Fun ways of deciding authorship order (2016)

https://dynamicecology.wordpress.com/2016/09/21/fun-ways-of-deciding-authorship-order/

72•qifzer•3d ago

Comments

jghn•3d ago

TFA touches on this, but one thing I initially found surprising is how few people understand different domains have different best practices around authorship order. It does make sense, people are typically not as involved in other domains and not exposed to those papers. But I do still find it surprising how different the practices can be overall.

madcaptenor•3d ago

The American Mathematical Society has a statement basically saying “in math, authorship order is alphabetical” that people going up for tenure can put in their files, in case people involved in the decision come from other disciplines which have other conventions.

https://www.ams.org/learning-careers/leaders/CultureStatemen...

dmurray•3d ago

Someone should study whether that statement is disproportionately included by authors with names later on in the alphabet.

xenonite•3d ago

Also I suppose that Z authors might have more publications because they are nice to collaborate with.

setopt•3d ago

Alphabetical order sounds interesting when you mix non-anglicized international names. Do you go by Unicode sort order?

I’m in physics, we have this thing where the first author did the most and the last author supervised the most, and the person in the middle just had an occasional coffee with them.

Wevah•2d ago

I’d guess it’d be a particular collation, rather than Unicode order…otherwise ö would always come after z (which is incorrect for English, but correct for, e.g., Swedish).

thaumasiotes•2d ago

> otherwise ö would always come after z

Really? Wouldn't that depend on how you spelled it and what kind of Unicode ordering you specified?

Which comes first?

    '\u0047\u00f6\u0064\u0065\u006c'
    '\u0047\u006f\u0308\u0064\u0065\u006c'

jpmattia•3d ago

The wordpress post is old, and so the author didn't have the chance to include my favorite method:

Every Author as First Author: (pdf) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01393

madcaptenor•3d ago

This is biased in favor of authors with long names (which they mention at the beginning of their Future Work section)

rendaw•2d ago

That's addressed in "Future work"!

Etheryte•3d ago

The only shortcoming is that they currently use opacity even if there is only one author. In that case, it would seem natural to render the text as-is.

MortyWaves•3d ago

Why does it contain half-redacted words?

maartin0•3d ago

They're not redacted. If you zoom in you'll just see a very large number of stacked names which is ironic (I thought the same for a second)

JohnKemeny•3d ago

Extra funny, considering it's written by Demaine and Demaine.

dhosek•3d ago

Kind of reminds me of the system we used in my band in the 90s: The person who brought the initial idea to the band gets to be first. After that, it was based on importance of contributions as determined by myself as the benign dictator, but if I contributed, my name always came last (unless I was the one who brought the idea to the band).

bix6•3d ago

This is the method I use at work, feels right, puts the team first.

jvanderbot•3d ago

This is exactly how most professors and managers do it. Unless they themselves do the majority of the writing they are last by convention so it actually has some prestige to be last.

What you don't want is second-to-last on a paper w 4 or more authors. That's the worst.

hinkley•3d ago

> the order of their authorship was determined by executing the following commands in R:

    set.seed (7998976/5271)
    x ‹- sample (c("Anne", "Peder"), 1)
    print (paste ("The winner is", x, "!"))

But who picked the seed, Anne? And how do we know they didn’t have their thumb on the scale?

madcaptenor•3d ago

I was wondering if this number was somehow significant in the paper, but it doesn't seem to be: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/251524591877096...

_Algernon_•3d ago

Maybe we can solve this with blockchain?

JohnKemeny•3d ago

Or maybe quantum?

zvorygin•3d ago

My guess is that each simultaneously picked a number, one for numerator and one for denominator.

hinkley•3d ago

Hopefully. Though I wonder if that can be gamed if you pick the denominator and the value is rounded. Eg a large prime.

fph•3d ago

That is weird; from what I understand (not an R expert), set.seed takes an integer, so I assume that number gets truncated / approximated to an integer. That means that all nearby seeds give the same result: for instance changing 7998976 to 7998977 or 7998975 makes no difference, up to the next multiple of 5271. This makes the result look a lot less random. Was Anne cheating?

madcaptenor•3d ago

From the documentation at https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/base/html/Rand..., seed is "a single value, interpreted as an integer, or NULL (see ‘Details’)." From some quick testing it appears that "interpreted" means "truncated".

MortyWaves•3d ago

What surprising timing! I have started making a bookmarks page on my personal site and soon realised that any papers I linked to would need to deal with this. I couldn’t find a reliable answer so decided I would simply have authors listed in exactly the same order as found on the paper/site/wherever.

setgree•3d ago

Another idea is to only co-author with people with your last name, as in "A Few Goodmen: Surname-Sharing Economist Coauthors" by Allen C. Goodman, Joshua Goodman, Lucas Goodman, and Sarena Goodman:

> We explore the phenomenon of coauthorship by economists who share a surname. Prior research has included at most three economist coauthors who share a surname. Ours is the first paper to have four economist coauthors who share a surname, as well as the first where such coauthors are unrelated by marriage, blood or current campus.

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/joshuagoodman/files/goodma...

Der_Einzige•3d ago

You should in general prefer to give people as much credit as possible. in AI/ML we have the astrik of "equal contribution" which can be used to make N authors technically "first author".

tpoacher•2d ago

Yes but you'd still cite the paper as "as shown in FirstFirstAuthor et al (2024)" which rather defeats the purpose. And citing as "FirstFirstAuthor and SecondFirstAuthor and [...] et al" is both impractical and petty.

Which is what caused the whole "race to first authorship" mentality in the first place.

a_e_k•3d ago

I was once an author on a systems paper where everyone after the primary author was ordered by (decreasing) tenure on the development team.

dfltr•3d ago

My partner is a mathematician who realized (along with the other members of their working group) that if they were to deviate from the standard alphabetical authorship order, they could author a paper on the DILF Theorem.

setopt•3d ago

Sounds like they’re on track for a FILD medal with that paper.

tpoacher•2d ago

I once co-wrote a paper with a person who insisted on alphabetical order as a means of ensuring fairness.

Except his surname was Aaronson and mine starts with a P.

15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python

Full Text Search of US Court records

Show HN: I made a Doom-like game fit inside a QR code

Understanding the Origins and the Evolution of Vi and Vim

Hextraction, a free and open source board game

UML diagram for the DDD example in Evans' book

Principles for Building One-Shot AI Agents

Electric Propulsion's Dirty Secret: Why Lithium Can't Fly (Or Float) Profitably

Judge Rules Blanket Search of Cell Tower Data Unconstitutional

Show HN: (bits) of a Libc, Optimized for Wasm

Ink and Switch Constraint System (2023)

Cyberpunk 1958: The Early Days of the Polish IT Industry

There's Life Inside Earth's Crust

A New ASN.1 API for Python

How a yacht works: sailboat physics and design

Loglan'82: programming language for object-oriented and distributed programming

The most famous carbon dioxide absorber

Dot (YC S21) is hiring a sales engineer to automate analytics (fully remote)

Defold: cross-platform game engine

Show HN: Attune - Build and publish APT repositories in seconds

Jupiter, it's mushballs all the way down

College Towns: Urbanism from a Past Era

The Good Karma Kit

Unique bacteria that survive by employing multicellular behavior

PDCurses – for environments that don't fit the termcap/terminfo model

Less Slow C++

AMP and why emails are not (and should never be) interactive

SDFs from Unoriented Point Clouds Using Neural Variational Heat Distances

Potatoes in the Mail

OpenAI's new reasoning AI models hallucinate more

15,000 lines of verified cryptography now in Python

Full Text Search of US Court records

Show HN: I made a Doom-like game fit inside a QR code

Understanding the Origins and the Evolution of Vi and Vim

Hextraction, a free and open source board game

UML diagram for the DDD example in Evans' book

Principles for Building One-Shot AI Agents

Electric Propulsion's Dirty Secret: Why Lithium Can't Fly (Or Float) Profitably

Judge Rules Blanket Search of Cell Tower Data Unconstitutional

Show HN: (bits) of a Libc, Optimized for Wasm

Ink and Switch Constraint System (2023)

Cyberpunk 1958: The Early Days of the Polish IT Industry

There's Life Inside Earth's Crust

A New ASN.1 API for Python

How a yacht works: sailboat physics and design

Loglan'82: programming language for object-oriented and distributed programming

The most famous carbon dioxide absorber

Dot (YC S21) is hiring a sales engineer to automate analytics (fully remote)

Defold: cross-platform game engine

Show HN: Attune - Build and publish APT repositories in seconds

Jupiter, it's mushballs all the way down

College Towns: Urbanism from a Past Era

The Good Karma Kit

Unique bacteria that survive by employing multicellular behavior

PDCurses – for environments that don't fit the termcap/terminfo model

Less Slow C++

AMP and why emails are not (and should never be) interactive

SDFs from Unoriented Point Clouds Using Neural Variational Heat Distances

Potatoes in the Mail

OpenAI's new reasoning AI models hallucinate more

Fun ways of deciding authorship order (2016)

Comments