frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenCiv3: Open-source, cross-platform reimagining of Civilization III

https://openciv3.org/
439•klaussilveira•6h ago•100 comments

The Waymo World Model

https://waymo.com/blog/2026/02/the-waymo-world-model-a-new-frontier-for-autonomous-driving-simula...
785•xnx•11h ago•475 comments

Show HN: Look Ma, No Linux: Shell, App Installer, Vi, Cc on ESP32-S3 / BreezyBox

https://github.com/valdanylchuk/breezydemo
151•isitcontent•6h ago•15 comments

How we made geo joins 400× faster with H3 indexes

https://floedb.ai/blog/how-we-made-geo-joins-400-faster-with-h3-indexes
16•matheusalmeida•1d ago•0 comments

Monty: A minimal, secure Python interpreter written in Rust for use by AI

https://github.com/pydantic/monty
137•dmpetrov•6h ago•60 comments

A century of hair samples proves leaded gas ban worked

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/a-century-of-hair-samples-proves-leaded-gas-ban-worked/
78•jnord•3d ago•5 comments

Dark Alley Mathematics

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/three-points/
44•quibono•4d ago•3 comments

Show HN: I spent 4 years building a UI design tool with only the features I use

https://vecti.com
254•vecti•8h ago•120 comments

Microsoft open-sources LiteBox, a security-focused library OS

https://github.com/microsoft/litebox
316•aktau•12h ago•155 comments

Show HN: If you lose your memory, how to regain access to your computer?

https://eljojo.github.io/rememory/
181•eljojo•9h ago•124 comments

Sheldon Brown's Bicycle Technical Info

https://www.sheldonbrown.com/
315•ostacke•12h ago•85 comments

Hackers (1995) Animated Experience

https://hackers-1995.vercel.app/
398•todsacerdoti•14h ago•218 comments

An Update on Heroku

https://www.heroku.com/blog/an-update-on-heroku/
325•lstoll•12h ago•235 comments

Make Trust Irrelevant: A Gamer's Take on Agentic AI Safety

https://github.com/Deso-PK/make-trust-irrelevant
6•DesoPK•54m ago•2 comments

Show HN: R3forth, a ColorForth-inspired language with a tiny VM

https://github.com/phreda4/r3
48•phreda4•5h ago•8 comments

PC Floppy Copy Protection: Vault Prolok

https://martypc.blogspot.com/2024/09/pc-floppy-copy-protection-vault-prolok.html
15•kmm•4d ago•1 comments

I spent 5 years in DevOps – Solutions engineering gave me what I was missing

https://infisical.com/blog/devops-to-solutions-engineering
109•vmatsiiako•11h ago•34 comments

How to effectively write quality code with AI

https://heidenstedt.org/posts/2026/how-to-effectively-write-quality-code-with-ai/
188•i5heu•9h ago•131 comments

Learning from context is harder than we thought

https://hy.tencent.com/research/100025?langVersion=en
145•limoce•3d ago•79 comments

Understanding Neural Network, Visually

https://visualrambling.space/neural-network/
239•surprisetalk•3d ago•31 comments

I now assume that all ads on Apple news are scams

https://kirkville.com/i-now-assume-that-all-ads-on-apple-news-are-scams/
982•cdrnsf•15h ago•417 comments

I'm going to cure my girlfriend's brain tumor

https://andrewjrod.substack.com/p/im-going-to-cure-my-girlfriends-brain
53•ray__•3h ago•13 comments

FORTH? Really!?

https://rescrv.net/w/2026/02/06/associative
41•rescrv•14h ago•17 comments

Introducing the Developer Knowledge API and MCP Server

https://developers.googleblog.com/introducing-the-developer-knowledge-api-and-mcp-server/
19•gfortaine•4h ago•2 comments

Female Asian Elephant Calf Born at the Smithsonian National Zoo

https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/female-asian-elephant-calf-born-smithsonians-national-zoo-an...
4•gmays•1h ago•0 comments

Evaluating and mitigating the growing risk of LLM-discovered 0-days

https://red.anthropic.com/2026/zero-days/
36•lebovic•1d ago•11 comments

Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents

https://docs.smooth.sh/cli/overview
77•antves•1d ago•57 comments

Why I Joined OpenAI

https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2026-02-07/why-i-joined-openai.html
60•SerCe•2h ago•47 comments

The Oklahoma Architect Who Turned Kitsch into Art

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2026-01-31/oklahoma-architect-bruce-goff-s-wild-home-desi...
19•MarlonPro•3d ago•4 comments

Show HN: Slack CLI for Agents

https://github.com/stablyai/agent-slack
40•nwparker•1d ago•10 comments
Open in hackernews

One hundred and one rules of effective living

https://mitchhorowitz.substack.com/p/101-rules-of-effective-living
120•mathgenius•8mo ago

Comments

ngangaga•8mo ago
If point 2 is something so subjective as "deal plainly", point 0 should probably be "be honest with yourself". More to the point—why would anyone want to do otherwise? The hard part is satisfying your own evaluation.

> 4) There exists uncanny congruity between thought and experience.

Charitably, there must be a more effective way to articulate this sentiment.

I could go on, but that seems sufficient to address the overall tone of the writing.

EDIT: I apologize for being so critical. These are clearly well-thought-out points and I'm not trying to detract from that. I'm just not sure how to process someone else's internal understanding of themselves in a generally useful manner.

jewayne•8mo ago
Yeah, I just realized there are two very different ways to parse the statement. I initially saw it as "Experiences shape thoughts in predictable ways." But the other way to interpret it is "Attitude shapes experiences in predictable ways."
throwaway173738•8mo ago
I feel like that second interpretation is the seat of so much misery and of so much happiness.
dullcrisp•8mo ago
Uncanny would mean the opposite of predictable
tcfhgj•8mo ago
> why would anyone want to do otherwise?

lying to yourself is sometimes a easy way out of cognitive dissonance

mudiadamz•8mo ago
More like how to be mediocre boring life advice
mbb70•8mo ago
> 42) Do not be an asshole.

This list is paying dividends already!

> 41) Use sarcasm rarely.

...Shoot

linsomniac•8mo ago
Reluctantly admitting 41 is correct right here.
whooshnoise•8mo ago
Odd that this list made you so angry you had to post how boring the people who follow must be? I feel sorry for you. Honestly. Judgement of others tends to make people miserable.
mcphage•8mo ago
Do you always assume that someone who disagrees with you must have been angry about it?
whooshnoise•8mo ago
When they use angry phrasing yes. It’s not a difficult concept, reading comprehension. Except maybe it is for the TikTok generation.
mcphage•8mo ago
> It’s not a difficult concept, reading comprehension.

Maybe don’t be so quick to say that.

awkward•8mo ago
> 7) Do not over-talk.

> 72) A positive mental attitude means evaluating circumstances based on their capacity for self-development.

pricees•8mo ago
“35) Give no second chances to anyone who shows disrespect“

This is one of the worst rules I have ever read. Taken literally it can squander a life otherwise well lived.

turnsout•8mo ago
Yeah, might as well make the rule "35) Be inflexible and cruel when it suits you."
vkou•8mo ago
I like that phrasing of it more. Someone following it will live pretty effectively.
jdthedisciple•8mo ago
I could relate to it only for one reason:

I was treated disrespectfully at a restaurant recently.

I do not plan on returning there ever.

jajko•8mo ago
Do you behave in same vein at your work, with your parents, spouse, children, friends etc?
worik•8mo ago
> “35) Give no second chances to anyone who shows disrespect“

This bit me.

I work for a disrespectful person.

It is awful.

AtlasBarfed•8mo ago
102. Exercise
WastedCucumber•8mo ago
103. Wear sunscreen.
snide•8mo ago
I've always like Ben Franklin's 13 virtues. It's a short list.

TEMPERANCE. Eat not to dullness; drink not to elevation.

SILENCE. Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation.

ORDER. Let all your things have their places; let each part of your business have its time.

RESOLUTION. Resolve to perform what you ought; perform without fail what you resolve.

FRUGALITY. Make no expense but to do good to others or yourself; i.e., waste nothing.

INDUSTRY. Lose no time; be always employ’d in something useful; cut off all unnecessary actions.

SINCERITY. Use no hurtful deceit; think innocently and justly, and, if you speak, speak accordingly.

JUSTICE. Wrong none by doing injuries or omitting the benefits that are your duty.

MODERATION. Avoid extremes; forbear resenting injuries so much as you think they deserve.

CLEANLINESS. Tolerate no uncleanliness in body, cloaths, or habitation.

TRANQUILLITY. Be not disturbed at trifles, or at accidents common or unavoidable.

CHASTITY. Rarely use venery but for health or offspring, never to dulness, weakness, or the injury of your own or another’s peace or reputation.

HUMILITY. Imitate Jesus and Socrates.

stuartjohnson12•8mo ago
That sounds like a very boring and miserable way to live. To respond with one of my own:

---

When I am an old woman I shall wear purple

With a red hat which doesn’t go, and doesn’t suit me.

And I shall spend my pension on brandy and summer gloves

And satin sandals, and say we’ve no money for butter.

I shall sit down on the pavement when I’m tired

And gobble up samples in shops and press alarm bells

And run my stick along the public railings

And make up for the sobriety of my youth.

I shall go out in my slippers in the rain

And pick the flowers in other people’s gardens

And learn to spit.

bix6•8mo ago
Today I learned about the red hat society, thank you
xyzwave•8mo ago
Fair critique, we should never lose the spirit of play, but Franklin’s guidance seems very much in line with a quote from Gustave Flaubert I often see echoed:

> Be steady and well-ordered in your life so that you can be fierce and original in your work

mindtricks•8mo ago
I think it's fair to have principles and still have an interesting an active life. The best example of this would have to be, well, Ben Franklin.
lazide•8mo ago
I find the list hilarious, because Ben Franklin was a notorious player, and his time in France (as American ambassador) was legendary - if documented today, it would make the Wolf of Wallstreet jealous. In modern parlance, ‘coke and hookers’ galore.

He also, by all accounts, was instrumental in getting France to support the US war of independence, without which the war would likely have gone an entirely different way.

Not to say he treated anyone badly - by all accounts, all participants enjoyed themselves immensely.

But don’t take these pronouncements as documentations of fact, but rather playing to an audience. He was also one of the major publishers and propagandists in early America, and his audience was profoundly conservative (often in the puritan sense), rural, and poor. It’s how he made one of his first fortunes [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_Richard%27s_Almanack].

He probably did follow some of them, when it suited him, but clearly was never hesitant to let them get in the way of a good time either. Taking it too literally is like taking one of those popular business books too literally.

MichaelZuo•8mo ago
Can you link the source for these claims?

Considering he didn’t have any embassy bureaucracy beyond a few staff helping him, and that any reply from washington would be many weeks away… it seems extremely unlikely he would have had much free time at all in Paris.

lazide•8mo ago
which part? your timelines seem pretty off if you think ‘weeks’ was a remotely possible timeline at the time either.

There was no electronic communication of any sort (electricity was barely understood at the time), and best case transit time was around 6 weeks each way, often 8-12 if possible at all. It was also highly seasonal, and still very dangerous.

So the absolute fastest turn around time was 12 weeks/3 months, and more realistically 4-6 months. With some decent odds that one of the legs of the trip might sink, losing all hands.

It’s why a literal founding father (and one of the most influential ones) was the ambassador. No one else could be trusted.

[https://www.history.com/articles/benjamin-franklin-france]

MichaelZuo•8mo ago
Are you confused about what “many weeks” means? it means >>few weeks
lazide•8mo ago
How does that work out 6 months in on your ‘many weeks’ work estimate?
MichaelZuo•8mo ago
Huh? Do you not believe 20 to 30 weeks is >>few weeks?
lazide•8mo ago
I have never seen (or used) ‘few’ in the description of something when there was 20 of something.

Technically, a year could also count if you said >> few seconds, but no one will take you seriously if you do either.

MichaelZuo•8mo ago
You seem very confused… “many weeks” was the exact quote. “few” was only brought up after the bizarre reply as part of the explanation in “>>few weeks”.

And yes “many weeks” easily covers the range of 20 to 30 weeks.

lazide•8mo ago
Nope. Just pointing out it’s the wrong scale, and providing context of the right scale. Which is months. Many months.
MichaelZuo•8mo ago
This doesn’t even make sense. Why don’t you accept it is often used?

You can search older HN comments and see hundreds upon hundreds of instances of “many weeks” and so on…

reverendsteveii•8mo ago
while I like redhatting as much as anyone the interesting wrinkle to this criticism of franklin in particular is that this is much more like the way he actually lived than the principles he listed were. in fact, I dare say the only thing he missed on this list was making up for the non-existent sobriety of his youth.
readthenotes1•8mo ago
The poem:

https://www.poetry.com/poem/141551/warning

(When I am an old woman, I will annotate other people's comments, With inapposite quibbling or info they already know ...)

ericmcer•8mo ago
I was teaching my dog to bark less, and I worried a bit that it might make him sit silently when I actually want him to bark, like if a stranger was coming through the window.

After a ton of training I realized he will never stop barking, he can realize that what he is doing is not right, but the urge to bark at every noise he hears will always be something we have to work on. We will never get it "right".

I think Ben Franklins strict rules are the same way. Obviously you can't run your entire life with military discipline, but you have to set the ideal fairly high because you are going to fall short over and over.

wordpad•8mo ago
That's the problem with set rules.

Overly productive and active people create rules to better focus their productivity and tame their impulses.

Someone unambitious and lazy would see more benefit from a single rule that says go do something, literally anything!

metalman•8mo ago
my dogs, when I have them, dont bark, but have exceptional freedom and are expected to act with discretion, I talk to my animals a lot, and watch them closely, responding to there needs and comunications......a big dogs warning "CHUFF" says everything needed....."big dog here....please observe formalitys, aproach calmly, say hi, be pleaant and confident, and all will be fine", with the understanding that I can order a stand down, for non dog people who are of no threat. dogs, and animals, offer a real ,genuine , opinion on many aspects of life, a check.......,can I walk away from that expectant look...sometimes it's , ha! nice try you manipulative fucker, and other times it's hang it all, your right, lets do the thing, now..... the leson bieng, to be aware of everything, and one of those things is that try as you might, there are loose ends, which will unpredictably re prioritise everything, and the final proof of living well, is having the capacity to re prioritise, and then go on from there and a child, or a dog, or a horse, will call your bluff
gatlin•8mo ago
Genuine question: if you could tell Ben Franklin this, would you? I'm not even disagreeing with you, nor do I think there is a correct answer, but your answer and the reasoning behind it would genuinely interest me.
stuartjohnson12•8mo ago
Sure I would. The conversation would go about as well as it would with any moral realist who believes he has identified the set of virtues or deontic norms which obligation would have us adhere to. I do not know if Mr. Franklin was a "serious man" as de Beauvoir described it, but these are certainly the same kinds of self-flagellatory ethics you would expect a serious man to have.

My interactions with such people usually reflect a piteous tone, as if it were a tremendous shame that I had not stopped for a second to think of the gravity of the situation. That is a necessary frame for them to hold given the preconditions which led to them becoming a serious man.

xandrius•8mo ago
Some are about breaking out of self-imposed constraints and some are just dickish: don't come into my garden and pick my flowers, thank you very much.
s_dev•8mo ago
Reminds me of the Core Principles from Severance.
arealaccount•8mo ago
Clearly Mr Franklin has never hyperscaled a tech company
os2warpman•8mo ago
Having read quite a bit about Franklin, his life was defined by an extremely generous interpretation of some of those virtues.
dole•8mo ago
"Franklin did not try to work on them all at once. Instead, he worked on only one each week "leaving all others to their ordinary chance." While he did not adhere completely to the enumerated virtues, and by his own admission he fell short of them many times, he believed the attempt made him a better man, contributing greatly to his success and happiness, which is why in his autobiography, he devoted more pages to this plan than to any other single point and wrote, "I hope, therefore, that some of my descendants may follow the example and reap the benefit."

[0] https://www.ushistory.org/franklin/autobiography/page38.htm

BizarroLand•8mo ago
This week, I will avoid murder. Other than that, all bets are off
jajko•8mo ago
Better be careful around you next week then
IncreasePosts•8mo ago
AIUI these are from his autobiography, which he wrote during the last 20 years of his life. I wonder if he wrote this section before his decade in France? As I understand it, while there, he very intentionally led a life with little temperance, silence, frugality, moderation, and chastity.
srik•8mo ago
It's funny that this is by Ben Franklin, someone notorious for routinely violating at least half of these virtues.
euroderf•8mo ago
> TEMPERANCE. Eat not to dullness; drink not to elevation.

"Not to elevation"? Let me direct you to the Finnish language. It contains two tightly related concepts: "nousuhumala" (ascending alcohol buzz) and the subsequent & corresponding "laskuhumala" (descending alcohol buzz).

If you recall the course of an evening of overindulgence, you may notice that these two concepts do describe the terrain.

whooshnoise•8mo ago
I didn’t know Thoreau read “The Secret”.
daveguy•8mo ago
> 100) Those who bill by the hour work not for you but for the hour.

This is just not true. Some bill by the hour to be certain that full and focused work is applied for you and your project. In other words, if someone is following even a fraction of these 101 rules, then they are working for you. Maybe I am misunderstanding what this rule is trying to say. But, it seems like the mode of payment is completely orthogonal to the motive and priority of the person working.

throwaway173738•8mo ago
Hourly is for work where you don’t know when it will be finished because you have no idea what you’re getting in to. Try demanding a flat rate next time you need a slow leak in a pipe in a wall repaired.
jebarker•8mo ago
I often wonder if there's any real benefit in reading things like this. Philosophising (and meditating) without putting it into practice in your life is largely worthless, but I tend to think with ideas like this you only learn them through experience.
LVB•8mo ago
Over my many years I've found that mental pivots that have lasted came at completely unpredictable times. I'd hear or read something like one of these, it would resonate and get me thinking "Hmm, yeah, I should stop that", and it stuck. Presumably my brain was primed to receive the advice at that time.
sandspar•8mo ago
Psychologists call this the "psychological moment." You can tell a depressed friend 100 times that they should go for a walk and they'll ignore you. Then for some reason the 101st time it sinks in, they go for a walk and lo, they feel better. Psychological moment applies to all sorts of changes. Telling your abused friend that they should take the kids and leave, telling your aging dad that it's time he gives up his driver's license, asking your husband to stop interrupting you. 100 times they ignore it, 101st time it clicks. Everything is timing.
FollowingTheDao•8mo ago
You do not need 101 rules. Just embrace the three treasures of the Dao:

Compassion, frugality, and humility.

neilv•8mo ago
> 8) Speak only of what you know well.

OK, but that's going to wipe out 99%+ of Internet 'content', HN included.

keiferski•8mo ago
I’ve thought about this before and concluded that it’s because HN/other sites are somewhat hostile to the approach of beginner’s mind, admitting you know nothing but want to learn more, etc. Asking basic questions tends to get you ridiculed or downvoted, and most subreddits have onerous lists of rules you have to follow before asking anything. YouTube and TikTok also incentivize acting like someone that has no doubts and is completely certain that they’re right.

I suppose that dynamic isn’t hugely different from a typical in-person social situation (e.g., a classroom where kids are afraid to look stupid by asking questions) but it would be cool if a social platform incentivized people to ask “dumb” questions they are curious about.

At this point though, ChatGPT is basically fulfilling this function for me, and its lack of judgement is refreshing compared to the typical Ask subreddit.

gilleain•8mo ago
Agreed about questions, although I have seen people have positive results by starting their question with some humility.

However there is the opposite problem - usually known as 'the empty pot sounds loudest' - where those who respond or comment are often those with the confidence of their simplistic opinions. Those with a more nuanced or expert view are more hesitant, so are less likely to weigh in.

HN is a lot better than other places (youtube comments! reddit!) but of course falls into these traps as well.

throwaway_sage•8mo ago
honestly a very good list (is it good because I happen to follow nearly all of these rules?)

nonetheless i made an account just to support it

reverendsteveii•8mo ago
hey mitch, how goes it?
corry•8mo ago
101 rules? Too many. I vastly prefer not a rule but THE life challenge with thanks to Mary Oliver:

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?"

bwfan123•8mo ago
these 100 rules are missing an important one. step back, and simplify. these rules are a result of overthinking which is something to avoid.

far simpler rules have been laid out numerous times in the classics.

such as: the golden rule of ethics, ie, dont do unto others what you dont want done to you, and the serenity prayer etc.

lifefeed•8mo ago
> In more than thirty years as a writer, editor, and publisher, I have, to my best reckoning, introduced, abridged, issued or reissued, and read nearly every major work of inspirational literature produced or translated into English.

I'm always wary of people who spend too much time in the world of inspirational books. It's healthy to read a little, and to "sharpen the ax" every so often, but reading too much of this stuff is mind-numbing outside of historiography reasons.

hnthrow90348765•8mo ago
>1) Do your work—do it on time and fully, if not early and overabundantly.

I cannot overstate how absolutely hollow it must be that work is your #1 rule of living

The next saddest thing is that the only mention of love is a fucking Machiavelli quote

reverendsteveii•8mo ago
Work != job

One of my greatest pleasures has been orienting my life toward projects and away from pleasures. I now find myself doing a lot of what other people consider work, but self-directed and self-paced in a way that brings me incredible, deep satisfaction. No one, including me, forces me to do these things. I do them because I like doing them. Bodybuilding, maintaining my home, lawn and garden, cooking/brewing/fermenting, building software. I'm not an extraordinarily wealthy man but if I woke up tomorrow with "comfortably live the rest of your life based on interest alone" money I don't suspect my life would change all that much.

Once you're doing that sort of work, the meaning of this rule will become clear as will its meaninglessness.

PaulRobinson•8mo ago
If these are in priority order, sure. If not, it's 0.9909% of the rules of living.

That Machiavelli quote is a poor take on love as part of life, I agree.

In defense of TFA though, it is titled rules of effective living, not necessarily happy living.

The rules on avoiding cruel people and who treat others badly are kind of like an anti-rule that works here though: if you're judicious and conscientious about that, I think you just end up with loving people around you, in every type of relationship: acquaintance, familial, friendship, intimate...

hex4def6•8mo ago
Some of my most stressful times at work have been when I had the least stuff to do. It's nice for a few days, but when it stretches into weeks I start feeling queasy.

Obviously, being buried under an avalanche of thankless work is just as bad.

My ideal life would be some sprints of large effort (maybe pulling the occasional all-nighter once in a while), followed by rest / low work times.

A constant amount of work, all the same, blurs the days together. Too little, and you start feeling useless. Too much (consistently) and you're overwhelmed.

jdalgetty•8mo ago
I always enjoy reading these.
aquariusDue•8mo ago
At some point a committee ought to write a manual for life and living. Though by most accounts it might be easier to write a modern standard library for C.
noja•8mo ago
Everybody's Free To Wear Sunscreen
iJohnDoe•8mo ago
A lot of these are learned through experiences in life. When you’re young it’s almost impossible to understand or recognize some of these in the moment. As you get older, you start to learn what’s important to you, and what you like and don’t like. Then you tend to respond quicker to situations.
world2vec•8mo ago
Some points contradict others:

20) Get away from cruel people—at all costs.

58) “If we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved.” (Machiavelli)

This is simply a self-help back-of-the-book quotes compilation.

reverendsteveii•8mo ago
this feels like another person who sits by himself thinking about things that sound wise to him. he operates on the assumption that he is wise because wise sounding things sound wise to him, and also that those things are wise because they sound wise to him and he is wise. they're great for books, blogs and other one-way forms of communication where their entire job is just satisfying fridge logic so that the audience upvotes and moves along. not so much for dialogue and discussion that will eventually sort every point into buckets labelled "meaningless" or "self-evident". it's the tobacconist's yoga: a contortionate attempt to blow smoke up one's own ass unassisted.
borroka•8mo ago
We all know what you should do, be doing, and not do. Of course, we should do our job earnestly and enthusiastically, love our families to death, and protect the weak and help the poor. All in this ethereal world in which there are no trade-offs, good and evil are separated like the ocean and the mountain, and somebody, up there, is looking pensively at our actions.

But the wise person, after reading a few inspirational books and slogans for the masses, gets annoyed at the simplistic "just be kind" that means nothing when out of context, of tough decisions to make, of mornings when everybody and everything annoy them. And so they decide to go back to looking at actions, that words are fleeting, but examples are lasting.

xivzgrev•8mo ago
I like how these kind of lists get us talking and thinking about our own experiences. What do you agree with, not agree with?

“Those who bill by the hour work not for you but for the hour.” Strikes me as cynical. Yes some people can run up the clock, but paying by the hour is also fundamentally the most fair work arrangement. You are asking for someone’s time, you pay for that time.

Flat rate work gets into their own issues. For example, suppose you want your home deep cleaned and someone charges you $x to do so. A great deal!

Except you find after the fact they missed a lot of stuff. Technically they followed through on the letter of what you agreed to but they did the bare minimum. There’s no pride in the work. If you had paid by the hour, you could’ve asked them to stay and focus on some areas that matter more to you.

Or conversely, there’s lots of horror stories here about devs accepting flat rate work and getting endlessly dragged thru change requests

reverendsteveii•8mo ago
>I like how these kind of lists get us talking and thinking about our own experiences. What do you agree with, not agree with?

I panned this list in a different comment but I like it a lot better from this perspective. It's not necessarily there to be right. Sometimes it's there to say things to which your immediate response is "That's bullshit" but in a way that forces you to articulate why, or (and this is even better) to admit that you can't. Like when I read Heinlein.

edoceo•8mo ago
I bill by the hour, but in chunks (20, 40, etc). I do discovery, define scope and that I determine scope, then work on narrow scoped thing. (Hard part) document each ECR, set scope and communicate price. Likely to next billed-task. Kinda combines fixed&hourly; not perfect.
CompoundEyes•8mo ago
These things remind me of the book “My Year of Living Biblically” by A.J. Jacobs. In our lives if we stopped to consult a list of all the platitudes we’ve ever come across one by one each time we did or experienced anything it would be similarly as absurd full of contradiction paralyzing.
jxjnskkzxxhx•8mo ago
> In terms of investments, virtually nothing, over time, outpaces an index fund.

Stopped reading here, waste of time.

standardUser•8mo ago
> Prepare for the day when your best friend betrays you.

Before you strap those extra rounds of ammo to your vest, may I suggest simply finding better friends?

There's several on the list that sound a bit paranoid to me. And many more that make it feel like I'm being scolded by a schoolmarm. But there's definitely some gems. My favorite...

> Cynics know nothing.

derbOac•8mo ago
When I first glanced at your post I thought you were pointing out the irony of contrast between your first and last line.
highfrequency•8mo ago
> Judge quality not category

I like this one. Would be curious to hear the author's elaboration.

ChrisMarshallNY•8mo ago
Man, those are great.

Thanks for posting this!

GMoromisato•8mo ago
I've narrowed my algorithm to three (not so simple) rules:

1. Know yourself.

2. Work hard.

3. Serve others.

I think 90% of unhappiness comes from violating at least one of these rules.

Conversely, of course, following these rules doesn't guarantee happiness, but (I think) it increases your chances.

worik•8mo ago
1.1 Forgive yourself
GMoromisato•8mo ago
Yes! That applies in so many situations.
ridiculous_leke•8mo ago
> 44) Reduce food intake by twenty percent.

Why exactly twenty percent?

ergonaught•8mo ago
1. Ignore lists of 101 anything.
eointierney•8mo ago
Be kind as in be like thyself as in see thyself in others as in don't be unkind as in be kind

The rest is noise in an expanding universe

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe•8mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
eointierney•8mo ago
Exactly

And yet the phrase "be kind" appears nowhere on that page

exiguus•8mo ago
89) Arrogance is a form of stupidity.

If you wish to train your mind with such aphorisms and craft your own, I recommend reading Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, or more modern thinkers like Heidegger and Adorno. Each of them has collections of aphorisms, akin to an elevated 'Farmer's Almanac'.

swayvil•8mo ago
> 67 concentration produces power

Yeah but it also produces blindness and lots of it.

karaterobot•8mo ago
I think that's a lot of rules to try to carry around in your head. If it works for this guy, more power to him.

For my money, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you shows up in some form or another in most major civilizations, and there's probably a reason for that. It's simple, makes sense, and covers a lot of situations.

If I had a number two rule to add, it would be slower traffic keep right. That's deep wisdom with a practical application.

chairmansteve•8mo ago
Rule 1: Never read substack.
jrvarela56•8mo ago
The best use for this kind of writing is to see which points cause a reaction in you. You can then question what is it that caught your attention and discover something about you that you may have overlooked or hadn’t noticed its impact on you.
graycat•8mo ago
Five rules:

(1) Financial Security.

Since tough to get financial security when have a boss, instead start a business, make it successful, and sell it. Usually at the beginning, tough to know if some business direction is good, and good/bad can change over time. So, keep in mind new directions.

The business should yield at least enough for a good family, a house for self and family in a good neighborhood, and significant savings.

(2) Health. Do well on diet and exercise. Don't smoke, drink, or take illegal drugs. Don't try to climb Mount Everest or anything similar.

(3) Family. Enabled by the other rules.

(4) Education. K-12, 4 year college, advanced degrees should yield good ability at selecting good from bad.

     “It ain't what you don't know that
     gets you into trouble. It's what you
     know for sure that just ain't so.“ –
     Mark Twain
Some of the good content may help with financial security. Friends made can be crucial for financial security and parts of family formation. Never stop learning and for much of education pick some good and relevant material and largely teach yourself. For your children, help them with their education.

(5) Socialization. Understand people and how to interact. So, special cases include friends, family, leadership, media, politics.

More is important, but these five 'rules' are a start.

ropable•8mo ago
Rule 0: Don't be a d#ck.
afpx•8mo ago
You can more easily get ~90% of these from practicing Christianity. And, if you practice it, you won't need the other 10%.

And, in Christianity, you don't have to do it alone. You instantly get a loving, supportive community to help you on your journey.

kashunstva•8mo ago
> 37) Honor every religion.

“…and the unbelief of those who dissent.”

mikhailfranco•8mo ago

  68) “The past controls the future but the present controls the past.” 
      (G.I. Gurdjieff)
I always thought that was Orwell "1984" (1948).

I know Orwell used Zamyatin "We" as an inspiration, but not seen the Gurdjieff attribution before.

P.S. Also a fan of Asian Dub Foundation's Memory War.

moominpapa•8mo ago
Rule 102: Stop following other people's rules, except for rule 102