The breathless feigned shock that Comey would share "86 47" is tiresome, especially coming from an administration whose head unrepentantly shared an image of the president bound and tied mid-kidnapping.
Meanwhile Trump and family are in the middle east making deal after deal and no one is really paying any attention or tracking the stakes.
This whole thing is an outrageous circus. I'm severely disappointed in all American institutions right now for playing along with it even a little bit.
Which I normally wouldn't comment on but your post is fairly ironic given the current thread. Which is claiming that the media is entirely absent from it's coverage of Trumps latest schemes in order to argue about what, precisely, a former FBI director meant with a picture of seashells.
Perhaps if the dog and pony show died down we could return to the very reasonable perspective that greed does not obey political boundaries.
The OP is about a term that was willfully misinterpreted as a call to violence rather than a call for removal from office (which has been done repeatedly, legally and civilly (2 impeachments!).
I abhor partisan politics and am more than happy to critique the side I am forced to align with; but the Trump Show is a daily barrage of WTFs for seasoned political spectators who are not cult members.
One thing stands out: nuance has no place in communicating to the masses.
wizardforhire•8mo ago
It’s a quick read that tickles the mammalian foraging behavior itch that is manifest by our insatiable desire for novelty.
My only complaint is that more research has not been done on this most important of esoteric subjects.