloche•49m ago
Even so, the article says it grew 8% YOY in the US. The best is to hope that this is an unstoppable trend so that even politicians won't be able to reverse it.
ceejayoz•45m ago
Never underestimate the capacity of shitty people to shoot themselves and others in the foot.
willio58•41m ago
It’s already irreversible, but it’s just disappointing to see how the U.S. administration has chosen to actively fight against it, while other countries like China are embracing reality.

It’s actually funny if you don’t think about it too hard. The U.S. president is trying to make us more reliant on fossil fuels, while starting a war in Iran that’s led to the global fossil fuel market to be negatively impacted, forcing most Americans to pay more for fossil fuels. Who could have seen that coming? We’re doing great!

mrhottakes•39m ago
"No One Could Have Predicted This!" - Nation where this happens all the time
dnautics•37m ago
> the U.S. administration has chosen to actively fight against it

the biggest producer of renewables is Texas, by a longshot. and the state of california just created insane NEM laws that favor the pockets of pg&e (and are shit for the environment) and as a result solar home installations have cratered.

ceejayoz•35m ago
> the biggest producer of renewables is Texas

That doesn't refute the point at all.

dnautics•31m ago
no, but renewables do speak for themselves in dollars and cents, even if they dont have subsidy. now should petrochem subsidies end too? probably yes.
ceejayoz•25m ago
> renewables do speak for themselves in dollars and cents

Yes. But administration opposition can change that math, as they have with the tariffs.

some-guy•22m ago
Both NEM 2.0 and 3.0 have serious issues, but for different reasons. NEM 2.0 was basically a early adopter's rich person's subsidy that heavily distorted the market, and NEM 3.0 does not have nearly enough subsidies to justify the cost unless you pay cash up front for a large system. (For the record, I am on NEM 3.0 and got such a system).

At the end of the day, the best case scenario is large scale renewable / battery storage to bring costs down as much as possible, and for those of us who want battery backup / solar can choose to invest in it, but it shouldn't be "the" solution.

adjejmxbdjdn•40m ago
Imagine how much faster it would be growing if the U.S. government wasn’t paying companies billions to not produce wind energy

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/climate/offshore-wind-gas...

or delaying standard approvals

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/04/climate/wind-solar-projec...

SirFatty•38m ago
Spoken with such authority!
ReptileMan•31m ago
Indeed. Steel mills, aluminum smelters and glass factories really adore the intermittent nature of renewables.
Danox•28m ago
Germany screwed themselves.
ZeroGravitas•6m ago
Smelters in Australia are leaning on the fossil-friendly politicians to stop getting in the way of renewables because they can't compete with global prices unless they use renewables.
kieranmaine•21m ago
The USA get's it. Trump doesn't. Texas is a the leader in wind and solar in the US.

Compare generation stats for yesterday between 2021 and 2026 on the Texas grid (ERCOT)

* 2021 - https://www.gridstatus.io/live/ercot?date=2021-06-03

* 2026 - https://www.gridstatus.io/live/ercot?date=2026-06-03

Also, the Californian grid (CAISO) shows where everyone is headed with a huge deployment of batteries:

* 2021 - https://www.gridstatus.io/live/caiso?date=2021-06-03

* 2026 - https://www.gridstatus.io/live/caiso?date=2026-06-03

yogthos•7m ago
All of that combined is peanuts compared to what's happening in China. Not to mention that all the panels and most of the wind turbines are produced in China. It's not just a question of installing them, it's having the industry and technical know how to make them that really matters.

https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-...

greekrich92•59m ago
Solar and progress on better batteries is a more consequential and useful technological revolution than AI. Should be a huge story, but there's not enough money to be made via speculation so it's not.
toomuchtodo•47m ago
Nailed it. Solar, wind, and batteries are going to be the predominant form of generation in a decade, but there is no speculative benefit, so it’ll happen silently.
ajross•39m ago
To be fair (and, somewhat ironically, rationally detached libertarian) that's the way it's supposed to be. We don't develop and deploy technology to make a bunch of too-online nerds rich. We develop and deploy technology to make everyone's lives better by providing goods at lower expense and lower externalized cost.
toomuchtodo•11m ago
Indeed, but wouldn't it be great if all of this capital pouring into the AI bubble went into global electrification and clean energy instead?
feelamee•42m ago
why is it? of course now this is true. But people investing money in the future of AI, a future where AI can produce an enormous amount of goods.
mrhottakes•41m ago
erelong•42m ago
I know some people who are adamantly against solar and wind

(personally I like both but I can see some shortcomings - for example I have heard that ai datacenters are using gas at times because of its flexibility)

So what are some of the best talking points to "sell" solar and wind to the unconvinced?

Or will the just adopt it once it's seen everywhere?

mrhottakes•40m ago
If people have strong opinions about renewable energy, just don't waste your breath. You can't reason someone out of an opinion they arrived at unreasonably.
jahnu•27m ago
Keep hammering the point that they are cheaper. If they are open to more advanced discussion point to the amazing structural changes that batteries are only starting to bring. Tell them something that sounds mildly like science fiction but is in fact happening already and will be HUGE. E.g. the battery you’ll have in your AC/stove/car will save you money or even make you money when part of a smart mesh of DERs.

Maybe I’m too optimistic :)

mrhottakes•22m ago
"It's cheaper" is a good route, but a lot of these people have decided they don't care about objective facts in favor of what their favorite media personality says.
WarmWash•9m ago
Let me preface this that I am a huge advocate for renewables, and have been spending borderline unreasonable amounts on turning my home green.

The rub with "solar is cheaper" is that those values are almost always calculated using an ideal environment. Solar is cheapest when you are using flat barren land in Arizona where an acre costs $500, the sun shines 330 days a year, you are bulk buying 750 MW of panels, and the bureaucracy is a single rubber stamp. Those are the numbers that ultimately trickle to headlines.

Things get much more complicated (read: expensive), when you are in the North East, an acre costs $12,000, the sun shines 170 days a year, you're bulk buying a few dozen MW of panels, and the bureaucracy is 6 different government bodies full of permits and assessments.

In that situation, a gas plant that produces 10x more power on 10x less land becomes very appealing to people who are already getting crushed by soaring electricity bills. (My take: we're just going to have to deal with higher costs).

So I am all with you on abandoning fossil fuels, but to someone who is firmly in gas camp, they will have legitimate ground to stand on when balking at costs. "It's cheaper" is unfortunately not all encompassing.

chris_money202•41m ago
Finally some good news!
baggachipz•35m ago
Great news. Now let's surpass coal, the far more insidious and prevalent source!
Danox•29m ago
How is that working for German industry where you need dense energy if you are going to continue build anything big..
ceejayoz•22m ago
Believe it or not, a large solar field (or several!) can readily densify its energy into a nice small power transmission line.
blackjack_•16m ago
Multiple ways. One interesting one is huge sand batteries that are being heated up to massive temps, then having pipes run through there to collect the heat energy as hot water and doing the industrial processes that way.

Another way is using excess green energy to produce green hydrogen, which can be used as a fuel source in very high energy scenarios.

Past that, we recently have made electric arc furnaces and electric smelting furnaces for steel and aluminum, and several of these are fully solar powered.

It’s a shift to change the energy source for industrial production, but we have the technology and the ability. And the sun is free!

dudefeliciano•14m ago
pretty well? and it can only get better if we continue rolling out renewables?
yogthos•12m ago
China having managed to position itself as the main driver of the green transition by investing into key industries illustrates the power of state planning. The markets simply can't operate on horizons of decades because there is no immediate profit to be had. You need long term planning and sustained investment that only a state is able to provide.
tonymet•9m ago
*electricity . Gas is heavily used for heating , cooking & industrial uses (e.g. drying agriculture like hops, boilers etc).

I raise this point since policymakers get confused and try to ban gas, only to realize how critical gas is for food & industrial applications that consumers enjoy after the fact.

philipkglass•6m ago
[delayed]
When will AI start producing goods?
onionisafruit•24m ago
Claude, Gemini and Grok are all doing shifts at Little Debbie’s making Swiss Rolls
mrhottakes•20m ago
Finally, AI has become useful!
jampa•23m ago
> there's not enough money to be made via speculation

I mean, there is money to be made. CATL stock (the major producer of EV batteries with 50% market share, with billions of contracts for stationary batteries) rose 48.81% over the last 6 months, for example.

But I agree that news about renewables goes unnoticed. I only see news about renewables because I actively seek out channels and websites that cover it. I wonder if it is because most companies in the industry are Chinese and don't focus on PR in the West as AI companies do.

pstuart•40m ago
I'm going to guess they are against it because it's "woke".

A question might be "why is it woke?"

And if it's because libtards like it, then you can point out that libtards like coffee, beer, sports, etc -- so when will they boycott those?

graemep•39m ago
I do not think the two should be lumped together. They do both need storage but solar is more predictable. Winds can be low for extended periods.
ceejayoz•34m ago
> Winds can be low for extended periods.

So can sun, but that's why we build both where that's unusual. We've got plenty of stats and data gathering on where it's reliably sunny/windy enough.

lstodd•30m ago
point is those projects are and were shoved in with almost complete disregrard of this data. because we're saviours of the world, almost jesuses
fredophile•16m ago
Can you point to large scale solar or wind projects that were shoved into places that have extended periods of low sunlight or wind?
dnautics•39m ago
it depends. some places it makes sense, some places it doesn't.

it will be adopted when the money speaks. the good news is that money is a reasonably close proxy to "environmental benefit" (balancing the environmental costs of green infra production versus dirtiness of gas generation)

tialaramex•22m ago
> some places it doesn't

I can see this for wind, but not solar. PV turns sunlight into electrical energy. The whole damp rock gets sunlight on the outside, why not build panels anywhere?

For wind yeah, if you live one of those boring flat places which gets tornadoes a wind turbine is definitely a bad idea, it won't make much energy and then a tornado turns it into scrap and possibly destroys nearby things with chunks of debris.

vincnetas•10m ago
If we can build skyscrapers that can survive tornadoes, can wind turbines be made tornado proof?
pbmonster•5m ago
> why not build panels anywhere?

Because there's better alternatives same places. Norway has legendary well-suited topography for hydro power (>90% of electricity), and it's reliably windy (>8% of electricity). It's also so far north that the sun doesn't shine very much for half the year, and it's notoriously cloudy.

So yes, it will probably never make much sense to build a lot of solar panels in Norway. Same for Greenland, Iceland (substitute geothermal), and probably some parts of Canada, Alaska and Southern Argentina.

id34•37m ago
I recommend this video from YouTuber Technology Connections: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

I appreciate his ability to talk renewables for almost an hour and barely mention climate change. This video has a bit of a twist ending, but he gives you a solid out before he becomes political if you're showing it to someone who won't be receptive to that messaging.

okr•36m ago
I find no arguments against solar. I can put it everywhere and has no moving parts. Once storing is solved, perfect.

But wind?? Huge nature areas are destroyed by beton fundaments, rotors break, and just in germany was a scandal lately about recycling, as the first structures need to be renewed.

tejohnso•28m ago
Why would you be adamantly against solar? That sounds like someone who is of the opinion that solar is NEVER a good idea. Nonsense.
outside1234•19m ago
Fox News is funded by fossil. They literally ship a 24x7 feed of why fossil is good and renewables are bad. It is their business model: money for placed content to shape opinions.

So someone watching that has strong opinions about renewables that is hard to overcome.

outside1234•20m ago
You need to include batteries in the equation: solar, wind, water and batteries.

What California and others have shown is that you can replace natural gas peaker plants (literally - tear out natural gas turbines) with batteries and get both superior cost dynamics and "dispatchability" (aka turning them on and off). Batteries have millisecond level dispatch, peaker plants have hours level dispatch.

Aurornis•20m ago
I don’t know how you can be against solar unless you’ve been given some uninformed talking points.

Are they against solar subsidies or other policy provisions? It’s hard to understand someone who is against passive energy collection.

ceejayoz•13m ago
> Are they against solar subsidies or other policy provisions?

They're mainlining paid propaganda from the fossil fuel industry. Same dynamic that made people defend cigarettes into the late 90s.

fp64•11m ago
I'm not against solar, my primary issue is that in northern Europe there's not much sun at some times. Energy storage and "smart grid" are not there yet, in my view, but maybe should have come first. Hydrogen (electrolysis) sounds a bit wild and impractical to me.
wat10000•10m ago
There's a lot of selective concern. They'll be outraged about the environmental damage from mining and manufacturing needed for panels, but ignore the orders of magnitude worse damage from burning fossil fuels. My favorite is outrage over wind turbines killing birds. Cats kill a thousand times more birds but nobody cares about that.
newyankee•18m ago
LCOE is the talking point that should shut down all others along with LCOS of LFP batteries
davedx•12m ago
Yeah the relatively recent paper that takes LCOE and adds back a bunch of cherry picked system costs is a PITA to refute because it's inherently complicated and actually has some good points.

The problem is every good argument for renewables will always inevitably have someone come up with some kind of counterpoint that on the surface may seem reasonable to those without the time or inclination to deeply research it all.

Energy is complicated.

FWIW I agree with a sibling poster who said to just say "its cheaper".

davedx•9m ago
- cheaper - much less upfront capex, lower operating costs

- removes nasty geopolitical dependencies on eg gulf state oil and gas; costs are more predictable

- easier to plan and build because the base units are much smaller

Variability remains a valid objection, to which the main answer today is "batteries. Lots of batteries. And other cheaper longer duration storage, like sand heat storage, vanadium flow, and good old pumped hydro."

_ZeD_•7m ago
> I know some people who are adamantly against solar and wind

let me guess... they sell oil?

toast0•5m ago
> So what are some of the best talking points to "sell" solar and wind to the unconvinced?

Increasing utility energy prices worked for me. I wasn't anti-solar, but it didn't seem worthwhile for me. When the utility price doubled over three years (or just about), the math makes sense now. I'm not looking for solar to acheive grid independence though, I already have a whole house generator for that, because utility power is two nines reliable around here.