But thanks for the heads up about Nipah Virus! Wow!
https://www.ricemedia.co/one-mans-quest-to-revive-toddy-the-...
It reminded me of a drink here in Switzerland made during grape harvest and also bacterial fermentation. Also sour cider in the babe region but that’s much more sophisticated.
This palm juice alcohol is very primitive and probably something monkeys drank.
Hmm... flies and all?
> send one of his servants out in the morning to buy it for us.
Hmmm..... one. servants?
> This palm juice alcohol is very primitive and probably something monkeys drank.
Hmm... primitive? monkeys?
Sorry, but I got an uncomfortable feeling from reading your comment. I think my insula cortex activated upon detecting chromatocrat type verbiage.
https://enviroliteracy.org/animals/can-elk-get-drunk/
Probably could have been a better choice of example than a monkey but if you spend a lot of time in India, the "we normally see these in a zoo!" novelty probably wears off quickly and its no different than dealing with deer in north america.
jollyllama•8mo ago
xnx•8mo ago
Whoa
howard941•8mo ago
neaden•8mo ago
Edit: Finally and relevantly they can come in close contact with people by coming into our homes, or people going into theirs. This can let the disease cross over.
thaumasiotes•8mo ago
What is the connection between these two ideas?
neaden•8mo ago
thaumasiotes•8mo ago
jollyllama•8mo ago
thaumasiotes•8mo ago
1. "A big reason bats carry a lot of diseases is that they have large temperature fluctuations."
2. "How does the one lead to the other?"
3. "Diseases can't tolerate temperature fluctuations."
That's gibberish, not an argument. Combining two random (or in this case, contradictory) sentences doesn't make an argument.