Fun ways of deciding authorship order (2016)

https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2016/09/21/fun-ways-of-deciding-authorship-order/

72•qifzer•9mo ago

Comments

jghn•9mo ago

TFA touches on this, but one thing I initially found surprising is how few people understand different domains have different best practices around authorship order. It does make sense, people are typically not as involved in other domains and not exposed to those papers. But I do still find it surprising how different the practices can be overall.

madcaptenor•9mo ago

The American Mathematical Society has a statement basically saying “in math, authorship order is alphabetical” that people going up for tenure can put in their files, in case people involved in the decision come from other disciplines which have other conventions.

https://www.ams.org/learning-careers/leaders/CultureStatemen...

dmurray•9mo ago

Someone should study whether that statement is disproportionately included by authors with names later on in the alphabet.

xenonite•9mo ago

Also I suppose that Z authors might have more publications because they are nice to collaborate with.

setopt•9mo ago

Alphabetical order sounds interesting when you mix non-anglicized international names. Do you go by Unicode sort order?

I’m in physics, we have this thing where the first author did the most and the last author supervised the most, and the person in the middle just had an occasional coffee with them.

Wevah•9mo ago

I’d guess it’d be a particular collation, rather than Unicode order…otherwise ö would always come after z (which is incorrect for English, but correct for, e.g., Swedish).

thaumasiotes•9mo ago

> otherwise ö would always come after z

Really? Wouldn't that depend on how you spelled it and what kind of Unicode ordering you specified?

Which comes first?

    '\u0047\u00f6\u0064\u0065\u006c'
    '\u0047\u006f\u0308\u0064\u0065\u006c'

jpmattia•9mo ago

The wordpress post is old, and so the author didn't have the chance to include my favorite method:

Every Author as First Author: (pdf) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01393

madcaptenor•9mo ago

This is biased in favor of authors with long names (which they mention at the beginning of their Future Work section)

rendaw•9mo ago

That's addressed in "Future work"!

Etheryte•9mo ago

The only shortcoming is that they currently use opacity even if there is only one author. In that case, it would seem natural to render the text as-is.

MortyWaves•9mo ago

Why does it contain half-redacted words?

maartin0•9mo ago

They're not redacted. If you zoom in you'll just see a very large number of stacked names which is ironic (I thought the same for a second)

JohnKemeny•9mo ago

Extra funny, considering it's written by Demaine and Demaine.

dhosek•9mo ago

Kind of reminds me of the system we used in my band in the 90s: The person who brought the initial idea to the band gets to be first. After that, it was based on importance of contributions as determined by myself as the benign dictator, but if I contributed, my name always came last (unless I was the one who brought the idea to the band).

bix6•9mo ago

This is the method I use at work, feels right, puts the team first.

jvanderbot•9mo ago

This is exactly how most professors and managers do it. Unless they themselves do the majority of the writing they are last by convention so it actually has some prestige to be last.

What you don't want is second-to-last on a paper w 4 or more authors. That's the worst.

hinkley•9mo ago

> the order of their authorship was determined by executing the following commands in R:

    set.seed (7998976/5271)
    x ‹- sample (c("Anne", "Peder"), 1)
    print (paste ("The winner is", x, "!"))

But who picked the seed, Anne? And how do we know they didn’t have their thumb on the scale?

madcaptenor•9mo ago

I was wondering if this number was somehow significant in the paper, but it doesn't seem to be: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/251524591877096...

_Algernon_•9mo ago

Maybe we can solve this with blockchain?

JohnKemeny•9mo ago

Or maybe quantum?

zvorygin•9mo ago

My guess is that each simultaneously picked a number, one for numerator and one for denominator.

hinkley•9mo ago

Hopefully. Though I wonder if that can be gamed if you pick the denominator and the value is rounded. Eg a large prime.

fph•9mo ago

That is weird; from what I understand (not an R expert), set.seed takes an integer, so I assume that number gets truncated / approximated to an integer. That means that all nearby seeds give the same result: for instance changing 7998976 to 7998977 or 7998975 makes no difference, up to the next multiple of 5271. This makes the result look a lot less random. Was Anne cheating?

madcaptenor•9mo ago

From the documentation at https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/Rand..., seed is "a single value, interpreted as an integer, or NULL (see ‘Details’)." From some quick testing it appears that "interpreted" means "truncated".

MortyWaves•9mo ago

What surprising timing! I have started making a bookmarks page on my personal site and soon realised that any papers I linked to would need to deal with this. I couldn’t find a reliable answer so decided I would simply have authors listed in exactly the same order as found on the paper/site/wherever.

setgree•9mo ago

Another idea is to only co-author with people with your last name, as in "A Few Goodmen: Surname-Sharing Economist Coauthors" by Allen C. Goodman, Joshua Goodman, Lucas Goodman, and Sarena Goodman:

> We explore the phenomenon of coauthorship by economists who share a surname. Prior research has included at most three economist coauthors who share a surname. Ours is the first paper to have four economist coauthors who share a surname, as well as the first where such coauthors are unrelated by marriage, blood or current campus.

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/joshuagoodman/files/goodma...

Der_Einzige•9mo ago

You should in general prefer to give people as much credit as possible. in AI/ML we have the astrik of "equal contribution" which can be used to make N authors technically "first author".

tpoacher•9mo ago

Yes but you'd still cite the paper as "as shown in FirstFirstAuthor et al (2024)" which rather defeats the purpose. And citing as "FirstFirstAuthor and SecondFirstAuthor and [...] et al" is both impractical and petty.

Which is what caused the whole "race to first authorship" mentality in the first place.

a_e_k•9mo ago

I was once an author on a systems paper where everyone after the primary author was ordered by (decreasing) tenure on the development team.

dfltr•9mo ago

My partner is a mathematician who realized (along with the other members of their working group) that if they were to deviate from the standard alphabetical authorship order, they could author a paper on the DILF Theorem.

setopt•9mo ago

Sounds like they’re on track for a FILD medal with that paper.

tpoacher•9mo ago

I once co-wrote a paper with a person who insisted on alphabetical order as a means of ensuring fairness.

Except his surname was Aaronson and mine starts with a P.

DoNotNotify is now Open Source

Dave Farber has passed away

Matchlock: Linux-based sandboxing for AI agents

Show HN: LocalGPT – A local-first AI assistant in Rust with persistent memory

Reverse Engineering Raiders of the Lost Ark for the Atari 2600

Haskell for all: Beyond agentic coding

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes (2023)

LLMs as the new high level language

The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) Berkeley DB

Modern and Antique Technologies Reveal a Dynamic Cosmos

Software factories and the agentic moment

(AI) Slop Terrifies Me

Rabbit Ear "Origami": programmable origami in the browser (JS)

Speed up responses with fast mode

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

uLauncher

Stories from 25 Years of Software Development

Vocal Guide – belt sing without killing yourself

Brookhaven Lab's RHIC concludes 25-year run with final collisions

LineageOS 23.2

The Legacy of Daniel Kahneman: A Personal View (2025)

Wood Gas Vehicles: Firewood in the Fuel Tank (2010)

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

First Proof

In the Australian outback, we're listening for nuclear tests

Start all of your commands with a comma (2009)

Substack confirms data breach affects users’ email addresses and phone numbers

Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and working with Disney

Where did all the starships go?

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

DoNotNotify is now Open Source

Dave Farber has passed away

Matchlock: Linux-based sandboxing for AI agents

Show HN: LocalGPT – A local-first AI assistant in Rust with persistent memory

Reverse Engineering Raiders of the Lost Ark for the Atari 2600

Haskell for all: Beyond agentic coding

SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes (2023)

LLMs as the new high level language

The Architecture of Open Source Applications (Volume 1) Berkeley DB

Modern and Antique Technologies Reveal a Dynamic Cosmos

Software factories and the agentic moment

(AI) Slop Terrifies Me

Rabbit Ear "Origami": programmable origami in the browser (JS)

Speed up responses with fast mode

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

uLauncher

Stories from 25 Years of Software Development

Vocal Guide – belt sing without killing yourself

Brookhaven Lab's RHIC concludes 25-year run with final collisions

LineageOS 23.2

The Legacy of Daniel Kahneman: A Personal View (2025)

Wood Gas Vehicles: Firewood in the Fuel Tank (2010)

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

First Proof

In the Australian outback, we're listening for nuclear tests

Start all of your commands with a comma (2009)

Substack confirms data breach affects users’ email addresses and phone numbers

Al Lowe on model trains, funny deaths and working with Disney

Where did all the starships go?

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

Fun ways of deciding authorship order (2016)

Comments