Pglocks.org

80•hnasr•8mo ago

Comments

whilenot-dev•8mo ago

I'm a bit lost here.

Locking is a challenging problem in complex systems. Is this list to be interpreted as a "TODO: get rid of locking conflicts in future releases" or more a "NOTE: be aware there are known conflicts that will not change - find ways to work around them"?

EDIT: Also, is the creation of this list an automated or a manual effort?

tux3•8mo ago

I think this is intended as educational material, not a list of things to fix.

The locks are here by necessity, it is not so easy at all to get rid of them. And even in special cases where it is possible, the complexity you have to introduce is not to be taken lightly...

If even a tenth of these disapppeared, it would be incredible, in a very surprising way.

atombender•8mo ago

The creator looks like a developer and teacher, not a Postgres core team member. So I assume this is for documentation purposes.

I actually like this a lot, as there isn't a single place in the Postgres documentation that lists all the possible locks; it's spread out all over. Having a quick reference for what kinds of commands you'd be blocking with your transaction is valuable.

It's pretty evident that the pages have been programmatically generated, but I'd love know what it's generated from. I think you can derive this information from the documentation, but not sure if you can do it in an automated way without an LLM.

braiamp•8mo ago

> there isn't a single place in the Postgres documentation that lists all the possible locks

Did you read this page? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/explicit-locking.htm...

atombender•8mo ago

That's a great page, but it has several issues.

First, it isn't complete; as I said, the locking behaviour is spread out all over the Postgres documentation. For example, that page doesn't list what locks DROP INDEX takes. To find that out, you have to go to the documentation page for that command and read it carefully. In fact, really carefully — the locking behaviour is only documented under the section about CONCURRENTLY.

The page also doesn't list what possible commands are then blocked. Locks interact in subtle (and incorrectly named!) ways that are explained in the tables on that page ("Conflicting lock modes"), so to understand if something will block something else you have to look at the two commands you are curious about and then look at how their locks interact.

gulcin_xata•8mo ago

I agree, it is not so straightforward to find out.

braiamp•8mo ago

These are database locks, which means that depending which arrives first, the later transaction has to wait till the first one finishes to complete. These locks are about SQL commands and which commands can run concurrently with the others. There's a graph here of how that looks like https://pankrat.github.io/2015/django-migrations-without-dow...

Usually for maximum performance (minimum latency, maximum throughput) you want to have operations not lock each other, unless absolutely necessary, in which case you want them to be short.

whilenot-dev•8mo ago

You make it sound like the conflict is just affecting performance and won't result in a deadlock. So it's for performance aware postgres clients/users, and not for postgres developers?

andyferris•8mo ago

It is a guide for developers using postgres as a client, who need to write systems that don't deadlock, are performant and are correct. These are the (rather sharp) tools that postgres provides for doing so (or else you can use e.g. serializable isolation and optimistic concurrency, but in my experience that has too many false positives and bail out rather eagerly, whereas these tools let you be very precise and granular).

mebcitto•8mo ago

Other relevant talks/blogs that I found really useful for understanding Postgres locks are:

* Unlocking the Postgres Lock Manager by Bruce Momjian: https://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/locking.pdf

* Anatomy of table-level locks by Gulcin Yildirim Jelinek: https://xata.io/blog/anatomy-of-locks

pasxizeis•8mo ago

Shameless plug: I wrote a tool[1] that executes a given migration against a test database (e.g. in your CI) and reports back what locks it acquired.

The rationale being to have a "lock diagnostics report" commented in your PR's migration file.

It's a prototype and has a few rough edges and missing functionality, but feedback is more than welcome.

[1] https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

jononor•8mo ago

Very practical! Locking is one of the things that can really bite when doing migrations.

The browser is the sandbox

First, make me care

Things I've learned in my 10 years as an engineering manager

Scientists identify brain waves that define the limits of 'you'

Iran's internet blackout may become permanent, with access for elites only

A macOS app that blurs your screen when you slouch

Ask HN: DDD was a great debugger – what would a modern equivalent look like?

A static site generator written in POSIX shell

Video Games as Art

Case study: Creative math – How AI fakes proofs

You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers

Compiling models to megakernels

The Science of Fermentation [audio]

Building a Real-Time HN Display for $15

Environmentalists worry Google behind bid to control Oregon town's water

The future of software engineering is SRE

Delta single handle ball faucets (1963)

Using PostgreSQL as a Dead Letter Queue for Event-Driven Systems

I was right about ATProto key management

Clawdbot - open source personal AI assistant

Web-based image editor modeled after Deluxe Paint

LED lighting undermines visual performance unless supplemented by wider spectra

Guix for Development

Show HN: An interactive map of US lighthouses and navigational aids

Spanish track was fractured before high-speed train disaster, report finds

Bitwise conversion of doubles using only FP multiplication and addition (2020)

Show HN: NukeCast – If it happened today, where would the fallout go

ICE using Palantir tool that feeds on Medicaid data

Oneplus phone update introduces hardware anti-rollback

Turbopack: Building faster by building less