Especially if you’re comparing yourself with Typeform, which is rather controversial. (I detest its entire approach.)

However, it looks like "too much" for what we're looking for. It seems to depend on too many external services. Does anyone know such a form creation system that can be self-hosted, has minimal dependencies, and is open source?

Taking a look at the demo (https://www.ikiform.com/forms/a2675039-5901-4052-88c0-b60977...), I'm not sure where the comparison to Typeform comes in. Probably the most unique feature of Typeform is the focus on user experience of the forms themselves, everything else is/was mostly built to support the forms, and making it as easy to fill out as possible. Things like the back button always being visible, no validation of fields as you enter data, no progress indication and so all makes it seem like there is a lot of polish left to do.

I guess the form looks OK, which is alright of course, but I'm not sure it actually serves as an alternative to Typeform. It seems to me to sit somewhere in-between the traditional (ugly) form providers, and Typeform, which isn't a bad place to sit at, but maybe people expecting a Typeform-like experience would feel slightly bait-and-switched by the comparison.

There used to be another open source project that replicated the form themselves and the experience (as far as I remember), but seem defunct by now (for the last 6 years...): https://github.com/tellform/tellform Besides that, seems there are some other open source alternatives, but I can't say I've tried them all (at a glance, Quill Forms seems most similar to Typeform): https://github.com/search?q=typeform+archived%3Afalse&type=r...

> Ikiform is completely open-source and available on GitHub

The link on the word Github should probably link to the actual repo or org and not the github homepage, I would imagine?

If the platform goes away in 1 year, it essenetially becomes 39$/year.

Any plans on how you'd make this a longer lasting product?

Those two are the two extreme ends of the target audience archetypes. So, decide which is yours.

> I was using Typeform, but as time went by and more people submitted forms, it got more and more expensive.

When people say they build cheaper alternatives, I often assume that the original is becoming better and more successful. Competing on price rarely wins.

I've found https://formbricks.com to be kinda the closest competition to Typeform, and also Open Source.

Second, to have a selling point, you might want to focus on privacy. Is the data shared in any way? Where is it kept? What measures have you taken to keep data safe? Will it be deleted if I cancel my account? That sort of things.

Anyway, good luck and keep on going!

From my own experience, about two years ago we built an AI form builder tech demo on top of our platform. We open-sourced it (https://github.com/chatbotkit/example-nextjs-ai-forms) to see if there was community interest. Not much. Since it wasn't our core product, we pivoted and turned it into a low-cost Typeform alternative with unlimited forms - formshare.ai was born. And while we have seen some modest commercial success, I wouldn't claim it's anywhere near Typeform's scale.

The takeaway here is that for this project, even though it wasn't our primary focus, leading with open source and undercutting on price didn't prove to be an effective strategy. If anything, charging too little initially will only devalue the product and attract the wrong kind of users - the ones less likely to convert or stick around for the long term.

Not sure that a product which is pitched as an alternative to current big incumbents is going to benefit from forcing users to first be logged into current big corporate.

What's the rationale here? That there are google users who are looking to stay with google for everything but forms? That must be an awfully niche market, no?

I’ve run into this too.

I had a client that needed to collect HIPAA protected data. Putting their marketing site into scope for HIPAA was not a sane choice. Their EMR vendor didn’t have any options that didn’t require migrating to a new EMR offering in order to create/publish/accept forms. All the other options were clunky and required a lot more work and niche expertise or training in those applications.

So we went with Google Forms. They already used Google Workspace and had executed the HIPAA addendum to the terms.

That lasted less than a year. The physicians and patients were both put off by the fact that it was a Google Form and it looked unprofessional.

They’re back to posting PDFs on their website.

If you're working towards something that developers can drop in, take a look at https://heyform.net/. If not, then it's still nice to be able to have some freedom on the deployment.

I know you are only asking for the Email address but at least, for my benefit, make it look like a real SME or a serious project.

The reason is that forms are like dates, time, addresses, names, to-do lists, etc. They are things that many developers need to work with, but are way deeper and more complicated than they seem at first. See the wide variety of feedback and suggestions just in this HN thread.

So I would recommend specializing if you want to gain traction. And expect to do tons of marketing.

I was browsing the code, and noticed this forms library was using Supabase, presumably a paid service if this OSS library takes off. I just can't seem to grasp why a custom form building library needs a 3rd party, managed Database included. Scale maybe?

These are genuine questions as I'm woefully unaware of the state of HTML forms / Frontend in 2025

It got it in the first shot, took me <3-4mins to copy paste in cloudflare. Been working well so far, the page is also hosted on cloudflare pages and hasnt cost anything so far.

I'm assuming I can remove these dependencies for my own use?

You would "scale" better with a $5 vps