frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Qwen3.8-Max: A New Bar for Coding and Cowork

https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.8
147•ai2027•1h ago•58 comments

Show HN: Isopolis – Isometric pixel map of SF

https://sf.isopolis.city/
92•nuwandavek•3h ago•21 comments

CP/M-386 – CP/M for 386 protected mode, derived from CP/M‑68K

https://github.com/johnsonjh/cpm386
43•TMWNN•3h ago•11 comments

Karpathy’s Pelican

https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/2083749667410727319
488•delichon•1d ago•356 comments

Why we write our own C and C++ inference engines

https://localai.io/blog/why-we-write-our-own-engines/
11•eatonphil•2d ago•1 comments

Show HN: ssh ssh.place

https://ssh.place
60•jeninh•3h ago•29 comments

Why Book Corners won't sync contributions back to OpenStreetMap

https://www.andreagrandi.it/posts/why-book-corners-wont-sync-contributions-back-to-openstreetmap/
65•pizzaiolo•4h ago•35 comments

Autoregressive Language Model on the 6502 Processor

https://mattbeton.com/blog/bitnet-6502.html
74•nmstoker•2d ago•8 comments

Show HN: Kakehashi – Experimental userspace to run macOS binaries on Linux ARM

https://github.com/wie-project/kakehashi
192•vlad_kalinkin•11h ago•43 comments

Show HN: A Handwritten Blogging Platform

https://handwritten.blog/
28•emilesilvis•2d ago•7 comments

Note-Taking and Personal Knowledge Management

https://unattributed.cc/note-taking-and-personal-knowledge-management
155•surprisetalk•5d ago•44 comments

Developers are attached to tools because tools encode trust

https://stackoverflow.blog/2026/07/29/developers-are-attached-to-tools-because-tools-encode-trust/
176•HieronymusBosch•4d ago•90 comments

RFC 9851: TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9851.html
19•Jimmc414•2h ago•6 comments

SwiftUI After 7 Years

https://ykvm.com/2026/07/swiftui-a-story-of-mediocrity/
133•mpweiher•9h ago•114 comments

Read the novels and forget everything else

https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/read-the-novels-and-forget-everything-else
71•samclemens•2d ago•39 comments

The myth of Snow Leopard

https://www.rubenerd.au/the-myth-of-snow-leopard/
57•speckx•9h ago•50 comments

The Computational Theory of Mind (2015)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/
42•cyanregiment•5h ago•17 comments

Show HN: Mu – Tools for Agents

https://github.com/micro/mu
47•asim•6h ago•12 comments

How the words we teach English language learners changed

https://pudding.cool/2026/07/essential-words/
195•c-oreills•12h ago•141 comments

My personal AI benchmark: “Generate an SVG of a frog with a Habsburg jaw”

https://frogs.vaguespac.es/
122•thebigship•8h ago•56 comments

Show HN: Make your Framework 12 sound like a creaky door

https://github.com/ArcaEge/creakwork12
62•arcaege•7h ago•8 comments

F*: A general-purpose proof-oriented programming language

https://fstar-lang.org/
169•ducktective•15h ago•76 comments

Show HN: NixOS-DGX-Spark – Nix and NixOS on the DGX Spark

https://github.com/graham33/nixos-dgx-spark
102•graham33•11h ago•31 comments

TinyNES Review – A Super Niche NES Console

https://blog.lon.tv/2023/02/05/tinynes-review-a-super-niche-nes-console/
41•throwoutway•8h ago•10 comments

Californians' data deletion requests, DROP, become enforceable Aug. 1

https://www.nbcsandiego.com/nbc-7-responds-2/californians-data-deletion-requests-drop-become-enfo...
117•MilnerRoute•5h ago•51 comments

When transit passes were designed by hand (2022)

https://letterformarchive.org/news/milwaukee-transit-passes/
120•nate•2d ago•29 comments

Show HN: Shitty – fast terminal. Memory-unsafe and faster than yours

https://github.com/pg83/shitty
104•pshirshov•5h ago•101 comments

Folding Paper Globes

https://foldingglobes.com/globes
160•dango2506•4d ago•32 comments

Rooting, firmware analysis and persistent credentials of TP-Link TL-841N

https://blog.juni-mp4.com/posts/42/rooting-the-tplink-tl841n-pt1/
90•mindracer•11h ago•17 comments

Fasttracker II clone in C using SDL 2

https://16-bits.org/ft2.php
119•andsoitis•4d ago•48 comments
Open in hackernews

Pglocks.org

https://pglocks.org/
80•hnasr•1y ago

Comments

whilenot-dev•1y ago
I'm a bit lost here.

Locking is a challenging problem in complex systems. Is this list to be interpreted as a "TODO: get rid of locking conflicts in future releases" or more a "NOTE: be aware there are known conflicts that will not change - find ways to work around them"?

EDIT: Also, is the creation of this list an automated or a manual effort?

tux3•1y ago
I think this is intended as educational material, not a list of things to fix.

The locks are here by necessity, it is not so easy at all to get rid of them. And even in special cases where it is possible, the complexity you have to introduce is not to be taken lightly...

If even a tenth of these disapppeared, it would be incredible, in a very surprising way.

atombender•1y ago
The creator looks like a developer and teacher, not a Postgres core team member. So I assume this is for documentation purposes.

I actually like this a lot, as there isn't a single place in the Postgres documentation that lists all the possible locks; it's spread out all over. Having a quick reference for what kinds of commands you'd be blocking with your transaction is valuable.

It's pretty evident that the pages have been programmatically generated, but I'd love know what it's generated from. I think you can derive this information from the documentation, but not sure if you can do it in an automated way without an LLM.

braiamp•1y ago
> there isn't a single place in the Postgres documentation that lists all the possible locks

Did you read this page? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/explicit-locking.htm...

atombender•1y ago
That's a great page, but it has several issues.

First, it isn't complete; as I said, the locking behaviour is spread out all over the Postgres documentation. For example, that page doesn't list what locks DROP INDEX takes. To find that out, you have to go to the documentation page for that command and read it carefully. In fact, really carefully — the locking behaviour is only documented under the section about CONCURRENTLY.

The page also doesn't list what possible commands are then blocked. Locks interact in subtle (and incorrectly named!) ways that are explained in the tables on that page ("Conflicting lock modes"), so to understand if something will block something else you have to look at the two commands you are curious about and then look at how their locks interact.

gulcin_xata•1y ago
I agree, it is not so straightforward to find out.
braiamp•1y ago
These are database locks, which means that depending which arrives first, the later transaction has to wait till the first one finishes to complete. These locks are about SQL commands and which commands can run concurrently with the others. There's a graph here of how that looks like https://pankrat.github.io/2015/django-migrations-without-dow...

Usually for maximum performance (minimum latency, maximum throughput) you want to have operations not lock each other, unless absolutely necessary, in which case you want them to be short.

whilenot-dev•1y ago
You make it sound like the conflict is just affecting performance and won't result in a deadlock. So it's for performance aware postgres clients/users, and not for postgres developers?
andyferris•1y ago
It is a guide for developers using postgres as a client, who need to write systems that don't deadlock, are performant and are correct. These are the (rather sharp) tools that postgres provides for doing so (or else you can use e.g. serializable isolation and optimistic concurrency, but in my experience that has too many false positives and bail out rather eagerly, whereas these tools let you be very precise and granular).
mebcitto•1y ago
Other relevant talks/blogs that I found really useful for understanding Postgres locks are:

* Unlocking the Postgres Lock Manager by Bruce Momjian: https://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/locking.pdf

* Anatomy of table-level locks by Gulcin Yildirim Jelinek: https://xata.io/blog/anatomy-of-locks

pasxizeis•1y ago
Shameless plug: I wrote a tool[1] that executes a given migration against a test database (e.g. in your CI) and reports back what locks it acquired.

The rationale being to have a "lock diagnostics report" commented in your PR's migration file.

It's a prototype and has a few rough edges and missing functionality, but feedback is more than welcome.

[1] https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

jononor•1y ago
Very practical! Locking is one of the things that can really bite when doing migrations.