Pglocks.org

80•hnasr•11mo ago

Comments

whilenot-dev•11mo ago

I'm a bit lost here.

Locking is a challenging problem in complex systems. Is this list to be interpreted as a "TODO: get rid of locking conflicts in future releases" or more a "NOTE: be aware there are known conflicts that will not change - find ways to work around them"?

EDIT: Also, is the creation of this list an automated or a manual effort?

tux3•11mo ago

I think this is intended as educational material, not a list of things to fix.

The locks are here by necessity, it is not so easy at all to get rid of them. And even in special cases where it is possible, the complexity you have to introduce is not to be taken lightly...

If even a tenth of these disapppeared, it would be incredible, in a very surprising way.

atombender•11mo ago

The creator looks like a developer and teacher, not a Postgres core team member. So I assume this is for documentation purposes.

I actually like this a lot, as there isn't a single place in the Postgres documentation that lists all the possible locks; it's spread out all over. Having a quick reference for what kinds of commands you'd be blocking with your transaction is valuable.

It's pretty evident that the pages have been programmatically generated, but I'd love know what it's generated from. I think you can derive this information from the documentation, but not sure if you can do it in an automated way without an LLM.

braiamp•11mo ago

> there isn't a single place in the Postgres documentation that lists all the possible locks

Did you read this page? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/explicit-locking.htm...

atombender•11mo ago

That's a great page, but it has several issues.

First, it isn't complete; as I said, the locking behaviour is spread out all over the Postgres documentation. For example, that page doesn't list what locks DROP INDEX takes. To find that out, you have to go to the documentation page for that command and read it carefully. In fact, really carefully — the locking behaviour is only documented under the section about CONCURRENTLY.

The page also doesn't list what possible commands are then blocked. Locks interact in subtle (and incorrectly named!) ways that are explained in the tables on that page ("Conflicting lock modes"), so to understand if something will block something else you have to look at the two commands you are curious about and then look at how their locks interact.

gulcin_xata•11mo ago

I agree, it is not so straightforward to find out.

braiamp•11mo ago

These are database locks, which means that depending which arrives first, the later transaction has to wait till the first one finishes to complete. These locks are about SQL commands and which commands can run concurrently with the others. There's a graph here of how that looks like https://pankrat.github.io/2015/django-migrations-without-dow...

Usually for maximum performance (minimum latency, maximum throughput) you want to have operations not lock each other, unless absolutely necessary, in which case you want them to be short.

whilenot-dev•11mo ago

You make it sound like the conflict is just affecting performance and won't result in a deadlock. So it's for performance aware postgres clients/users, and not for postgres developers?

andyferris•11mo ago

It is a guide for developers using postgres as a client, who need to write systems that don't deadlock, are performant and are correct. These are the (rather sharp) tools that postgres provides for doing so (or else you can use e.g. serializable isolation and optimistic concurrency, but in my experience that has too many false positives and bail out rather eagerly, whereas these tools let you be very precise and granular).

mebcitto•11mo ago

Other relevant talks/blogs that I found really useful for understanding Postgres locks are:

* Unlocking the Postgres Lock Manager by Bruce Momjian: https://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/locking.pdf

* Anatomy of table-level locks by Gulcin Yildirim Jelinek: https://xata.io/blog/anatomy-of-locks

pasxizeis•11mo ago

Shameless plug: I wrote a tool[1] that executes a given migration against a test database (e.g. in your CI) and reports back what locks it acquired.

The rationale being to have a "lock diagnostics report" commented in your PR's migration file.

It's a prototype and has a few rough edges and missing functionality, but feedback is more than welcome.

[1] https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

jononor•11mo ago

Very practical! Locking is one of the things that can really bite when doing migrations.

NIST scientists create 'any wavelength' lasers

Anonymous request-token comparisons from Opus 4.6 and Opus 4.7

Updating Gun Rocket through 10 years of Unity Engine

College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

The electromechanical angle computer inside the B-52 bomber's star tracker

Why Japan has such good railways

Optimizing Ruby Path Methods

Modern Common Lisp with FSet

Zero-Copy GPU Inference from WebAssembly on Apple Silicon

Migrating from DigitalOcean to Hetzner

State of Kdenlive

Dad brains: How fatherhood rewires the male mind

Thoughts and feelings around Claude Design

NASA Shuts Off Instrument on Voyager 1 to Keep Spacecraft Operating

Michael Rabin has died

Show HN: MDV – a Markdown superset for docs, dashboards, and slides with data

My first impressions on ROCm and Strix Halo

Sumida Aquarium Posts 2026 Penguin Relationship Chart, with Drama and Breakups

Bypassing the kernel for 56ns cross-language IPC

Floating Point Fun on Cortex-M Processors

Scientists discover “cleaner ants” that groom giant ants in Arizona desert

A story about how I dug into the PostgreSQL sources to write my own WAL receiver

PgQue: Zero-Bloat Postgres Queue

Understanding the FFT Algorithm (2013)

UpCodes (YC S17) is hiring SDRs to help make construction more productive

80386 Memory Pipeline

Amiga Graphics Archive

Show HN: SmallDocs – Markdown without the frustrations

Brunost: The Nynorsk Programming Language

Fuzix OS